Tag: 2023

  • PRESS RELEASE : UN HRC52 – Statement on torture and other inhuman treatment [March 2023]

    PRESS RELEASE : UN HRC52 – Statement on torture and other inhuman treatment [March 2023]

    The press release issued on 14 March 2023.

    During the 52nd session of the UN Human Rights Council the UK delivered a statement on torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.

    Thank you, Mr. Vice-President

    We thank the Special Rapporteur for her report.

    The UK considers torture to be an abhorrent violation of human rights and human dignity. The UK continues to stand in solidarity with torture victims around the world. We owe it to survivors to hold perpetrators of torture to account.

    We must take a survivor-centred approach in investigating and prosecuting this serious crime. We must also work together to ensure real accountability when torture is used, including instances of rape and sexual and gender-based violence.

    The UK is a long-standing, vocal supporter of the Subcommittee for the Prevention of Torture, and other international mechanisms focussed on ending torture. We are committed to upholding our obligations under international law and call upon all states to do the same.

    The UK welcomes the Special Rapporteur’s report and recommendations. We note her grave concern about the lack of investigations into torture and other ill treatment. What steps would she advise to ensure more states uphold their duty to investigate crimes of torture in national law and practice?

    Thank you.

  • PRESS RELEASE : Developer remediation contract – Developers Who Have Signed and Not Signed Document [March 2023]

    PRESS RELEASE : Developer remediation contract – Developers Who Have Signed and Not Signed Document [March 2023]

    The press release issued by the Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities on 14 March 2023.

    Details

    The government wrote to housebuilders and mixed-use developers on 30 January 2023 saying that it expected them to sign the newly published developer remediation contract by 13 March 2023.

    Once signed, the contract requires developers to:

    • Take responsibility for all necessary work to address life-critical fire-safety defects arising from design and construction of buildings 11 metres and over in height that they developed or refurbished over the last 30 years in England.
    • Keep residents in those buildings informed on progress towards meeting this commitment.
    • Reimburse taxpayers for funding spent on remediating their buildings.

    These requirements reflect a public pledge signed by 49 developers last year. Once signed, the contract makes the pledge commitments legally binding.

    As of 14 March 2023, 39 developers had signed the contract.

    Four developers who signed the pledge were subsequently found not to have developed buildings within the scope of the contract. Those developers have therefore not been required to sign the contract at this stage. They may be asked to sign the contract in future if information emerges indicating that they did in fact develop buildings which are in scope.

    The government has made clear that eligible developers who refuse to sign the contract or fail to comply with its terms face significant consequences.

    Developers who have signed the contract:

    1. Allison Homes Group Limited
    2. Barratt Developments PLC
    3. Bellway PLC
    4. The Berkeley Group Holdings PLC
    5. Bewley Group Limited
    6. Bloor Investments Limited
    7. The British Land Company PLC
    8. Cala Group (Holdings) Limited
    9. Canary Wharf Group PLC
    10. C.G. Fry and Son Limited
    11. Churchill Retirement PLC
    12. Crest Nicholson Holdings PLC
    13. Croudace Homes Group Limited
    14. Fairview Holdings Limited
    15. Frasers Property (UK) Ltd
    16. MJ Gleeson PLC
    17. Grosvenor Group Limited
    18. Hill Holdings Limited
    19. Hopkins Home Group Limited
    20. Jelson Holdings Limited
    21. Keepmoat Limited
    22. Land Securities Group PLC
    23. Lifestory Holdings Limited (also covers Anthology Group)
    24. McCarthy & Stone Limited
    25. Miller Homes Limited
    26. Morgan Sindall Group PLC (parent company for Lovell and Muse)
    27. Morris Homes Group Limited
    28. Persimmon Public Limited Company
    29. Redrow PLC
    30. Rowland Group Limited
    31. Sorbon Group Limited (parent company for Shanly Homes)
    32. St Modwen Group Holdings Company Limited
    33. Story Homes Limited
    34. Strata Homes Group Limited
    35. Taylor Wimpey PLC
    36. Tilia Homes Limited
    37. Vistry Group PLC
    38. Weston Group PLC
    39. William Davis Homes

    The list of signatories will be kept up to date.

    Developers who signed the pledge but were subsequently found not to have developed buildings which are within its scope:

    1. Davidsons
    2. MacTaggart & Mickel
    3. Robertson
    4. Wain Homes

    Developers who have yet to sign the contract:

    1. Abbey Developments
    2. Avant
    3. Ballymore
    4. Dandara
    5. Emerson Group (Jones Homes)
    6. Galliard Homes
    7. Inland Homes
    8. Lendlease
    9. London Square
    10. Rydon Homes
    11. Telford Homes

  • PRESS RELEASE : Developers sign Gove’s building safety contract [March 2023]

    PRESS RELEASE : Developers sign Gove’s building safety contract [March 2023]

    The press release issued by the Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities on 14 March 2023.

    Thirty-nine of the country’s biggest developers have signed the contract providing relief for thousands of leaseholders and tenants.

    Michael Gove has secured the signatures of the country’s biggest housebuilders on the developer remediation contract, a major step toward ending the building safety scandal.

    Thirty-nine developers – including the top ten biggest housebuilders in the UK – all put pen to paper on the legally binding document before yesterday’s deadline and irreversibly committed themselves to fix unsafe buildings they developed or refurbished.

    Signatories represent a substantial proportion of the housing market, and the signed agreements will raise at least £2 billion for remediation costs.

    This will come as a welcome relief for the thousands of innocent leaseholders and tenants whose homes are covered by the contract. Developers will be legally bound to pay to fix their unsafe buildings and eligible developers who fail to sign will not be able to operate freely in the housing market.

    Following the contract deadline passing, Secretary of State for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities, Michael Gove, said:

    I have been clear all along – those that are responsible for this crisis must pay. So, I am grateful to those developers who have done the right thing today by signing this legally binding contract. We will be monitoring their progress on remediation very closely, to ensure this work is completed urgently and safely. For those developers that have taken responsibility, today offers the chance for a reset, so we can get on and build more of the safe, decent and affordable homes we so desperately need.

    To those developers that have failed to sign the contract without good reason, let me be very clear – we are coming after you. If you do not sign, you will not be able to operate freely in the housing market. Your investors will see that your business model is broken – only responsible developers are welcome here.

    But today should not be about developers, or about government. Today is about innocent leaseholders. I want to put on record my apology to all leaseholders for the years of misery and hardship you have endured. You should never have been ignored, asked to pay and let down.

    Today marks a turning point – and an important step towards resolving this crisis. There is so much more to do, but I will always act to protect leaseholders and end this injustice.

    Signatories are required to fix all life-critical fire-safety defects in all English buildings over 11 metres they had a role in developing or refurbishing. It also requires them to reimburse the taxpayer where government funds have already paid for remediation, with that money being used to make other buildings safe faster.

    For developers who have signed, their obligations start immediately. Leaseholders will benefit from a common framework of rights and responsibilities that will get their buildings fixed without them having to pay, and developers will be required to inform residents in affected buildings how they will be meeting these commitments.

    The Government will publish further information next week on how developers will be prohibited from carrying out major development or from receiving building control approval unless they sign and adhere to the contract, using Building Safety Act 2022 powers.

    Regulations will establish the Responsible Actors Scheme and set out the criteria for eligibility and the conditions of membership. Eligible developers who do not sign the contract will not be able to join the Scheme and will be subject to the prohibitions.

    Further information:

    • A list of developers who signed and did not sign the contract is published here.
  • PRESS RELEASE : UK addresses Security Council meeting on ‘Russophobia’ – UK at the UN [March 2023]

    PRESS RELEASE : UK addresses Security Council meeting on ‘Russophobia’ – UK at the UN [March 2023]

    The press release issued by the Foreign Office on 14 March 2023.

    Statement by Political Coordinator Fergus Eckersley at the Security Council meeting on ‘Russophobia’.

    Thank you President.

    Colleagues, Russophobia is one of the ever-growing list of excuses that Russia has come up with to justify its war in Ukraine.

    The fact that they are inventing so many of these is itself a good indication that they know none of them stands up to full scrutiny.

    Let me be clear, on behalf of the UK, and let me say it in Russian.

    Мы не русофобы. Наоборот, у нас есть исторические отношения между нашими странами.

    Мы вместе сражались в двух мировых войнах. Мы глубоко уважаем богатое культурное наследие России.

    Я сам семь лет изучал русский язык, его историю и замечательную литературу.

    [Translation: We do not suffer from Russophobia. We have a long history between our two countries. We fought together in two world wars. Across our country people respect and admire Russia’s rich cultural heritage.

    [I myself spent seven years studying Russia’s language, its history and its remarkable literature.]

    We do not want Russia to fail as a state, as the Russian delegation sometimes claims. Quite the opposite, in fact. We want Russia to be a stable and prosperous nation – just one that does not invade and try to annex its neighbours.

    What Ukraine wants, what we all want, is peace in line with the UN Charter.

    The problem in Ukraine today is not caused by Russophobia. It is caused by President Putin’s desire to annex a sovereign nation, in breach of the most fundamental principles of the UN Charter.

    So when the Russian state complains about Russophobia, what they actually object to, very simply, is Ukraine’s determination that it should remain an independent nation: its refusal to bend to Russia’s will and to give Russia its land.

    And in pursuit of Ukraine’s land, the Russian military has killed and injured many tens of thousands of Ukrainians, and displaced millions. There have been widespread reports of atrocities, with the Office of the Prosecutor General of Ukraine recording more than 70,000 potential war crimes so far.

    Hundreds of Ukrainian apartment buildings, train stations, hospitals and schools have been hit. Ukrainian cultural property has been looted and cultural heritage sites destroyed.

    And more than that. To build domestic support for his war, Putin’s government is pushing out propaganda about Ukraine, to dehumanise the people it is killing, and to delegitimise the country it is invading. All while falsely claiming that Russia is somehow the victim.

    In the run up to the invasion, President Putin called Ukraine an intolerable “anti-Russia” and declared that it was an “inalienable part of Russia’s own history, culture and spiritual space”.

    We have since heard relentless false claims, including from President Putin, that the Ukrainian government are ‘neo-Nazis’. And from former President Dmitry Medvedev that Ukrainians are “scum and freaks”, “cockroaches” and “grunting pigs”.

    The Russian government may believe that this propaganda will help to justify at home the lives of the tens of thousands of Russian soldiers who have been sacrificed.

    But the consequences for innocent civilians, for Ukraine as a nation state, and for the rest of the world are catastrophic.

    Colleagues, Russia is not under attack. There is only one aggressor here. So we must all tell the Russian government, very clearly, to turn off its war machine: to stop the invasion, to stop the killing, and to stop the propaganda.

    Thank you.

  • PRESS RELEASE : North Korea ballistic missile test [March 2023]

    PRESS RELEASE : North Korea ballistic missile test [March 2023]

    The press release issued by the Foreign Office on 14 March 2023.

    The Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office (FCDO) has issued a statement following reports that a missile has been launched by North Korea.

    “North Korea’s ballistic missile launches on 14 March are a breach of multiple UN Security Council resolutions. Unlawful ballistic missile launches pose a threat to regional peace and stability.

    “The UK will continue to call out violations of UNSCRs. We strongly urge North Korea to return to dialogue and take credible steps towards denuclearisation.”

  • Amanda Spielman – 2023 Speech at the Annual Apprenticeship Conference

    Amanda Spielman – 2023 Speech at the Annual Apprenticeship Conference

    The speech made by Amanda Spielman, the Chief Inspector of Ofsted, on 13 March 2023.

    Hello, and it’s good to be here, thank you for inviting me.

    State of the nation

    I want to start by recognising the great job that you do. In recent inspections, two thirds of apprenticeship providers have come out as good or outstanding. This shows that we have a lot of high-quality training in the sector – but of course, there is still work to do.

    High-quality apprenticeships are particularly important right now. They play such a big part in making sure that the economy has the right skills to grow. And while they may be mainly aimed at young people, they can be just as valuable for those wanting a career change.

    On a recent visit to a learning provider, I met Lauren. Lauren had already completed a childcare apprenticeship, but when she started working, she realised it wasn’t the right career for her. As she’d really enjoyed her first apprenticeship, she returned to the same learning provider for a business administration apprenticeship. And the learning provider then hired her, and she now works in their digital marketing team.

    This is a wonderful example of how your work makes a difference. You can help the country meet its skills needs. And you help individuals to find the career that works for them, personally and professionally.

    Workforce challenges

    The fact that so many of you are offering this kind of high-quality training is particularly impressive given some of the challenges you have faced and are still facing.

    Many of you are struggling with workforce pressures. Recruiting and retaining staff is difficult in all kinds of education, and beyond. And these difficulties are even greater for specialist staff, many of whom can earn far more working in their sectors.

    We also know that, with the current economic uncertainties, smaller employers are less willing to take on apprentices. So, opportunities for level 2 and level 3 apprenticeships are continuing to decline.

    English and maths

    And we know that many of your apprentices have had their education hampered by the pandemic. You may well have young people who are behind where you need them to be in English and maths. You may also be having to do more to work out which apprentices need additional help. This leaves you and their employer with the challenge of getting them get to the right level.

    We know that some of you have concerns about the reformed functional skills qualifications. You think they are harder to pass. The fact that pass rates are lower might support this, but of course there are other factors at play such as disruption to younger apprentices’ education.

    It is also important to remember that functional skills tests are summative tests not diagnostic assessments. They may not be the best tools to identify what apprentices still need to be taught. You need to assess their skills properly and make sure that you’re genuinely helping them to improve, not just to pass an assessment.

    Just think of all the subjects that you teach and all the different ways that you use English and maths every day. Care apprentices need to measure medicines accurately. Hospitality apprentices need to measure ingredients and calculate portion sizes. Business analyst apprentices need to interpret data and client requirements. Management apprentices need to communicate with their teams, write job specifications and create marketing materials. The list goes on, but these examples show how important English and maths are at every level and in every subject.

    So, you do need to think carefully about how to assess and improve your apprentices’ English and maths skills. You should be asking yourselves the questions:

    • Are you identifying apprentices’ starting points when they begin their training?
    • Are you using the information you gather to plan a suitable curriculum?
    • Are English and maths teachers working with vocational trainers to help apprentices learn these skills in a way that’s relevant to their other training?

    And it’s not just younger apprentices or those at lower levels who need help with English and maths. We recently visited a police constabulary that was training police community support officers as part of a level 4 apprenticeship. Those apprentices did need to be taught spelling and grammar because their notes and statements weren’t always fit to be used as evidence in court.

    Ready for work

    We do also know that some new apprentices don’t have a good attitude to work. They may not have done any work experience in school or college, nor had a part-time job. This can make the start of on-the job training difficult and strain employer relationships which also adds to your workload.

    Funding

    Of course, funding plays a big part in many of these challenges, and in their solutions. We know there are concerns about the complexity of the apprenticeship levy. And we know that several billion pounds have been returned to the Treasury since the levy was introduced which could have funded many more apprenticeships.

    It’s encouraging to hear that the amount being returned is declining which could indicate that businesses are taking on more apprentices. But these new apprenticeships tend to be at higher levels, which are more costly to teach. And the recent data does show a further decline in starts at levels 2 and 3 and for under-19s. Skills gaps often are at the lowest levels, and it is important to maximise opportunities for under-19s.

    We welcome the UCAS announcement that it’s extending its service to apprenticeship vacancies. Along with initiatives to improve school careers guidance, this could significantly improve young people’s awareness and take-up of apprenticeships.

    We also welcome the Institute’s announcement that it’s reviewing funding for the 20 highest enrolling apprenticeships. But we know that some of you are already cutting apprenticeships because they aren’t economically viable. In a few cases, providers are leaving the market completely. We know that the sector is resilient and reactive, but it’s wasteful to lose good capacity only to have to rebuild it.

    I hope that these kinds of changes can accelerate improvement in the sector. We will continue to play our part by highlighting good practice and identifying what needs to improve.

    A need for improvement

    Because, while many of you are doing a great job, we do have concerns about some parts of the sector. We know the current environment is tough, but it is our role to report on the quality of provision as we find it. We will always acknowledge the context, but we can’t soft-pedal on inspection. That wouldn’t be fair to you, and it wouldn’t be fair to the apprentices you train. And by reporting accurately, we can then make a case for systemic change when it’s needed.

    We are concerned about the slow pace of improvement particularly among new providers. The picture is improving and the proportion who aren’t doing well enough at their first inspection has declined. But that proportion is still too high despite all the information, guidance and support that is available.

    Looking at our judgements, we cannot ignore that apprenticeships are the worst performing type of provision in the further education and skills sector.

    Achievement rates

    So, we do welcome the DfE setting a target of 67% for apprenticeship achievement rates. But it’s important to think about why achievement rates are often so low.

    The pandemic, yes it had an impact, but achievement rates were often too low even before this. And it’s worth noting that the apprentices who do take their end-point assessment are very likely to pass. The big challenge is apprentices leaving before they finish their training.

    And of course, there are various reasons for this. They include poor-quality tuition that doesn’t include meaningful practical experience, employers not releasing staff for off-the-job training or just not enough opportunities for on-the-job training.

    Low wages in childcare, hospitality, adult care, and other sectors means that some apprentices are leaving for higher paid roles. This is obviously understandable in the current climate, and different skills aren’t always equally rewarded. But it’s worth asking yourself questions:

    • Could I be doing more to explain the longer-term benefits of apprenticeships?
    • Do my apprentices understand the importance of a career path over a short-term pay boost?
    • Am I acting with integrity when I recruit apprentices?

    All these factors must be considered and tackled if the DfE target is to be met.

    We know that low achievement rates don’t necessarily indicate a problem with the provider. When we inspect, we won’t hold previously low achievement rates against you. But we will want to see that you know the reasons for low rates and have taken actions to improve them where you can.

    High-quality educational experience

    Of course, the most important factors in determining whether apprentices complete their programmes are the quality of the training and the experience.

    Apprentices need high-quality training from skilled and experienced staff. You need to plan it well and teach it in a coherent order. You need to balance the on- and off-the-job elements carefully. You need to know what will be learnt and when, and your apprentices should know this too.

    You need to think about how and in what order you’re going to teach the knowledge and skills. If your hairdressing apprentices need to colour a client’s hair, you obviously need to teach them the practical skills. But you also need to teach them the health and safety aspects around using colouring chemicals. And you’ll need to teach them the skills to hold a client consultation.

    You also need to consider the apprentice’s experience. Online learning and self-study can be part of that. But they can also be a toxic combination when they’re overused or used too soon in an apprenticeship.

    I know that many of you balance these factors well but failing to do so can damage apprentices’ motivation and enthusiasm. If an apprentice spends most of their first 3 months studying at home on their own, we can hardly be surprised if they drop out.

    So, it is important to think about how and why you use these methods. It can be appropriate when it improves the apprentices’ experiences or prepares them well for work in their chosen sector. But it shouldn’t be for your convenience or to save money.

    Other sessions

    We know that part of the value we can add is engaging and supporting you with training. As usual, we’re offering several workshops at this conference. They are being run by our knowledgeable HMI, so you’ll be able to talk directly to the people who come to inspect you.

    The workshop topics reflect the areas where we think we can offer the most help.

    We have a session on on- and off-the-job training and the important relationship between these 2 elements.

    To try and help those of you who are newer to the sector, we have a session on how we inspect. Understanding more about new provider monitoring visits and about full inspections will help those of you who haven’t already got this experience in your team.

    And on both days, we’re running our ever popular ‘Ask the Inspector’ sessions. We really do want to do everything that we can to demystify the process. These sessions give you the chance to ask inspectors whatever you want. Pretty much the only thing they won’t tell you is the date of your next inspection!

    Thank you again for listening. I’m happy to take questions and I’m going to be joined on the platform by Paul Joyce, who is our Deputy Director for Further Education and Skills, and he will join me in answering them.

    Thank you.

  • PRESS RELEASE : Change of His Majesty’s Ambassador to Turkmenistan [March 2023]

    PRESS RELEASE : Change of His Majesty’s Ambassador to Turkmenistan [March 2023]

    The press release issued by the Foreign Office on 14 March 2023.

    Mr Stephen Conlon has been appointed His Majesty’s Ambassador to Turkmenistan in succession to Ms Lucia Wilde who will be transferring to another Civil Service appointment. Mr Conlon will take up his appointment during May 2023.

    Curriculum vitae

    Full name: Stephen Austin Conlon

    Married to: Ruta Conlon (née Taraskeviciute)

    Children: Two

    Date Role
    2022 to present Full Time Language Training (Russian)
    2020 to 2022 Brussels, UK Mission to the EU, Head of European Parliament Team
    2017 to 2020 United Kingdom Permanent Representation to the European Union, Head of European Parliament Team
    2014 to 2017 United Kingdom Permanent Representation to the European Union, Food Safety and Veterinary Attaché
    2009 to 2014 Vilnius, Deputy Head of Mission, Chargé d’Affaires and Her Majesty’s Consul
    2004 to 2008 Helsinki, Director of UK Trade and Investment
    2004 FCO, Desk Officer, EU Department (Internal), later Full Time Language Training (Finnish)
    2003 Stockholm, Trade Attaché
    2001 to 2003 FCO, Desk Officer for EU Environment & Food Safety, EU Department (Internal)
    1997 to 2001 The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, United Nations Economic Commission for Europe and the World Economic Forum, Desk Officer, Economic Policy Department
  • Andrew Adonis – 2023 Comments on HS2 Delays

    Andrew Adonis – 2023 Comments on HS2 Delays

    The comments made by Andrew Adonis on Twitter on 10 March 2023.

    A big mistake to delay HS2 north of Birmingham. It will add to costs and delay benefits. Also puts Manchester at huge competitive disadvantage to Birmingham for a decade or more. Birmingham will be barely half an hour from London by HS2, while Manchester will be more than 2 hours.

    Birmingham will also have an HS2 connection directly into Elizabeth Line at Old Oak Common, whereas Manchester won’t (at Euston) which means onward journeys to West End, City and Canary Wharf will be far slower and more congested from Manchester.

  • PRESS RELEASE : UN HRC52 – Statement on human rights while countering terrorism [March 2023]

    PRESS RELEASE : UN HRC52 – Statement on human rights while countering terrorism [March 2023]

    The press release issued by the Foreign Office on 14 March 2023.

    At the 52nd session of the UN Human Rights Council in Geneva, the UK delivered a statement on human rights and fundamental freedoms while countering terrorism.

    Thank you, Mr Vice-President.

    The UK would like to thank the Special Rapporteur for her latest Report on the implications of the development, use and transfer of new technologies, and for her contribution to the promotion of human rights in countering terrorism over the course of her six-year mandate, which is drawing to a close this summer.

    The UK strongly believes that to be truly effective, our counter terrorism and counter violent extremism efforts must respect human rights.

    In line with this, the UK welcomes the recommendations of the Special Rapporteur. The use of biometric information helps us combat terrorism, but it must be used in compliance with human rights law. The UK stands ready to engage with member states to support this objective, building our capability and capacity to counter terrorism whilst protecting and promoting human rights around the world.

    With this in mind, we would like to ask the Special Rapporteur what more could be done by States to ensure that human rights are respected in the deployment of new technologies when it comes to countering terrorism.

    Thank you.

  • Siobhain McDonagh – 2023 Speech on Brain Tumour Research Funding

    Siobhain McDonagh – 2023 Speech on Brain Tumour Research Funding

    The speech made by Siobhain McDonagh, the Labour MP for Mitcham and Morden, in the House of Commons on 9 March 2023.

    I crave the indulgence of the House for the speech that I am about to make.

    On 27 November 2021, my beautiful, unique, tough, resilient, successful sister collapsed in front of me and had a series of fits. Five hours later, in University College Hospital, two doctors named Henry told me that they suspected that she had a brain tumour, but as this was the NHS, MRI scans were not done at the weekend, so they could not confirm their diagnosis. On Wednesday, when I stepped on to her ward, she demanded—and everybody here who knows her will be able to hear her say it—that I ask the ward doctor to come and speak to her. She said, “It’s bad, Siobhain, because he can’t look at me.” And it was.

    For the woman who had run Labour’s only two consecutive successful general election campaigns, and achieved her ultimate ambition to see two full-term Labour Governments, the diagnosis was of a glioblastoma. All her toughness evaporated, and there was my little sister with a diagnosis that meant that she might have nine months left—a condition for which there was no cure, for which treatment had not made progress in over 30 years. Just before Christmas, she had the tumours removed by two amazing female surgeons, Róisín Finn and Anna Miserocchi at the National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, but this was post Brexit, so there were not enough nurses to keep all the operating theatres open, and Margaret’s operation was cancelled three times. I leave it to Members to guess my reaction to that, and how we got that operation in the end.

    The best piece of advice I have ever received in my life, and I have received many bits of good advice, was from the clinical nurse specialist. When we asked her where Margaret should go for post-operative treatment— St George’s, down the road from where we live; the Royal Marsden, around the corner; or to stay at University College—Róisín said, “We have Professor Paul Mulholland, and he is the best. He is the best in the UK, and he is the best in Europe.” I want to confirm to the House that he is the best. He is why Margaret is still alive.

    What you get when you have your tumour removed, if you live that long—many people do not—is six weeks’ radiotherapy, followed by six months’ chemotherapy with a drug called temozolomide. That drug was introduced in 2005, and since then there have been no variations to the gold-standard treatment in our NHS, so when you read articles such as the one in The Times on Monday, telling us all how successful cancer treatment in the UK is—how 85% of people with a breast cancer diagnosis, 55% of people with a bowel cancer diagnosis, and 98% of people with a prostate cancer diagnosis will get to live for 10 years—do not believe that it is the same for brain cancer. The Times may have chosen a brain as the photograph for the top of the article, but those statistics do not apply.

    Margaret had her treatment in early new year 2022; like so many, she could not go through with it—the treatment would have killed her. At that point, where do you go? There were no alternatives. It is not that there are a few trials: there are no trials, and there is nowhere to go. So, like so many of us who are lucky enough to have friends and family and access to money, we looked to the private sector and international travel. Margaret has been on a course of treatment with nivolumab, a Bristol Myers Squibb drug that was seen to be unsuccessful in the treatment of brain cancer, and Avastin, and has been going monthly to Düsseldorf, Germany for four days. That might seem an easy thing to do, but taking a seriously ill person on an aeroplane to a hotel, with no access to healthcare and no emergency services, would be foolhardy unless there was nothing else in this country. There was, and is, nothing.

    The help that we received from Dr Sahinbas and his wife, who runs their small clinic in Germany, with hyperthermic treatment was amazing. Their kindness was overwhelming, but there were times when I thought that I would not be able to get Margaret on the plane—that somebody would stop her because she was so unwell. There was one night when I stayed and stared at her, because I did not think she was going to make it through the night, and how would I explain that to anybody?

    By June 2022, Margaret had a scan, and they could not see the tumour. When I asked Dr Mulholland, “Is this normal for this treatment?”, he said, “Normal? I have never tried this on anybody before.” Nobody has ever had this drug so early in their treatment or at the quantity that Margaret has had it, or at the same time as hyperthermia therapy. Those who know about Margaret’s experience have come to me and sought support from Dr Mulholland because there is nothing else. The number that the NHS is currently forsaking and, for the lucky people who can get the funds to do it, abandoning to international travel is nothing short of a complete and utter national scandal. I wonder what my mum who came here in 1947 to train as part of the first generation of NHS nurses from Ireland would say about the NHS abandoning her daughter.

    But things can be different. Things can be better—maybe not today, maybe not tomorrow, maybe not next year, and maybe not within Margaret’s lifetime—and they can be different if we want them to be different. I ask the Minister to please not give the NHS or the cancer research charities any more money until they guarantee that at least 200 sufferers every year get access to a trial—that would be 1,000 patients over the lifetime of a Parliament—because with those trials we can begin to understand what works and what does not.

    The Minister should give no more money to the NHS trainers until they commit that every young doctor training to be a medical oncologist has to go through a course on brain tumour. At the moment, there is no compulsory training. The reason why there is nobody on those wards and nobody doing the work is that we are training nobody, and we are training nobody because nobody is required to do the course, and it was like that 15 years ago with melanoma. Some 15 years ago, the survival rates were so poor, but somebody came up with the idea that immunotherapy would be successful, and today we see successful survival rates equivalent to the best in any discipline. We also see young doctors wanting to take on the specialism, because it is exciting, there is hope, there is a future and there are alternatives.

    Who in their right mind today would become a medical oncologist in glioblastoma? There is no hope, no future, no trials—nothing. It would have to be someone with the belligerence and tenacity of my sister Margaret, and we have found that person in Paul Mulholland, but there needs to be more Pauls and more determination. We must have access to trials for 200 people and the training of medical oncologists, and we must require the pharmaceutical industry—because we will make no progress without it—to trial every drug that gets licensed to deal with tumours on those with brain tumours, so that there is access to existing drugs that can be repurposed.

    I am sorry about the time I have taken for this speech, but I want to tell the House that when I go to bed tonight I will keep my ear open for Margaret to hear her call my name, I will get up and I will go into her room, and it may be that she is asleep and I have imagined that she has called me. I accept that. That is my duty. It is what I have learned from my family, from my faith and from my politics. I accept that. That is my duty. It is what I have learned from my family, what I have learned from my faith, and what I have learned from my politics. I accept my responsibility. All that I want is for the NHS, cancer research charities, and pharmaceutical companies to stand up and accept their responsibility, and give some hope to the 3,200 people who will be diagnosed with a glioblastoma this year.