Tag: 2020

  • Louise Haigh – 2020 Comments on Providing Guidance for Businesses in Northern Ireland

    Louise Haigh – 2020 Comments on Providing Guidance for Businesses in Northern Ireland

    Below is the text of the comments made by Louise Haigh, the Shadow Secretary of State for Northern Ireland, on 2 July 2020.

    Ministers wasted eight months insisting these checks would never be needed. Businesses are still in the dark and the new system to manage these checks doesn’t yet exist.

    The Government needs to say clearly what businesses need to do, what proportion of goods will face physical checks and how they are going to help Northern Irish businesses weather these new costs.

    This level of incompetence would be irresponsible at any time but, right now, it is completely reckless. Jobs have already been lost and their cavalier approach risks costing many more.

  • Steve Reed – 2020 Comments on Local Government Funding

    Steve Reed – 2020 Comments on Local Government Funding

    Below is the text of the comments made by Steve Reed, the Shadow Communities and Local Government Secretary, on 2 July 2020.

    Many councils are on the brink of bankruptcy because of the costs of tackling Covid-19, so any help is welcome. But if the Government breaks its promise to fund the costs in full, councils will be forced to cut back services like social care, youth activities and bin collections, and closed libraries and leisure centres might never reopen.

    This funding is a start, but we don’t know how it will be shared out and much of the detail is being held back until the autumn which might be too late to save many frontline workers’ jobs that are now at risk.

    We urge the Government to stick to its promise to support councils to do what’s necessary to get communities through this. Councils have kept their part of the bargain, now the Government must do the same rather than punish local communities with cuts to the services they rely on.

  • Cat Smith – 2020 Comments on Career Disruption for the Young

    Cat Smith – 2020 Comments on Career Disruption for the Young

    Below is the text of the comments made by Cat Smith, the Shadow Minister for Young People, on 3 July 2020.

    Young people have been ignored by the Government since long before the coronavirus crisis. After a decade of austerity, young people are facing surging housing prices, stagnating wages, and rising student debt. And the Coronavirus Crisis will only compound and exaggerate these issues.

    Many young people find jobs in the hospitality and retail sectors. The Government must use next week to introduce a Back to Work Budget which preserves those jobs, creates new jobs and provides job guarantees for young people to prevent long term unemployment.”

  • Cat Smith – 2020 Comments on the Generational Divide

    Cat Smith – 2020 Comments on the Generational Divide

    Below is the text of the comments made by Cat Smith, the Shadow Minister for Young People, on 3 July 2020.

    This generational divide is only going to worsen with the Government’s continued radio silence on what it will do for young people.

    The high proportion of young people from Black, Asian, and minority ethnic households unable to access outdoor space highlights wider inequalities laid bare by the Covid-19 crisis.

    This report shows how important it is for a proper government plan that puts young people at the heart of post-pandemic recovery plans.

  • Anneliese Dodds – 2020 Speech on a Back to Work Budget

    Anneliese Dodds – 2020 Speech on a Back to Work Budget

    Below is the text of the speech made by Anneliese Dodds, the Shadow Chancellor of the Exchequer, on 3 July 2020.

    Back in March, as lockdown began, hastily written notes were placed in the windows of shops and businesses on high streets across the country.

    They announced an unavoidable shut down with no certainty about how or when they could re-open.

    This is every business’ nightmare, but for three long months, it has been their waking reality.

    Now, for some parts of our economy, the notes are beginning to come down, and the shutters are beginning to come up.

    But for others, the crisis is still not over.

    We are still in the middle of the greatest crisis in a generation one where our government, sadly, has been too slow to act. Too slow to lockdown. Too slow to ramp up testing. And too slow to get PPE to our brilliant frontline workers.

    As lockdown restrictions begin to ease, attention is turning to the economic impact of coronavirus.

    Labour is very clear: the government cannot afford to be too slow.

    Britain needs a Back to Work Budget with a focus on jobs, jobs and jobs again.

    What we are hearing from the government on the economy is worrying.

    Worrying that – yet again – they plan to take a hands-off approach to helping business and people’s livelihoods.

    Worrying that the Chancellor is reported to have said he “shouldn’t be picking winners.”
    As if supporting a local pub or family-run restaurant, that has been boarded up at the direction of government is somehow cheating the natural order of things.

    Worrying that some press reports suggested the Chancellor was considering putting off his Summer Economic Update, in order to wait and see what happens this weekend, when more of the lockdown lifts. Even though many other countries announced weeks ago, their recovery packages, focused on backing the green jobs of the future.

    Waiting to see is not a strategy.

    The OECD’s Global Outlook report published last month, made for sobering reading.
    It suggested that the economic hit on the UK due to the coronavirus would be the worst of all industrialised nations.

    And, that unemployment levels in the UK could be the second worst in the industrialised world.

    Just as the hit to our population’s health from coronavirus threatens to be one of the worst of all industrialised countries, so our economy stands at a crossroads.

    This is not a time to wait and see.

    In Leicester this week we have seen the first major re-imposition of lockdown.

    The government promised these lockdowns would be local.

    But the reality is they are being driven from Whitehall.

    We still do not have a functioning track, trace and isolate system.

    And local authorities are not getting the data they need in the time they need it.

    The experience in recent days and weeks in Leicester is a familiar one in our response to this crisis. Muddled. Confusing. With a refusal to bring in local authorities and too slow – much – much too slow.

    We desperately need and want government to get this right.

    Lives and livelihoods depend upon it.

    Because for as long as there is confusion and delay in the public health response, many people will stay away from our high streets and out of our shops, pubs and restaurants.

    At this time of continued national crisis, Labour is determined to act as a constructive opposition.

    So, in that spirit, I call on the Chancellor to acknowledge the impact of the slow health response on our economy and do something about it.

    Today we call on government, to lay out plans to extend support schemes for businesses and people in areas like Leicester that are forced into local lockdowns.

    These support schemes should serve as economic sandbags, ensuring localised second waves of COVID-19 don’t wash away businesses and jobs in their wake.

    Labour has also repeatedly set out constructive solutions when it comes to test, track and isolate, including changes to sick pay, so people are not having to choose between self-isolating and providing for their families.
    And we have repeatedly called for clear public health messaging – with unambiguous and strongly-enforced guidance.

    These solutions are critical to reducing infection and to building trust and aiding our economic recovery.

    We have also set out the fiscal measures Government should take, to first secure, and then turbocharge our recovery.

    Instead of the limited ‘Summer Economic Update’ promised next week, we need a real Back to Work Budget.

    It must focus on preventing unemployment, supporting the unemployed back into work, and creating the jobs of the future, so that when we emerge from this crisis, Britain is ready to come back even better than before.

    We already know many of the policies which can prevent and combat unemployment, and the long-term costs unemployment incurs.

    And we know that many other countries announced their economic recovery packages not just days, but weeks ago.

    Already we are falling behind others.

    This is no time to wait and see: it’s the time to act in our country’s interest.

    Labour supported the Job Protection Scheme and self-employed schemes – indeed, we called for them.

    We also called for an exit strategy.

    But as with the lifting of lockdown, what we have now is an exit without a strategy.

    First, government must abandon its one-size-fits-all wind-down of the Job Protection and self-employed schemes.

    We need a targeted strategy that acknowledges that workers in struggling sectors cannot and should not be treated the same way, as workers in sectors that are already back to full capacity.

    This is not about ‘picking winners’, in the Chancellor’s words.

    It is about protecting those who have lost – through no fault of their own. It is about giving people across the country a fair chance.

    The reward for months of sacrifice cannot be a redundancy notice.

    This week we saw a wave of companies announcing enormous job losses – because the government is refusing to shift from its one-size-fits-all approach.

    Smaller companies have a shorter redundancy period. To avoid the same flood of redundancy notices for workers within smaller companies later on this month, government must act now – and abandon its one-size-fits-all approach.

    When we talk about our economy, it can feel distant and remote: interest rates and budgets and spreadsheets. It is anything but.

    The economy is our jobs and family incomes.

    It is our high streets and our communities.

    It is the things that add meaning and character to the places we live and love.

    It is small business owners, who have put their life and soul into building their businesses.

    It has been heartbreaking to hear from many of them in recent weeks. How they feel their businesses slipping through their fingers because of a temporary lack of cash flow, even though with the right, targeted support now, they would be perfectly viable in the long term.

    That frustration, that anger, at working hard all your life, playing by the rules, doing the right thing, waiting your place patiently in the queue. Only to find it snatched away from you by a combination of this terrible crisis and government’s refusal to help.

    Supporting them now isn’t about picking winners.

    It’s about basic fairness.

    Government must also act now to provide support for those who have become unemployed.

    Instead, the DWP are re-introducing sanctions at a time when there are more than eight people unemployed for every vacancy.

    This government seems completely divorced from the scale of the unemployment crisis facing us.

    It must speedily put in place the ‘active labour market policy’ that already operates in many other countries, and which our JobCentres do not have the capacity to provide.

    Government must also act now to support the jobs of the future.

    And here we need guarantees of delivery, not just warm words.

    In 2015, the Conservative government promised to huge fanfare 200,000 new homes for first-time buyers. Not a single one of those homes was built.

    The Conservatives have talked and talked: they have not built.

    If you could construct houses out of Conservative press releases, promises and hot air, the housing crisis in this country would have ended years ago.

    Instead, the rate of homeownership has fallen, and almost 800,000 fewer households under-45 own their own home now, compared to in 2010.

    The Conservatives have talked and talked: they have not built.

    And on the green infrastructure that every region and nation of this country is crying out for, there have been promises and paper commitments, but precious little action.

    The Conservatives have talked and talked: they have not built.

    Two years ago, the National Infrastructure Commission published an assessment. There has been no official response.

    And this week the Prime Minister tried to claim he was creating a ‘New Deal’. Most of it was re-announcements of things we have heard before.

    So, it wasn’t really ‘new’.

    And, when we cut through the bluster and looked at the detail of what the Prime Minister was actually offering, it works out at less than £100 investment per person.

    So, it’s not much of a deal either.

    Ten years of Conservative government. Ten years of talk. Ten years of inaction.

    Instead of yet more promises and yet more talk, we need a laser focus – on jobs, jobs, jobs.

    To deliver on jobs, the Chancellor’s statement must meet four key tests.

    First, it must focus, not on re-announced, re-hashed prestige projects, but on supporting high-quality jobs.

    The test of a project can’t be if it piques the interest of the Prime Minister’s closest advisor.

    Instead, projects must involve local firms. They must give the local workforce new skills and training. They must lead to material improvement in the quality and availability of local employment.

    And, programmes to support employment must be measured against the success of schemes like the Future Jobs Fund, and reflect the different challenges faced by young workers, older workers, and particularly impacted areas of the UK.

    Second, the Chancellor’s statement must buck the trend of the last ten years and rebuild economic resilience right across our country.

    As a recent report noted:

    “[t]here is little chance of a so-called ‘bounce-back’ in areas such as Pendle, Burnley, or Barnsley where local authority service spending has fallen by 53 per cent, 51 per cent, and 35 per cent over the decade in real terms”.

    And public support for ailing companies must come with good-value strings attached, to support local employment, to keep value in the UK by avoiding dividend payments, share buybacks and the use of tax havens, and to adhere to strong environmental requirements.

    Third, every single project must be consistent with the drive to net-zero – so we can build the green jobs of the future.

    Last week’s Committee on Climate Change report showed how far behind the UK is falling – now is the time for action.

    Just as the German, Danish and South Korean stimulus packages have focused on green technologies, so must the UK’s, if we are to avoid falling behind other countries.

    And fourth, any benefits of investment now must not be cancelled out by poor decisions later.

    Because, while the Prime Minister says now that those who have borne the brunt of the crisis will not be called on to pay for it, we’ve seen the opposite over the last ten years.

    Since this dreadful virus struck, we have seen who our key workers really are.

    Those who staff our NHS; those working in our emergency services; those keeping supermarkets open; and the elderly and vulnerable cared for.

    Our keyworkers are the people keeping bins collected, children educated, and the country safe.

    Those on the frontline of this crisis have heroically risen to the challenge over the last few months – but, for many, that follows a decade of reductions in pay, security and living standards.

    Over the last ten years, the gap in income and wealth has increased, and living standards for low and middle-income people have stagnated – at the same time as taxes for the very best-off have been reduced.

    So finally, government must commit, at the very least, to not increase taxes or cut support for low and middle-income people, during the period while we recover from this crisis.

    Because just like the small business that fears for its future, what people want – what they deserve – is fairness.

    We cannot go back to business as normal.

    We cannot “wait and see”.

    We cannot have more empty promises.

    We cannot have more inaction.

    We need a response which recognises the scale of the challenge we face.

    And the first step in this, the first move to get Britain back on its feet, needs to happen now.

    Britain needs a Back to Work Budget – one that focuses on jobs, jobs, jobs.

  • Keir Starmer – 2020 Comments on NHS Pay

    Keir Starmer – 2020 Comments on NHS Pay

    Below is the text of the comments made by Keir Starmer, the Leader of the Opposition, on 3 July 2020.

    This weekend we celebrate the anniversary of our National Health Service and the incredible staff who make our NHS what it is: our nation’s proudest achievement, and our greatest asset.

    In recent months, NHS staff have served selflessly on the frontline against Covid-19. For every life tragically lost, many more have been saved by the actions of our NHS heroes.

    That’s why Labour supports those calling on the Government today to make an immediate commitment to pay talks for NHS workers.

    We know that valuing our NHS workforce, through fair pay and conditions, is crucial to tackling the many vacancies across the NHS.

    And we urge the Government to agree this deal as soon as possible, in recognition of the bravery and sacrifice shown by our healthcare heroes during this crisis.

    We cannot clap our carers for weeks, then fail to back it up with meaningful action. We must show our NHS staff the same commitment they have shown our country in its hour of need.

  • Jim McMahon – 2020 Comments on Government’s Quarantine Measures

    Jim McMahon – 2020 Comments on Government’s Quarantine Measures

    Below is the text of the comments made by Jim McMahon, the Shadow Transport Secretary, on 3 July 2020.

    Labour – like families and businesses up and down the country – are keen for the government’s quarantine measures to be lessened, but this a mess.

    First we had the quarantine that they were slow to implement, then they said they’d do air bridges. Now we see a plan to let residents of 60 or more countries into England without any reciprocal arrangements.

    The fact they have been unable to negotiate air bridges is an indictment of their failure to tackle the crisis at home. They were too slow to take lockdown, too slow to order PPE and too slow to protect our country.

  • Robert Jenrick – 2020 Statement on Local Government Funding

    Robert Jenrick – 2020 Statement on Local Government Funding

    Below is the text of the statement made by Robert Jenrick, the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, in the House of Commons on 2 July 2020.

    I wish to set out to the House the further measures this Government are ​putting in place so that local government can continue to fulfil its essential role in the national response to covid-19 and lead us through the next phase of recovery.

    I said at the start of the pandemic that we would ensure local authorities have the resources they need. To do that, the Government have provided £27 billion to support local councils, businesses and communities; including £3.8 billion of support specifically for local authorities. This funding has allowed councils to deliver for their communities: including helping get rough sleepers off the streets, establishing our shielding programme, controlling infection in care homes and providing support for 800,000 small and medium-sized businesses.

    The comprehensive plan I am announcing today demonstrates my commitment by ensuring that local councils have the certainty they need to manage their finances to the end of the financial year. The plan covers covid-related expenditure, income losses from sales, fees and charges, and irrecoverable tax losses.

    Additional funding for spending pressures

    We recognise the pressures on councils and our communities have not yet passed, and today I have announced a further £500 million to help ensure that councils have the money they need to meet costs in the coming months. I would like to thank councils for the financial information they have provided, and I will continue to work with my cabinet colleagues to monitor the pressures on the sector.

    This award follows two previous rounds of grant allocations. The first was primarily focused on getting emergency support into adult social care. The second round addressed both expenditure pressures and income shortfalls. With the benefit of better data, we now plan to address income shortfalls separately to expenditure and so we have created a new formula for ​the additional £500 million. This formula will reflect the factors which the data returns have told us correlate most closely with expenditure, and will take account of population, deprivation and the way that service costs vary across the country. Details on allocations will be announced in due course.

    Non-tax income

    The pandemic has had an unprecedented impact on councils’ income from sales, fees and charges, for which they could not have planned. To help mitigate this, the Government are also introducing a co-payment scheme to compensate local authorities for relevant, irrecoverable losses in 2020-21. Under this scheme councils bear the first 5% of losses compared to their budgeted income—reflecting the fact these income sources are by their nature volatile from one year to the next—but the Government will support those worst affected by covering 75p in every pound of losses beyond this.

    Irrecoverable tax losses

    I am also committed to supporting the sector through an apportionment of irrecoverable council tax and business rates losses between central and local government, to be agreed at the spending review. I have announced today that the repayment of collection fund deficits arising in 2020-21, will be spread over the next three years rather than the usual period of a year, giving councils breathing space in setting budgets for next year.

    Taken together, these measures will give local councils sufficient confidence to continue to deliver the services their communities rely on. Nevertheless, my Department will continue to work closely with councils to monitor the situation as it develops, and I will return to the House setting out any further measures necessary should a changing situation require it.

  • Alok Sharma – 2020 Statement on Celsa Steel

    Alok Sharma – 2020 Statement on Celsa Steel

    Below is the text of the statement made by Alok Sharma, the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, in the House of Commons on 2 July 2020.

    I would like to update the House on a commercial agreement that the Government has concluded with Celsa Steel (UK) Ltd.

    Since the start of the covid-19 pandemic, the Government have set out a far-reaching package of support to protect jobs and the UK economy. However, in exceptional circumstances, where a viable company of strategic importance has exhausted all other options available to it, the Government has said that we will consider bespoke support on a “last resort” basis.

    There is an extremely high bar for making use of taxpayers’ money in this way, and any companies seeking support from the Government should do so only as an absolute last resort.

    Such circumstances applied to Celsa, which is a key supplier to the construction industry.

    While commercial confidentiality prevents me from setting out detail, I can assure the House that the Government have agreed terms that will protect taxpayers’ money and ensure that the financial burden is shared with the company’s shareholders and lenders.

    The Government have agreed legally binding contractual conditions with Celsa on employment, climate change and tax. We have also put in place legally binding conditions on corporate governance, including restraints on executive pay and bonuses. We would expect any company seeking such support from the taxpayer to play their role in our society’s shared endeavours and challenges in the same way.

    More broadly, the Government have already taken wide-ranging actions to support the UK steel industry, including more than £300 million in relief for electricity costs since 2013. We have also created public procurement guidelines with annual reports on the proportion of public sector steel bought from British companies, and details of a steel pipeline on national infrastructure projects worth around £500 million over the next decade.

    This agreement achieves a positive outcome and secures over 1,000 jobs, including more than 800 positions at the company’s main sites in South Wales.

    We want to praise the commitment of Celsa’s workforce and management. Our focus is now on working with all parties to secure the company’s future success, as well as ensuring that the loan is repaid and Celsa continue to deliver employment, climate change, corporate governance and tax commitments.

  • Kelly Tolhurst – 2020 Speech on Manchester Airport

    Kelly Tolhurst – 2020 Speech on Manchester Airport

    Below is the text of the speech made by Kelly Tolhurst, the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Transport, in the House of Commons on 2 July 2020.

    I congratulate the hon. Member for Stockport (Navendu Mishra) on securing this debate about Manchester airport and the local economy, and I thank my hon. Friend the Member for Warrington South (Andy Carter) for his contribution. I know that the hon. Member for Wythenshawe and Sale East (Mike Kane) has a keen interest in Manchester airport but is unable to speak in the debate. I have listened carefully to the points that the hon. Member for Stockport has made and will endeavour to address as many of them as I am able to.

    As Members across the House will be well aware, these are incredibly challenging times for the aviation sector. Covid-19 has presented unprecedented difficulties for the industry, but we must not forget that the aviation and aerospace industry is a British success story. Before the impact of covid-19, the UK aviation sector contributed at least £22 billion to the UK economy each year and directly supported around 230,000 jobs spread across the UK. Around 12% of those jobs are in the north-west, so I am mindful of the impact that covid-19 is having on communities across the region.

    Aviation is one of the sectors worst affected by covid-19, and areas such as Manchester, with its large airport and supply chain, are particularly affected. Having held regular discussions with the whole sector since the pandemic began, I met again with senior management from Manchester airport earlier this week. I want to thank them for their constructive engagement throughout this period, as we continue to work collaboratively with the sector to ensure its recovery. I was very encouraged, as I am sure the hon. Member for Stockport was, to hear this week that Manchester airport plans to reopen terminal 2 from 15 July, following the opening of terminal 3 this week. I know that we still have a long way to go, but this shows the beginning of the sector’s recovery, as flights once again take to the skies.

    The restart comes on the back of the unprecedented package of measures that the Chancellor put in place to protect the economy and jobs. The hon. Member spoke ​about support for this particular sector, and I am afraid that this is where we disagree. The support provided was unprecedented and has enabled airlines, airports and ground handlers to benefit from a significant amount of taxpayer support during the most critical time. It did not end there. The Chancellor and the Secretary of State for Transport were incredibly clear that any business needing further support, having exhausted all the economic measures that were put in place, will have the ability to talk to us about further support. We stand ready to speak to any business that is in that situation and has used all that support.

    Mr William Wragg (Hazel Grove) (Con)

    I apologise to you, Madam Deputy Speaker, for arriving late, and I congratulate the hon. Member for Stockport (Navendu Mishra) on securing the debate. Have there been any approaches from the likes of Manchester airport to take the Minister up on the offer that she appears to be making?

    Kelly Tolhurst

    Obviously, commercial discussions are not for discussion in the Chamber, but I reassure my hon. Friend that I am in regular communication with all the airports in the United Kingdom, and officials in the Department are in weekly contact with them.

    The measures put in place include the Bank of England’s covid corporate financing facility, which provides funding to businesses to pay wages and suppliers; the coronavirus job retention scheme, which helps firms to keep people in employment by allowing businesses to put workers on temporary leave; and the business interruption loan scheme. All those measures have been designed to ensure that companies of any size receive the help they need to get through this difficult time, including airports, airlines and the wider supply chain.

    Beyond that package, many firms are getting support from established market mechanisms such as existing shareholders—the hon. Member for Stockport mentioned the support that has been provided by local authorities—and bank lending and commercial finance. We have been looking at other flexibilities to give the sector. The Civil Aviation Authority is working with airlines, airports and ground handlers to provide flexibility within the regulatory framework to help them manage the impacts of covid. We also welcome the response by the European Commission, which relaxed the 80:20 rule on slots, and we continue to engage with organisations across the sector on that issue. Nevertheless, I would not want to underestimate the challenges to the sector and to airports such as Manchester, because despite the measures that we have put in place to protect the economy, there remain serious challenges for the aviation sector.

    I want to turn to the announcements of redundancies by a number of companies, which the hon. Gentleman has mentioned. As he said, these are distressing announcements for employees and their families. While they are commercial decisions, they are decisions that I profoundly regret as Aviation Minister. Redundancies are not something that should be considered lightly, and if organisations find themselves having to consider these measures, I hope that they will do so sensitively. I hope that they will take into account the dedication and professionalism that their employees have shown, and that they will act within and, where possible, beyond the requirements and the spirit of all relevant legislation.​

    The hon. Member for Stockport and my hon. Friend the Member for Warrington South mentioned British Airways in particular. I have spoken directly to BA and to the IAG chief executive, Willie Walsh, to discuss the organisation’s plans and its engagement with staff and union representations. I have offered to support these engagement efforts where possible, and where it is appropriate to do so. I am also in regular communication with the unions that are particularly affected by those redundancies. I encourage BA and the unions to engage constructively with each other, and to strive to provide employees with as much certainty as possible during this challenging time.

    I would now like to turn to the sector’s restart and the next stage of our plan to help it to recover. We need aviation. It is vital to our future as a global trading nation and plays a critical role in local economies, whether in Manchester or elsewhere. We have established the restart and recovery team, with an expert steering group to ensure a truly collaborative approach between Government and industry. Last month, we published the aviation health guidance for operators, as well as the safer air travel guidance for passengers. This forms a vital first pillar as we seek to ensure that our aviation sector returns to its full strength as soon as possible.

    Andy Carter

    The Minister has mentioned the Manchester economy, but does she agree that Manchester airport affects not just the Manchester economy but the north-west economy—particularly Warrington, Cheshire and across to Merseyside? The size of Manchester airport means that it is a much bigger operation and affects much more than just the Manchester economy.

    Kelly Tolhurst

    My hon. Friend is correct. Major infrastructure such as airports always have a wider impact than the activity that they directly partake in. The success of Manchester airport has been a big contributor to the wider local economy and the supply chain, and that is something that we are very mindful of within the Department for Transport. We are working with our colleagues across Government to ensure that we understand the full impact of the difficulties within the aviation sector.

    I would like to point out that the Manchester Airports Group—MAG—and Manchester airport were among the leading members of the expert steering group working with us to devise that health and passenger guidance, and I thank them very much for that. We have built on progress, and on Monday we announced that the Government would shortly begin to ease the health measures at UK borders, allowing passengers to be exempt from self-isolation requirements in certain circumstances on arrival in the UK. The joint biosecurity centre, in close consultation with public health and the chief medical officer, has developed a categorisation of countries and territories that present a lower risk, so that passengers entering the UK from those places will not require 14 days of self-isolation. This has been informed by factors including the level of covid within a country, the number of new cases and the expected trajectory in the coming weeks. Further details, including a full list of those countries from which arriving passengers will be exempt from self-isolation, will be announced shortly.​

    Throughout this process, public safety has been at the heart of our decision making. We have worked closely with health and policy experts from across Government to ensure that the steps we are taking are gradual and minimise the risk of new covid-19 cases, while helping to open up our travel and tourism sectors. We want the aviation sector to return to normal operations as soon as possible. However, even with this week’s announcements, there is a great deal of uncertainty around how long this will take, given the truly international nature of the sector. We want to ensure a safe customer journey in the UK and abroad. We also want aviation to be as sustainable and environmentally friendly as possible. The aviation sector must be a green one that creates high-quality, high-skilled jobs.

    Navendu Mishra

    Will the Minister commit to looking at the proposals put forward by the French Government to support the sector, and the conditions that they have introduced with regard to using cleaner fuel, reducing emissions and supporting the wider economy with a sectoral package?

    Kelly Tolhurst

    The hon. Gentleman will have heard, and maybe seen, the Secretary of State announce last week the formulation of the Jet Zero Council, which has been supported by the industry and will bring together the Government with aviation and environmental groups to make net-zero-emissions flights possible. I have spoken with Manchester airport and others across the industry this week, and there is a real determination from the sector to make this a vital pillar of the recovery. We have an industry that wants to deliver on this agenda and are working with the industry, with or without that bespoke support. It is important that we understand the profound impact that covid-19 will have on the way that people’s lives, work and travel will change. It is clearly sensible that our plans to reduce emissions understand that and take it into account.

    I thank the hon. Gentleman for securing this debate. Manchester airport is the only British airport other than Heathrow to operate two full-length parallel runways. It handled its first scheduled flight in 1938—a KLM Douglas DC-2 to Amsterdam—and in 2010 it became the first airport of its size in the world to have a daily A380 service. As Aviation Minister, I have been given the opportunity by this debate to address concerns. I am mindful of and take on board the concerns he raised around slots, the green recovery and the particular strain that local authorities may feel as a result of supporting their local airports.

    As I have highlighted to the hon. Gentleman, the Department for Transport is committed to staying close to our airports and working with them in the best way possible. We are all aware of the scale of the challenge facing the aviation sector and the economy as a result of covid. The efforts that we are making in partnership with the sector are intended to ensure that UK aviation can recover, and that airports such as Manchester and the communities they serve can recover and prosper in the future, just as they have done in the past.