Tag: 2024

  • PRESS RELEASE : Australia’s naval nuclear propulsion: AUKUS update to IAEA Board of Governors [June 2024]

    PRESS RELEASE : Australia’s naval nuclear propulsion: AUKUS update to IAEA Board of Governors [June 2024]

    The press release issued by the Foreign Office on 7 June 2024.

    Statement by Australia, the UK and the USA (AUKUS) to the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Board of Governors on naval nuclear propulsion.

    Thank you, Chair.

    I have the honour of speaking on behalf of Australia, the United Kingdom, and the United States to provide an update to the Board of Governors on Australia’s naval nuclear propulsion program.

    Chair,

    Australia and the IAEA are continuing to hold bilateral technical consultations on a robust safeguards and verification approach for Australia’s acquisition of conventionally armed, nuclear-powered submarines. These consultations include negotiations relating to the development of an arrangement under Article 14 of Australia’s Comprehensive Safeguards Arrangement. The most recent round of formal consultations between Australia and the Agency took place in May. These discussions encompassed legal and technical aspects of an Article 14 arrangement for Australia. Discussions are continuing.

    We thank the Director General and the Secretariat for the Agency’s productive engagement with Australia in these ongoing consultations, in exercising its technical mandate to engage with Member States on the implementation of their safeguards agreements. Bilateral, in-confidence engagement between the Secretariat and Member States is fundamental to the non-proliferation regime.

    We are confident that Member States will see through the attempts we observed earlier at the current Board meeting, and indeed ever since AUKUS was announced, to sow doubts about the Secretariat’s engagement with Australia on naval nuclear propulsion. We thank the many Board members who earlier in this meeting noted with appreciation the Secretariat’s engagement with the relevant States on naval nuclear propulsion, as accurately reflected in the 2023 Safeguards Implementation Report.

    I refer Member States to my recent, publicly available remarks delivered at the workshop organised and hosted by the Permanent Mission of China, outlining the well-established legal and policy framework through which Australia is engaging the IAEA.

    As I made clear at the workshop, it struck me as highly unusual for one country to organise an event targeted at another country’s sovereign endeavour and bilateral engagement. I decided to speak at the event in the interest of transparency, but fully aware the forum was not one designed to facilitate impartial discussion.

    The IAEA’s technical role is an integral part of the non-proliferation system. It is crucial that all Member States respect the independence, mandate and technical authority of the IAEA. This is why Australia has expressed serious concern about references to ‘an intergovernmental process’. Such a process could subject the IAEA’s technical work to the political deliberations of Member States. All Member States share an interest in protecting the IAEA’s technical mandate – as we all rely on its ability to carry out its mandate independently and impartially in these challenging times.

    Chair,

    The AUKUS partners recognise that the acquisition of conventionally armed, nuclear-powered submarines by Australia carries with it a responsibility to ensure the highest standard of non-proliferation is upheld. Under Australia’s Article 14 arrangement, the IAEA will maintain oversight of nuclear material. We reiterate our commitment that Australia will not enrich uranium or reprocess spent fuel as part of this program and to ensuring that the non-proliferation approach for Australia’s naval nuclear propulsion program will enable the IAEA to fulfil its technical objectives for Australia at all stages of the submarines’ lifecycle. The Agency will continue to verify that there has been no diversion of nuclear material; no misuse of nuclear facilities; and no undeclared nuclear material or activities in Australia.

    The Director General has confirmed that, once Australia’s Article 14 arrangement has been developed, he will transmit it to the Board for appropriate action. As we have stated before, we fully support this approach.

    Chair,

    We remain committed to keeping the Board updated on relevant developments concerning our three countries’ cooperation on naval nuclear propulsion. Since we met in March, Australia has announced the selection of industry partners for the build and sustainment of Australia’s future conventionally armed, nuclear-powered submarines. In April, our defence ministers released a joint statement which, in addition to providing an update on a number of initiatives, outlined readiness to begin engaging additional countries on specific advanced capability projects under AUKUS Pillar Two. AUKUS Pillar Two does not involve nuclear cooperation or capability. It is separate from the initiative under AUKUS Pillar One to support Australia’s acquisition of conventionally armed, nuclear-powered submarines, which will remain exclusively trilateral between Australia, the United Kingdom, and the United States.

    Together, our defence ministers demonstrated our united approach, and reiterated our commitment to setting the highest non-proliferation standard. They also referred to AUKUS partners’ initiatives to build Australia’s capability to safely and securely maintain its future submarines. These include initiatives to support workforce skills and development, including a maintenance activity to be conducted on a US nuclear-powered submarine in Australia, which is scheduled to occur in the second half of 2024.

    As the Director General has said in recent statements, Australia and the Agency are engaging to ensure that relevant technical measures are in place ahead of any such activity, under Australia’s safeguards agreements with the Agency. Such engagement on safeguards implementation is entirely consistent with the Agency’s mandate and with longstanding practice.

    Chair,

    The Director General has confirmed he will continue to provide reports on naval nuclear propulsion programs to the Board as the need arises. We fully support his prerogative to decide the appropriate time for this matter to be placed on the Board’s agenda.

    The AUKUS partners will continue to update the Board on developments relating to Australia’s naval nuclear propulsion program, and to engage the international community, including at the upcoming NPT Prep Com. We welcome the opportunity to address questions from interested delegations regarding our non-proliferation approach, at future Board meetings and in other fora, as appropriate.

    Thank you, Chair.

  • Daisy Cooper – 2024 Comments on Craig Williams and Rishi Sunak Betting Scandal

    Daisy Cooper – 2024 Comments on Craig Williams and Rishi Sunak Betting Scandal

    The comments made by Daisy Cooper, the Deputy Leader of the Liberal Democrats, on 13 June 2024.

    This [Cabinet Office] inquiry is needed to get to the bottom of who knew what when, and uncover whether Craig Williams knew the election date at the time the bet was placed.

  • Rishi Sunak – 2024 Statement on Craig Williams and Betting Scandal

    Rishi Sunak – 2024 Statement on Craig Williams and Betting Scandal

    The statement made by Rishi Sunak, the Prime Minister, on 13 June 2024.

    It is very disappointing. Craig Williams has said that it’s a huge error of judgment. Now there is an independent inquiry which is confidential and it’s important that that is allowed to continue. It’s not appropriate to say anything while that’s ongoing.

  • Keir Starmer – 2024 Speech at the Launch of the General Election Manifesto

    Keir Starmer – 2024 Speech at the Launch of the General Election Manifesto

    The speech made by Keir Starmer, the Leader of the Opposition, on 13 June 2024.

    Thank you, thank you very much. Thank you, Ange, for your introduction, for everything that you’re doing, I think I’m taking your bus this afternoon. Thank you, Richard, for your words. Thank you, Daniel, for reminding us why we’re doing what we’re doing.

    Nathaniel, I’ve heard your story before, but every single time it gets to me and I’m sure gets to every single person that listens to what you say, and I’m humbled by your determination to make sure that things are better for those in the next generation.

    And Holly, that was fantastic. Holly is 18-years-old. Anybody who has stood on a stage like this knows how hard it is, for all of us to stand up here. That’s the first time Holly has done anything like this in her life. Fantastic, Holly. And taken together, isn’t this clear evidence of a changed Labour Party, and clear evidence of the change we need for our country.

    We gave up on being a party of protest five years ago. We want to be a party of power. That’s not in the script, but that is part of the change.

    And Holly, can I also say at the start of this, that this party respects and will never forget the contribution that your generation made during the pandemic. Thank you so much.

    And thank you all for coming to Manchester. Thank you for all the hard work that’s gone into this campaign so far, into this project. Four-and-a-half years of work changing our party to put it back in the service of working people.

    And now – the next step, the most important step, changing Britain. Rebuilding our country. So that it too serves the interests of working people.

    And what a place to launch our plan to do so. The home of the Co-operative Group. An organisation that has long believed, as we do, that the pursuit of social justice and economic growth must go hand-in-hand.

    A day where I am proud – in this place, in this city – to launch Labour’s general election manifesto. A manifesto for wealth creation. A plan to change Britain.

    Because today we can turn the page. Today we can lay a new foundation of stability. And on that foundation we can start to rebuild Britain. A Britain renewed by an old argument – that we serve working people, as their ambition drives our country forward.

    Because there is so much potential in this country. So much possibility if we stand together as four nations, and back the ambition people have for their family and their community.

    I see it everywhere I go. Potential held back. I spoke to Will, he’s a fireman in Milton Keynes. He works really hard. What he wants, his dream, is to own his own home. A roof over his head that he can call his own. As well as a firefighter, he’s got two other jobs, but he can’t afford a mortgage – his dream will not be realised. That’s the price he’s paying.

    I went to Alder Hey Hospital, not far from here. It is a brilliant children’s hospital, absolutely brilliant. And the day I went in, I went to the ward where they were doing operations on 0 to 2-year-old children, heart operations. It’s incredible to just see what they do, the courage of the individuals in there. Heart surgery – the brilliance of the NHS staff. I found that totally humbling, completely uplifting. Until I found out that at Alder Hey Hospital, the commonest cause for admission for operations for 6-to-10-year olds is children going there to have their teeth taken out, because they are decaying. That is the price that they are paying.

    So just imagine, imagine if instead – a Labour Government gives Will and Daniel the affordable homes that they need. Imagine, if instead – a Labour Government tackles the rot of tooth decay. Imagine what those nurses and doctors could do – with a Labour Government on their side.
    Now don’t get me wrong. These challenges don’t disappear overnight if Labour wins. We don’t have a magic wand. But what we do have – what this manifesto represents, is a credible long-term plan. A plan built on stable foundations, with clear first steps, tough spending rules that will keep taxes and inflation low. NHS waiting times cut – with 40,000 extra appointments every week. A Border Security Command to smash the criminal smuggling gangs. Great British Energy to cut bills in your home for good, more police in your town, cracking down on antisocial behaviour, and 6,500 new teachers in your school – giving your children the start in life that they deserve.

    But also, a plan that is much more than a list of policies. A plan for change, for growth, for giving our children their future back.

    A chance to refocus politics on the things that matter to your family. The era of sticking plaster politics, the chaos and division, replaced by a government back in the service of you and your family.

    And make no mistake – that is the cause of this changed Labour Party and we have written that argument through every word of this manifesto, because it’s urgent.

    Britain has lost its balance. It is too hard for working people to get on. Opportunity is not spread evenly enough and too many communities are not just locked out of the wealth that we create, they are disregarded as sources of dynamism in the first place.

    Ignored by the toxic idea that economic growth is something the few hand down to the many. Today, we turn the page on that, forever.

    Because that idea is part of the story of the past 14 years, part of everything they put you through.

    When they crashed the pound to give tax cuts to the richest 1%. When they decimated your public services because of a mess made by banks. When they failed to invest in clean British energy, we were exposed when Putin invaded Ukraine.

    That idea was there, a Tory inability to face the future, rather than change, reform and strengthen government, so that it can intervene, in partnership with business, to give you and your family stability in this insecure world.

    It doesn’t matter how many new policies the Tories throw at the wall, hoping that some of them will stick. None of them face up to the reality of this future. But mark my words – this changed Labour Party will.

    We have a plan in this manifesto. A total change of direction. Laser-focused on our cause: stability, growth, investment and reform. A government back in the service of your family, ready to change Britain.

    We will restore the foundations of good government. National security, border security, economic security. We will make new choices to reform our economy and public services, hard choices, choices ducked for years.

    These choices will be fully-funded and fully-costed. That is non-negotiable, you cannot play fast and loose with the public finances. We have lived through the damage that this does. The Government we have now played fast and loose with the finances, and working people paid the price.

    Just after Liz Truss’ mini-budget, I went to Wolverhampton a week or so afterwards. And I met there a couple, they had a 3-year-old child, they had decided they want a second child. They had chosen a new home that was big enough to accommodate their new family. They got a mortgage offer that they could afford. Liz Truss crashed the economy, their mortgage offer went through the roof, they couldn’t afford it, they pulled out, they couldn’t move to their new home, they felt they were held back. But they also took the decision that they could no longer afford to have a second child. And they will live with that for the rest of their lives. That’s the price that they’re paying.

    So I make no apologies for being careful with working peoples’ money, and no apologies for ruling out tax rises on working people. And this isn’t just the election, don’t think it’s just politics, this is an issue of conviction. I don’t believe it’s fair to raise taxes on working people when they’re already paying this much, particularly in a cost-of-living crisis.

    So let me spell it out. We will not raise income tax. We will not raise National Insurance. We will not raise VAT. That is a manifesto commitment.

    And another thing. Because there may be some people here today who say: where’s the surprise? Where’s the rabbit out of the hat? To which I say, if you want politics as pantomime, I hear Clacton is nice this time of year!

    But seriously, we have to come to terms with this. Britain needs stability, not more chaos. I set out our long-term plan in this room 18 months ago, and that plan stands because it is the right plan.

    We did the work properly. Our responsibility to give a clear direction to businesses, communities, everyone invested in Britain’s future.

    We took that seriously.

    So yes, those five national missions: higher growth, safer streets, cleaner energy, more opportunity, the NHS back on its feet – they remain at the core of this manifesto.

    But if they are to offer hope and clarity through these times. If they are to show, despite the hard road, the light of the certain destination, then we must keep to that road, no matter the short-term ebbs and flows of politics. Even in a campaign.

    That’s what mission-driven government means. A chance to stop us bobbing along until the next crisis blows us off course, and instead make sure we can keep going through the storm. Stability over chaos. Long-term over short-term. An end to the desperate era of gestures and gimmicks, and a return to the serious business of rebuilding our country.

    And on that foundation of stability, we start to rebuild. A rebuilding that must begin, first and foremost, with new choices on economic growth. That is the mandate we seek from Britain at this election, a mandate for economic growth.

    Because the way we create wealth in this country is broken. It leaves far too many people feeling insecure, people who are working hard and doing the right thing.

    So we will reform it, and we will keep on reforming it, until it delivers for them. Wealth creation is our number one priority. Growth is our core business. The only route to improving the prosperity of our country and the living standards of working people. And that’s why we made it our first national mission in government.

    But we must change our approach so that it comes from every community. Not just shared with every community, redistribution can’t be a one-word plan for our poorest towns and regions.

    No, we need to give them the tools they need, back their pride and potential. Growth for every community, growth from every community, that is the path to national renewal.

    And now, some people say that how you grow the economy is not a central question. That it’s not about how you create wealth, but how you tax it, how you spend it, how you slice the cake, that’s all that matters.

    So let me be crystal clear, this manifesto is a total rejection of that argument. Because if you transform the nature of the jobs market, if you transform the infrastructure that supports investment in our economy, if you reform the planning regime – start to unlock the potential of billions upon billions of pounds worth of projects that are ready to go, held up by the blockers of aspiration – then clearly that does so much more for our long-term growth prospects.

    And the same is true of public services. If we grew the economy at anything like the rate of the last Labour Government, we’d have tens of billions of pounds worth of investment for our public services every year.

    So if you take nothing else away from today, let it be this. This changed Labour Party has a plan for growth: we are pro-business and pro-worker. The party of wealth creation.

    We will reform the planning rules – a choice ignored for 14 years – and build the homes and infrastructure you need. We will level up your rights at work – a choice ignored for 14 years – and raise your wages and your security. We will create a new industrial strategy – a choice ignored for 14 years. And we will back it with a national wealth fund – invest in clean steel, new ports, gigafactories. And we will create 650,000 new jobs for communities like yours, relight the fires of renewal across all four of our great nations.

    You can choose a different path – you have the power. You can choose to take back control from Westminster. More democracy for your community. New powers over transport, skills, employment. Unlock the pride and potential in every community. That is a different choice you can make.

    You can cut your bills for good with a new energy company – funded by a tax on the oil and gas giants: owned by the taxpayer, making money for the taxpayer, powering your home with clean British energy. That is a different choice you can make.

    And you can choose to get our NHS back on its feet. End the 8am scramble. Back our NHS staff, get the best technology in their hands, slash waiting lists in your hospital, funded by taking on the non-doms and tax avoiders. That is a different choice you can make.

    And I’ll tell you another choice you can make. You can choose to live in a country that believes in and backs its young people, the future of our country.

    I am fed up of politicians lecturing young people about their responsibility to our nation, when those politicians fail in their responsibility to the future.

    After what young people did during the pandemic, what they gave up for people – let’s be blunt – more at risk than them, that adds insult to injury.

    But more than that, it tears up the unwritten contract, the bonds of respect that hold these four great nations together, the values that make us who we are, the responsibilities we owe to each other. Past, present and future.

    My dad was a tool-maker, he worked in a factory. My mum was a nurse. We didn’t have a lot when we were growing up, and, like millions of working-class children now, I grew up in a cost-of-living crisis.

    I know what it feels like to be embarrassed to bring your mates home because the carpet is threadbare and the windows cracked. I was actually responsible for that because I didn’t put the football through it! But we didn’t have the money to fix it. Or to be honest – the time and energy. Economic insecurity drains you of that as well.

    But look, what always comforted my parents was the idea that, in the end, Britain would give their children a fair chance.

    The old saying, the story we still tell our children – “work hard and you can achieve anything” – that meant something.

    My parents believed in that. But the question now, after 14 years, is – do we?

    Do kids like those in Somers Town – a very poor part of my constituency, one of the poorest parts of Europe – do they look out of their window, to the glittering success of London 300 yards and another world away, and believe that success could belong to them?

    Do parents here in Manchester – or in Glasgow, Cardiff, Plymouth, Sunderland, Sussex, Stoke-on-Trent – do they believe, with the certainty that they deserve, that the future will be better for their children?

    Because in the Britain I want to leave to my children, they do.

    And we can build it. We can restore the dream of home ownership to 1.5 million families. We can create 3,000 new nurseries to give them the best start in life. We can roll out a new generation of technical excellence colleges, a world-class vocational education respected by all, grounding young aspiration in the soil of their community.

    We can guarantee, for every young person, a job placement or apprenticeship when they are out of work. We can invest in their mental health, their physical health, their dental health. We can reform the curriculum to prepare them for their world.

    We can create new youth hubs and give them something to do in their community. Raise their wages if they’re at work, give them the power of the vote, tackle injustice with a new Race Equality Act and with our mission on clean power we can lead the way on climate, finally show our responsibility to their future.

    A fairer, healthier, a more secure Britain, at the service of working people, with growth from every community. A Britain ready to restore that promise.

    The bond that reaches through the generations and says – this country will be better for your children.

    That is the change on offer on 4 July.

    That is our plan and I invite you all to join our mission to stop the chaos, turn the page and start to rebuild our country.

    Thank you so much.

  • PRESS RELEASE : Keir Starmer’s time as Director of Public Prosecutions [June 2024]

    PRESS RELEASE : Keir Starmer’s time as Director of Public Prosecutions [June 2024]

    The press release issued by the Labour Party on 4 June 2024.

    Keir Starmer was appointed Chief Prosecutor and head of the Crown Prosecution Service in 2008. He held the post for five years, before becoming leader of the Labour Party in 2020.

    The role was a recognition of his work as a lawyer, which included helping to take Vladimir Putin to court for the murder of Alexander Litvinenko, and five years as legal advisor to the Northern Ireland Policing Board, helping to bring communities together following the Good Friday Agreement.

    In 2014, Keir Starmer received a knighthood for his services to criminal justice.

    What did Keir Starmer achieve as Director of Public Prosecutions?

    Keir Starmer made the Crown Prosecution Service work for people:

    In his first year in the role, he oversaw the first ever UK prosecution of al-Qaeda terrorists.

    In 2009, he sought a retrial of terrorists involved in a suicide bombing plot that saw them locked behind bars.

    A year later, he brought forward charges against Tory and Labour politicians during the expenses scandal.

    In 2012, he worked with Doreen Lawrence to play a crucial role in bringing the racist killers of her son Stephen to justice.

    When John and Penny Clough’s daughter Jane was murdered after her killer was released on bail, he worked with them to change the law so that no one had to go through what they did – they’re now close friends.

    In 2013, he launched the Victims’ Right to Review, giving victims and bereaved families the right to challenge decisions not to charge suspects or drop cases.

    How Keir Starmer has stood up for victims of crime

    Keir Starmer reformed the Crown Prosecution Service so that victims were listened to – as a result, conviction rates of sexual offences rose and victims were better supported.

    Conservative MPs in the Tory government at the time praised Keir for his work. The then Tory Attorney General, Dominic Greaves, described Keir Starmer as “one of the most successful directors of recent years” and “highly effective and someone who always behaved with great integrity”.

    What Labour will do to tackle crime

    Under the Conservatives, 90% of crimes now go unsolved. The Tories have hollowed out neighbourhood policing and taken a wrecking ball to the criminal justice system. That means more criminals being let off and more victims being let down.

    Labour has a long-term plan to take back our streets, with a first step to crack down on antisocial behaviour by putting 13,000 extra neighbourhood police and PCSOs on the beat.

    We will tackle violence against women and girls, prevent youth crime, and rebuild public confidence in policing and the criminal justice system with much-needed reform.

  • PRESS RELEASE : Nuclear safeguards – AUKUS statement to the IAEA Board of Governors [June 2024]

    PRESS RELEASE : Nuclear safeguards – AUKUS statement to the IAEA Board of Governors [June 2024]

    The press release issued by the Foreign Office on 7 June 2024.

    Statement by Australia, the UK and the US about AUKUS safeguards under the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty

    Chair,

    I take the floor on behalf of Australia, the United Kingdom, and the United States to respond to comments made regarding Australia’s acquisition of a naval nuclear propulsion capability. We expressed our position on this agenda item in our Note Verbale, dated May 30, 2024, and I will not repeat it here other than to reiterate that this item has never enjoyed consensus support and is not a standing agenda item. However, we feel compelled – once again – to invoke our Right of Reply to respond to the remarks made today.

    In response to a request in March and last November from my distinguished colleague who requested this agenda item, I and my counterparts from the United Kingdom and Australia have, indeed, sat and attentively listened to the remarks made today, just as we have done for two-and-a-half years. Unfortunately, much of what I have heard today, and what I have in fact heard under this item for the last two-and-a-half years, are serious mischaracterizations and misleading assertions from certain countries.

    These assertions continue to ignore or misrepresent the information we have provided in good faith, and to disregard the answers which the Director General has already provided in response to the questions asked. We express our deep concern about these mischaracterizations. We, and the large majority of Board members who have spoken in previous meetings on this topic, have expressed confidence in Director General Grossi’s handling and prerogative on this issue. Indeed, we note many member states expressed confidence in the Agency’s engagement with relevant parties on naval nuclear propulsion under Agenda item 6b at this Board. We have been clear that this agenda item is unnecessary.

    Chair,

    The People’s Republic of China and the Russian Federation have spoken multiple times over the last two days of the need to avoid politicization of the Board, particularly on issues that the Board and the Director General have deemed to be of significant concern such as Iran, the DPRK, and Syria’s failure to meet obligations in their Safeguards Agreements as well as on the nuclear safety, security, and safeguards implications of Russia’s illegal war in Ukraine. It is difficult to understand why these states do not apply their own logic to this issue. Why, when the Director General has expressed his satisfaction and a majority of the Board has expressed no desire for quarterly discussion on one country’s naval nuclear propulsion program, do we continue to have this item added to the agenda?

    The Director General has repeatedly stated that the Agency has “the necessary experience to develop the arrangements related to the use of nuclear material for naval nuclear propulsion in accordance with the Statute and relevant safeguards agreements.” The Director General has also made clear that Australia’s Article 14 arrangement will allow the Agency to continue to meet the technical safeguards objectives established for Australia, and that, once developed, it will be transmitted to the Board for appropriate action. Despite these statements, it remains deeply concerning that some states continue to call into question the Director General’s ability to perform the functions vested in him by the Statute, by the relevant safeguards agreements, and by decisions of the Board.

    One country has called for referring the matter to the Standing Advisory Group on Safeguards Implementation, known as SAGSI. Obviously, we fully support the Director General’s use of SAGSI as he sees fit and on technical matters within its remit. We defer to the Director General to determine whether to seek SAGSI’s input on naval nuclear propulsion, or, for that matter, any other technical issue relating to safeguards implementation. It is not this Board’s responsibility to dictate whether or how the Director General receives input from his own advisory group.

    Chair,

    The AUKUS partners have and will continue to engage consistently, openly, and transparently with Member States and the Secretariat on genuine questions. We welcome that the Agency has repeatedly reported its satisfaction with Australia’s engagement.

    Australia, the United Kingdom, and the United States have provided updates on relevant progress at all Board meetings since the initial AUKUS announcement in September 2021, and will do so again at this meeting under Any Other Business. We will continue to keep the Board updated on our engagement, as appropriate. Our three countries – along with the majority of the Board – continue to oppose any proposal for this item to be a standing agenda item or to establish any efforts that undermine and politicize the independent technical mandate of the IAEA. We reject any suggestion that the Agency does not have a mandate to engage bilaterally with Member States on issues relevant to the implementation of their safeguards commitments. We urge colleagues to continue to reject deliberate efforts to challenge the Agency’s independence and integrity. And we welcome the Director General’s commitment to continuing to provide updates to the Board as and when he deems appropriate.

    Thank you, Chair.

  • PRESS RELEASE : UK stands with Moldova as it seeks to safeguard the democratic choices of its people – UK statement to the OSCE [June 2024]

    PRESS RELEASE : UK stands with Moldova as it seeks to safeguard the democratic choices of its people – UK statement to the OSCE [June 2024]

    The press release issued by the Foreign Office on 6 June 2024.

    Ambassador Holland voices support for Moldova, as it pursues a bold reform agenda and builds its future in Europe, in line with the wishes of the Moldovan people – all while defending against increased attention from hostile actors.

    Thank you, Chair.

    The UK supports Moldova in its considered rejection of the claims made by the Russian delegation at the Permanent Council meeting on 23 May. The Moldovan delegation’s comments speak for themselves, but I would nonetheless like to voice the UK’s support for Moldova. This is a country which is pursuing a bold reform agenda and building its future in Europe, in line with the wishes of the Moldovan people – all while defending against increased attention from hostile actors.

    Firstly, the measured and proportional steps taken by Moldova in recent years have been necessary to address unprecedented levels of Russian disinformation, in an attempt to undermine Moldova’s democratic process. All Moldovans are entitled to credible and transparent journalism, free from propaganda and foreign interference. And as noted by my Moldovan colleague, Reporters without Borders placed Moldova 31st on the World Press Freedom Index. A well-earned position which demonstrates Moldova’s clear commitment to a free and independent media.

    Moldova’s commitment to OSCE principles on election integrity and election observation is similarly welcome, building on the commitments agreed by all participating States at Copenhagen. We commend Moldova’s longstanding and close cooperation with ODIHR, including Moldova’s recent request for a legal opinion on postal voting and their other work to follow up on ODIHR’s election recommendations.

    Regarding the Transnistrian settlement process, Russia’s request to resume the 5+2 format makes no sense. We would dearly have liked the 5+2 to continue but, as Russia well knows, it is on hold because Russia has chosen to pursue its illegal war of aggression against Ukraine, and will continue to be on hold until all sides agree to resume. The UK continues to support a peaceful settlement under the 1+1 format, and we are grateful to the parties on both sides of the Nistru for their persistence in seeking constructive dialogue despite Russia’s repeated attempts to instrumentalise the process.

    Madam Chair, it is ironic that many of the accusations made by the Russian delegation are a thinly veiled attempt to criticise them for taking the steps necessary to protect its democracy and territorial integrity from the very hybrid threats that Russia alone is responsible for. The UK stands resolutely with Moldova as it seeks to safeguard the democratic choices of its people.

    Thank you.

  • PRESS RELEASE : Russia’s violation of OSCE principles undermines comprehensive security in Europe – UK statement to the OSCE [June 2024]

    PRESS RELEASE : Russia’s violation of OSCE principles undermines comprehensive security in Europe – UK statement to the OSCE [June 2024]

    The press release issued by the Foreign Office on 6 June 2024.

    Ambassador Holland calls out Russia’s failure to live up to the commitments it signed up to in the OSCE’s Decalogue with its illegal full-scale invasion of Ukraine.

    Thank you, Madam Chair.  Each week in this Council, we confront the reality of what is taking place on the ground in Ukraine as a result of Russia’s illegal full-scale invasion.  And that is right. As long as it continues to fight this war, we should never stop confronting the Russian Federation with what their so-called Special Military Operation means for the people on the ground; the heroically brave Ukrainian Armed Forces, the first responders to Russian attacks on Ukraine’s infrastructure or the innocent civilian victims of Russia’s aggression. We should express our opposition and disgust at what is happening in the name of Russia in Ukraine – and hold Russia accountable.

    However, occasionally, it is also worth taking a step back to remind ourselves of what the Russian Federation has done to comprehensive security overall in our region by their violation in Ukraine of the principles, agreed at Helsinki, that sit at the heart of this organisation: specifically, the Decalogue. The Decalogue was adopted, by consensus – and that means all of us – nearly half a century ago.

    Looking at the Decalogue again, it is striking what a good job our predecessors did. If we were starting from scratch today to design a set of principles that should govern relations between the states of our region, I think and hope we would come out in a similar place.

    Take for example the first principle:

    “The participating States will respect each other’s sovereign equality and individuality as well as all the rights inherent in and encompassed by its sovereignty, including in particular the right of every State to juridical equality, to territorial integrity and to freedom and political independence. They will also respect each other’s right freely to choose and develop its political, social, economic and cultural systems as well as its right to determine its laws and regulations.

    “Within the framework of international law, all the participating States have equal rights and duties. They will respect each other’s right to define and conduct as it wishes its relations with other States in accordance with international law and in the spirit of the present Declaration. They consider that their frontiers can be changed, in accordance with international law, by peaceful means and by agreement.  They also have the right to belong or not to belong to international organizations, to be or not to be a party to bilateral or multilateral treaties including the right to be or not to be a party to treaties of alliance; they also have the right to neutrality.”

    Who among us would not want that principle applied to our own country?  None, I imagine.  Then why should that principle apply to 56 of us but not to Ukraine? The standards should apply to all of us. But that is clearly not the view of the Russian Federation who in invading Ukraine has driven a coach and horses through the principle of territorial integrity that they signed up to.

    So, Madam Chair, I would like to ask a direct question of the Russian delegation as to whether they consider Russia’s actions in Ukraine to be in conformity with this first Helsinki principle.  If so, could they please explain how?

    Thank you.

  • PRESS RELEASE : Appointment of Suffragan Bishop of Woolwich [June 2024]

    PRESS RELEASE : Appointment of Suffragan Bishop of Woolwich [June 2024]

    The press release issued by 10 Downing Street on 6 June 2024.

    The King has approved the nomination of The Venerable Alastair Cutting, Archdeacon of Lewisham & Greenwich, for nomination to the Suffragan See of Woolwich in the Diocese of Southwark in succession to the Right Reverend Karowei Dorgu following his untimely death.

    Background

    Alastair was educated at Westhill College, Birmingham University, trained for ministry at St. John’s, Nottingham, and gained a Masters at Heythrop College, London University. He served his title at All Saints Woodlands, Doncaster, in the Diocese of Sheffield and was ordained priest in 1988. He served as Assistant Curate at Wadsley from 1989 and in 1991 he was appointed Chaplain to The Nave Arts Centre and the Town Centre, Uxbridge, in the Diocese of London.

    In 1996, Alastair was appointed Vicar of Copthorne, West Sussex, in the Diocese of Chichester, and from 2010 he served as Vicar of Henfield and Rector of Shermanbury and Woodmancote. He was elected twice to General Synod, in Chichester and Southwark Dioceses, and twice also elected as ProProlocutor of the House of Clergy.

    Alastair has served in his current role as Archdeacon of Lewisham & Greenwich in the Diocese of Southwark since 2013.

  • Rishi Sunak – 2024 Speech on the 80th Anniversary of D-Day

    Rishi Sunak – 2024 Speech on the 80th Anniversary of D-Day

    The speech made by Rishi Sunak, the Prime Minister, on 6 June 2024.

    Eighty years ago, the weather broke – and the greatest invasion force in history left the shores of Britain to liberate Europe.

    We are here today to remember the sacrifice of the tens of thousands who did not make it home.

    And we are here to honour the service of those who did.

    Men like Ken Cooke.

    18 years old. He’d never been on a boat before. He’d never been on a beach before.

    Yet with his regiment, the Green Howards, he landed in the first wave to storm Gold Beach.

    Or Stan Ford, 19, who was manning a gun turret on HMS Fratton when a torpedo struck, blowing him into the water.

    The ship sank in 4 minutes. 31 of Stan’s shipmates were lost from a crew of 80.

    Or Royal Marine Dennis Donovan, who landed on Juno Beach alongside Canadian forces.

    They fought their way off the beach and into the bitter house-to-house fighting to take Langrune-sur-Mer.

    By the end of the first day, a quarter of his unit was dead or wounded.

    Ken, Stan, and Dennis are here today, alongside dozens of their fellow veterans.

    We are humbled to be with you. And for what you did that day, we will always be grateful.

    I can guess how they might feel when they hear us applaud their courage.

    “I’m no hero”, they will say. “I just did my duty”.

    That humility is so much a part of why they are truly the best of us.

    But to call one person a hero does not diminish the heroism of others.

    Each of you who contributed that day – sailor, soldier, aviator, civilian…

    …whether you fought on the beaches, or parachuted from the skies, or flew fighters or gliders…

    …whether you were an engineer, or a radio operator, or an intelligence officer…

    …your actions freed a continent and built a better world.

    You risked everything. And we owe you everything.

    We cannot possibly hope to repay that debt.

    But we can – and we must – pledge never to forget.

    After the war, many of you dedicated your lives to telling the story of what happened here.

    You sold poppies and raised millions for charity.

    You taught generations of young people about the horrors of war.

    You lived lives of quiet dignity and dedication in your homes, workplaces, communities.

    Yet with each passing year, it falls now to those of us who listened in awe to your stories…

    …to pass them on to our own children and grandchildren.

    Because only by remembering can we make certain that the cause you fought for…

    …and that so many of your friends and colleagues died for…

    …that great cause of freedom, peace, and democracy…

    …will never be taken for granted.

    That is why we come here today.

    That is why we honour our veterans – now and always.

    And that is why I ask those who can, to rise and please join me in giving our heroes the welcome they so deserve.