Tag: 2016

  • David Cameron – 2016 Speech in Bavaria

    davidcameron

    Below is the text of the speech made by David Cameron, the Prime Minister, in Bavaria, Germany on 7 January 2016.

    Well thank you very much Gerda [Hasselfeldt] for the warm welcome that you have given me and let me send my thanks as well to the Minister-President and also to Angela Merkel who I had an excellent meeting with last night.

    It’s a great pleasure to be back here in Bavaria and looking around, I can understand why Bavarians feel they are particularly blessed with this beautiful landscape.

    It has been a pleasure to come, the relationship between Britain and Germany is so strong and so important. We look at the world in so many of the same ways. We know you have to earn money before you can spend it, we know the importance of backing enterprise and business to create jobs, we know the importance of the Atlantic Alliance for our security. We know how important it is, as we enter 2016, that we confront Islamist extremism and terrorism and that we do so together.

    So our relationship is very deep and very strong as members of the European Union, as members of NATO and also the relationship between our parties as parties of the centre-right, has also been very strong and will continue to be strong in the future.

    I really enjoyed the discussions here today and the presentation I was able to make. My aim is very clear – I would like to secure the future of Britain in a reformed European Union but this reform is vital.

    Britain does have real issues with the way that the European Union works today and my negotiation is about dealing with each of those issues. Making sure that we’re in Europe for cooperation and to work together, that we’re not part of an ever-deepening political union, making sure that Europe is adding to the competitiveness of countries like Britain, and indeed Germany, rather than holding back our competitiveness. Making sure there are fair rules for both countries that are inside the eurozone and countries like Britain that won’t join the eurozone but want the eurozone to be a success. Who want to make sure that outside the eurozone there are no disadvantages, that we’re not called upon to support the eurozone financially.

    These are important issues, as is the issue of migration and movement across Europe. Britain supports the concept of free movement. Many British citizens can go and live and work elsewhere in Europe but we want to make sure that the welfare systems – and particularly our welfare system – is not an unnatural draw to Britain because we do feel the pressure of excessive migration that we’ve had in recent years.

    We believe that all these issues can be dealt with. The discussions are going well. They’re hard, they’re tough, these are difficult issues but I’m confident that with goodwill – and there is goodwill on all sides – we can bring these negotiations to a conclusion and then hold the referendum that we promised in our election manifesto and we’ve now legislated for in Parliament.

    In the end, the choice will be for the British people but I want to make sure they have the very best choice of staying in a reformed European Union, giving Britain the best of both worlds.

    A part of Europe for trade and cooperation, working together on the security challenges that we face, helping to keep our people safe, particularly in the difficult and dangerous world that we face. But not joining the Euro, the currency that many have in the European Union, not being part of the Schengen no borders agreement – we’ll keep our own borders in Britain and strengthen those borders. And making sure we address each and every 1 of the 4 issues that I’ve raised.

    I’m even more confident after the excellent discussions I’ve had here in Bavaria with colleagues in the CSU that these things are possible, not just good for Britain but good for Europe. Not simply because other European countries will benefit by Britain continuing to be a member of Europe but I think its important that this organisation shows it has the flexibility of a network and can address concerns of individual members, rather than the rigidity of a bloc.

    I’m confident we can reach good conclusions but it’ll take a lot of hard work. I’ve been very heartened by the goodwill I’ve felt from the fellow sister party members in the CSU here in Bavaria today and let me once again thank you for the warmth of your welcome. I remember coming 7 years ago and its been even more pleasurable to come back again and have these discussions with you.

    Thank you.

  • George Osborne – 2016 Speech on the Economy

    gosborne

    Below is the text of the speech made by George Osborne, the Chancellor of the Exchequer, in Cardiff, Wales on 7 January 2016.

    Scott, thank you and thank you for such a warm Cardiff welcome.

    It’s good to see so many business leaders here today.

    It’s fantastic to be back here again to see the Cardiff Business Club and talk to the people who are helping to drive forward the Welsh economy.

    And it is fitting that we have Cardiff Bay as our beautiful backdrop, in typical sunshine.

    From this Bay, the people of South Wales set off to lead the industrial revolution around the world.

    But by the 1970s, after decades of decline, it was left derelict.

    Today it is thriving again. Audiences flock to the Millennium Centre from all over the world – and get to experience that famous Welsh hospitality when they do.

    Much of the development that underpinned this happened during the 1980s, spearheaded by local people working in partnership with my colleagues Nick Edwards and Michael Heseltine.

    And we owe a particular debt to the late Sir Geoffrey Inkin for driving the redevelopment forward.

    It is an example of the government working with you – the job creators – to deliver for Wales.

    As we look across the Bay, we can all see the Welsh Assembly building on the other side.

    Today I make this offer to the next Welsh government: work with us to make Wales stronger still.

    We have our plan for Wales, one that support jobs, pay and rising living standards.

    And the question for the whole United Kingdom is this: are we going to see through the economic plan that is delivering growth at home and security from risks abroad?

    For I worry about a creeping complacency in the national debate about our economy.

    A sense that the hard work at home is complete and that we’re immune from the risks abroad.

    A sense we can let up, and the good economic news will just keep rolling in.

    To the people peddling those views, I have a very clear warning.

    Last year was the worst for global growth since the crash and this year opens with a dangerous cocktail of new threats from around the world.

    For Britain, the only antidote to that is confronting complacency and delivering the plan we’ve set out.

    Anyone who thinks it’s mission accomplished with the British economy is making a grave mistake.

    2016 is the year we can get down to work and make the lasting changes Britain so badly needs.

    Or it’ll be the year we look back at as the beginning of the decline.

    This year, quite simply, the economy is mission critical.

    We have to finish the job.

    So let me explain, first, how the economy is mission critical here in Wales.

    A lot has been done since 2010.

    70,000 thousand jobs have been created.

    Unemployment has fallen by 30%.

    Superfast broadband has been rolled out to over half a million homes and businesses.

    We pulled the eyes of the world to Newport when we chose to bring the huge NATO Summit here.

    The UK Investment Summit with over 150 global investors that followed soon after saw £240 million of new investment across the UK.

    And we’re seeing results: since 2010 Wales has grown faster than any part of the UK outside of London, and in the latest data employment is rising almost twice as fast as in the capital.

    But ambition for Wales should not end there. I know yours doesn’t; well mine doesn’t either.

    For while we’ve come a long way, we cannot be complacent.

    Wales still faces the decades-old challenge that it lags behind much of the rest of the UK.

    Unemployment is higher, pay is lower, and output is lower. Wales could be doing so much better.

    The government recognises that Wales needs more investment.

    That is why, working with Stephen Crabb, our strong and effective Welsh Secretary, we’ve just announced we’ll boost capital investment by £900 million over the next five years.

    We recognise that Wales needs to be better connected to the rest of the UK.

    So we are electrifying the Great Western Mainline to Swansea and giving the Welsh government early access to the capital borrowing powers to help fund the M4 relief road.

    And by bringing the massive investment in HS2 to Crewe six years early, we will bind North Wales ever more closely into the Northern Powerhouse and the rest of the UK too.

    We also recognise that more decisions affecting Wales should be taken here in Wales.

    The Welsh Assembly already has the power to legislate on health and education; we’ve given them power to set business rates, and, from 2018, the power to set Stamp Duty and Landfill taxes too.

    And soon the Assembly will have unprecedented power to set income tax as well.

    Crucially, this means that the Welsh government is now going to be responsible for how they raise money, as well as how they spend it.

    That will focus attention on who can deliver low taxes for the people of Wales and Welsh businesses, and who can deliver value for money. That is attention I want to see.

    As a UK government we’ve committed to a City Deal for Cardiff.

    This City Deal can transform this city as much as the development around the bay did a generation ago. It’s a deal that will secure Cardiff’s bright future.

    We will support a new infrastructure fund for the Cardiff Capital Region as part of this.

    It demonstrates our ambition for the Cardiff region and I want to see the deal signed by the time of the Budget in March. So let’s get on with it.

    Wales is an incredibly exciting, innovative nation, home to world class research and pioneers of technology. I want Wales to be at the centre of the high tech economy of the future.

    Steven and I have been to Cardiff Uni to see brilliant work on semiconductors with companies such as IQE.

    So today I can tell you that we will establish a new UK national centre – based here in Wales – that will develop the semiconductors that are at the heart of modern technology. It will be part of our network of R&D catapults.

    It will bring together scientists and businesses with expertise in this cutting edge technology. It will create jobs, here. Bring investment here.

    And I’m committing £10 million this year and every year for the rest of the decade, £50 million in total, so that we build the future here in Wales.

    I see it as a down-payment on our side of the deal.

    Here’s a striking fact and a challenge for us all.

    If the growth rate in Wales matched that of the UK average, the economy would be around £6 billion bigger by 2030.

    That is almost £1,900 more per person here than if Wales continues at its current pace.

    And if employment increased by as much in this Parliament as in the last, there would be over 60,000 more people in work in Wales by 2020.

    There can be no room for complacency about Wales’ future.

    And there can be no room for complacency when it comes to Britain’s economic future too.

    We are only seven days into the New Year, and already we’ve had worrying news about stock market falls around the world, the slowdown in China, deep problems in Brazil and in Russia.

    In just one week in December South Africa had three separate finance ministers…a stat no Chancellor likes to read about.

    Commodity prices have fallen very significantly.

    Oil, which was over $120 a barrel in 2012, dipped below $35 earlier this week.

    That is good for consumers and business customers here in Britain, bad news for the oil and gas industry, worrying for the creditors who have lent to it, and a massive problem for the countries that depend on it.

    And all of it adds to the volatility and sense of uncertainty in the world.

    Meanwhile, the political developments in the Middle East, with Saudi Arabia and Iran, concern us all.

    Alongside this short-term turbulence there is a long-term trend economists worry about.

    It is an idea that date back to the depression-era 1930s dubbed ‘secular stagnation’

    And it results in predictions that Western economies might not grow at all.

    The concern is that demographic changes – an aging population – means a rise in global savings.

    At the same time entrepreneurs stop innovating.

    They don’t want to set up companies or expand and so don’t want to borrow those savings to invest.

    But when the demand for borrowing is so weak firms will only take a loan when interest rates are ultra-low.

    And the so called ‘natural’ rate of interest – this is the rate needed to keep the economy growing at a healthy pace – falls permanently.

    Some of the predictions from the 1930s were stark.

    They spoke of “sick recoveries which die in their infancy.”

    Slumps with an “immovable core of unemployment.”

    That’s not been Britain’s story these last few years.

    But think of much of the rest of the western world since the crash.

    Many places have seen stop-start recoveries; others persistent high unemployment.

    Some economists have revived the idea of secular stagnation for the modern age – warning that we will either get stagnation and unemployment, or, where there is growth it will be pinned on asset price bubbles.

    They pose these economics for us what seems like an impossible choice:

    Do you keep rates ultra-low to boost your economy, but accept the risk of bubbles?

    Or do you hike rates to avoid bubbles, and accept an economic slowdown?

    I’m determined to show that this choice is a false one.

    That you can have sustained growth and new innovation and a strong savings culture, and by doing these things lay the foundations for higher living standards for decades to come.

    And our economic plan – which backs investment and the generation of new ideas like the catapult here for compound semiconductors, and puts in place checks on debt and bubbles – is the way to achieve that.

    Economies grow and prosper when there is a security and confidence about the long term. We’re providing that here in Britain with our economic plan.

    So what is our response to the current risks in the global economy?

    It’s not to cut ourselves off, and isolate Britain.

    You don’t avoid the world’s problems by trying to pretend, in the modern age, that we can be completely self-contained.

    No, our problem is that we haven’t had strong enough links with many of the fastest growing parts of the world.

    That is because we were complacent in the run up to the crash. We didn’t go out there and build those links with the rest of the world.

    Well now we are.

    Our determination to be China’s strongest partner in the West is opening up new markets for our businesses and bringing new investment and jobs to our shores.

    We have an excellent relationship with India but we can do more. So we will, and the Indian Finance Minister Arun Jaitley is coming to Britain later this month to make that happen.

    We’re working with the US and the EU to agree a new Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership, a big trade deal that could increase the size of our economy by £10 billion per year.

    And with our partners in Europe, we’re seeking ambitious reforms that will make a real difference to the British people.

    What could be more complacent than acknowledging Europe needs to change and can work better for Britain; but then to say: that’s just the way it is in Europe – there’s nothing we can do about it?

    Under the strong leadership of David Cameron, we’re working flat out to get a better deal and then we’ll put it to a vote and the British people will decide.

    There’s also much more we can do at home to strengthen our economy and build for the future.

    Productivity lies at the heart of a healthy, growing economy. Because when output per hour is higher firms can pay their workers more, and return larger dividends to their investors.

    What does that mean? It means more money and higher living standards for families.

    Delivering that requires action to address historic weaknesses in the British economy.

    We have suffered a chronic shortage when it comes to skills for decades – so next year we’re introducing our important new apprenticeship levy on all large firms.

    The levy will fund three million apprenticeships in England – with firms offering apprenticeship able to get out more than they put in. And Wales will get its fair share of the support too.

    It’s a major reform to raise the skills of the nation.

    Another weakness is that Britain has always been too slow to build.

    Late last year I set up the National Infrastructure Commission.

    Its independent group of world-class experts; it’s already hard at work, led by Andrew Adonis.

    Today we are publishing a consultation which set outs the structure and operation of the commission.

    It represents a huge shift.

    The old way – short termism and a failure to think ahead – is out.

    Long term thinking is in.

    And I’m looking forward to receiving the first ideas from the new Commission by the time of the Budget.

    Getting infrastructure decisions right in 2016 is mission critical.

    So too is our plan to boost the wages of Britain’s low paid.

    If we’re complacent, Britain could find itself going the way of some other Western nations and become a society of higher welfare bills, higher taxes to pay them and lower wages as a result.

    We need to do the opposite. That doesn’t happen by itself. It needs a plan and decisive action.

    So we’re reducing welfare costs and ensuring it always pays to work, with major reforms to our benefit system.

    We’re cutting taxes on income – in April the tax-free personal allowance will reach £11,000.

    We’re making further major cuts to corporation tax to give us the lowest rate of any major economy in the world.

    And we’re bringing in the new National Living Wage in April. The new rate of £7.20 will mean a £900 increase in the annual earnings of a full-time worker.

    This is how we build the higher wage, lower welfare, lower tax society Britain needs.

    And we’re going to make sure those wages go further too.

    So we have committed to a big push on competition. Again, competition doesn’t just happen.

    If you’re not active in promoting it, monopolies creep in, vested interests take control.

    Last autumn I asked Treasury economists to look at 10 core markets – things like banking, telecoms, the utilities and insurance – to make sure customers are getting good deals.

    They found a typical household spent close to 40% of their disposable income in these markets.

    But they also found inefficiencies: a lack of competition in some markets, opaque pricing and people paying too much in others.

    The steps we are taking to cut out those distortions mean households could save close to £500 a year.

    And over the course of this Parliament we will go further, removing the obstacles to allow new competitors to enter protected markets.

    I’ll give you some examples. It means online pharmacies that deliver prescriptions to the door; it means giving people choice over their water supplier; and making it easier for places like supermarkets to provide legal services.

    One of the biggest monthly bills many people pay is their mortgage – and an important source of income for people is their savings.

    So it’s no wonder that people are starting to talk about what a rise in interest rates might mean for us all.

    Of course, interest rates are not something for me to set. That’s for the independent Monetary Policy Committee at the Bank of England.

    But inevitably, with the US Federal Reserve having made their decision to raise rates last month, there is a discussion about how and when we begin to move out of a world of ultra-low rates.

    Let’s be clear, higher interest rates are a sign of a stronger economy.

    The job of government is to make sure we’ve got in place the policies to monitor overall levels of indebtedness across families and the wider economy, while backing savings too.

    That doesn’t just happen by itself.

    It requires positive action and a plan, and that’s what we’ve put in place.

    So I’ve created a powerful new Financial Policy Committee in the Bank of England that can check overall levels of debt in the economy, and deal with specific risks such as the buy-to-let mortgage market.

    These steps are not always popular, but they do make our economy more resilient.

    British families have also worked hard these past few years to reduce their debts – and so debt as a proportion of income has fallen.

    But there is more to do to make sure British household finances are sound.

    40% of British adults don’t have a week’s wages put aside to cover an unexpected expense, and almost half don’t have any pension savings.

    Of course, putting money aside is often difficult, every family is different – and it’s up to each one to make their own decisions about when it’s right to borrow and when it’s right to save.

    But that is not an excuse for government inaction and complacency.

    Overall we must make it easier and more attractive for people to save.

    For while there may be a global glut of savings, here in Britain not enough people on lower and middle incomes are saving for their retirement.

    That’s why we’ve got a plan to change that: auto-enrolment – the scheme where employers enrol all employees into a pension – is having a huge impact: there are three million more people are saving into a pension compared to just two years ago.

    We’ve made pension saving more attractive – by removing the restrictions on how people can spend their savings when they reach retirement.

    We’ve massively increased ISA limits – the most popular way for people to save tax-free.

    Last month we launched our Help to Buy ISA – already over 140,000 people have opened an account and are starting to save for their first home.

    And in April we’re introducing our new state pension. It will be far simpler than the current system, more progressive and much fairer to women.

    It’s all part of supporting saving for everyone. And there’s more critical work to do in 2016.

    There’s also work to do to shake the national debate out of that sense of complacency about our economic prospects that I talked about earlier.

    Yes, the British economy has performed better than almost anyone dared to hope. And as an issue, the economy has slipped down the list of everyday concerns.

    But the biggest risk is that we all think that it’s “job done”. Many encourage this, irresponsibly suggesting that we can just go back to the bad old ways and spend beyond our means for evermore.

    Though the year is only seven days old, already we’d had their predictable calls for billions of pounds, literally billions more debt-fuelled public spending.

    They reject all the reforms we propose to deliver better-quality public services for less taxpayers’ money.

    Today I want to issue this warning: unless we finish the job of fixing the public finances, to get Britain back into the black by finally spending less than we borrow, all of the progress we have made together could still easily be reversed.

    That’s why we’ve got to go on fixing the roof while sun is shining.

    The prize for us all if we do is that Britain could become the most prosperous of all the major nations in the world in the coming generation.

    In 2015 we won the support of the British people for our economic plan – and we set out in the Budget and Autumn Statement the means to achieve that.

    We established new fiscal rules to reduce debt and get that surplus.

    We set out department spending plans that mean we live within our means.

    Taken together, it is part of a huge national effort to get our house in order – what the Office for Budget Responsibility describes as the biggest reduction in government consumption outside of demobilisation in over 100 years.

    If 2015 was the year for setting out that plan – 2016 is the year for the delivery of it.

    That is why it is so critical.

    Economic security and sound public finances don’t just happen – they require hard effort and continued application.

    And this year we will require that. You know – as do I – that none of us can see the future.

    We don’t know what exactly will happen to the global economy.

    We don’t know when the next turn of the cycle will come.

    But we do know that we haven’t abolished boom and bust.

    So there is no excuse for inaction. We are in charge of our own destiny.

    We can back infrastructure investment and innovation.

    We can be an outward facing nation – forging new and stronger links with the rest of the world.

    We can continue to support higher pay, lower tax and consumer markets that foster choice and competition.

    We can do more to support savers.

    This plan is what Wales, and the UK, needs.

    And it is why the economy remains centre stage to everything we want to achieve in this country.

    So 2016 is not mission accomplished. But our future is very much in our hands.

    This year is mission critical year.

    Now is the time to make the long term decisions to secure our country’s future.

    And in the forthcoming Budget and beyond, that’s precisely what I’ll do, for Wales and for the whole of the UK.

  • David Cameron – 2016 Speech in Hungary

    davidcameron

    Below is the text of the speech made by David Cameron, the Prime Minister, in Budapest, Hungary on 7 January 2016.

    Well thank you very much and thank you Viktor [Orbán] for the warmth of your welcome and for your friendship and your support. As you say, it’s a decade since a British Prime Minister has been to Hungary. That’s far too long and I’m delighted to be here today.

    I came to your country as a student in 1985. I came as a young man a couple of times, actually, in the 1990s and later, and it’s great to be back here as Prime Minister and to see the incredible progress of this country and to see your Prime Ministership and economy that is growing, unemployment that is low, and a very successful Hungarian economy it is. And thank you for what you said about Britain’s investment. It is a strong economic relationship we have, and a number of British companies are operating here, and I would like to see that number increase.

    Britain and Hungary have important and close relations. We’re both members of NATO, enthusiastic members of NATO. We’re both members of the European Union. And we’ve worked together very closely. I think we share a lot of the same perspectives about Europe. We want a Europe that works, but we want a Europe that respects nation states, and a Europe that does not try to do everything, that recognises the role of nations states and believes in subsidiarity, that there are many things that are better left for countries to do themselves. But we should cooperate where we can achieve goals that suit us all.

    We’ve discussed at some length the European reform agenda that I’ve put forward and the 4 points, the 4 areas where we think there needs to be progress. We want to see a Europe where, of course if some countries want to integrate further, they can, but for Britain this is not an ever-closer union. This is a cooperation over economics, over things we share in common, over policies where we can advance our mutual interests, but we don’t believe in an ever-deepening political project for Britain.

    We want, as you said, a Europe that adds to our competitiveness, not that takes away from our competitiveness. We want a Europe that’s signing trade deals with the fastest-growing areas of the world, that’s completing the single market in energy, in services and digital; things that can drive the growth in jobs that we want to see in our countries. We want a Europe that has fair rules for those countries that are in the eurozone and those countries that are outside the eurozone. And this is, I think, an area where Britain and Hungary can make common cause. We want to make sure, yes, that the euro is a success. That is important for my economy, important for your economy. But we need to make sure that those of us outside the eurozone suffer no disadvantage, suffer no discrimination. And I think it’s important we get that right in the discussions we have.

    And finally we have discussed the issue of welfare and of the movement of people. Let me be clear, I support the free movement of people. People in Britain welcome the fact they are able to go and live and work in other European countries. But what matters is that we deal with the scale and the pressures that sometimes that movement can create. And Britain’s welfare system has provided something of an additional draw in terms of movement of people, and it’s that that my proposal of the 4-year wait for welfare benefits is designed to address.

    So we’ve had good discussions. We obviously now have a limited time between now and the February European Council, but I’m confident that, if we work hard with goodwill on all sides, we should try for an agreement at that Council. But as I have said, I only have to hold my referendum by the end of 2017. If it takes longer to make an agreement, then obviously what matters to me is the substance rather than the timing.

    We’ve also discussed the important issues of mutual concern. The migration crisis into the European Union, where I think we have many common perspectives. We agree we have got to solve these problems upstream. We need a peace deal in Syria. We should go on supporting, as Britain does very generously, Syrian refugees in Lebanon, in Turkey, in Jordan and indeed in Syria itself. I quite agree with Viktor that Europe needs strong external borders and those that help provide those strong external borders I believe are doing very much the right thing.

    We talked about the crisis in Syria and how we can work together. We’ve talked about the work that we’re doing to confront Daesh and Islamist extremism, and the very welcome contribution that Hungarian forces are making as part of the coalition. And we’ve also discussed relations with Russia and the importance of Europe working together, particularly over implementing the Minsk Agreement with respect to Ukraine.

    So it’s been a very good meeting. Viktor and I have worked together now for many years. I look forward to working with you for many more years in the future, and I think there are important perspectives that we share, not just on Europe, but on defence, on NATO, and on these broader issues too. So thank you for the welcome, it’s very good to be back and I promise it won’t be another 10 years before a British Prime Minister, indeed this British prime minister, comes back to Hungary.

    Thank you.

  • David Cameron – 2016 Statement on European Council

    davidcameron

    Below is the text of the statement made by David Cameron, the Prime Minister, in the House of Commons, London, on 5 January 2016.

    With permission, Mr Speaker, I would like to make a statement on the European Council meeting which took place before Christmas.

    The Council focused on 3 issues – migration, terrorism and the UK’s renegotiation.

    I’ll take each in turn.

    Migration

    First, on migration, even in winter there are still many migrants coming to Europe, with over 3,000 arriving via the eastern Mediterranean route each day.

    Now of course, Britain is not part of the Schengen open border arrangements and we’re not going to be joining.

    We have our own border controls and our border controls apply to everyone attempting to enter the UK and every day those border controls help to keep us safe.

    Let me repeat: these controls apply to all – including EU citizens and we have stopped nearly 95,000 people at our borders since 2010, including almost 6,000 EU nationals.

    These people were not allowed to come in. What Schengen countries are now trying trying to put in place are a pale imitation of what we already have.

    What they do is, of course, a matter for them. But it is in our interests to help our European partners secure their external borders.

    So we have provided more technical expertise to the European Asylum Support Office than any other European country including practical assistance to help with registering and fingerprinting of migrants when they arrive in countries like Greece and Italy.

    We have also focused on the root causes – not just the consequences – of the migration crisis.

    That is why we continue to play a leading role in the efforts of the International Syria Support Group to end the conflict in Syria through a political process and that’s why we have backed the agreement reached in Morocco which should pave the way for a new united, national government in Libya.

    We have deployed HMS Enterprise in the Mediterranean to go after the people traffickers. We have provided £1.12 billion in humanitarian assistance for the Syrian conflict – by far the largest commitment of any European country, and second only to America.

    Find out about Syria refugees: UK government response
    And the donor conference that I am hosting next month together with Germany, Kuwait, Norway and the United Nations will help further, raising significant new funding to help refugees in the region this year.

    Mr Speaker, the Council focused on implementing the previously agreed measures on refugee resettlement.

    In Britain, we said that we would resettle 20,000 Syrian refugees during this Parliament, taking them directly from the camps.

    And I can tell the House that – exactly as promised – over 1,000 Syrian refugees from camps in Turkey, Jordan and Lebanon were resettled here in time for Christmas. These people are now in homes, their children are starting this new year in our schools and they can look forward to building a new life here in Britain.

    I know many in this House have called for us to take more refugees, or take part in EU relocation and resettlement schemes.

    The reality is that we have already done significantly more than most of our EU partners in this regard.

    Indeed the House might be interested to hear the figures. By the time of the December Council, only 208 refugees had been relocated within the EU – that was out of the 160,000 agreed. And in all other member states put together, according to the most recent statistics, just 483 refugees had been resettled from outside the EU under the EU’s voluntary resettlement scheme.

    The point is clear: we’ve said what we would do – and got on and done it.

    Terrorism

    Turning to terrorism, the latest appalling video from Daesh is a reminder of their brutality and barbarism. It is desperate stuff from an organisation that hates us not for what we do, but for what we are – a democratic multi-faith, multi-ethnic nation built on tolerance, democracy and respect for human rights.

    Mr Speaker, Britain will never be cowed by terror. We will stand up and defend our values and our way of life. And with patience and persistence we will defeat these extremists and eradicate this evil organisation.

    Mr Speaker, I am sure the whole House will want to join with me in paying tribute to the British servicemen and women who have spent this Christmas and New Year away from their families.

    In the last month RAF aircraft have conducted 82 strikes in Iraq and Syria. In recent weeks the priority of the international coalition has been supporting the Iraqi Security Forces’ successful recapture of Ramadi, to which our air strikes made an important contribution. They have also helped Kurdish forces repel major Daesh counter-attacks in northern Iraq.

    In Syria, there have been 11 RAF strike missions, 10 against Daesh controlled oil infrastructure and 1 against Daesh terrorists near Raqqah. And we continue to fly intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance missions, providing vital support to our other coalition partners.

    In terms of the discussion at the Council, we now have a clear agreement on new rules to share passenger name records. This is a vital breakthrough but we still need to go further.

    So the Council agreed to take forward urgent proposals on more systematic data-sharing on stepping up our co-operation on aviation security and on working together to do even more to starve Daesh of money and resources – choking off the oil and clamping down on firearms and explosives, to stop them getting into the hands of terrorists.

    We also agreed to do more across Europe to counter the extremist propaganda and the poisonous ideology of Islamist extremism that is the root cause of the terrorism we face.

    The Daesh threat is a threat to us all – and we must stand together to defeat it.

    UK renegotiation

    Mr Speaker, turning to the UK renegotiation, I have set out the 4 areas where Britain is seeking significant and far-reaching reforms.

    On sovereignty and subsidiarity, where Britain must not be part of an ‘ever closer union’ and where we want a greater role for national Parliaments.

    On competitiveness, where the EU must add to our competitiveness, rather than detract from it, by signing new trade deals, cutting regulation and completing the single market.

    On fairness for countries inside and outside the eurozone, where the EU must protect the integrity of the single market and ensure there is no disadvantage, discrimination or additional costs for a country like Britain – which is not in the euro and which is never, in my view, going to join the euro.

    And on migration, where we need to tackle abuses of the right to free movement, and deliver changes that ensure that our welfare system is not an artificial draw for people to come to Britain.

    Mr Speaker, this is the first time a country has tried to renegotiate its membership of the EU from a standing start.

    Many doubted it was even possible.

    But at this Council we had an entire session focused on this issue, lasting several hours, and with almost every European leader contributing.

    I am happy to go into detail on what was an extensive discussion.

    But the key points were these.

    There was strong support for Britain to stay in the EU. European leaders began their remarks not by saying Britain is better off in Europe, but that Europe would be better off with Britain staying in it. And all wanted to reach an agreement that would address the concerns we have raised.

    There was extensive discussion on all 4 areas. Difficulties were raised with all 4. And the most difficult issues were around free movement and welfare. But there was a great deal of goodwill.

    And at the end of the discussion the Council agreed – and I quote directly from the conclusions – that we would “work closely together to find mutually satisfactory solutions in all the 4 areas”.

    I think it is significant that the conclusions talk about solutions – not compromises.

    And I made clear that these solutions would require changes that are legally binding and irreversible.

    So Mr Speaker, while each of these areas will require hard work, I believe there is now a pathway to an agreement.

    Later this week I am continuing my efforts to secure that agreement with further discussions in Germany and Hungary.

    And I hope we can reach a full agreement when the Council meets again next month.

    But what matters is getting the substance right, not the speed of the deal.

    If we can see this through and secure these changes, we will succeed in fundamentally changing the UK’s relationship with the EU and finally addressing the concerns that the British people have over our membership.

    And if we can’t, then as I have said before I rule nothing out.

    My intention is that at the conclusion of the renegotiation, the government should reach a clear recommendation and then the referendum will be held.

    It is the nature of a referendum that it is the people not the politicians who decide.

    And as indicated before Christmas, there will be a clear government position, but it will be open to individual ministers to take a different personal position while remaining part of the government.

    Ultimately it will be for the British people to decide this country’s future by voting in or out of a reformed European Union in the referendum that only we promised and that only a Conservative majority government was able to deliver.

    And I commend this statement to the House.

  • Theresa May – 2016 Statement on Counter-Terrorism

    theresamay

    Below is the text of the statement made by Theresa May, the Home Secretary, in the House of Commons, London on 5 January 2016.

    With permission, Mr Speaker, I would like to make a statement about our work to counter the threat we face from terrorism in light of the latest propaganda video from Daesh.

    This weekend Daesh released a video depicting the sickening murder of five men who they had accused of spying for Britain. The video also featured a young boy.

    I would like to echo the Prime Minister’s words that this is a barbaric and appalling video. Daesh seek to intimidate and spread hateful propaganda, but in doing so they only expose their own depravity and the emptiness of their proposition.

    The House will understand that this is an ongoing police investigation and I cannot comment further while that investigation continues. To do so could prejudice the outcome of any future judicial process. And for the same reason, I cannot comment on the alleged identities of the man or the child in the video.

    Since the start of the conflict in Syria, more than 800 people from the UK who are of national security concern are thought to have travelled to the region, and we believe that around half of those have returned. Those who have travelled include young women and families.

    We have seen deadly Daesh-inspired terrorist attacks in Europe and other countries including the attacks last year in Paris, Lebanon, Turkey, Kuwait and Tunisia, where 30 British nationals along with others were murdered at a tourist resort.

    Mr Speaker, it is imperative that the police and security services have the resources and the powers they need to keep us safe.

    Since 2010, we have protected the counter-terrorism policing budget. As we announced in November, through the Strategic Defence and Security Review, we have made new funding available to the security and intelligence agencies. This will provide for an additional 1,900 officers – an increase of 15% – at MI5, MI6 and GCHQ to better respond to the threat we face from international terrorism, cyber-attacks and other global risks.

    We have also strengthened the powers available to the police and security and intelligence agencies.

    In 2013, I updated the criteria governing the use of the Royal Prerogative, which allows the Government to cancel the passports of those planning to travel to engage in terrorist-related activity overseas. And in 2014, I removed 24 passports from people intending to travel for terrorism-related activity.

    Last year, the Counter-Terrorism and Security Act provided new powers to deal specifically with the problem of foreign fighters, and prevent radicalisation. This included a new power to temporarily seize the passports of those suspected of intending to leave the UK in connection with terrorism-related activity. These powers have been used on more than 20 occasions and in some cases have led to longer-term disruptive action such as use of the Royal Prerogative to permanently cancel a British passport.

    And in November, we published the draft Investigatory Powers Bill, which is currently undergoing pre-legislative scrutiny.

    Since April last year, exit checks have been in place on all international commercial scheduled air, sea and rail services using the UK. The information this provides is already supporting our intelligence work, enabling us to make appropriate interventions. In addition, the UK has joined the European watchlist system – so-called SIS II – meaning we are now alerted when any individual is stopped at a border checkpoint or by police anywhere in Europe and is checked against the system.

    And through our Prevent and Channel programmes we are working to protect people from being drawn into terrorism. In partnership with industry we are working to secure the removal of extremist videos through the police Counter-Terrorism Internet Referral Unit. They are currently securing the removal of around 1,000 pieces of unlawful terrorist-related content every week.

    It is clear Daesh will continue to try and poison minds, and to hurt people in Europe and other parts of the world. We must not let that happen and we stand with all those who want to stop them.

    Time and again we have seen people of all faiths and backgrounds join together and demonstrate their opposition to terror, and to stand for democracy and freedom.

    Britain will not be intimidated by Daesh, and together, we will defeat them.

  • Liz Truss – 2016 Speech to Oxford Farming Conference

    Liz Truss
    Liz Truss

    Below is the text of the speech made by Liz Truss, the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, to the Oxford Farming Conference on 6 January 2016.

    Thank you. 2015 was a tough year in farming, ending with a very tough time indeed in Cumbria, Lancashire and Yorkshire. People had been getting ready to celebrate Christmas, but found themselves instead cleaning out their homes, clearing debris off fields and disposing of dead livestock.

    Our immediate effort has been focused on the emergency and on restoring infrastructure and communications, and we have made available grants of up to £20,000 for farmers. In the longer term, we are working to build resilience and farmers have a key role to play.

    Global challenges

    The flooding we have had to confront is one of a whole set of interlinked challenges in the environment, food and farming that face Britain and the world. They are of strategic importance.

    In this room today, we have many of the people with the bold and ambitious vision to tackle those challenges and seize the opportunities they bring.

    There are going to be well over 9 billion people in the world by 2050, needing 50 per cent more food and water than today. We will have to meet this demand while reducing the impact on the environment, and while extreme weather becomes more frequent.

    The shape of the global economy is in flux, bringing ever-more intense competition and price volatility – and new economic superpowers. Our relations with China are entering a golden era. Last year, I led our biggest-ever delegation of food businesses to what is now the world’s most valuable food market.

    The growth in world trade and prosperity will bring huge opportunities to sell our high-value, superb quality food and drink as long as we are at our most productive and competitive.

    The people who reap full advantage will be the ones with the skills, the innovation, the investment—and the ambition.

    Re-making Defra

    Defra is reshaping itself to step up to this new level of challenge and opportunity, helping Britain be a global leader in farming.

    We have secured £2.7 billion to invest in capital – 12 per cent more than in the previous five years. That includes a doubling of investment in our world-class capabilities in science and animal and plant health. We will invest in technology, digital systems, growing our exports, world-leading science, protection against animal health and plant disease – and of course flood defences. This will enable us to modernise Defra and turn it into a trailblazer for government.

    In the past, Defra and its agencies have been accused of operating in silos. One bit of the network would be looking at flood protection, another at farming, another the environment, without linking up all the challenges. And we have been criticised for taking too much decision-making out of local hands. We have duplicated functions like human resources and IT, meaning we have not always provided best value for money. While it is right that we manage major national risks, we should not seek to micro-manage everything.

    This is changing. Defra and its organisations like the Environment Agency, APHA, the RPA and Natural England will in the future be more integrated, operating towards clear shared goals. And from July, the Environment Agency and Natural England will be using the same boundaries and the same plan. There will be one back office so we can put more resources into the front line, helping us save 15 per cent from our running costs, improving the value we provide to the taxpayer.

    Under the leadership of James Bevan and James Cross, these organisations will be more pragmatic, responsive to local communities and better value.

    The need for a joined-up, bold vision is what has inspired the 25-year plans we will publish in the next few months for food and farming and for the environment.

    We will decentralise decision-making. That’s the approach we are taking with the Somerset Rivers Authority and the Cumbrian Floods Partnership – I am glad the Communities Secretary has given the Authority the power to raise a Shadow Precept from this April on the way to long-term local funding.

    Subject to parliamentary approval, we will also allow farmers across the country to maintain ditches up to 1.5km long from April, so they can dredge and clear debris and manage the land to stop it getting waterlogged. This follows the successful pilots we started two years ago. We will also soon announce proposals to give internal drainage boards and other groups more power to maintain local watercourses.

    Our reforms will also help farmers by getting rid of unnecessary red tape. It will become simpler to apply for permits. We will cut thousands more inspections with the Single Farm Inspection Task Force.

    And we are improving the way the RPA operates under Mark Grimshaw’s leadership. 2015 was a very challenging year – with a complex new CAP and tough international markets. Despite the majority of payments being made by December 31st, as we pledged, I recognise cash-flow is an issue for many. That’s why I am making sure the RPA has all the resources it needs to make sure payments go out as soon as possible.

    Brussels

    If our food and farming industry is to power ahead, it is vital that Brussels becomes more flexible, more competitive and cuts the red tape.

    That is why I am fighting for reforms like getting rid of the three-crop rule, reforming the over-the-top audit and controls regime, and the absurd requirement for farmers to put up ugly posters in the countryside to publicise EU funding.

    I fully support the Prime Minister’s renegotiation of our relationship with the EU. I have seen how hard he is fighting to get a better deal for Britain. Of course it is difficult – negotiating with 27 countries will never be easy. But front and centre of our mind is Britain’s economic and national security. Let me give you one example: improving Europe’s competitiveness is a key plank of our reforms, and I can see what it would mean for our farmers and food producers.

    It would make Europe more flexible, outward-looking and dynamic, and we could see faster progress on a China Free Trade agreement. That will mean our dairy producers no longer paying 15 percent tariffs. And it could make a real difference to companies like Cranswick in Yorkshire, who employ 5,000 people and have contributed to the doubling of our food trade with China over the past five years. There is a huge prize at stake and one worth fighting for.

    In the end, the British people will decide. Because we made a promise and kept it – to deliver an in-out referendum.

    Productivity and competitiveness

    This country already has some of the best farmers in the world. Many of them are in this room. And I am proud that our food is produced to world-leading standards of quality, safety, traceability and animal welfare. To make the most of this talent and quality, we need to work with farmers to raise our productivity and close the gap with some of our leading competitors.

    That means supporting businesses to increase investment, improve skills across the sector, grasp innovation opportunities and make the most of one of our most precious assets, the Great British Brand.

    Investment

    Farming businesses have invested strongly in recent years and we need to drive that forward. We need more capital going into the right investments to improve productivity in farming and throughout the food chain. That includes foreign investment – in 2014, foreign companies invested more in British food and drink than in all other manufacturing put together.

    We are providing support with our reforms to tax averaging and investment allowances that will help farmers plan capital spending for the long term.

    The best managers in farming are putting money into skills, innovation and the right technology to boost productivity and profits. I would like to see this best practice spread right across the industry.

    Innovation and skills

    Britain has some of the most visionary scientists in the world at places like Rothamsted and John Innes. We have world-famous colleges and universities like Cirencester and Harper Adams, who are training a new generation of farmers.

    In addition, the government is putting £80 million into centres for livestock, crop health, precision engineering and data. We are developing the Food Innovation Network, announced by the Prime Minister last summer, to make sure ambitious entrepreneurs are linked up to the latest scientific knowledge. And we will be raising skill levels across the workforce by trebling the number of apprentices in food and farming.

    British brand

    2016 will be the Year of GREAT British Food, opening a long-term campaign. We are going to have a calendar of trade missions and events in the UK that showcase businesses big and small.

    Our farmers are intensely proud of British produce and for years they have wanted to get the message out. I am pleased that the beef, lamb and pork levy boards, as part of the AHDB, will be involved in the campaign and celebrating the British origin of their produce in everything they do.

    And people will know meat will be British, thanks to the new rules on country of origin labelling for pork, lamb and chicken that came into force last April.

    The new Great British Food Unit, which we promised in our manifesto, started work this week, bringing practical help and expertise, particularly for producers breaking into new markets. We have already made improvements, bringing in a 24-hour turnaround time for export health certificates.

    Resilience

    We have to sharpen our competitiveness and productivity and look outwards, and we have to build up our resilience to the growing risk of shocks and events from the changing climate and increased global trade.

    Floods

    There is no single answer to improve our resilience to flooding. Dredging, tree planting, improved defences, all have a role to play.

    For the first time we have put in place a 6-year programme for flood defences of £2.3 billion – a real terms increase in investment. More than half of our best-quality land is on plains where there is a potential risk. And over this decade we will be protecting an additional million acres – 580,000 in the last parliament and a further 420,000 by 2021.

    The new Natural Capital Committee led by Dieter Helm will, as part of its remit, look at catchment management and upstream solutions to flooding, learning from innovative programmes like Slowing the Flow in Pickering, which works with nature to reduce risk.

    And our National Flood Resilience review, which will report in the summer, is stress-testing the way we assess risk to make sure we build the right defences in the right places in the light of the latest science on climate change.

    Animal disease

    We are also improving our resilience to animal disease by investing around £65 million in new capital. This will bring us state-of-the-art laboratories and fund the upgrade of our bio-containment facilities at Weybridge, securing our ability to fight diseases like swine fever and avian flu.

    I am absolutely committed to eradicate TB. We are making good progress against what is the gravest animal disease threat facing Britain, with half of England due to be declared TB-free by 2020.

    Our approach of tackling the disease both in cattle and wildlife has worked in Australia and is working in Ireland and New Zealand.

    Thanks to the efforts and dedication of local farmers, all three areas – Somerset, Gloucestershire and Dorset – hit their target in 2015. The Chief Veterinary Officer is clear this policy needs to be followed over a wider area to secure full disease control benefits. That’s why I announced, in line with his advice, I want to see culling in more areas this year.

    New cases of TB are levelling off, but we still have the highest rate in Europe. I will do whatever it takes to get rid of this terrible disease.

    Conclusion

    We have a long-term plan to improve competitiveness and build Britain’s resilience. The global challenges we face bring huge opportunities for new prosperity, jobs, environmental progress and global leadership.

    This will require bold ambition and bold solutions from government and from industry. Britain is well placed to succeed, we have a proud heritage and, I believe, an even prouder future. Together we can make sure our food producers will take the lead in feeding the world.

    Thank you.

  • David Cameron – 2016 New Year Speech

    davidcameron

    Below is the text of the speech made by David Cameron, the Prime Minister, on 1 January 2016.

    It’s a new year. And with our economy growing and a strong, majority government in power, Britain begins it with renewed strength.

    There are no new year’s resolutions for us, just an ongoing resolve to deliver what we promised.

    Security – at every stage of your life.

    Over 31 million people will begin the year in work – more than any in our history.

    Six million children will start the new term at a good or outstanding school.

    More than half a million workers will be taken out of income tax in April, as everyone apart from the very best paid gets a tax cut and, for the lowest paid, there will be a new National Living Wage.

    Meanwhile, millions more will benefit from the free childcare, new academies, rising pensions and extra apprenticeships that we committed to, all as a result of our long-term economic plan.

    We also promised something else: giving you a say on Europe. Now we are delivering on that promise. There will be an in-out referendum by the end of 2017 – it is written into the law of the land. I am negotiating hard to fix the things that most annoy British people about our relationship with the EU.

    There is just one thing that drives me: what is best for the national interest of our country?

    But in the end it will be for you to decide: is our economic and national security in a dangerous world better protected by being in, or out?

    We also go into the year confronting some deep social problems, ones that have blighted our country for too long.

    I want 2016 to be the time when we really start to conquer them – a crucial year in this great turnaround decade.

    Because with economic renewal and social reform, we can make everyone’s lives more secure.

    So if you’re one of the many hard-working young people locked out of the housing market, we will deliver the homes that will help lead you to your own front door.

    If you’re off school or out of work, trapped in an underworld of addiction, abuse, crime and chaos, we will sweep away state failure and help give you stability.

    If your dreams have been dashed simply because of who you are, we will fight discrimination and deliver real opportunity, to help lay your path to success.

    And we will take on another social problem, too.

    When our national security is threatened by a seething hatred of the west, one that turns people against their country and can even turn them into murderous extremists. I want us to be very clear: you will not defeat us. And we will not just confront the violence and the terror.

    We will take on their underlying, poisonous narrative of grievance and resentment. We will come down hard on those who create the conditions for that narrative to flourish. And we will have greater confidence in – indeed, we will revel in – our way of life.

    Because if you walk our streets, learn in our schools, benefit from our society, you sign up to our values: freedom; tolerance; responsibility; loyalty.

    These are the big challenges of our age, some of the biggest our nation has ever faced. And this year is a test of our mettle.

    Whether we put up with poverty – or put an end to it, ignore the glass ceiling – or smash it, abandon the tenant – or help make them a homeowner, appease the extremist – or take apart their ideology, piece by piece.

    We’ll get Britain a better deal in Europe, give families the peace of mind they crave and we’ll make our country even more secure.

    That’s what this year – this turnaround decade – is all about.

    So let me wish everyone the very best and a very happy new year.