Tag: 2014

  • Kevan Jones – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Ministry of Defence

    Kevan Jones – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Ministry of Defence

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Kevan Jones on 2014-06-12.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, with reference to the National Audit Office report, Army 2020, HC 263, published on 11 June 2014, page eight, if he will provide a breakdown of the costings used to work out that reserves cost around 87 per cent of the costs of regulars when mobilised.

    Anna Soubry

    The figures used by the NAO in paragraph 11 of their report, Army 2020, HC 263, published on 11 June 2014, were taken from Future Reserves 2020: The Independent Commission to Review the United Kingdom’s Reserve Forces. I refer the hon. Member to paragraph 97. This involved considerable work to develop a Regular: Reserve Cost Comparison Model.

  • Chuka Umunna – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills

    Chuka Umunna – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Chuka Umunna on 2014-04-03.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills, what the total value is of funds not yet drawn down by winning bidders under the regional growth fund in each bidding round and region.

    Michael Fallon

    Regional breakdown of RGF allocations for each bidding round (Rounds 1-4) including the amount drawn down and remaining to be drawn down are provided in the attached tables. This data is as at 2 April. The RGF not drawn down for Rounds 1 to 4 totals £1,238 million. Of this, currently, £1,152 million is budgeted to be drawn down in 2014/15 and later years. Payments schedules are agreed with companies and payments are made when they need them.

    Round 1

    Region

    RGF Allocation (£m)

    RGF Drawdown (£m)

    RGF not drawn down

    (£m)

    North West

    21

    19

    2

    Yorkshire & Humber

    47

    39

    8

    North East

    34

    34

    0

    West Midlands

    89

    22

    67

    East Midlands

    2

    2

    0

    East of England

    16

    10

    6

    South East & London

    0

    0

    0

    South West

    4

    4

    0

    National

    175

    175

    0

    TOTAL

    388

    305

    83

    Round 2

    Region

    RGF Allocation (£m)

    RGF Drawdown (£m)

    RGF not drawn down (£m)

    North West

    189

    123

    66

    Yorkshire & Humber

    68

    45

    23

    North East

    64

    56

    8

    West Midlands

    91

    87

    4

    East Midlands

    80

    49

    31

    East of England

    35

    20

    15

    South East & London

    60

    45

    15

    South West

    71

    69

    2

    National

    90

    80

    10

    TOTAL

    748

    574

    174

    Round 3

    Region

    RGF Allocation (£m)

    RGF Drawdown (£m)

    RGF not drawn down (£m)

    North West

    113

    43

    70

    Yorkshire & Humber

    63

    28

    35

    North East

    113

    44

    69

    West Midlands

    158

    24

    134

    East Midlands

    57

    14

    43

    East of England

    25

    8

    17

    South East & London

    48

    18

    30

    South West

    82

    8

    74

    National

    177

    75

    102

    TOTAL

    836

    262

    574

    Round 4

    Region

    RGF Allocation (£m)

    RGF Drawdown (£m)

    RGF not drawn down (£m)

    North West

    96

    5

    91

    Yorkshire & Humber

    30

    2

    28

    North East

    33

    1

    32

    West Midlands

    65

    1

    64

    East Midlands

    41

    1

    40

    East of England

    15

    3

    12

    South East & London

    25

    2

    23

    South West

    14

    0

    14

    National

    115

    12

    103

    TOTAL

    434

    27

    407

  • Kevan Jones – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Ministry of Defence

    Kevan Jones – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Ministry of Defence

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Kevan Jones on 2014-06-12.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, with reference to the National Audit Office report, Army 2020, HC 263, published on 11 June 2014, page five, if he will provide a breakdown of the £5.3 billion savings that reductions in the army would save from 2012-13 to 2021-22.

    Mr Mark Francois

    The vast majority – approximately 85% – of the savings referred to in the National Audit Office report, Army 2020, are the direct result of the reduction in the size of the Regular Army from 94,000 to 82,500.

    The remaining savings arise from associated cost reductions, such as the reduced requirement for civilian support.

  • Chuka Umunna – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills

    Chuka Umunna – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Chuka Umunna on 2014-04-03.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills, what the total value is of all bids to each round of the Regional Growth Fund; how much has been committed to winning bidders in each Regional Growth Fund bidding round; and how much such funding has been drawn down in each region to date.

    Michael Fallon

    Regional breakdown of RGF allocations for each bidding round (Rounds 1-4) including the amount drawn down and remaining to be drawn down are provided in the attached tables. This data is as at 2 April. The RGF not drawn down for Rounds 1 to 4 totals £1,238 million. Of this, currently, £1,152 million is budgeted to be drawn down in 2014/15 and later years. Payments schedules are agreed with companies and payments are made when they need them.

    Round 1

    Region

    RGF Allocation (£m)

    RGF Drawdown (£m)

    RGF not drawn down

    (£m)

    North West

    21

    19

    2

    Yorkshire & Humber

    47

    39

    8

    North East

    34

    34

    0

    West Midlands

    89

    22

    67

    East Midlands

    2

    2

    0

    East of England

    16

    10

    6

    South East & London

    0

    0

    0

    South West

    4

    4

    0

    National

    175

    175

    0

    TOTAL

    388

    305

    83

    Round 2

    Region

    RGF Allocation (£m)

    RGF Drawdown (£m)

    RGF not drawn down (£m)

    North West

    189

    123

    66

    Yorkshire & Humber

    68

    45

    23

    North East

    64

    56

    8

    West Midlands

    91

    87

    4

    East Midlands

    80

    49

    31

    East of England

    35

    20

    15

    South East & London

    60

    45

    15

    South West

    71

    69

    2

    National

    90

    80

    10

    TOTAL

    748

    574

    174

    Round 3

    Region

    RGF Allocation (£m)

    RGF Drawdown (£m)

    RGF not drawn down (£m)

    North West

    113

    43

    70

    Yorkshire & Humber

    63

    28

    35

    North East

    113

    44

    69

    West Midlands

    158

    24

    134

    East Midlands

    57

    14

    43

    East of England

    25

    8

    17

    South East & London

    48

    18

    30

    South West

    82

    8

    74

    National

    177

    75

    102

    TOTAL

    836

    262

    574

    Round 4

    Region

    RGF Allocation (£m)

    RGF Drawdown (£m)

    RGF not drawn down (£m)

    North West

    96

    5

    91

    Yorkshire & Humber

    30

    2

    28

    North East

    33

    1

    32

    West Midlands

    65

    1

    64

    East Midlands

    41

    1

    40

    East of England

    15

    3

    12

    South East & London

    25

    2

    23

    South West

    14

    0

    14

    National

    115

    12

    103

    TOTAL

    434

    27

    407

  • Alison Seabeck – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Education

    Alison Seabeck – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Education

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Alison Seabeck on 2014-06-12.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Education, how many parliamentary questions tabled to his Department in the last parliamentary Session did not receive a substantive answer by the time of the 2014 prorogation; and when each such question was first tabled.

    Elizabeth Truss

    Two parliamentary questions tabled to the Department for Education, PQs 198493 (tabled on 13/5/2014) and 198434 (tabled on 12/5/2014), did not receive substantive answers by the time of prorogation. The questions had reply on dates during prorogation, and therefore could not be answered due to the House’s rules regarding notice periods.

    As a courtesy, both Members have been sent copies of the answers that they would have received had the Department been permitted to give the answers in the usual way.

  • David Winnick – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the HM Treasury

    David Winnick – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the HM Treasury

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by David Winnick on 2014-04-03.

    To ask Mr Chancellor of the Exchequer, if he will put arrangements in place to enable telephone callers to the Tax Credit Office in Preston to raise queries with an official rather than through the automatic telephone system.

    Mr David Gauke

    The introduction of HMRC’s Intelligent Telephony Automation (ITA) system has enabled HMRC to significantly reduce call handling and call waiting times and increase satisfaction.

    The speech recognition technology system reacts to what the caller says instead of selecting an option by pushing a button on their phone. ITA allows customers to say what they want to discuss when they telephone HMRC. For the majority of customers, this means their queries are answered by tailored informational messages, without the need to speak to an adviser. If a customer still wants to speak to someone, ITA ensures the adviser is already aware of the customer’s reason for calling, offering a more effective customer service.

    This enables HMRC to offer a more efficient and tailored customer service and where necessary, give the customer extra support.

  • Lord Kennedy of Southwark – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs

    Lord Kennedy of Southwark – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Lord Kennedy of Southwark on 2014-06-18.

    To ask Her Majesty’s Government what assessment they have made of the marine aggregate industry.

    Lord De Mauley

    The UK Marine Policy Statement (MPS) is the framework for preparing Marine Plans and taking decisions affecting the marine environment. The MPS sets out the policy objectives for key activities taking place in the marine environment. This includes an assessment of marine aggregate resources, potential impacts from extraction activities and issues for consideration by decision-makers. Within English waters marine aggregate extraction activities are regulated by the Marine Management Organisation.

    Government, regulators, The Crown Estate and the British Marine Aggregate Producers Association (BMAPA) have collaborated on an extensive programme of research (over £25 million in ten years) into understanding and minimising the environmental impacts of aggregates dredging. Following the completion of that programme BMAPA and The Crown Estate recently commissioned and published Aggregate Dredging and the Marine Environment – an overview of recent research and current industry practice. The report is available on The Crown Estate website at www.thecrownestate.co.uk

    The marine aggregate industry has and continues to engage constructively with Government and regulators in developing marine plans and licensing policy and Marine Conservation Zones.

  • Andrew Rosindell – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Ministry of Defence

    Andrew Rosindell – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Ministry of Defence

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Andrew Rosindell on 2014-04-03.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what assessment he has made on the effect of changes in the size of the regular Army on the UK’s ability to fulfil NATO obligations.

    Mr Mark Francois

    We remain fully confident the UK is able to fulfil its obligations to NATO as we implement our Future Force 2020 plans. As explained to NATO Allies during recent NATO defence planning discussions, the UK has a realistic and achievable plan to meet our target of a sensible whole force balance and the UK already has an enviable reputation in NATO for addressing the defence planning targets the Alliance gives us.

  • Jim Cunningham – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills

    Jim Cunningham – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Jim Cunningham on 2014-06-18.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills, pursuant to the Answer of 11 June 2014, Official Report, column 213W, on apprenticeships, if he will make it his policy to collect information centrally on how many individuals who started an apprenticeship in the 2012-13 academic year were existing employees or new employees.

    Matthew Hancock

    Information will be collected via the Individualised Learner Record for the 2013/14 academic year onwards on the length of time a learner has been with their employer prior to starting their apprenticeship.

  • Barry Gardiner – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs

    Barry Gardiner – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Barry Gardiner on 2014-04-03.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, pursuant to the Government’s response to the Government’s Environmental Audit Committee’s Report HC 1195 published on 26 March 2014, what the forecasted costs and savings are under each cost heading for planning authorities of implementing the biodiversity offsetting proposals over a five year period.

    Dan Rogerson

    The consultation paper “Biodiversity Offsetting in England”, published on 5 September 2013, set out a number of options for taking forward offsetting in England. The accompanying Impact Assessment (Defra 1126) set out the available financial information. However, the costs and benefits to each sector would vary according to the system of offsetting which was adopted. In keeping with the Environmental Audit Committee’s recommendations, the Government will not take any policy decisions on offsetting until the assessment of the six pilots is available.