Tag: 2025

  • James Cleverly – 2025 Speech to Conservative Party Conference

    James Cleverly – 2025 Speech to Conservative Party Conference

    The speech made by James Cleverly, the Shadow Housing Secretary, in Manchester on 6 October 2025.

    Owning your own home should not be a luxury.

    The Conservative Party is the party of aspiration.

    We are the party that believes in reward for hard work.

    So, when we see home ownership becoming a fantasy for many people, when a home of your own is an impossible dream, no matter how hard you work, we know we must act.

    And when Conservatives are in charge, we do act.

    Remember, it was the Conservatives who cleared the slums in the 1930s.

    Harold Macmillan built 300,000 homes a year in the 1950s.

    And Margaret Thatcher made home ownership a reality for millions of people with the Right to Buy in the 1980s.

    The point is, we don’t just have to look at the distant past.

    Since 2010, Conservatives have delivered 2.5 million homes, a million of those in the last Parliament alone.

    Last year, in the South East of England and the East of England, Conservative-run regions, about 2.5 new homes were built per thousand people.

    In London, run by Labour for the best part of a decade, 0.5 homes per thousand.

    And so, what do those figures mean for real people, for ordinary hard-working Londoners?

    In 1980, the average London home cost £25,000, about four times the average national salary.

    Today, the average London house costs over half a million pounds, and that is fifteen times the average salary.

    That is Sadiq Khan’s record of failure.

    We should not, and we cannot, and we must not accept it.

    But what did Angela Rayner do when she was Housing Secretary?

    She gave Sadiq Khan a free pass.

    She dropped the Government’s call-in for the London Plan.

    And she cut London’s housing target.

    And what was the result? A mere 5,000 private homes are forecast to be built across the whole of London this year, against a target of 88,000 homes.

    Rayner’s failure to deal with Khan’s failure ends up by dumping that housing shortfall on rural Britain.

    I’ve got a small confession to make, ladies and gentlemen.

    I was actually looking forward to holding Rayner to account.

    I was looking forward to going toe to toe with a real firebrand of the modern Left.

    Instead, I’m up against Steve Reed.

    Steve “I’m not Wikipedia” Reed.

    No, Steve, you’re not Wikipedia, Wikipedia can actually be useful.

    And let’s remind ourselves, ladies and gentlemen, Steve Reed is a man who has just spent the last year destroying family farms so that he can spend next year concreting over them.

    He wears a baseball cap that says “Build, Baby, Build”, but in reality, it’s “Block, Baby, Block”.

    Because he said no to new homes being built in his urban London constituency, where they are both needed and wanted.

    And that’s Labour all over, isn’t it?

    Slogans say one thing; their record shows something completely different.

    And as for the Labour Government’s pledge of 1.5 million homes built by the end of this Parliament, either they are lying about how many homes they are going to build, or they’re lying about how long this Parliament is going to last.

    And what about these fabled Labour new towns?

    Initially, they said they were going to build twelve of them.

    Then they said they only might start three during this Parliament, and that’s only if you count one spade in the ground as progress.

    For me, it’s like being promised a pony for Christmas and ending up with a goldfish.

    Now, when I drive through London, from my home in Essex, I see the Olympic Park, a brownfield site transformed into homes and businesses by Boris, a Conservative Mayor of London.

    I see Canary Wharf, derelict docks turned into homes and a world-class financial hub, by Heseltine and Thatcher, a Conservative Government.

    And that same story is true beyond London: Ben Houchen in Teesside, Paul Bristow in Cambridgeshire and Peterborough, Conservative Mayors rolling up their sleeves and getting stuff done.

    And look, I know London isn’t the only place that matters, we all understand that.

    But the UK’s biggest city does have a unique role to play.

    And the Labour Mayor of London has not, and will not, get a grip of the situation, which is why we need a Conservative Mayor of London who will.

    We need a Conservative Mayor to rewrite the London Plan, focus on delivery, and unlock tens of thousands of desperately needed homes in that city, near transport links, near the night-time economy, and near job opportunities.

    By prioritising brownfield sites and turning them into business and housing hubs, just like we did before in Canary Wharf and in the Olympic Park.

    Now, to get this done, we need to cut down the mountains of well-intentioned regulation.

    We have affordable housing targets so high they basically prevent anything from getting built.

    And I wonder if the Steve Reed now in charge of housing will look back at the Steve Reed who was in charge of environmental regulation and have a word with himself.

    Because we’ve made it too easy to say no to housing.

    And we need to find reasons to say yes to housing.

    We need to win the argument.

    We need to make people want to say yes.

    Now, just so you know where I’m coming from, I reject the false choice between low-rise sprawl into the green belt and soulless tower blocks.

    We can, and we should, build homes that are liveable, attractive, and welcomed by their neighbours.

    Because beauty in the built environment should not be the preserve of the wealthy, it should be for everyone.

    Building is important, of course it is.

    But we must also make better use of the homes we already have.

    I’m going to give you a scenario, and I expect a few of you will recognise it.

    In every town and city across the country, there are roads full of empty nesters.

    You know the kind of houses I mean, three, four, maybe even five-bedroom family houses, where the children have grown up and moved out, and now just one or two people are living there.

    I don’t want to force anybody to leave the home they love.

    But we should make it easy for older couples to downsize, without punishing them with ever more property tax.

    Because encouraging downsizing frees up a whole chain of homes, helping retirees, bigger families, smaller families, and first-time buyers all at the same time.

    And that, ladies and gentlemen, is just common sense.

    And that is what should underpin Conservative housing policy: common sense.

    Easing the burden of regulation, getting stuff built.

    Easing counterproductive taxation that stops homes being bought and sold.

    That is the Conservative answer.

    But compare that with Labour’s answer, even more taxes.

    They are hiking council tax by more than £11 billion over this Parliament, with more to come, through higher tax bands and new taxes on family homes.

    But we Conservatives know that you cannot tax your way to growth.

    Real growth comes not from the state, but from its citizens and the communities they build.

    Strong communities need a smaller state, and we know strong communities matter.

    Many of you in this hall today are councillors, and you are on the front line, working in and for your local communities.

    You are the manifestation of Conservative values that people actually see in their day-to-day lives.

    And I want to thank you.

    Because when I speak about Conservative leadership, and I try not to do that so much these days, I’m talking about Conservative leadership in town halls, county halls, and village halls.

    Conservative councillors who improve their high streets, who stand up for local businesses, who defend community pubs, local parks, and village greens.

    Who deliver leaflets late at night and early in the morning, whatever the weather.

    Whatever the political weather, and whilst you deliver, other parties let their communities down.

    Labour councils, taxes up, bins uncollected. Over-taxing, under-delivering.

    Liberal Democrats, hiking council tax to some of the highest levels in the country.

    And Reform? Well, being angry about stuff doesn’t get bins collected, or schools run better, or parks maintained, or old people cared for.

    Because being a keyboard warrior doesn’t prepare you to manage a multi-million-pound council budget.

    That is why they are failing and infighting wherever they get elected.

    So, let Reform chase the clicks and likes online, and let real Conservatives serve their communities.

    In our party, we understand the difference.

    But we must understand why so many people are angry.

    And rather than just reflect that anger back to them, we look to do something about it.

    Because that’s how you build policy, not just press releases.

    A party that is ready to govern, and communities built on unity, not division, that is us.

    And we also know that the scale of immigration has put unprecedented pressure on housing provision and on our neighbourhoods.

    That’s why, as Home Secretary, I took action to halve net migration.

    Because people are angry when they see an immigration system that gives houses to asylum seekers whilst local families wait for years.

    This madness has got to stop.

    That is why we brought in the Rwanda plan that Labour scrapped as soon as they entered office.

    That is why we have committed to leaving the ECHR so that we can prioritise the people of our country.

    That is why we must have stronger borders.

    That is why we must have a stronger economy.

    Because simply building more homes is not enough.

    We have got to cut immigration, and we have got to rebuild our communities too.

    The foundation stone for successful communities is the simple fact that we all play by the same rules, and that people who break those rules are punished, not rewarded.

    Where no group is above the law, and where the laws are universally applied.

    Communities where hard work is rewarded.

    Where pride in place, pride in country, is valued and praised, not vilified and mocked.

    A tradition of free speech, and yes, that does mean the right to offend.

    But the right to offend is not the same as a duty to offend.

    Because we do have a long-standing tradition of decency, politeness, and good manners.

    But we don’t need to turn that tradition into law, which is why blasphemy laws have no place in the United Kingdom.

    The cherished right of freedom of religion must be protected, and protected robustly, by all of us.

    Protected with the strength of the Jewish men and women who held that door shut at the synagogue on Yom Kippur, here in Manchester just last week.

    Because warm words or empty symbolism will do nothing to keep people safe.

    That is why, when I was Home Secretary, I overruled officials to ensure record funding to protect the security of Jewish communities.

    But we must do more to tackle the growing challenge of antisemitism in this country, much, much more, with the strength of our words and our actions.

    And as we see Labour councils bringing in anti-Israel boycotts and divestment in a cynical, sectarian attempt to win votes, we should recognise what it is and call it out for what it is.

    Labour is currently trying to jump on a patriotic bandwagon.

    Starmer is trying to wrap himself in the Union flag.

    But in reality, he is an emperor with no clothes.

    Labour is not fooling anyone.

    Did you see it at Labour Conference in Liverpool?

    You could see it on their faces.

    They were forced to wave the St George’s flag and the Union flag with gritted teeth, and Andy Burnham scuttling out via the back door.

    Starmer allegedly opposes division, but frankly, he can’t even unite his own party, let alone the country.

    It is his party that is pushing identity politics.

    It is their misplaced ideal of multiculturalism that leads to parallel cultures rather than integrated communities.

    The Conservatives have always been, and will always be, the party of patriotism.

    And more than that, we know the formula for success.

    Multi-ethnic communities, of course.

    Diverse religions within communities, yes.

    But an adherence to the norms, values, and laws of our country.

    That is how successful, integrated, sustainable communities are built.

    And that is what we should work towards, bringing society together across class, colour, and creed.

    That is how we build trust.

    That is how we build strong neighbourhoods.

    That is how we make Britain a home for everyone who is willing to play their part.

    I was chuffed when Kemi asked me to take on this role, because fixing our housing crisis and restoring pride in our communities are two of the biggest challenges we face.

    And the simple truth is, Labour does not want to fix these problems.

    And Reform cannot fix these problems.

    But we can, and we will.

    We will build more homes.

    We will build stronger communities.

    We will build stronger borders.

    We will build a stronger economy.

    And we will restore pride in this great country once again.

    Thank you.

  • PRESS RELEASE : Russia’s war in Ukraine has been built on a foundation of falsehoods [October 2025]

    PRESS RELEASE : Russia’s war in Ukraine has been built on a foundation of falsehoods [October 2025]

    The press release issued by the Foreign Office on 2 October 2025.

    Ambassador Holland examines the various falsehoods that Russia deployed in seeking to justify its illegal and unjust war of aggression against Ukraine.

    Thank you, Mr Chair.

    The recent Moscow Mechanism report further highlighted widespread and systematic mistreatment of Ukrainian prisoners of war, reflecting Russia’s ongoing disregard for International Humanitarian and Human Rights Law. Now, it is right that this Council devotes significant attention to Russia’s conduct in its illegal war against Ukraine. But we should also not forget to challenge the falsehoods that have been used as justifications for this war.

    This week marks three years since Russia’s unlawful attempts to annex Zaporizhzhia, Kherson, Donetsk, and Luhansk oblasts.  Russia attempted to justify these actions, along with its eleven-year occupation of Crimea, by claiming to protect Russian-speaking populations.  But there is no credible evidence that these communities faced any genuine threat.  Instead, the occupation has brought suffering, violence, and fear—denying freedoms, abducting children, forcing Russian passports, and destroying local communities.  Furthermore, the notion that speaking Russian in Ukraine equates to support for Moscow and its war is flawed.  Russia’s narrative of “protecting Russian-speakers” is unsubstantiated, oversimplifying Ukraine’s diverse linguistic and ethnic landscape.

    On 24 February – in addition to the false claim that Russian-speakers in Ukraine were facing a genocide – President Putin claimed that Russia’s “Special Military Operation” aimed to demilitarise and “denazify” Ukraine and prevent NATO’s expansion.  These justifications have proven to be gross distortions.

    Firstly, the assertion that Ukraine needed to be demilitarised is unfounded. Indeed, Russia itself thought the Special Military Operation would last three days. Ukraine posed no threat to Russia; its military was significantly smaller, and it had voluntarily given up its nuclear arsenal, with Russia pledging in the Budapest Memorandum to respect Ukraine’s sovereignty and independence. We have seen, though, over the past three and a half years that size isn’t everything.

    Secondly, the objective to “denazify” Ukraine is a misapplication of historical facts.  Ukraine’s president is Jewish and has family members who were Holocaust victims.  Far-right parties received only 2.15% of the vote in the last parliamentary election, which further undermines Russia’s claims.

    And thirdly, President Putin’s claim of acting to prevent NATO expansion does not stand up to scrutiny.  NATO is a defensive alliance, and membership is voluntary.  Allies do not seek expansion, though experience shows states may feel compelled to seek membership in such alliances precisely because of the aggressive behaviour Russia has displayed towards Ukraine and its neighbours.  And the Helsinki Final Act guarantees each nation’s sovereign right to determine its own alliances.

    Russia’s illegal war is built on falsehoods and has resulted in the deadliest conflict in Europe since the Second World War.  So, while we rightly tackle the appalling conduct of its war, we should always remember that this is an unjust war. Moscow’s true objections are to Ukrainian sovereignty and the existence of an independent, democratic neighbour.  The 1991 Ukrainian independence referendum, where Ukraine voted overwhelmingly for independence and three years of determined resistance demonstrate Ukraine’s clear desire for self-determination and freedom from external control.  Russia must respect this will and withdraw its forces unconditionally from all of Ukraine.

    Thank you.

  • Andrew Griffith – 2025 Speech to Conservative Party Conference

    Andrew Griffith – 2025 Speech to Conservative Party Conference

    The speech made by Andrew Griffith in Manchester on 6 October 2025.

    Conference, business builds Britain.
    It is business that takes ideas and turns them into reality.
    Takes jobs and turns them into livelihoods.
    And it is business that pays the nation’s bills.
    With strong business, everything is possible.
    I spent 25 years in business where I saw optimism at work every day.
    That is why I am optimistic.

    I know Britain can return to being a world-leading economy.
    Our country has huge strengths which even years more of this government will not diminish.
    The English language, respect for property, our deep, sophisticated financial markets, and a mix of the businesses that thrive globally.
    Around the world, people want what we produce.
    And they want our skills, our capital and our ideas.
    Thanks to the last Conservative government, we have an independent trade policy which allows us to sell not just to Europe but to our long-standing allies and most of the fastest growing economies on the planet.
    Compare that distinguished record on trade to the press release politics we’ve seen over the last year.
    The Prime Minister told us in May his US deal was signed, sealed and delivered.
    Yet tariffs remain.
    He told us he had a deal for pharmaceuticals.
    But it never materialised, and our drug companies are leaving.
    He told us he finally understood Brexit
    And he then went running back to Brussels to let them dictate our rules, killing our flexibility for future deals.
    It’s clear that Labour and the other parties simply don’t understand business.
    How could they? Unlike our Party, their ranks are full of professional politicians, trade unionists and the public sector.
    No government that understood business would ever have imposed a jobs tax and changes to national insurance thresholds which hurt those employing the most the hardest.
    Or the family business tax – a death tax.
    Or doubled rates on the very businesses which keep our high streets alive.
    And conference, no government that cared about British firms and British workers would ignore energy costs that are four times higher than our competitors.
    Instead of creating wealth, they attack it, driving away entrepreneurs, investors, and top talent.
    Too many of our best and brightest are exchanging Docklands for Dubai or Manchester for Milan.
    And what Labour do nationally, the Greens, Lib Dems and the nationalists do locally.
    Hostile planning policies frustrating businesses trying to expand.
    Blocking new infrastructure.
    And suffocating firms with traffic congestion, parking restrictions and red tape.
    The next government will fix this and more just as after the failed consensus of the seventies, Britain picked itself up, restoring our pride and our growth.
    But the process of change requires being honest about where we start.
    We are no longer the rich country many think we are.
    For too long we’ve been slipping down the international rankings in GDP per capita, competitiveness, and inward investment.
    Under Labour, Britain is competing in the veterans’ race – comparing ourselves to the G7 – when the real competition are those younger, fitter economies who are overtaking us.
    We Conservatives know that it is only private enterprise that creates growth, not government.
    There were moments in office where we strayed from that truth.
    More regulations, raising taxes, the state as nanny.
    Indulging the idea that government is the solution, when we know very often it is the problem.
    But the Conservative Party is under new management.
    And at the heart of our strategy is an approach that’s proud to champion wealth creators and risk takers.
    Creating a new generation of entrepreneurs and backing our businesses.
    I am announcing clear policies today which start that work.
    In our very first budget, we will repeal the family business tax which punishes success and dis-incentivises growth.
    We will build a tax system which values those who take a risk and helps the smallest businesses.
    And the next Conservative government will actively reverse the job destroying measures in Labour’s Unemployment Rights Bill.
    A Bill which allows strikes to be called even if just a tiny fraction of the workforce vote.
    A Bill which will destroy job opportunities for young people whilst topping up Labour’s political fund without workers being given the choice.
    And the opposition to this terrible Bill in Parliament has been led by your Conservative shadow business team.
    David Hunt and Andrew Sharpe in the House of Lords.
    My shadow Ministers Harriet Baldwin, Gareth Davies and my PPS, Ali Griffiths in the Commons.
    Not by any other party. By the Conservative Party.
    And there is more.
    I understand there are far too many hurdles for small businesses to jump.
    Red tape that steals away the precious time of those who run them.
    Take HMRC, an organisation which literally tried to turn its helplines off for six months of the year.
    We say ‘enough’. That is unacceptable.
    So, within weeks of entering government, we will that ensure every time a small business contacts HMRC, they are given the opportunity to rate their experience in the same way as companies seek customer feedback.
    No more hanging on the phone for an hour with no one held accountable.
    No one loves paying their taxes. But the taxman needs to respect those whose hard work and enterprise pays their salaries.
    Nowhere. Nowhere is that more important than the self-employed.
    They’re risk-takers, striking out on their own, often with nothing more than a laptop and a belief they can make it work.
    That’s why we commit today to doing better for the self-employed. And that includes looking again at reforming IR35.
    Because if Britain is to have ladders of opportunity, then the self-employed need to be able to climb them.
    Similarly, opening a bank account today is so hard it is a miracle anyone starts a business at all.
    It can take weeks or even months to do what other countries do in minutes.
    It shows just how far our regulators have lost the plot and it’s a brake on growth we cannot afford.
    So, we will transform a process which makes banks treat you as guilty until proven innocent.
    From the tone at the top of the regulators to repealing EU era rules, we have a clear plan, and we will fix this.
    So: scrapping the family business tax, reversing the Unemployment Bill, easier bank accounts and a better service from HMRC.
    Real policies that will make a real difference.
    And, where we can, we need a tax framework which shows our support with actions not words.
    No sector has been hurt harder by Labour’s onslaught against enterprise than hospitality, retail, and leisure/
    89,000 jobs lost in the hospitality sector alone since Rachel Reeves’ Autumn Budget.
    One of her first actions in office was to more than double business rates for many of our high street businesses by cutting the relief that previous Conservative governments introduced.
    Because of the choices she’s made, the life in our high streets is ebbing away.
    And we know the heart of our communities are suffering.
    So, we want to give them hope.
    Today, we are announcing that when we return to government, we will introduce a permanent, one hundred per cent rate relief in business rates for retail, hospitality, and leisure.
    250,000 businesses will benefit from that change.
    Pubs, shops, restaurants struggling across the country will be saved.
    And our high streets will get an enormous boost.
    But conference there’s one more thing.
    We want to reignite a culture of entrepreneurship in Britain.
    To support and celebrate those who take a risk.
    A mission the like of which we’ve not seen since my friend and mentor, Lord David Young was Mrs Thatcher’s Secretary for Trade and Enterprise.
    To create a new generation of entrepreneurs.
    As Business Secretary, I want to see young entrepreneur schemes flourish in every school and college in the country.
    Building on existing schemes, delivered by people who’ve been there and done it and who want the next generation to succeed.
    We will provide the support to make this happen because this is what we believe a stronger economy requires.
    So, Conference, let me be clear.
    The Conservative Party as the party of enterprise, the party of the entrepreneur, the party of business.
    On the side of the pub landlord, the restaurateur, the small business owner, the self-employed, and the family business.
    Those who work for themselves and give work to others.
    The builders, not the blockers.
    Those that make, not those that take.
    That’s who we support, that’s who we believe in, that’s who our government will serve.
    Nations that seize opportunity, rise.
    We will seize that opportunity, and together we will make Britain’s economy strong again.
    Thank you.

  • PRESS RELEASE : Cowell affirms UK support to Lebanon’s social protection systems [October 2025]

    PRESS RELEASE : Cowell affirms UK support to Lebanon’s social protection systems [October 2025]

    The press release issued by the Foreign Office on 2 October 2025.

    They addressed support for conflict-affected populations, internally displaced persons, and the evolving refugee file.

    British Ambassador to Lebanon, Hamish Cowell, met with the Minister of Social Affairs (MoSA), Haneen Sayed, to reaffirm the UK’s ongoing commitment to strengthening Lebanese national social protection systems. This includes MoSA’s rights and access programme for people with disabilities and support to vulnerable Lebanese communities through the UK’s £5 million contribution to the AMAN programme.  

    They discussed ongoing UK support to MoSA programmes on social protection through international and local partners including the World Food Programme (WFP) and the International Labour Organisation (ILO). Ambassador Cowell congratulated Minister Sayed on the restructuring of the Ministry and her vision and priorities. They also addressed support for conflict-affected populations, internally displaced persons, and the evolving refugee file.  

    Following the meeting Ambassador Cowell said: 

    I am proud of our partnership with the Ministry of Social Affairs to strengthen vital national social protection systems and reach the most vulnerable Lebanese families. Through recent £5M UK funding, over two hundred thousand vulnerable Lebanese individuals have accessed basic assistance through the AMAN programme. 

    The UK remains committed to working with the Government of Lebanon and partners to support those in need.

  • PRESS RELEASE : Joint migration statement [October 2025]

    PRESS RELEASE : Joint migration statement [October 2025]

    The press release issued by the Cabinet Office on 2 October 2025.

    A joint statement from European Leaders on managing the challenges of illegal migration following the European Political Community Summit in Copenhagen, Denmark.

    Today, at the European Political Community Summit in Copenhagen, the leaders of Andorra, Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Cyprus, Czechia, Denmark, Germany, Greece, Italy, Malta, The Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Sweden and the United Kingdom, in the presence of the President of the European Commission and the President of the European Parliament, set out a number of steps to be taken collectively to help manage the complex challenges of illegal migration.

    They underlined the need for a ‘whole-of-route approach’, and for innovative solutions to keep pace with the ever-evolving challenges of illegal migration. They committed to support one another in their efforts, along the following key themes:

    • Take the strongest action against smugglers and secure our borders: ensuring that law enforcement have the powers, data and capabilities to work across borders to target this threat and its enablers effectively, and to manage our external borders. And work together on new ways to target smuggling gangs, such as the use of sanctions regimes.
    • Ensure our legislative frameworks and asylum systems are robust: protecting against exploitation, deterring those trying to undermine our systems, and ensuring international frameworks, including the European Convention on Human Rights and the Refugee Convention, are implemented in a way that safeguards against abuse and so that governments can tackle modern challenges.
    • Take an unequivocal approach to returns: developing common principles using all the tools available – including diplomatic and visa leverage – to enact efficient and effective returns. And forge new and innovative partnerships, including with third countries, to accelerate processing and alleviate domestic pressures.
    • Strengthen migration management at the earliest opportunity: working with countries at source and on transit routes, including supporting the work and mandate of agencies like the IOM and UNHCR, on initiatives spanning themes like development, job creation, education, and voluntary returns, to deliver on mutually beneficial partnerships.
    • Put innovation at the heart of migration reform: recognising that without a system-wide shift in how we approach this issue we will not be able to secure our borders effectively.
    • New frameworks, partnerships, capabilities and pilots that are fair, regulated and fit for the future need to be taken forward to undermine the smuggling gangs’ model and limit illegal migration.
  • PRESS RELEASE : UK to reform asylum offer to reduce the pull factor for small boat crossings [October 2025]

    PRESS RELEASE : UK to reform asylum offer to reduce the pull factor for small boat crossings [October 2025]

    The press release issued by 10 Downing Street on 1 October 2025.

    Migrants granted asylum in the UK will no longer be automatically given settlement and family reunion rights, under landmark policy changes outlined by the Prime Minister today.

    • Changes to the leave granted to asylum seekers in the UK will mean they are no longer automatically given settlement and family reunion rights, balancing protection against persecution with controlling our borders
    • Will make the system fairer, in line with our European allies and reduce incentives for asylum seekers travelling illegally to the UK, bypassing other safe countries
    • Comes as Prime Minister drives forward progress on tackling illegal migration at EPC Summit in Copenhagen

    Migrants granted asylum in the UK will no longer be automatically given settlement and family reunion rights, under landmark policy changes outlined by the Prime Minister today (Thursday 2 October).

    In her forthcoming asylum policy reform, the Home Secretary will introduce a fundamental change to the rights provided to those granted asylum in the UK, looking to end automatic family reunion rights and altering the requirements for long-term settlement in the UK.

    The Prime Minister is announcing the reforms ahead of his attendance at the European Political Community Summit in Copenhagen, where he will co-chair a roundtable with leaders on innovative approaches to tackling illegal migration.

    The fundamental reforms will be the basis of a fairer system where – as the Home Secretary indicated in her speech to Conference – the route to settlement should be longer, and be earned via contribution to the country. They are also aimed at addressing the pull factors driving high levels of illegal migration to the UK.  

    The latest step in unpicking the business model of criminal people smugglers and securing our border under the Plan for Change, it builds on progress in recent weeks to show those who come here illegally that the UK is not a soft touch. This follows the first small boat migrant returns to France under the UK-France Treaty and the government unveiling plans to crack down on illegal working through digital ID. 

    The changes will bring an end to the unfair system that sees those crossing the channel in a small boat having greater rights to settlement and family reunion than those who arrive through proper legal routes and even British citizens. 

    In line with our values as a tolerant and fair minded country, genuine refugees will not be returned to their home country – and will be entitled to a package of core protection should they receive a positive decision – but they will face a new, longer route to settlement requiring them to contribute, replacing the current 5 years, and they will not have the automatic right to family reunion. Full detail of the reforms will be set out in an Asylum Policy Statement set to be unveiled later in the Autumn.  

    The asylum core protection announcement builds on plans set out by the Home Secretary earlier this week for a series of further conditions that migrants will have to meet before gaining indefinite leave to remain (settlement) in this country.  

    This includes being in work, making a certain level of National Insurance contributions, not taking any benefits payments, learning English to a high standard, having a spotless criminal record, and giving back by, for example, working in your local community. 

    Prime Minister Keir Starmer said: 

    I believe that if you want to come to the UK, you should contribute to our society. That is the tolerant and fair approach to migration that our communities are built on, but the current system is not fit for purpose. 

    That is why we’re making fundamental changes to what those granted asylum are afforded in the UK. Settlement must be earned by contributing to our country, not by paying a people smuggler to cross the channel in a boat. 

    The UK will continue to play its role in welcoming genuine refugees fleeing persecution. But we must also address the pull factors driving dangerous and illegal small boats crossings. There will be no golden ticket to settling in the UK, people will have to earn it.

    The Prime Minister is set to discuss the changes, as well as other ways European countries can work together to tackle the shared challenge of illegal migration, at the EPC Summit.  

    In a meeting with Danish Prime Minister Mette Fredriksen, the leaders are set to announce a new partnership backed by up to £3 million to tackle the causes of migration upstream in Western Balkan countries, including by encouraging people to stay in the region and take up jobs there. 

    Having boosted international cooperation with key partners, the PM will also take the opportunity to reflect on progress made to date to disrupt and deter people smuggling upstream, and discuss how to go further, including through reform of implementation of the ECHR.

    This will include the fact the UK is contributing up to £5.75 million under Italy’s Rome Process to tackle migration upstream in key African source and transit companies, reducing movements of migrants towards Europe and supporting the voluntary return of people to countries of origin.

    The UK and Germany will deepen collaboration between their respective justice systems to combat migrant smuggling by strengthening law enforcement efforts to bring migrant smuggler networks to justice.

    This will include a focus on efforts to seize and disrupt the supply of dangerous small boats equipment and prosecute smugglers, taking full advantage of Germany’s law change to criminalise facilitation of irregular migration to the UK, expected before the end the year.

  • PRESS RELEASE : Keir Starmer meeting with Secretary General of NATO Mark Rutte [October 2025]

    PRESS RELEASE : Keir Starmer meeting with Secretary General of NATO Mark Rutte [October 2025]

    The press release issued by 10 Downing Street on 1 October 2025.

    The Prime Minister met NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte this afternoon in Copenhagen ahead of the European Political Community summit tomorrow. 

    The leaders began by reflecting on the recent developments on Ukraine and welcomed President Trump’s strong statement in response to Russia’s stalling tactics on a peace deal. They agreed that Putin could not win the war and continues to lie to the Russian people about his successes. 

    Turning to NATO, both leaders recognised the value of the Eastern Sentry in deterring further reckless aggression from Russia towards the Alliance, while acknowledging the need to consider all options to bolster defences further.

    The Prime Minister noted that partners needed to continue to defend the Eastern flank, while remaining sharply focused on equipping Ukraine and its armed forces so they can continue to repel Russia’s illegal invasion. 

    They agreed to keep in close touch.

  • PRESS RELEASE : Keir Starmer meeting with Prime Minister Støre  of Norway [October 2025]

    PRESS RELEASE : Keir Starmer meeting with Prime Minister Støre  of Norway [October 2025]

    The press release issued by 10 Downing Street on 1 October 2025.

    The Prime Minister met Prime Minister Jonas Gahr Støre of Norway in Copenhagen this evening ahead of the European Political Community summit tomorrow.

    The leaders reflected on the thriving and fast-growing partnership between their two countries, and welcomed how this had already led to Norway selecting the UK to provide frigates to its navy, an agreement worth £10 billion and creating 4,000 jobs. 

    The Prime Minister reaffirmed his commitment to ongoing close work with Norway to place further economic pressure on Russia, particularly the shadow fleet, in the face of Putin’s brazen aggression in Europe. 

    They looked forward to seeing each other at the EPC Summit tomorrow.

  • PRESS RELEASE : UK reimposes UN sanctions on Iran [October 2025]

    PRESS RELEASE : UK reimposes UN sanctions on Iran [October 2025]

    The press release issued by the Foreign Office on 1 October 2025.

    Statement on the UK reimposing UN sanctions on Iran due to significant Iranian non-performance of its JCPoA commitments.

    On 28 August 2025, the Foreign Ministers of the UK, France and Germany (the E3) notified the UN Security Council (UNSC) to trigger the mechanism to reimpose UN sanctions on Iran due to significant Iranian non-performance of its Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPoA) commitments. 

    Today, the UK has reimposed those sanctions, following an end to the “snapback” process. Today’s sanctions include the reapplication of 121 designations on individuals and entities involved in Iran’s nuclear and ballistic missiles programme. 

    This follows an announcement by the UK on the 29 September to apply sanctions on over 70 Iranian individuals and organisations linked to Iran’s nuclear programme. UN Iran sanctions have been reimposed following the re-instatement of six UNSC resolutions related to Iran’s nuclear proliferation activities on 28 September 2025. 

    The UN sanctions that have come back into force include: 

    • A UN embargo on the transfer of conventional arms to and from Iran;  
    • A ban on the supply or transfer of items, materials, equipment, goods and technology which could contribute to Iran’s enrichment-related, reprocessing or heavy-water related activities or development of nuclear weapon delivery system; 
    • Financial and trade restrictions related to nuclear and missile programmes; and  
    • 121 designations targeting those involved in Iran’s nuclear and ballistic missiles programme. 

    The following individuals and entities are designated under today’s UN sanctions: 

    • 7th of Tir
    • Abbas Rashidi
    • Abbas Rezaee Ashtiani
    • Abzar Boresh Kaveh Co.
    • Ahmad Derakhshandeh
    • Ahmad Vahid Dastjerdi
    • Ali Akbar Tabatabaei
    • Ali Hajinia Leilabadi
    • Amin Industrial Complex
    • Amir Moayyed Alai
    • Amir Rahimi
    • Ammunition and Metallurgy Industries Group (AMIG)
    • Armament Industries Group
    • Atomic Energy Organisation of Iran
    • Azim Aghajani
    • Bahmanyar Morteza Bahmanyar
    • Bank Sepah and Bank Sepah International
    • Barzagani Tejarat Tavanmad Saccal companies
    • Behineh Trading Co.
    • Behman Asgarpour
    • Brigadier General Mohammad Hejazi
    • Brigadier General Mohammad Reza Zahedi
    • Brigadier General Morteza Rezaie
    • Brigadier General Qasem Soleimani
    • Brigadier-General Mohammad Reza Naqdi
    • Cruise Missile Industry Group
    • Dawood Agha-Jani
    • Defence Industries Organisation (DIO)
    • Defense Technology and Science Research Center
    • Doostan International Company
    • Dr. Mohammad Eslami
    • Ehsan Monajemi
    • Electro Sanam Company
    • Esfahan Nuclear Fuel Research and Production Centre (NFRPC) and Esfahan Nuclear Technology Centre (ENTC)
    • Ettehad Technical Group
    • Fajr Industrial Group
    • Farasakht Industries
    • Farayand Technique
    • Fater (or Faater) Institute
    • Fereidoun Abbasi-Davani
    • First East Export Bank, P.L.C
    • Gen Hosein Salimi
    • General Zolqadr
    • Gharagahe Sazandegi Ghaem
    • Ghasem Soleymani
    • Ghorb Karbala
    • Ghorb Nooh
    • Haleh Bakhtiar
    • Hamid-Reza Mohajerani
    • Hara Company
    • Houshang Nobari
    • Imensazan Consultant Engineers Institute
    • Industrial Factories of Precision (IFP) Machinery
    • Irano Hind Shipping Company
    • IRISL Benelux NV
    • Jabber Ibn Hayan
    • Jafar Mohammadi
    • Javad Rahiqi
    • Joza Industrial Co
    • Kala-Electric
    • Karaj Nuclear Research Centre
    • Kaveh Cutting Tools Company
    • Kavoshyar Company
    • Khatam al-Anbiya Construction Headquarters
    • Khorasan Metallurgy Industries
    • Lt Gen Mohammad Mehdi Nejad Nouri
    • M. Babaie Industries
    • M. Javad Karimi Sabet
    • Maj Gen Yahya Rahim Safavi
    • Makin
    • Malek Ashtar University
    • Mehrdada Akhlaghi Ketabachi
    • Mesbah Energy Company
    • Ministry of Defense Logistics Export
    • Mizan Machinery Manufacturing
    • Modern Industries Technique Company
    • Mohammad Fedai Ashiani
    • Mohammad Qannadi
    • Mohsen Fakhrizadeh-Mahabadi
    • Mohsen Hojati
    • Morteza Behzad
    • Naser Maleki
    • Niru Battery Manufacturing Company
    • Novin Energy Company
    • Nuclear Research Center for Agriculture and Medicine
    • Omran Sahel
    • Oriental Oil Kish
    • Parchin Chemical Industries
    • Pars Aviation Services Company
    • Pars Trash Company
    • Pejman Industrial Services Corporation
    • Pishgam (Pioneer) Energy Industries
    • Qods Aeronautics Industries
    • Rah Sahel
    • Rahab Engineering Institute
    • Rear Admiral Morteza Safari
    • Reza-Gholi Esmaeli
    • Sabalan Company
    • SAD Import Export Company
    • Safety Equipment Procurement (SEP)
    • Sahand Aluminum Parts Industrial Company (SAPICO)
    • Sahel Consultant Engineers
    • Sanam Industrial Group
    • Sepanir
    • Sepasad Engineering Company
    • Seyed Jaber Safdari
    • Seyyed Hussein Hosseini
    • Shahid Bagheri Industrial Group (SBIG)
    • Shahid Hemmat Industrial Group (SHIG)
    • Shahid Karrazi Industries
    • Shahid Satarri Industries
    • Shahid Sayyade Shirazi Industries
    • Sho’a’ Aviation
    • South Shipping Line Iran (SSL)
    • Special Industries Group
    • TAMAS Company
    • Tiz Pars
    • Vice Admiral Ali Akbar Ahmadian
    • Ya Mahdi Industries Group
    • Yas Air
    • Yazd Metallurgy Industries
  • PRESS RELEASE : G7 Foreign Ministers Statement on Iran Sanctions Snapback [October 2025]

    PRESS RELEASE : G7 Foreign Ministers Statement on Iran Sanctions Snapback [October 2025]

    The press release issued by the Foreign Office on 1 October 2025.

    Statement from the G7 Foreign Ministers and the High Representative of the EU on support for the E3 activation of the snapback sanctions and other restrictions against Iran.

    “We, the G7 Foreign Ministers of Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the United Kingdom and the United States of America and the High Representative of the European Union, stand united in our support for the E3 activation of the snapback reimposing United Nations Security Council (UNSC) sanctions and other restrictions against Iran. This action is the result of the Iranian Government’s continued failure to meet its requirements under the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA).

    “We welcome the re-instatement since 20:00 EDT (00:00 GMT) on 27 September 2025 of previously lifted Resolutions 1696 (2006), 1737 (2006), 1747 (2007), 1803 (2008), 1835 (2008), and 1929 (2010).

    “In accordance with our obligations as UN members, we are now proceeding with the swift reintroduction of restrictions reapplied by these UNSC resolutions. We urge all UN member states to fully implement and comply with these sanctions and other restrictions.

    “The E3 and the United States have repeatedly offered diplomatic avenues in good faith to Iran to avoid the snapback and reach a durable and comprehensive negotiated resolution. Diplomacy remains essential now that the UNSC process has led to the reimposition of sanctions. We call on Iran to refrain from any escalatory action, immediately engage in direct talks with the United States and make demonstrable progress towards fully meeting its nuclear non-proliferation obligations.

    “Iran must fully cooperate with the IAEA without any further delay and fully implement its obligations under its NPT-required Comprehensive Safeguards Agreement. This includes allowing for IAEA inspections to resume in all its nuclear facilities and accounting for all of the nuclear material it holds, in particular its stockpile of highly enriched uranium for which no credible civilian justification exists. We will continue to work with all parties towards a diplomatic solution to ensure Iran never obtains a nuclear weapon.”