Tag: 2022

  • Suella Braverman – 2022 Joint Statement from UK and France on Small Boat Incident in the Channel

    Suella Braverman – 2022 Joint Statement from UK and France on Small Boat Incident in the Channel

    The joint statement made by Suella Braverman, the Home Secretary, and Gérald Darmanin, the French Minister of Interior and Overseas Territories of France, on 14 December 2022.

    Early this morning authorities were alerted to an incident in the Channel concerning a small boat in distress. Regrettably, multiple fatalities have been confirmed.

    Our thoughts are with everyone affected by this tragic event, and on behalf of the UK and France, we send our deepest condolences to the loved ones of those involved.

    There has been a coordinated response to this terrible tragedy, with UK and French actors working side by side. We commend the engagement of all those involved.

    This tragic incident – like the loss of at least 27 people on 24 November last year – is a stark reminder of the urgent need to destroy the business model of people-smugglers.

    We have prevented more than 30,000 crossings so far this year, and together with other European partners, including Europol, we have made over 500 arrests since 2020.

    We recently agreed on a renewed bilateral framework to tackle illegal migration, with closer joint working and intelligence sharing, more French officers equipped with cutting-edge technology patrolling the French coast and UK and French officers working with each other’s law enforcement teams as embedded observers.

    We also held a meeting in Calais format (Germany, Belgium, France, Great Britain, Netherlands) in Brussels on 8 December and resolved, with our European neighbours, to intensify our police, border and judicial cooperation, with the support of EU agencies.

    Today’s tragic incident underlines the importance of taking this forward together.

  • George Freeman – 2022 Speech at Keio University in Japan

    George Freeman – 2022 Speech at Keio University in Japan

    The speech made by George Freeman, the UK Minister for Science, Research and Innovation, in Tokyo on 14 December 2022.

    Thank you, Ambassador, for that kind introduction.

    Good morning, everyone.

    It is a pleasure to be here today, representing the United Kingdom in Japan as Minister for Science, Research, Technology and Innovation.

    Thank you to the Times Higher Education for inviting me here to speak and to Keio University for so kindly hosting us.

    It’s a particular personal pleasure for me to be here on behalf of UK with our longstanding global ally Japan in one of the great R+D Powerhouse nations in this great university (especially given the leading role which this university has played in the human genome project, one of the world’s greatest science success stories) at this event with so many distinguished leaders to make some important announcements about UK global science and diplomacy and our Science Superpower mission.

    But it’s also a particular pleasure having had a 15-year career in the UK bioscience venture capital sector before coming to Parliament.

    In the UK we have a longstanding joke that if you come to Parliament with any particular expertise the Whips will ensure you end up doing something unrelated!

    I seem to be the exception that proves the rule!

    Elected after a 15-year career in science, research, technology and innovation founding, financing and managing technology start-up companies, I’ve somehow managed to spend 12 years in Parliament on this agenda.

    As the first UK Minister for Life Science (launching our ground-breaking 100k Genomics program and Accelerated Access Reforms).

    As the first Minister for Agri-tech launching our Agri-tech Industrial Strategy.

    As the first UK Minister for the Future of Transport and Transport Tech.

    Now as UK Minister for Science, Research, Technology and Innovation.

    But in each role and all the time persuading Prime Ministers through the tumultuous last decade that science, research, technology and innovation is key to both UK economic prosperity, global sustainability and security.

    Security?

    Yes. I want to suggest that science is as key to long term global and national security as our military hardware.

    Because in a world where lack of food, energy and water represent such massive global challenges – and geopolitical tensions – our security is increasingly shaped as much by our ability to prevent and cure disease, feed 9 billion mouths, prevent the famine and poverty driving the mass population dislocation in Africa, help lessen our dependence on Russia and China for energy and strengthen global commitment to our values as by our military might.

    But, of course, soft and hard security and soft and hard power go together.

    As we have seen in Ukraine with the appalling attack by a brutal Kremlin war machine determined to flex its muscles, divide the world and test the resolve of the “West”.

    It’s a test for all of us and one that our 2 nations have made very clear we will stand up to and pass – with our recent announcement of the new UK Japan Italy next generation fighter technology project.

    But I’m here today to focus on the other: the soft power and security that comes from science and technology leadership.

    UK mission

    The UK has taken the opportunity of the last decade (the Crash, Austerity, Brexit, Pandemic and War) to reset out global economic and geopolitical vision, mission and strategy.

    Our recent Integrated Review sets out a clear analysis of the UK’s place in an increasingly dangerous world.

    At its heart is a strategic commitment to science, research, technology and innovation.

    It’s reflected in a series of important policy reforms:

    First, our strategic commitment to significantly increase the level and role of science, research, technology and innovation in our economy for improved economic growth, productivity, international competitiveness, inward investment, technological sovereignty, industrial resilience, global security and geopolitical soft power.

    Second, the establishment alongside the National Security Council of the National Science and Technology Council, (NSTC) chaired by the Prime Minister, with the top half of Cabinet, myself as Science Minister and our National Science and Technology Adviser my good friend Patrick Vallance, to whom I’d like to pay tribute and put on record my personal thanks for all he has done for UK Science and Technology in his years as UK Chief Science and Technology Adviser as he comes to the end of his term this spring.

    Third, our 30% increase in public R+D over 3 years announced by the Prime Minister when Chancellor twelve months ago and now protected by Chancellor Hunt last month in a necessarily difficult budget.

    Alongside our 30% increase between 2022 and 2027 – to be matched by private sector, pension reforms in the City of London to boost scale-up finance and use of post-Brexit freedoms in Procurement and Regulation to support the UK Technology sector.

    As Minister for Science, Research, Technology and Innovation I’m responsible for 75% of the UK budget. That’s £11 billion per annum and £40 billion over CSR.

    But I’ve set up an Inter-Ministerial Group of the other key Ministers across other Delts with big R+D budgets.

    I’ve framed the Mission in 2 parts.

    Science Superpower

    Our Science Superpower mission isn’t about a militarisation or aggressive sovereignty in science – it’s about delivering 6 key objectives:

    One: world class science in an increasingly competitive world

    Two: Global Impact for global good

    Three: attracting much more global R+D inward investment

    Four: recognising science demands global career and talent paths

    Five: insisting on the values of scientia: free speech, critical thinking, challenge.

    Six: harnessing demonstrable UK commitment to these for geopolitical soft power.

    This means reforming our research funding and career ecosystem to ensure we continue to punch above our weight in world class research.

    Deepening our collaborations with R+D powerhouses, like Japan.

    Improving the global impact of and inward investment into UK R+D.

    Widening global talent pathways and international research collaboration.

    And maximising UK science, technology and innovation leadership for global geopolitical soft power influence in tackling the big challenges facing our planet.

    Innovation Nation

    To be a Science Superpower (as opposed to an academic powerhouse) you have to also be an Innovation Economy linking our R to D: Research AND Development.

    Better connecting our science base to the City, using our post-Brexit Regulatory and Procurement freedoms to help make the UK a global test-bed and scale-up hub for innovation.

    Widening the regional R+D footprint by nurturing the clusters of innovation around our whole country using our global leverage to help technology transfer and inward Investment in R+D.

    This means improving the depth and breadth of the innovation economy across the UK through supporting the regional clusters of STI excellence around the UK.

    Increasing investment in the Catapult network and improving successful commercialisation of UK innovation through better industry partnerships and spin/out and scale-up financing and more strategic use of HMG levers through regulation, procurement and global technology transfer.

    Fundamentally this is about Britain’s role in the world.

    The urgency of post-pandemic economic recovery and the growing geopolitical importance of strategic UK science, research, technology and innovation leadership in an increasingly competitive, and in places hostile, global landscape make these missions increasingly central to the UK’s role in the world.

    In all the defining global grand challenges, science is playing an increasingly pivotal role in Food, Medicine, Energy, Global warming, Net Zero and Cleantech, Oceans, Space, Quantum and Compound semiconductors.

    The pace of technology is driving the new dawn of a new era in global development.

    The prize is huge.

    Food security through Agri-tech (that means doubling world food production on the same land area with half as much energy and water by 2050).

    Energy security through new energy technologies. Climate security through Cleantech. Biosecurity and public health through Life science and med-tech. Clean oceans. Safe space. Secure data, research and IP.

    We are the generation who have to deliver.

    For our children and their children.

    But it will require all who share the same commitment to science for global good to stand for it.

    In a world in which the global race for science, research, technology and innovation is increasingly dominated by China (£240 billion pa), the USA (£180 billion pa + defense = £300 billion pa).

    The rest us are going to have to work increasingly closely together.

    The EU programs impasse

    The European Union has rightly spotted this as an opportunity and makes much of its destiny as the “3rd global bloc”.

    In our Brexit negotiations we carefully negotiated to stay in the EU research programs: Horizon, Euratom and Copernicus.

    Sadly, the EU has decided to punish the UK for Brexit by weaponizing science for political pressure.

    Association to Horizon Europe remains the UK’s aim and we are continuing to push actively for Association with Science Ministers across Europe – most recently in Paris last week (where you will have seen we made a £1.75bn commitment to a range of missions and programs key to UK Space science and industry).

    But whilst we push for Association, I am clear that we cannot allow UK researchers to be “benched” indefinitely while we wait.

    If we cannot play in the European Cup of science, we must play in the World Cup of science.

    So we have made clear that we will provide the interim and “in-flight” funding guarantee to honour the commitment at CSR21 that the money earmarked for Horizon would be invested in UK and international research if and while association continues to be blocked.

    But we simply cannot allow the Horizon block to hold back UK research any longer. Our priority is to invest in the UK’s R&D sector, if necessary through alternative programmes.

    That’s why the Chancellor announced the £480 million research support package of additional research spending that is targeted at those institutions most affected by the Horizon impasse.

    The new ISPF

    But we plan to go further. Today I’m announcing the first part of a package of additional funding for international research through the International Science Partnership Fund (ISPF).

    This is alongside our commitment to deploy, if necessary, the £15 billion ringfenced funds for Horizon for alternative programs to further support strong international UK research.

    As set out in July, this package of funding is structured around 4 key pillars.

    The Flagship Fellowships (Early, Mid and Late-Stage Career).

    The Technologies of Tomorrow and Industrial Innovation Challenges.

    Global Challenge Collaborations.

    And world class research infrastructure.

    I want to stress that in pursuing these we are not closing the door on the Horizon negotiations. But simply honouring the commitment we made to UK researchers that we will ensure the money that we would have received through Horizon will not be lost to UK research.

    The ISPF is designed to support research programs in themes and countries which align well with the UK’S Integrated Review.

    That’s why, today, I am delighted to announce the launch of phase one of our International Science Partnerships Fund.

    We will use this initial £119 million ISPF funding to support our scientists, researchers, and innovators to collaborate with colleagues around the world in tackling the great global research challenges of our time.

    No country better fits that profile than Japan which is why I’ve come here today to announce it.

    Japan

    Few countries can match Japan when it comes to R+D.

    Total expenditure (in 2020) on R+D £128 billion, 3.59% of GDP, 72% (£92 billion) from the private sector.

    951,000 researchers, 5th in 2021 Nature Index (UK 4th!), 13th in Global Innovation Index (UK 4th).

    World class universities, the second most Nobel Prizes in natural sciences including Manabe (modelling of earth’s climate) 2021, Yoshino (Lithium Ion Batteries) 2019, Honjo (Cancer) 2018, Ohsumi (autophage) 2016, Kajita (neutrinos) 2015, Omura (parasites) 2015, Amano and Akasaki (blue LED) 2014.

    Nine Moonshot Programmes, £1 billion Strategic Innovation Program and WPI Centres.

    And the UK and Japan have a long and distinguished history of research.

    The UK is Japan’s fourth biggest research collaborator.

    Japan is UK’s fourteenth biggest research collaborator.

    UK / Japan research quality is 3.5 times the world average. That’s higher than our average with USA, Germany or China.

    In medicine – it’s over 6.5 times the average!

    In 2019 UK researchers are the fourth largest group of visiting researchers

    The UK is the second most popular destination for Japanese researchers on mid to long term placements.

    And we have a range of joint projects including Ai (recently agreed with my Colleague and co-chair of Council for Ai – Secretary of State Michelle Donellan). The next generation fighter platform. CoVID 19. Space Situational Awareness. Nuclear decommissioning. Regenerative medicine. And Marine sensor technology.

    In the past two decades alone, we’ve seen the likes of Tim Peake and Yamazaki Naoko working together in the International Space Centre in the ice beneath Japanese barley sitting securely alongside British brassicas in the Svalbard Global Seed Vault…

    …and, given where we are, it would be remiss of me not to mention again the human genome project, which we’ve seen complete its sequencing of the DNA shared by each and every one of us here today.

    DNA science which was the key to discovering the Covid vaccine and stopping the coronavirus pandemic which threatened to put a stop to so much scientific collaboration, doing real damage to research, but also highlighted just how vital this collaboration is, as the foundation for a future where security and prosperity can be enjoyed by all.

    Scientific collaboration between our two countries goes back centuries. Almost 160 years ago, the Choshu five arrived in London after a 135-day journey.

    Enrolling at University College London, under the mentorship of Alexander Williamson, these men embraced life in Victorian Britain and Bloomsbury’s burgeoning scientific scene.

    When they returned to Japan, each of these ‘five fathers’ drew on what they learnt to transform their country with technology.

    Inoue Masaru used his civil engineering education to become the founding president of the Japanese Board of Railways.

    Yamao Yozo established the Imperial College of Engineering, Japan’s first institute of technology.

    And Ito Hirobumi as the first Prime Minister of Japan, shaped the constitution of the Meiji era and remodelled the political, social, and economic life of a nation newly open to the world around it.

    For much of the century and a half since, Japan has led the way… and the UK has benefitted.

    On rail, the same transformative technology that powers the Shinkansen is driving forward change in Britain’s high-speed rail network.

    On road, the lithium-ion battery brought to Japanese markets over three decades ago is now the cornerstone of our expanding electric vehicle industry.

    On screen, Japanese calculators, cameras, and computers kick-started our digital revolution – and continue to represent the cutting edge in our tech market today.

    And in our ears, digital recording has changed the way generations of British citizens listen to one another, whether with turntables, Walkmans, CDs, Blue Ray or the revival of cassettes.

    In the past century, we’ve each succeeded in large part thanks to the strength of our collaboration…

    …underpinned by our common commitment to academic freedom and a shared belief in the value of bottom up, peer-reviewed, and foundational research, supported by state-of-the-art facilities and adopted by excellent industries.

    Just take our first-class universities.

    From Cambridge to Kyoto, we are working together to lead top quality research in regenerative medicine, following our joint research call in 2020.

    This year, we’re celebrating the 10th anniversary of RENKEI, a consortium of universities who are improving collaboration between our young academics.

    The RENKEI winter school, hosted by Kyoto University, will establish a new UK-Japan network of climate change early career researchers.

    But we both know that it’s not just about what goes on inside academia – it’s about getting research out there in the world, driving up growth and unlocking new sectors, industries, jobs, and skills.

    Both through established industries leading and embracing innovation, and venture-backed start-ups and spin-outs.

    Because it’s our innovative enterprises who are leading the way in quantum, in Ai, in biotechnology and in fusion.

    I am looking forward to meeting Kyoto Fusioneering later this week, an exciting spinout who are leading the development of advanced fusion reactor technologies here in Japan – technologies which could completely transform the way we generate our energy in future.

    In the UK, we have launched our own fusion strategy, with a world-first pro-innovation regulatory framework published in summer 2022 and plans for the world’s first Industrial fusion plant via UKAEA Spherical Topomak.

    And – like our universities – our enterprises are joining up, too.

    Just take Amphibio and Azul Energy, who – with funding from UKRI and NEDO – are partnering to combine zero-waste, automated digital 3D knitting technology and metal-air batteries to manufacture seamless, safe, and sustainable waterproof clothing.

    Nowhere is this story of collaboration stronger than in space.

    Last year UKSA and JAXA marked a milestone moment by signing a Memorandum of Cooperation.

    But we haven’t just heard words; we’ve seen action, too.

    Whether it’s our universities and agencies getting together to tackle space junk…

    …or our businesses like Astroscale, a Japan-UK collaboration whose ELSA-d mission has done truly pioneering work to demonstrate the core technologies necessary for debris docking and removal.

    I have no doubt, then, that ISPF funding will be a game-changer for scientific collaboration between our countries.

    But ISPF is only part of the picture for the UK and Japan.

    We hope to announce more research calls to come.

    And we’ve agreed to work together on open joint research programmes…

    …to develop targeted strategic research programmes exploring our space, marine, and polar environments, providing a critical boost to our shared decarbonisation efforts…

    …and to improve our collaboration in digital and aerospace…

    Hyper-K announcement

    And it’s not just our researchers. We’re also committed to supporting the shared infrastructure which they need to succeed.

    I’m proud today to announce that we’re investing £15.5 million for the construction of the Hyper-K neutrino project, on top of the £4.2 million we invested during the research and development phase.

    This is a pioneering project, the likes of which the world has never seen.

    Buried under a mountain to avoid interference from cosmic rays, Hyper-K will be a ‘microscope’ to unveil the mysteries of the elusive neutron, the most abundant (but perhaps the least understood) matter particle in the universe.

    But it will also be a ‘telescope’ for observing the sources of these neutrinos, from the Sun and supernovas to black holes and dark matter.

    Hyper-K could help us to answer the fundamental questions which remain for the Standard Model of Particle Physics, the way we understand the basic building blocks of our universe.

    And we know that it will support scientific research at every level, and in every participating country, including the UK, where our very own Professors Francesca Di Lodovico and Dave Wark are leading ground-breaking neutrino research.

    And I am delighted that we in the UK are doing our bit to get it up and running.

    New British Council grants program called Reconnect to help boost Indo -Asia Pacific academic collaborations

    That’s why – with the legacy of the Choshu five still with us – I am also delighted to announce a new grants programme called ‘Reconnect’, funded by the British Council, to help teams of academics across the Indo-Pacific region to join up following the disruption of the Coronavirus pandemic.

    Today, the British Council is opening a call for proposals structured around our shared priorities, across Synthetic Biology, Ocean science, Healthy ageing, Clean Energy, Advanced materials and Quantum computing.

    This visit

    Over the next 3 days I’m honoured and delighted to be visiting and meeting some of the top people and research institutes across this R+D powerhouse economy: Keio University, Presidents and Executives of Japanese Universities, JAXA Tsukuba Space Centre, J-PARC Japan Proton Accelerator Complex, JAEA Naraha Center for Remote Control / Nuclear Robotics Technology Development, Kyoto Fusioneering, Minister Takaichi, Prof Ueyama, State Minister Nakatani, Minister Nagaoka, Prof Hashimoto and Tokyo Uni Edge Capital Partners.

    Over these 23 visits and meetings I hope we can deepen our two nations’ longstanding history of science and research collaboration, identify ways we can extend our work for mutual benefit and promote greater academic and investment collaborations and exchange.

    But something else too. To send a clear message that global science, research, technology and innovation can’t be dominated by just China (or the USA) but requires international partnerships rooted in shared values and a shared commitment to “scientia” as a force for good in the world.

    International scientific collaboration demands mutual respect for some key frameworks that underpin science free speech, the rule of law, open science, respect for intellectual property, research security and integrity which I’m delighted and grateful Japan has agreed to prioritise in the G7 Science Summit in Sendai in Japan in May.

    That just as our two great nations deepen our collaboration for military defence and security, so we will also deepen our collaboration in science, research, technology and innovation for peaceful, sustainable geopolitical development and soft power.

    By working together in robust defence of our shared commitment to the values of democracy, peace, freedom and mutuality which underpin our shared humanity we can both make the world a safer place for our children, and our countries more prosperous and secure.

  • PRESS RELEASE : British High Commissioner in The Bahamas – we are a Proud Partner with The Bahamas on Security, Diplomacy, Trade and Investment [December 2022]

    PRESS RELEASE : British High Commissioner in The Bahamas – we are a Proud Partner with The Bahamas on Security, Diplomacy, Trade and Investment [December 2022]

    The press release issued by the Foreign Office on 14 December 2022.

    British High Commissioner, Tom Hartley, reflects on the strong ties between the UK and The Bahamas.

    UK Foreign Secretary James Cleverly described the role of diplomats in his recent foreign policy speech; he spoke of the importance of ‘investing in relationships based on patient diplomacy, on respect, on solidarity, and a willingness to listen.’ These characteristics are the foundation of the strong ties between the UK and The Bahamas, who are proud partners on security, diplomacy, trade, and investment.

    On the occasion of the 217thanniversary of Trafalgar Day, His Excellency Sir Cornelius Smith, ON, GCM; The Honourable Wayne Munroe, KC, Minister of National Security; Dr. Raymond King, Commodore of the Royal Bahamas Defence Force; Mrs. Ann Marie Davis, spouse of The Honourable Philip ‘Brave Davis, KC, Prime Minister; Captain Gregg Gellman, Senior Defence Attaché, United States Embassy; Mrs. Dellareece Ferguson and Mr. Zhivago Dames, Assistant Commissioners, Royal Bahamas Police Force; and other important partners on security attended a traditional Trafalgar dinner at the official British Residence with His Excellency the British High Commissioner, Thomas Hartley.

    Trafalgar provided the opportunity to, between courses, discuss a shared vision of strategic leadership in the security space highlight the UK’s work in the region, including the Royal Navy’s response to hurricanes Dorian, Matthew, and Joaquin, the establishment of a new UK Defence Academy for the Caribbean, in Jamaica, more naval officer training at Dartmouth, and other opportunities for Bahamian RBDF officers.

    Four months into his appointment British High Commissioner Tom Hartley said:

    I am here to listen, learn, and reflect on how we can strengthen people to people ties.

    It was my pleasure to welcome to the Residence the Governor General, First Lady, Ministers, and strategic Bahamian partners on security, and host a black tie traditional Trafalgar Day event – as a modern celebration of the partnership between UK and Bahamian Defence forces.

    At this Trafalgar Day dinner, I came to learn about the history of the Royal Bahamas Defence Force, founded in 1980 and now one of the largest navies in the Commonwealth Caribbean.

    Joined by UK Defence Attaché Colonel Simon Westlake RM, we were surrounded by an incredible group of Bahamians who embody the spirit of the Royal Marines and Royal Bahamas Defence Force in their courage, determination and capacity to endure the seas even during the most extreme natural hazards such as they witnessed post hurricane Dorian.

    I am truly impressed by their service and our partnership, and proud that over the years so many RBDF officers have received training at the finest naval academy in the world, the Britannia Royal Naval College, Dartmouth (UK), including Commodore Raymond King himself.

    The British High Commissioner continues to engage with Bahamian leaders and communities, as he listens and learns to their priorities for the UK-Bahamas relationship, and how the British High Commission can help. Most recently he welcomed to the Residence representatives from the Bahamian government, community and junkanoo groups, artists, environmental leaders, British university graduates, foreign embassies, legal professionals, the chamber of commerce, and the business and banking sectors for a Christmas cocktail to discuss opportunities in 2023. High Commissioner Hartley reflected:

    Last evening, my wife Jennie and our three children welcomed colleagues, partners, friends and neighbours to Christmas Cocktails. I was so pleased to be able to host such a diverse group of attendees and hear their vision for the UK-Bahamas relationship in 2023 and beyond.

    It’s clear my priorities for engagement in 2023 must include more trade and investment, more scholarships, supporting The Bahamas’ environmental protection priorities, an strengthening our international cooperation.

    I hope to work on re-establishing the British business group, and bringing a trade mission from the UK to strengthen links in financial services, food and drink, infrastructure, and tourism to The Bahamas, and to encourage more Bahamian exports to the UK. Building on the great success of Chevening, I will also work hard to secure more scholarships for applicants to British universities, as well as other training and educational links, and to celebrate Bahamian and British sport, art, and music as part of the 50th anniversary celebrations.

    There is much to look forward to, building on the existing strong links.

  • PRESS RELEASE : We take seriously our role in strengthening the multilateral system – UK Statement at the Security Council [December 2022]

    PRESS RELEASE : We take seriously our role in strengthening the multilateral system – UK Statement at the Security Council [December 2022]

    The press release issued by the Foreign Office on 14 December 2022.

    Ambassador Barbara Woodward’s statement at the Security Council meeting on reformed multilateralism.

    Thank you, President. I join others in thanking the Secretary General and the President of the General Assembly for opening our debate and their leadership on this issue.

    The UK has long-supported multilateralism, and we remain deeply committed to it today.

    We take seriously our role in strengthening the multilateral system, and supporting the rules-based international order.

    This is more important than ever. Today, as we’ve heard, we face extraordinary, complex, and interconnected challenges.

    This includes the global threat posed by climate change, and alarming violations of human rights that have a disproportionate impact on women and girls.

    With Russia’s illegal invasion of Ukraine, we have also witnessed a permanent member of the Security Council violating the UN Charter and flouting the principles of sovereignty and territorial integrity.

    In the face of these challenges, the UN as a whole, and the Security Council, must continue to take decisive action.

    However, the world today is very different to the one that gave birth to the UN in 1945.  So it is right that we consider how the UN and the multilateral system should evolve.

    The Security Council must, as others have said, become more representative of the world today and the UK has long called for its expansion, in both the permanent and non-permanent categories.

    As the UK Foreign Secretary publicly reiterated this week, we support new permanent seats for Brazil, Germany, India and Japan, and permanent African representation.

    We also look forward to the resumption of the General Assembly’s Intergovernmental Negotiations on Security Council reform, and hope to see these progress to a text in the New Year.

    Beyond the Security Council, the UK welcomes the Secretary-General’s efforts to advance wider UN reform.

    We strongly support his reform agenda and vision for a UN 2.0, better adapted to the challenges of the twenty-first century.

    We also welcome the Secretary-General’s report on ‘Our Common Agenda,’ seeking to turbocharge delivery of the Sustainable Development Goals. As we know, these have been set back by the pandemic and the global energy and food crises.

    The new Agenda for Peace, in particular, will set new ambition for the UN’s response to international peace and security and we welcome the further detail the Secretary-General set out today.

    Through better data use, analysis, innovation and strategic foresight we can unlock the full potential of the UN. This must also be accompanied by a focus on results.

    Beyond this, we support reform efforts with international financial institutions, and admire the momentum built by the Prime Minister of Barbados, Her Excellency Mia Mottley.

    The UK is driving forward many of the objectives of the Bridgetown Agenda, including on greater finance provision, the G20’s Capital Adequacy Framework Review and on climate change financing.

    In closing, Madam President, I quote from the Foreign Secretary’s speech this week, we all benefit from the wisdom and compassion of those leaders who created the laws and institutions that prevent a relapse to the old order where the strong prey on the weak.

    So in conclusion, Madam President, we will continue working with our partners to ensure that the UN, and the multilateral system as a whole, is best-positioned to respond to the complex challenges of today’s world.

    I thank you for convening today’s debate.

  • Claudia Webbe – 2022 Speech on Benefit Sanctions

    Claudia Webbe – 2022 Speech on Benefit Sanctions

    The speech made by Claudia Webbe, the Independent MP for Leicester East, in Westminster Hall, the House of Commons, on 13 December 2022.

    It is a pleasure to serve under your chairship, Mr Pritchard. I thank the hon. Member for Glasgow South West (Chris Stephens) for securing this valuable and important debate.

    The Government claim that evidence clearly shows that their sanctions regime is clear, fair and effective in getting people into work, so why are they hiding data from experts who want to study that effectiveness? Benefits sanctions are an utterly inhumane blunt instrument that have not been shown to be effective in their supposed aim. Instead, almost every study that has looked at the benefit sanctions regime seems to include the word “cruel”—indeed, it is “pointlessly cruel” according to a Select Committee report, and “cruel”, “inhumane” and “degrading” according to academics. That is what the experts conducting those studies have found.

    The sanctions regime is enormously disproportionate and punitive: a complete withdrawal of support for missing a single jobcentre appointment. Examples of people sanctioned because of illness, a lack of wi-fi connectivity or other reasons outside their control are easy to find. That cruelty can be imposed with little effective scrutiny for up to three years. The organisation Feeding Britain reported that in Leicester, one woman with two children was sanctioned after she missed appointments as a result of going to Iraq to look after her sick father. It left her in a terrible state, with bills and rent arrears. Another referral over the summer had his appointment with his work coach rearranged because the work coach was not in. He was then sanctioned because whoever was standing in for the work coach rearranged the appointment to be earlier, and he missed it.

    The UK is an international outlier in this cruelty. Indeed, the UK is unique among OECD nations in using sanctions to punish claimants. A Bristol University Press publication on the impact of sanctions shows that they are largely ineffective and often make people more likely to remain out of work. This consciously cruel regime is operating at record levels—more than double its pre-pandemic numbers—in the middle of a cost of living crisis, and a huge number of working people in my constituency of Leicester East are being sanctioned for not accepting zero-hours contracts to top up their incomes.

    Of course, the more vulnerable a claimant, the greater the impact of this conscious cruelty. The Government cannot claim to be unaware of this, as they have been repeatedly warned by MPs, academics and advocate groups about the huge damage being done. Rethink Mental Illness recently called for an immediate halt to sanctions, with the group’s chief executive officer describing them as

    “incredibly damaging to people’s mental health”

    because of

    “the massive financial and psychological impact”

    of sanctions and of the fear that they might be imposed.

    Speaking of the more than doubling of the number of sanctions, David Webster of the University of Glasgow said:

    “A Universal Credit claimant is now more likely”—

    in the midst of the worst cost of living crisis in living memory—

    “to be under a sanction than to have Covid”,

    which is a truly horrifying illustration. Dr Webster also accused the Government of withholding information about the scale of the crisis they have created. That is not a new phenomenon. As we have heard, in February the Government blocked access to data for academics who simply wanted simply to study whether benefit sanctions were driving up suicide rates, bringing a vital study that was already under way to an immediate halt. Even for the Conservative party, this is an astonishing level of disregard for people’s mental health and, indeed, for their lives. It is institutional cruelty.

    It is time to end the culture of secrecy about the impacts and effectiveness of the Government’s benefit sanctions policy. Will the Minister commit the Government to releasing this data? It is an open secret that information already in the public domain showed that a staggering 43% of unemployed disability benefit claimants had attempted to take their own lives because of the horrors inflicted on them, and that was in 2018—long before the sanctions reached their current appalling high level.

    Sanctions are indeed pointlessly cruel, inhumane and degrading. If the Government think that the facts show otherwise, why are they hiding them?

  • Kenny MacAskill – 2022 Speech on Benefit Sanctions

    Kenny MacAskill – 2022 Speech on Benefit Sanctions

    The speech made by Kenny MacAskill, the Alba MP for East Lothian, in Westminster Hall, the House of Commons, on 13 December 2022.

    I congratulate the hon. Member for Glasgow South West (Chris Stephens) on introducing this important issue that it is very appropriate to debate at this time. I will start by saying what this debate is not about. It is not about benefit fraud, in case the Daily Mail or others thought it was. That is rare—far rarer than tax avoidance—but it is dealt with by criminal prosecution, and rightly so because it is about public funds.

    Equally, I do not believe that anyone is suggesting that there should be no sanctions. What is required is an appropriate form of sanctions in every walk of life, whether in a social club or a political party. If someone transgresses, there have to be repercussions. If we breach the rules here, we can rightly face sanctions. I am a former chair of the judicial panel of the Scottish Football Association; even in sport, if someone breaks the laws through misconduct on or off the park, they will rightly face some challenge. The issue is that the extent of it is far too great, certainly at a time of huge austerity.

    More importantly, it is about the reasonableness and proportionality of sanctions. Players do not get banned sine die for two minor yellow cards in a football match, yet people are facing something that would almost bring them to the end of their life. Equally, it is about the circumstances in which these sanctions are being imposed. There has to be some understanding of the individual we are dealing with and the circumstances in which they are living, as opposed to having draconian measures.

    It is well over 40 years since I graduated in law. I did welfare law as part of my law degree. At that stage, it was national insurance and supplementary benefit. Even then, when supplementary benefit was brought in in the Beveridge plan, it was set at a level that was the very minimum upon which someone could live. But our circumstances have changed since then. Not simply have we gone through mass unemployment; we have moved towards a gig economy and people in vulnerable occupations. We have moved away from the national insurance supplementary benefit scheme to universal credit. That has caused challenges and difficulties, but it seems that the moral compass has been lost. We have lost any element of compassion. Looking back, sanctions did apply to national insurance and supplementary benefit, but they were proportional, reasonable and certainly not to the extent that we have today.

    Three issues follow from that. As has been mentioned by the hon. Member for Glasgow South West and others, punishment is being exacted upon those who work in the Department for Work and Pensions. They are threatened with punishment, and potentially with dismissal, if they do not get their number of sanctions up. That is simply unacceptable. This should be not a target-driven system, but a welfare state and a welfare system. It should be about the individual and the circumstances, not any spurious targets.

    We know from PCS and other whistleblowers that many people worry that if they do not enforce a sanction against an individual, they will face consequences. That is simply unacceptable. That is not simply from the PCS; we know it from welfare rights officers. Any welfare rights officer in any constituency will tell a similar tale. It even goes beyond that. We see it in fiction on television and cinema screens. It is a few years now since “I, Daniel Blake” came out—an award-winning movie that highlighted the difficulties and, indeed, tragedy of the sanctions scheme. It is a few years past now, but the circumstances remain. I am fortunate to have been a friend of that film’s writer for over 40 years, and I know that although the movie was fictional, it was based on fact. As we would meet and discuss, he would tell me about the meetings he had had with people at food banks, trade union representatives and welfare representatives. He told me stories, such as that of the woman who had a miscarriage, who was unable to get to her appointment with the DWP and who was sanctioned, or the young father who rushed to the hospital to be at the birth of his child, whose sister phoned the DWP to say, “He cannot come; he’s gone to see the birth of his child. Surely that will be okay.” No, it wasn’t, because when he next turned up, he found himself sanctioned.

    Those stories are not fiction: they are fact, and that is simply unacceptable. That is why it was not Paul Laverty but Ken Loach, who filmed the movie, who described our benefits system as “institutionalised cruelty”. The sanctions system is institutionalised cruelty, because we are taking the most vulnerable people—those who have the least income at a time of inclement weather, rising costs and enforced austerity, when work can be hard to find as unemployment figures are going up—and treating them harshly.

    It is not even as if it works. As other Members have mentioned, many of these people, if not most of them, have significant challenges, whether with mental health, educational difficulties, or—as shown in “I, Daniel Blake”—simply being able to access IT. In some instances, it can be the inability to access the equipment; in other instances, it can be a generational gap. I am challenged by IT systems, and people of my age who do not have access to those systems will be even more challenged. Sanctions do not help those people; what they require is more of a mentoring scheme.

    In summary, what we have to do and what the Minister must try to move towards is a system that by all means contains sanctions for those who fundamentally breach it, because that is unacceptable to those who pay their taxes and abide by the law, but where an individual is challenged, they have to be supported. Where an individual has reasonable, proportionate circumstances and an explanation, they most certainly should not be punished, and we most certainly should not see people being treated harshly as a result of a tick-box system to get the figures up. That is fundamentally wrong. It would not apply in most private businesses, and it certainly should not apply in a welfare state.

  • Beth Winter – 2022 Speech on Benefit Sanctions

    Beth Winter – 2022 Speech on Benefit Sanctions

    The speech made by Beth Winter, the Labour MP for Cynon Valley, in Westminster Hall, the House of Commons, on 13 December 2022.

    I, too, congratulate the hon. Member for Glasgow South West (Chris Stephens) on securing this important debate and on all the amazing work he does on this issue. As we know, inflation is at a 40-year high, energy bills are rising, real wages have fallen for the last 13 months, the number of people living in deep poverty is increasing and we are living through a cost of living emergency. It is in that context that sanctions are being applied to people in receipt of social security benefits.

    I have to start by reiterating the points made by my hon. Friend the Member for Easington (Grahame Morris). Sanctions are by their nature punitive, but continuing to operate them in such an aggressive manner in the worst cost of living crisis for a generation is actively harmful to the individuals who suffer, as my hon. Friend illustrated with horrific examples of people who have lost their lives as a result, but also to the wider economy and society. The scale of sanctions is totally unacceptable. They simply drive people into far greater debt and greater poverty, and punish people for things that are no fault of their own. People are in these situations because they may have lost their job or fallen on difficult times, and they are being punished for that. We should be supporting people in those circumstances.

    It is little wonder that the Public Law Project has said that sanctions “do not work” and has referred to them as “a presumption of guilt”, or that the Welfare Conditionality project has found:

    “Benefit sanctions do little to enhance people’s motivation to prepare for, seek, or enter paid work. They routinely trigger profoundly negative personal, financial, health and behavioural outcomes”.

    Yet despite the overwhelming evidence that sanctions do not work, the DWP is using them more and more. Statistics from November show that more than 320,000 adverse sanctions decisions were made across the UK this year alone, up to July. The number of people subject to sanctions continues to grow. In August 2022, 115,000 people—6.5% of all recipients—were subject to them in one month. We can compare that with August 2021, when the figure was only 18,000. Like my right hon. Friend the Member for Hayes and Harlington (John McDonnell), I would be particularly interested to hear the Minister explain why there has been such an astronomical increase in the use of sanctions. Why that has happened is just beyond me.

    The latest sanctions were worth, on average, £262 a month. That is nearly a third of the average UC payment. This is a full-frontal attack on universal credit recipients that must end.

    In my opinion, the Government should end completely the sanctions regime, especially during this inflation and cost of living crisis, just as they did during the covid pandemic. They need to conduct a review of the impact on poverty, ill health and employment. They can also look to improve the application of easements and allow decision makers to cancel sanctions—the list goes on of measures that the Government could and should introduce.

    I want to take this opportunity to say something about the deductions that are taken from almost 2.1 million claimants to repay debts. I recently submitted a written question on the issue to the DWP, which responded that 3,300 universal credit recipients in my constituency of Cynon Valley are subject to deductions for debts and overpayments. That is 52% of all recipients. A majority of those who use universal credit as a lifeline are having some taken away. People cannot afford those deductions. I back campaigners’ calls to convert them into grants or to write off the debts completely, which would be a much better solution. The Government must seriously consider those proposals, and at least adopt the Work and Pensions Committee’s recommendation that debt repayments be paused.

    From the contributions today and the overwhelming evidence, it is clear that the sanctions system is ineffectual and extremely cruel to the most vulnerable people in our society, whom we should be supporting and helping. Prior to entering this place, I worked for many years as an advice worker, and I worked with lots of people who were suffering from homelessness. I also volunteered in a food bank. The number of people who had to access the service because their benefits had been stopped was unbelievable. They were people who were in work or who were suffering mental health problems. There were families. A gentleman who came in with his three children had been unable to attend his benefits appointment because one of his children was ill; he was sanctioned for two weeks. In the 21st century, that is absolutely appalling. It beggars belief.

    The use of decision makers who are not known to the individuals being sanctioned is completely inhumane. I worked with a lot of older people who are digitally excluded and unable to navigate the system. People are penalised because they are excluded from a system that is, quite frankly, designed to prevent people from accessing an entitlement. That is what benefits are: they are an entitlement that people should be allowed to access.

    The sanctions system completely fails to achieve its stated objective, which is to encourage compliance and people’s return to employment. It has the opposite effect, and I talk from experience: it alienates, unfairly punishes and stigmatises people. All of that has a serious detrimental impact on people’s health and wellbeing. Instead of punishing people, the Government should overhaul the social security system, so that it provides people with an adequate payment that prevents poverty—rather than pushing people into poverty, as the current system does—encourages and enables people to find employment, and treats people with dignity. The current system does not treat people with dignity.

    Other measures might include the reinstatement of the £20 UC uplift and its extension to those on legacy benefits, the ending of the five-week waiting period and the removal of the two-child limit. Lots of changes could and should be made to the social security benefit system. With 40% of UC claimants in work, it is clear that wages in this country are insufficient, which is why I and many others here support the campaign for a £15 minimum wage.

    The crisis that the Government’s approach is causing is the reason for the increasing calls in Wales, for instance from the Bevan Foundation, for a Welsh benefits system. The Welsh Affairs Committee has said that the Government should assess the merits of devolving the administration of benefits to Wales, as happened in Scotland. In yesterday’s Westminster Hall debate on pensions, I said that £1.7 billion of pension credit is unclaimed. The figure for unclaimed means-tested benefits is £15 billion. Some 7 million people in this country are not claiming what they are entitled to. I really wish the Government would spend more time ensuring that those people who are not claiming get what they are entitled to than punishing people in dire straits.

    There are many problems with the Government’s approach, but very little interest in a solution. I would be interested to hear from the Minister why there has been such a significant increase in sanctions and what evidence the Government have that they work. All the evidence that I have seen is to the contrary. Can the Minister respond on the suspension of punitive sanctions, debt and overpayment deductions, the role of the decision maker and the question of devolution in Wales? Let me finish by congratulating again the hon. Member for Glasgow South West on securing this debate. I fear that we will revisit this issue if things do not change.

  • Grahame Morris – 2022 Speech on Benefit Sanctions

    Grahame Morris – 2022 Speech on Benefit Sanctions

    The speech made by Grahame Morris, the Labour MP for Easington, in Westminster Hall, the House of Commons, on the 13 December 2022.

    It is always a pleasure to serve under your chairmanship, Mr Pritchard. I will endeavour to heed your advice about the timings. I thank my good and honourable friend and comrade, the hon. Member for Glasgow South West (Chris Stephens), for securing this important debate. I also congratulate him on his assiduous work in questioning Ministers, both in the Chamber and with the use of written questions. I also thank him for sharing the figures that he has discovered—the constituency-based figures—with other Members.

    In my remarks, I will first go over the purpose of universal credit and look at the level of sanctions. I also want to stress the human cost of sanctions. Universal credit is the last line of the social security safety net. It is set at a level no one should fall below. By any standard, it is set at a very low level. Let us just remind ourselves that for a single person under 25 the standard allowance—this is a monthly allowance not a weekly allowance—is £265.31. There are additional premiums for disability and so on, but the standard allowance is intended to cover council tax, utilities, food, clothing and other bills. Sometimes the housing element does not meet the full rent, so there is a top-up element for rent as well.

    For a couple over 25, the standard allowance is £525.27. In a functioning economy, housing, heat and food should not be scarce commodities. They should be readily available, whether an individual is retired, employed —many people are in low-paid, insecure employment—or in receipt of social security. Universal credit should alleviate poverty. Instead, sanctions are entrenching hardship and destitution. It is a terrible shame that the Government do not put the same effort into hunting down tax evasion and apply sanctions against the very wealthy individuals who evade payment of many millions of pounds in the tax that they owe.

    The level of sanctions is excessive. I thank again the hon. Member for Glasgow South West for highlighting the figures and sharing them. He mentioned that throughout the whole country the figures are as follows: in June 2020, there was over £34 million in sanctions; in July 2022, a little under £35 million; and in August 2022, £36,397,000—£36.5 million basically. If we total those together, sanctions at that level is almost half a billion pounds a year.

    Where is the one-nation, caring and compassionate Conservative party, if the Government force people into poverty and destitution, particularly those who are vulnerable? My right hon. Friend the Member for Hayes and Harlington (John McDonnell) quoted the figures for his constituency, but the figures are worse for my constituency of Easington. Deductions amount to roughly £75,000 a month from people who are in the direst hardship before the deductions for advance payments, for bedroom tax, or overpayments caused by administrative error or neglect.

    The hon. Member for Glasgow South West made a great point about digital exclusion and the number of people who simply cannot access the system because they do not have even a basic smartphone or the wi-fi connectivity to be able to do that. The consequence is rising poverty, growing queues at food banks, and now the need for the voluntary and community sector to create warm spaces to accommodate people and at least give them a hot drink and some shelter, particularly in this terrible cold weather that we are experiencing. Sanctions harm society and can have tragic consequences.

    I want to quote a BBC article dated 10 May 2021. It is a moving piece entitled “Deaths of people on benefits prompt inquiry call”. The article states:

    “Cases where people claiming benefits died or came to serious harm have led to more than 150 government reviews since 2012”.

    It highlights cases, including this one:

    “Ms Day, 27, who had been diagnosed with emotionally unstable personality disorder, had previously said her benefit claim left her feeling ‘inhuman’, her sister told the BBC.”

    After Ms Day’s death, the inquest concluded that the authorities made 28 errors in managing her case.

    In another case:

    “Errol Graham starved to death in 2018 while seriously mentally ill. His benefits were stopped when he failed to attend a work capability assessment and did not respond to calls, letters or home visits from the DWP. When his body was found, Mr Graham weighed four-and-a-half stone (30kg) and his family said he had used pliers to pull out his teeth.”

    We need to end the sanctions culture. It harms society, leaves the poorest in destitution and places the sick, the ill and the disabled in extreme circumstances in which they can often see no way out. The Minister can act by introducing a moratorium on sanctions. Sanctions should not be used routinely; they should instead be reserved as a last resort for the most extreme circumstances and cases. This is a matter of life and death. The Minister has an immense responsibility to safeguard those in need and the vulnerable. I urge him not to fail them as his predecessors have failed them, and to end the sanctions culture we have today.

  • PRESS RELEASE : New Permanent Secretary, Gareth Davies, appointed to the Department for International Trade [December 2022]

    PRESS RELEASE : New Permanent Secretary, Gareth Davies, appointed to the Department for International Trade [December 2022]

    The press release issued by the Department for International Trade on 14 December 2022.

    The Cabinet Secretary has appointed Gareth Davies as the new Permanent Secretary to the Department for International Trade.

    The Cabinet Secretary, with the approval of the Prime Minister, has appointed Gareth Davies as the new Permanent Secretary at the Department for International Trade (DIT).

    Gareth succeeds James Bowler who took up a new role as Permanent Secretary to HM Treasury in October. Gareth will take up his new role early in the new year.

    Gareth will support the Rt Hon Kemi Badenoch MP, the Secretary of State for International Trade and President of the Board of Trade, and her Ministerial team and be responsible for leadership of the Department.

    Gareth brings with him invaluable experience from his current role as Second Permanent Secretary at the Department for Transport and from his time as Director General in the Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy.

    Earlier in his career, Gareth led the Prime Minister’s Strategy Unit and worked in 10 Downing Street and spent over a decade in the private sector.

    International Trade Secretary Kemi Badenoch said:

    I’m delighted Gareth is taking on this role at a hugely important moment in the UK’s journey as an independent trading nation.

    Gareth’s experience in both Government and business will help the UK win more valuable investment, boost our exports and secure world class trade deals.

    He will also lead the department’s work with international partners to confront threats to the global market and show the UK as a beacon of free trade.

    The Cabinet Secretary said:

    I would like to congratulate Gareth on his appointment. Gareth takes on this vital leadership role in government at a critical time for UK trade and brings a wealth of experience from a variety of roles in government and the private sector.

    I would also like to thank Crawford Falconer for his strong leadership of the department since October.

    Gareth Davies said:

    I am delighted to have been asked to lead the Department for International Trade at this crucial time. We will only get back to growth if companies have the confidence to invest and export.

    The Department can be rightly proud of its achievements over its first six years. I’m looking forward to working with the Secretary of State and the leadership team to open up new markets, support companies across the country to trade and protect British businesses from unfair competition.

    About Gareth Davies

    • Gareth is currently Second Permanent Secretary at DfT where his responsibilities include decarbonising transport, technology, international and security. Prior to this, Gareth was a Director General in the department. He has also been Director General in the Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy.
    • Gareth has spent over a decade in the private sector. He has worked for AIA, the life insurance company based in Hong Kong. He started his career in PriceWaterhouseCoopers, working across Central and Eastern Europe.
    • Plans to identify his successor will be announced in due course.
  • PRESS RELEASE : UK statement at the UN vote on ending Iran’s membership on the Commission on the Status of Women [December 2022]

    PRESS RELEASE : UK statement at the UN vote on ending Iran’s membership on the Commission on the Status of Women [December 2022]

    The press release issued by the Mayor of London on 14 December 2022.

    Ambassador Barbara Woodward delivered a statement to the UN Economic and Social Council.

    Madam President, thank you.

    The death of Mahsa Amini was a shocking reminder of the repression facing women and girls in Iran. Since her death, the Iranian people’s message has been clear: they will no longer tolerate violence and oppression at the hands of their own government.

    The people of Iran demand that women and girls’ rights be respected, and so do we.

    That’s why the UK will vote in favour of the resolution to remove Iran from the Commission on the Status of Women.

    Let me expand on that in three points:

    First, the Commission on the Status of Women is the world’s main body dedicated to the promotion of gender equality. In recent weeks, Iran has tightened its oppression of women and girls. Its actions are inconsistent with the objectives of the Commission and are incompatible with membership.

    Second, the severity of Iran’s brutal and disproportionate state-sponsored use of force against protesters calling for “Woman, Life, Freedom” over the past several weeks have appalled the world. Here at the UN, we cannot sit by and allow the violence that led to the arrest and death of Mahsa Amini to continue with impunity.

    Third, instead of engaging with the international community, the Iranian government has responded by deepening its violent oppression. 350 people have died, including over 60 children; 14,000 people have been arrested; and Iran has begun executing people for exercising their right to peaceful assembly.

    So we urge every ECOSOC member to vote yes on this resolution: vote yes to remove Iran from CSW, vote yes to ensure accountability for Iran’s actions, and vote yes to support women and girls – like Mahsa – in Iran. The UK will vote in solidarity with them.

    Thank you.