Tag: 2024

  • PRESS RELEASE : UK Minister Lord Benyon to attend inauguration of Guatemalan President Arévalo [January 2024]

    PRESS RELEASE : UK Minister Lord Benyon to attend inauguration of Guatemalan President Arévalo [January 2024]

    The press release issued by the Foreign Office on 11 January 2024.

    British Minister Lord Richard Benyon will lead the United Kingdom’s delegation to the Presidential inauguration of His Excellency Bernardo Arévalo.

    The delegation will participate in the inauguration ceremony and events, and meet with President Arévalo and his cabinet to reinforce the UK’s commitment to building a strong relationship with Guatemala.

    Lord Benyon said:

    It is an honour to represent the UK at the inauguration of President Arévalo, which represents an important victory for democratic values. The UK is committed to supporting the new administration in our shared objectives, including boosting trade, defending human rights and tackling climate change.

    Lord Benyon is Minister of State at the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office (FCDO) and the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA). The UK’s Ambassador to Guatemala, Nick Whittingham, will join him in the delegation.

    During his visit, Lord Benyon will also meet with civil society leaders, private sector representatives and members of congress.

    As DEFRA Minister, Lord Benyon is working to tackle climate change at home and abroad. He will visit Petén to see the work of some of the Guatemalan projects funded by the UK’s £15m Biodiverse Landscapes Fund investment in Central America, and meet organisations working to protect biodiversity.

  • PRESS RELEASE : Three members reappointed to the Prudential Regulation Committee [January 2024]

    PRESS RELEASE : Three members reappointed to the Prudential Regulation Committee [January 2024]

    The press release issued by HM Treasury on 11 January 2024.

    The three external members have been reappointed by the Economic Secretary to the Treasury.

    John Taylor, Antony Jenkins, and Tanya Castell have been reappointed by the government as external members of the Prudential Regulation Committee (PRC).

    John Taylor will serve a further three-year term, from 14 January 2024 to 13 January 2027. Antony Jenkins will also serve a further three-year term, from 5 April 2024 to 4 April 2027. Tanya Castell will serve a further three-year term from 1 September 2024 to 31 August 2027.

    The Economic Secretary to the Treasury, Bim Afolami, said:

    “I am pleased to reappoint John Taylor, Antony Jenkins, and Tanya Castell to the Prudential Regulation Committee. They have all made important contributions during their initial terms on the Committee and their reappointments will ensure the PRC continues to benefit from their industry experience and expertise.”

    Further information

    John Taylor currently serves as a non-executive director on the boards of the International Centre for Mathematical Sciences, the Royal Conservatoire of Scotland and the Medical, Dental Defence Union of Scotland and a member of Scottish Taskforce for Green and Sustainable Financial Services. He is a former chair of the Scottish Financial Risk Academy and a former president of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries.

    Antony Jenkins is the founder, chair and CEO of 10x Future Technologies Group, a company that aims to redefine how banks operate and engage with customers. He is chair of Redpin, the first non-bank foreign exchange payments specialists in the UK and member of the Advisory Board of Palamon Capital Partners. Previously, Antony held board leadership positions at Barclays Plc (2009 – 2015) including chief executive officer from 2012-2015.

    Tanya Castell is an independent non-executive director on the Board of Border to Coast Pensions Partnership, which is an asset management company set up to pool the assets of the 11 local authority pension funds that own it. Tanya is also a member of the Financial Conduct Authority’s Regulatory Decisions Committee, a trustee on the board of the Royal National Institute for Blind where she chairs the Audit, Risk and Assurance Committee and the founder (and former CEO) of the charity Changing the Chemistry. Its aim is to improve diversity of thought on boards.

    About the Prudential Regulation Committee

    The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) supervises banks, insurers and major investment firms.

    The PRA’s most important decisions are taken by the Prudential Regulation Committee, chaired by the Governor of the Bank of England. Five members are Bank staff, including the governor and four deputy governors. The Prudential Regulation Committee has a majority of external members, including the chief executive of the Financial Conduct Authority and six others selected for their experience and expertise in financial services.

  • PRESS RELEASE : The opportunity of a lifetime: the Bays Consulting supplier story [January 2024]

    PRESS RELEASE : The opportunity of a lifetime: the Bays Consulting supplier story [January 2024]

    The press release issued by the Home Office on 11 January 2024.

    Curiosity kept Bays Consulting pondering after delivering a commission for ACE – and the subsequent results changed the company’s prospects.

    Bays Consulting, an analytics company that prides itself on using ‘maths, not magic’ to solve data challenges, supported the Accelerated Capability Environment (ACE) on a government commission to model the way large crowds behave in an emergency.

    However, after the initial commission work was complete, the Bays team felt more could be done to develop the concept – and two of them asked founder Sophie Carr for permission to spend time taking it further. The original work was covered by Crown copyright, which meant it couldn’t be reused, so they started from scratch.

    A novel solution

    At this time, Bays was investing internally to explore what was possible simply to satisfy the team’s curiosity, with no suggestion of external funding. But when a follow-up piece of work for the same customer was put out to tender to ACE’s expert Vivace community, Bays had an interesting solution to offer.

    Dr Carr explained: “We said, we can use your code and work on it – but what you’re investing won’t get you to where we are now, because of what we’ve done ourselves. So now the money for this work is accelerating our roadmap and giving them a much, much better tool at the end of it – and it’s genuinely a partnership.”

    This second phase delivered a simulation tool of interest to event operators, responders, and policymakers, which has provided an increased understanding of how crowds could move in response to external stimuli.

    As part of the deal, Bays kept the intellectual property (IP) for their new tool, meaning they could commercialise it, but the Home Office was given a free forever licence for use within the Home Office.

    Bays’ new tool, says Dr Carr, “is a 2D cellular model which is faster and more efficient to use than its ancestor. Maps of a given area can be uploaded, and crowd composition differentiation means groups, individuals and families are all easily identified.

    “This is important because realistic modelling against different scenarios is key to increasing understanding of what mitigations and protections are needed to help keep the public safe.

    “The crowd can be set by age, to mimic known footfall or density in a given area on a given day. It’s also scalable – and can be used for anything from a local cinema or high street to a major street in London.”

    “This model is really designed to be a risk management and crowd management tool. It can help planners to understand how their current plan could affect the outcomes of a scenario.”

    Dr Carr added: “The crowd’s objective is to not get injured. So, we’ve been working with a professor of psychology to make sure we capture the crowd’s responses as accurately as possible.”

    Validators working with Bays as part of this latest ACE work include an ex-head of crowd control and an ex-deputy commissioner from London’s Metropolitan Police.

    The opportunity of a lifetime

    In terms of company development, Dr Carr said, having the IP “gives us something we can push out as a product or service, something which helps us create a stable base and be known for something we’re good at”.

    “I’m not joking when I say it’s the opportunity of a lifetime – it’s literally company-changing.”

    Dr Carr founded Bays in 2009 after she was made redundant. Winning a grant in 2021 to predict the need for independent food banks in the UK enabled her to hire the company’s first statistician. Work for the Joint Biosecurity Centre (JBC) during the pandemic followed, because they needed statisticians too, and the company started to take off.  Then Bays found ACE – and a whole new journey began.

    Looking back over her experience with ACE so far, Dr Carr said: “The real draw, as a small company, is that ACE offers – in a way that no other government framework we’re involved in has – the chance to work on short, sharp, quick turnaround projects and different projects.

    “Equally, the rainbow teaming means we’ve worked with much bigger companies who we would struggle to meet and work with otherwise.

    “We’ve now met other companies that we bid on work with outside ACE, and we’ve built up a reputation externally for some of the work we’ve done internally. I don’t know any other environment that is a genuine community in the way that ACE is.”

  • PRESS RELEASE : Board member reappointed to the Charity Commission for England and Wales [January 2024]

    PRESS RELEASE : Board member reappointed to the Charity Commission for England and Wales [January 2024]

    The press release issued by the Department for Culture, Media and Sport on 11 January 2024.

    The Secretary of State has reappointed Will Lifford as a Board Member of The Charity Commission for a second term of three years.

    Will Lifford

    Reappointed for a three year term commencing 18 January 2024.

    Will Lifford was first appointed to the Charity Commission in January 2021 for a three year term.

    He is a Chartered Accountant who, for 25 years, was a partner at Grant Thornton, retiring in 2007 as UK Senior Audit Partner.

    Since then, he has held a number of non-executive board positions in the charitable and wider public sector. These include: Chair of Yorkshire Housing (until 2021), Chair of Martin House Children’s Hospice (until 2017), board member of the Agriculture & Horticulture Development Board (until 2020) and Entrust, regulator of the Landfill Communities Fund (until 2015). Will is currently a board member of the Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority and chairs its Audit and Risk Assurance Committee.

  • PRESS RELEASE : Legacy – The false claim of consensus regarding the Stormont House Agreement [January 2024]

    PRESS RELEASE : Legacy – The false claim of consensus regarding the Stormont House Agreement [January 2024]

    The press release issued by the Northern Ireland Office on 11 January 2024.

    In an opinion piece, published in the Irish Independent and Belfast Telegraph, The Lord Caine challenges the Irish Government on legacy issues.

    Just over nine years ago, on 23 December 2014, eleven weeks of political negotiations that included the UK and Irish Governments and the five main Northern Ireland parties concluded with what became known as the Stormont House Agreement. The Agreement was, we believed, a considerable achievement, covering a wide range of issues, including, of course, legacy. The finance provisions almost certainly averted the collapse of the Northern Ireland Executive.

    As Special Adviser to the then Secretary of State, I participated in all eleven weeks of those talks. I am, therefore, somewhat perplexed at the retrospective recasting of the legacy provisions of the Stormont House Agreement as having near universal support and constituting an “agreed” way forward to deal comprehensively with the past.

    Even in December 2014, the legacy proposals did not have the backing of all parties – the Ulster Unionists rejected them outright, while the SDLP regarded them as a dilution of previous proposals. Recognising the difficulties of taking the proposals through Stormont, I recall the First and deputy First Ministers persuading the then Secretary of State to legislate at Westminster, even though the proposed new institutions were technically devolved.

    Commitments to do so subsequently appeared in the Conservative manifesto at the 2015 General Election and in the Queen’s Speech that followed.  It cannot be stated strongly enough that there was no lack of commitment on the part of the UK Government to deliver on the Agreement. To that end, we also established a Stormont House Implementation Group, “the Shig”, to try and maintain a degree of consensus with the parties.

    Ultimately, however, as we tried to convert the small number of paragraphs on legacy in Stormont House into detailed legislation, the fragile consensus we thought we had achieved began to evaporate. Martin McGuinness, on behalf of Sinn Féin, vetoed efforts by the then Secretary of State to include substantive commitments on legacy in the Fresh Start Agreement of November 2015.

    Instead, the final text of that Agreement stated, “While progress has been made on most aspects of the legacy of the past, we have been unable to agree a way forward on some of the key issues.” This led the Victims and Survivors Forum to agree a rare statement expressing concern that victims of the Troubles who had “suffered the most” had now been “forgotten once again”.

    A key concern of a number of victims’ groups in Northern Ireland focused on the role of the Irish Government under the Stormont House proposals. Unlike the UK Government, there were no commitments of any kind by the Irish Government to pursue criminal investigations into Troubles-related incidents within its own jurisdiction. This was despite the cross-border element of so many atrocities during the Troubles.

    In fact, the only significant commitments made by the Irish Government, and which were the only parts of Stormont House that were the subject of an international agreement, were to establish jointly a body designed to encourage information recovery by enabling individuals to come forward secretly to reveal what they had done. Information recovery is, of course, at the centre of what will be delivered through our Legacy Act.

    Despite these setbacks, the UK Government continued to seek to break the deadlock, particularly through the consultation we launched in 2018. While the consultation responses revealed some support for the broad architecture of Stormont House, on the details they raised more questions than answers. It also revealed concerns that people would never co-operate with an information recovery process while the threat of prosecution remained.

    All of this led me, in October 2019, after I had left my role as a Special Adviser, to reflect publicly that the legacy proposals in Stormont House were close to requiring life support. In February 2020, the DUP said that the Agreement was not acceptable and needed revisiting. At different times after the Agreement, therefore, the two largest Northern Ireland parties expressed real concerns about the Stormont House mechanisms.

    As a result, since early 2020, the UK Government has sought to put in place structures designed to provide more information to victims and survivors of the Troubles, against a background of the likelihood of successful prosecutions being vanishingly rare, and a realistic assessment of what can be delivered a quarter of a century after the Belfast Agreement and over fifty years since the Troubles began.

    In many respects our proposals include, and build upon, Stormont House: an independent body capable of  conducting criminal investigations; the ability to refer cases to prosecutors where individuals do not co-operate or seek to mislead; full disclosure by the UK Government; effective information recovery; and measures to promote oral history and reconciliation.

    I am the first to acknowledge that some parts of the Act are challenging, particularly the conditional immunity elements. As a result, however, of the many changes we made during its legislative passage, I am confident that it is capable of delivering more answers, to more people, more quickly than is possible under current structures – or those envisaged nine years ago. We do not expect this to be an entirely comfortable process for anyone.

    I regret that, in our efforts over the last three years, we were unable to find more common ground with the Irish Government, not least as its own approach to troubles-related prosecutions has appeared to recognise the dilemmas we have had to confront.

    Rather than focusing on legally challenging the UK’s Legacy Act in Strasbourg, perhaps it is time for the Irish Government to reflect on how it might now answer legitimate questions about its own role in dealing with legacy issues within its own jurisdiction.

  • PRESS RELEASE : Biggest expansion of nuclear power for 70 years to create jobs, reduce bills and strengthen Britain’s energy security [January 2024]

    PRESS RELEASE : Biggest expansion of nuclear power for 70 years to create jobs, reduce bills and strengthen Britain’s energy security [January 2024]

    The press release issued by the Department for Energy Security and Net Zero on 11 January 2024.

    Roadmap sets out how UK will increase nuclear generation by up to 4 times to 24GW by 2050.

    • Government roadmap includes exploring a new power station as big as Hinkley C and Sizewell C
    • UK becomes first country in Europe to launch high-tech nuclear fuel programme with up to £300 million investment into UK production, pushing Putin out of global market
    • measures such as smarter regulation will help quadruple UK nuclear power by 2050 up to 24GW – the biggest expansion for 70 years

    The government today outlines plans for the biggest expansion of nuclear power for 70 years to reduce electricity bills, support thousands of jobs and improve UK energy security – including exploring building a major new power station and investing in advanced nuclear fuel production.

    In the 2 years since Putin’s illegal invasion of Ukraine, the government has doubled down on security of supply to protect the country from price volatility and hostile foreign regimes and bolster the UK’s energy independence.

    The Civil Nuclear Roadmap will give industry certainty of the future direction of the UK’s ambitious nuclear programme, on top of the government’s historic commitment to Sizewell C and world-leading competition to develop small modular reactor (SMR) technology.

    The roadmap sets out how the UK will increase generation of this homegrown supply of clean, reliable, and abundant energy by up to 4 times to 24 gigawatts (GW) by 2050 – enough to provide a quarter of the UK’s electricity needs.

    The plans include next steps for exploring a GW-scale power plant as big as Sizewell in Suffolk or Hinkley in Somerset, which are capable of powering 6 million homes each.

    The government will also invest up to £300 million in UK production of the fuel required to power high-tech new nuclear reactors, known as HALEU, currently only commercially produced in Russia.

    As the first country in Europe to launch a HALEU programme, the UK will lead the way from its North West production hub to provide the world with this form of uranium fuel, with the first plant aiming to be operational early in the next decade. This builds on the ambition to return uranium conversion to the Springfields nuclear fuel site, both of which are critical to pushing Putin out of the global market.

    An additional £10 million will be provided to develop the skills and sites needed to produce other advanced nuclear fuels in the UK, helping to secure long term domestic nuclear fuel supply and support our allies.

    The roadmap also includes a government ambition to secure 3 – 7GW worth of investment decisions every 5 years from 2030 to 2044 on new nuclear projects.

    The Prime Minister, Rishi Sunak, said:

    Nuclear is the perfect antidote to the energy challenges facing Britain – it’s green, cheaper in the long term and will ensure the UK’s energy security for the long-term.

    This is the right long-term decision and is the next step in our commitment to nuclear power, which puts us on course to achieve net zero by 2050 in a measured and sustainable way.

    This will ensure our future energy security and create the jobs and skills we need to level up the country and grow our economy.

    Secretary of State for Energy Security and Net Zero, Claire Coutinho, said:

    Strengthening our energy security means that Britain will never again be held to ransom over energy by tyrants like Vladimir Putin. British nuclear, as one of the most reliable, low-carbon sources of energy around, will provide that security.

    We’re making the biggest investment in domestic nuclear energy in 70 years. Our £300 million plan to produce advanced nuclear fuel in the UK will supply nuclear plants at home and overseas – further weakening the Kremlin’s grip on global energy markets.

    From large gigawatt projects to small modular reactors, the UK’s wider nuclear revival will quadruple our nuclear capacity by 2050 – helping to power Britain from Britain.

    Plans to streamline the development of new power stations and introduce smarter regulation could speed up the overall process and, as a result, the delivery of nuclear power in the UK. This includes allowing regulators to assess projects while designs are finalised, and better join-up with overseas regulators assessing the same technology.

    Ministers will bring together the brightest and best from the nuclear industry and beyond as part of a ‘hackathon’ event to come up with ideas on how government and industry can accelerate new nuclear projects, while maintaining the highest levels of safety and security.

    These plans will help build new supplies of affordable and clean domestic power so the transition to net zero doesn’t mean higher prices, protecting households from global instability.

    The government is also today publishing 2 consultations, one on a new approach to siting future nuclear power stations and another on supporting the sector and encouraging private investment to roll out advanced nuclear projects. The proposals will attract investment in the UK nuclear sector by empowering developers to find suitable sites rather than focusing on 8 designated by government. Community engagement will remain critical to any decisions, alongside maintaining robust criteria such as nearby population densities.

    Following its launch last year, Great British Nuclear (GBN) will drive the UK’s nuclear ambitions forward, including through the game-changing SMR competition which will soon invite short-listed companies to tender.

    Unlike conventional nuclear reactors that are built on site, SMRs are smaller, can be made in factories, and could transform how power stations are built by making construction faster and less expensive. Alongside large gigawatt power stations, SMRs will play a key role in delivering on the expansion of UK nuclear capacity.

    As well as powering homes, innovations in the nuclear sector could provide direct heat for industry, energy for green hydrogen production, and medical isotopes for the diagnosis and treatment of cancer.

    Analysis by the Nuclear Skills Strategy Group suggests that to reach up to 24GW, the civil and defence nuclear workforce will need to double over the next 20 years – supporting around 80,000 additional skilled jobs across the UK.

    The Nuclear Skills Taskforce will shortly set out plans to meet the demand of an industry – already worth £6 billion to the British economy – which is likely to include increasing the numbers of graduates and apprentices and attracting mid-careerists with relevant skills and expertise.

    Minister for Nuclear Andrew Bowie said:

    The government’s investment in nuclear will ensure the UK remains at the forefront of technological developments.

    Our plans will give investors the confidence to back new UK projects, with a simpler process for locating new schemes and clear support for private sector companies developing innovative new technologies.

    By meeting a quarter of our electricity demand with nuclear, we will strengthen our energy independence, reduce bills and support jobs across the UK.

    The roadmap will also confirm plans for decommissioning to make sure they remain suitable for new nuclear technologies and protect future generations from bearing the costs.

    Tom Greatrex, Chief Executive of Nuclear Industry Association, said:

    We welcome the publication of the roadmap – the commitment to explore a further large-scale project beyond Sizewell C in parallel with the deployment of SMRs is very welcome. We will need both large and small nuclear at scale and at pace for our energy security and net zero future. Allowing developers to engage with the government about Regulated Asset Base funding models should also make it cheaper to finance projects, cutting costs to the consumer. Decisions on 3-7GW in each 5 year period provide the greater clarity and predictability, which in turn enables supply chain investment and more UK content in the future fleet.

    The commitments to maximise our use of regulatory assessments already undertaken overseas will help get innovative reactor designs into construction faster and reduce the duplication in regulatory activity that eats up time for no additional benefit.

    Sue Ferns, Senior Deputy General Secretary of Prospect trade union, said:

    Commitment to a long-term investment in new nuclear capacity is most welcome.

    Nuclear is an essential part of a low carbon, secure energy strategy that should also deliver good, clean jobs at scale. Investment in both GW-scale power plants as well as SMRs is critical to ensuring a nuclear renaissance, as is reducing our exposure to Russian nuclear fuel production.

    Prospect looks forward to playing an active role in delivering this mission that is critical to meeting our net zero and energy security goals.

    Babcock’s CEO for Nuclear Harry Holt said:

    The UK’s Nuclear Roadmap will provide opportunities for the whole civil nuclear sector. Babcock, through our Cavendish Nuclear business, is committed to developing UK capability, jobs and skills and this is a great step in the right direction.

    Carol Tansley, Vice President of UK New Build Projects at X-energy, said:

    We’re delighted this ambitious roadmap recognises the vital role in the UK energy mix for advanced modular reactors (AMRs).

    The announcement of funding for an advanced fuel enrichment facility is also a very welcome demonstration of commitment to deliver the next generation nuclear technologies in the UK.  We look forward to engaging in the forthcoming consultations to create a blueprint for successful deployment.

    Gwen Parry-Jones, CEO of Great British Nuclear said:

    Since Great British Nuclear started the SMR technical selection process last July, we have moved strongly forward and are on track to complete vendor selection later this year.  Shortly we will invite the six companies we have selected to submit tenders.

    The Civil Nuclear Roadmap provides a framework for GBN to help deliver more safe, clean and affordable UK nuclear power to UK consumers.  Together with industry, we will enthusiastically take up the role the government has set out for us in delivering and advising across the UK’s nuclear programme.  We are actively building GBN’s capability to take on the challenge ahead.

    Chris O’Shea, Group Chief Executive, Centrica, said:

    The UK’s ambitious net zero targets will only be met if we utilise all of the tools at our disposal, including nuclear power generation. Centrica has invested in nuclear power generation for almost 15 years and we know the benefits it can create for customers and the country. We welcome the roadmap set out by the government today as we look to support the UK’s efforts to create a more secure, resilient energy system for the future.

    Dr Fiona Rayment OBE FNucI, President of the Nuclear Institute, commented:

    I am delighted to see the publishing of the Nuclear Roadmap. It not only continues to provide a strong signal from government on nuclear, but reaffirms the only way to achieve carbon neutrality for energy whilst maintaining both energy and national security is through nuclear as a significant part of the UK energy mix.

    Reaching 24GW by 2050 is achievable but challenging and recognising the need to address the skills and capability challenges in enabling this is key. The Nuclear Institute, as the professional membership body for the sector, assists in creating this capability and we are proud to support our nuclear workforce in the years ahead.

    Andrew Murdoch, UK Managing Director of Advanced Modular Reactor developer, newcleo, said:

    newcleo welcomes today’s announcements by government which offer strong support for our sector and outline a clearer future for nuclear energy policy in the UK, be it big, small or advanced.  We now look forward to participating in the government’s consultations on both siting and the routes to market for advanced technologies ahead of developing our first of a kind advanced modular reactor here in the UK by 2033.

    newcleo is ready to invest billions of pounds of private money in the UK and create thousands of high value jobs in local communities with our innovative reactors.  Today’s announcements help to provide the framework in which the industry and government can work together to realise the ambition to deliver 24 GW of much-needed nuclear power by 2050.

  • Lord Benyon – 2024 Statement on the Democratic Republic of Congo Presidential Elections

    Lord Benyon – 2024 Statement on the Democratic Republic of Congo Presidential Elections

    The statement made by Lord Benyon on 11 January 2024.

    Minister of State Rt Hon Lord Benyon gave a statement on the process and outcome of the 2023 DRC presidential elections.

    Statement by Minister of State Rt Hon Lord Benyon:

    I would like to congratulate President Tshisekedi on his re-election as President of the Democratic Republic of the Congo.

    The United Kingdom commends DRC voters for their participation in the Presidential elections and their determination to exercise their democratic rights. We also welcome that voting was broadly peaceful and that elections took place on time.

    We also acknowledge issues raised by electoral observation missions regarding the electoral process. I urge the Government of DRC to address these issues transparently and for all candidates to raise complaints or seek redress about the electoral process through peaceful means and engagement with the proper legal and constitutional channels.

    The United Kingdom remains a committed partner to the people of DRC, and I look forward to working constructively with President Tshisekedi and his government in this second term. We fully support the President’s ambition to secure long term peace and prosperity for both DRC and the region and look forward to strengthening our bilateral relationship even further, particularly in trade and investment given the DRC’s participation in the upcoming UK African Investment Summit. I also encourage the President and his government to work with the region to find a peaceful solution to the ongoing conflict and humanitarian challenges in the east of the country and an early return to the regionally led peace processes.

  • PRESS RELEASE : Sir Ross Cranston to chair independent inquiry into 2021 Channel crossing tragedy [January 2024]

    PRESS RELEASE : Sir Ross Cranston to chair independent inquiry into 2021 Channel crossing tragedy [January 2024]

    The press release issued by the Department for Transport on 11 January 2024.

    Cranston Inquiry to look into the events of 24 November 2021, when at least 27 people lost their lives crossing the Channel.

    • former Judge and Solicitor General, Sir Ross Cranston, announced as Chair of independent inquiry into 24 November 2021 Channel crossing tragedy, announced on 9 November 2023
    • terms of reference also published, with inquiry designed to allow a public, transparent hearing into the circumstances of the deaths to take place
    • inquiry will examine the events of 24 November 2021, when at least 27 people lost their lives crossing the Channel

    Former judge and Solicitor General, Sir Ross Cranston, is to chair the independent inquiry into the events of 24 November 2021, when at least 27 people lost their lives crossing the Channel.

    The Cranston Inquiry will look into who the deceased were, and when, where and in what circumstances they came by their deaths.

    It will also consider what further lessons can be learned from the events of 24 November 2021 and, if appropriate, make recommendations to reduce the risk of a similar event occurring.

    The inquiry was announced on 9 November 2023 by the Transport Secretary, Mark Harper, following the publication of a report by the Marine Accident Investigation Branch (MAIB) outlining the circumstances surrounding the tragedy.

    Transport Secretary, Mark Harper, said:

    This inquiry will allow a thorough and independent investigation into the circumstances of the deaths to take place.

    I’m grateful that Sir Ross Cranston has agreed to chair the inquiry into this tragic event. I know that Sir Ross will conduct his work with thoroughness and professionalism.

    I hope this inquiry will give the families of the victims the clarity they deserve.

    Chair of the inquiry, Sir Ross Cranston, said:

    I have been appointed to Chair the independent inquiry into the tragic incident in the Channel on 24 November 2021.

    My inquiry will enable the survivors and family members of the deceased to be heard and to identify lessons that can be learned to avoid a similar tragedy in the future.

    I aim to complete the inquiry and deliver my report to the Secretary of State for Transport as expeditiously as possible and will announce how the inquiry will proceed shortly.

    See the terms of reference for the inquiry for more information.

    Sir Ross Cranston is a professor of law at the London School of Economics and Political Science. He is a former Judge of the High Court of England and Wales, who sat in the Queen’s Bench Division and, in 2016, became the judge in charge of the Administrative Court. In his political career, Sir Ross was MP for Dudley North between 1997 and 2005 and Solicitor General for England and Wales from 1998 to 2001.

    Sir Ross has served on missions for the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), the Commonwealth Secretariat, the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the European Commission. He was, until 2022, Chair of Trustees of the British and Irish Legal Information Institute (BAILII), which provides free access to British, Irish and European Union legal material. In 2018, he chaired a committee of JUSTICE, which published a report: Immigration and asylum appeals – a fresh look. In 2019, he conducted an independent assurance review of Lloyds Bank’s handling of claims arising from fraud committed at the HSBOS Impaired Assets Office.

    Rory Phillips KC, of 3 Verulam Buildings (3VB) Chambers, has been appointed Counsel to the inquiry. Stephen Brown, Deputy Director in the government legal department, has been appointed Solicitor to the inquiry.

    The inquiry is on X (formerly Twitter) with the handle @CranstonInquiry. A website for the inquiry will be launched in due course.

  • PRESS RELEASE : Defra appoints new non-executive board member [January 2024]

    PRESS RELEASE : Defra appoints new non-executive board member [January 2024]

    The press release issued by the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs on 11 January 2024.

    The Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) has today (11 January 2024) announced the appointment of Chris Tyas OBE as a non-executive board member.

    Non-executive board members are senior figures from outside government, appointed to provide challenge to government departments. All non-executive board member appointments follow an open and transparent process, in line with the government’s Code of Good Practice for Corporate Governance in Central Government Departments. As set out in the Code of Practice, non-executive board members are appointed directly by the Secretary of State and are not civil servants.

    Chris’ term as non-executive board member will last for three years. The Defra board provides strategic, corporate leadership to the department and has particular responsibility for monitoring performance and delivery.

    Chris Tyas OBE

    Chris is the Chair of GS1UK, the neutral, not-for-profit standards organisation whose data standards power barcodes and QR codes globally across food, consumer goods, healthcare and construction. Chris recently spent two years as the co-Chair of Defra’s Food Resilience Industry Forum, helping to bring together all parts of the food supply chain during the pandemic.

    Prior to that, Chris had a 40-year career in the food industry, working for Mars and Nestle in a variety of roles across procurement, manufacturing, HR, IT and logistics. He has spent the last five years as the Senior Vice President responsible for Nestle’s global supply chain, based in Switzerland.

  • PRESS RELEASE : Government seeks closure of failing cemetery [January 2024]

    PRESS RELEASE : Government seeks closure of failing cemetery [January 2024]

    The press release issued by the Ministry of Justice on 11 January 2024.

    Tottenham Park Cemetery in Enfield is facing closure after owners repeatedly failed to make necessary improvements to ensure the safety of burials.

    • Closure of Tottenham Park Cemetery sought following failure to improve
    • Concerns raised after remains unlawfully disturbed at the privately-run site
    • Closure would prevent future burials on the site, except for in reserved plots

    The government has today (11 January 2024) announced its intention to apply to the Privy Council for an order requiring burials be stopped at the cemetery in North London. This would mean no new burials would be permitted, except where plots have previously been reserved.

    The move follows 2 government-ordered inspections which found remains were being unlawfully disturbed during the burial process. Recommendations that no new plots should be excavated or sold, record keeping should be improved, and a survey undertaken to identify existing burials have not been met.

    The prevention of future burials should not impact the opening of the site for the public to visit their loved ones’ graves.

    Justice Minister Mike Freer said:

    The people buried in this cemetery were laid to rest and the repeated disturbance of their remains is not only illegal but a breach of trust.

    I believe it is necessary to seek this closure to ensure that Tottenham Park Cemetery can safely serve its community in future.

    The Ministry of Justice will continue to work with the cemetery’s owners, Enfield Council and other interested parties to ensure the reserved graves continue to be managed.

    Complaints about the site were first raised by the local council, Baroness Hussein-Ece, and local MPs, prompting the 2 inspections.

    For the government to stop burials at private cemeteries legally it requires an Order in Council. Those are considered by the Privy Council Office and signed by the King.

    Notes to editors

    • Public notices have been issued and people have one calendar month to make representations, which will be considered before any application is made.
    • To provide representation write to the Coroners and Burials Team at the Ministry of Justice, 102 Petty France, London SW1H 9AJ or email coroners@justice.gov.uk (quoting reference CN/TPC/JAN24).
    • Following the 2 inspections, the cemetery owners were tasked with:
      • Scanning and digitising all available records, including records of reserved graves
      • Creating a digital grave plan
      • Ensuring that excavation for burial in a reserved grave is closely monitored to ensure that remains are not disturbed
      • Introducing an effective grave maintenance scheme
    • Part of the Cemetery is leased to the Tottenham Park Islamic Cemetery Association (TPICA) which manages burials in that area. The MoJ is in contact with the TPICA about the implications of the closure for grave space reserved within their area.