Tag: 2000

  • HISTORIC PRESS RELEASE : Gordon Brown urges Fast-Track to Dynamic Single European Financial Services Market [July 2000]

    HISTORIC PRESS RELEASE : Gordon Brown urges Fast-Track to Dynamic Single European Financial Services Market [July 2000]

    The press release issued by HM Treasury on 17 July 2000.

    The Chancellor, Gordon Brown, today called for fast-track completion of the single European financial services market and called for a plan for a 2004 implementation date.

    Proposing early implementation of priority measures, Gordon Brown said:

    “A dynamic single financial market is key to achieving fundamental economic reform and prosperity across Europe.

    “Businesses, including start-ups and SMEs, will benefit from deeper, more liquid capital markets, which in turn will deliver growth and jobs. And consumers and investors will benefit from more competition and innovation, driving down prices and delivering a wider and better choice of financial products.

    “Today I have set out practical steps to reinforce the Financial Services Action Plan and deliver the strategic goal agreed at Lisbon – to become the most competitive and dynamic knowledge-based economy in the world capable of sustainable economic growth with more and better jobs and greater social cohesion.

    “That is a goal worth striving for but there is a case to achieve it on an even faster track: with will and determination, we can have a genuine single capital market by 2003 and complete a single market in financial services by 2004, bringing economic prosperity to citizens and business across the EU.

    “We must focus on measures which will deliver early benefits. And, in the spirit of our Lisbon goal, we must embrace competition, innovation and flexibility.”

    Key proposals set out by the Chancellor in a paper published today include:

    • fast-tracking priorities in the Financial Services Action Plan;
    • bringing forward the target date by one year to 2004;
    • speeding up the completion of the capital market – a new deadline of 2003;
    • delivering a competitive financial services market based on mutual recognition of core standards to ensure the integrity of financial markets and protection of consumers;
    • a framework which recognises diversity of regulatory approaches, is responsive to market developments and encourages co-operation and exchange of information between supervisors;
    • developing clear indicators and measures of success – for example, of the depth and liquidity of capital markets and price differentials for standard financial services products.
  • HISTORIC PRESS RELEASE : Good news for savers and taxpayers – National Savings review foresees greater competition [July 2000]

    HISTORIC PRESS RELEASE : Good news for savers and taxpayers – National Savings review foresees greater competition [July 2000]

    The press release issued by HM Treasury on 24 July 2000.

    Greater saver choice and more attractive, competitive savings products will be delivered more effectively as National Savings (NS) continues to modernise, Economic Secretary Melanie Johnson said today.

    Welcoming the findings of the five-yearly review of the NS agency, Miss Johnson said:

    “The review highlights the important part recent innovations in service delivery, have played in helping to make NS more efficient and more flexible. This includes the role played by outsourcing its operations.

    “NS is now better placed than ever before to build on this achievement to modernise and adapt to the changing market it operates in. It now has the potential to match the best in the financial services market to the benefit of its millions of customers. But it will only realise that potential if it provides choice and good value products which savers want to buy in the very competitive savings market.

    “I believe that NS now has an effective launching pad to develop and deliver those products. It must make best use of developing access technologies in e-commerce and telephone services, as well as by post and through Post Offices, to make sure that it remains an attractive option for savers.”

    The review sees these developments as central to NS continuing to make a valuable contribution to the cost-effectiveness of the national debt by offering attractive products and services to members of the public. It will be set a clear and overarching objective to achieve cost-effective government debt management. NS, which will remain a government agency, funds a significant amount – over £62bn – of the national debt. Taxpayers will continue to see the benefit of the NS contribution, which is more cost-effective than comparable gilt-edged securities.

    This is also good news for existing NS savers and for future customers. NS will be working to give its current and new customers more attractive, more up to date products and services. People will also get more choice on how they access those products. In addition to being able get NS products through the Post Office and by post as they do now customers will in future be able to choose from a wider range of channels.

    The recommendations of the review will be taken forward in a new NS business strategy, and reflected in the framework document that governs the relationship between NS, the Treasury and Government. In taking forward its business plan, NS will give particularly close attention to the need to continue to modernise so that it remains relevant, efficient and cost-effective, and continues to develop new products as well as embracing new innovations and ideas.

    Recognising the contribution of NS staff to recent developments, Miss Johnson added:

    “This is an exciting vision of the future for NS, which the agency is now working to make a reality. All NS staff and those working with NS, can rightly be proud of the impressive transformation that has been achieved in recent years. The scene is now set for this spirit of improvement and innovation to continue building a modern, best-practice organisation that can succeed for many years to come.”

  • HISTORIC PRESS RELEASE : Banking Competition to Deliver Benefits to the Consumers – Government Response to the Cruickshanck Report [August 2000]

    HISTORIC PRESS RELEASE : Banking Competition to Deliver Benefits to the Consumers – Government Response to the Cruickshanck Report [August 2000]

    The press release issued by HM Treasury on 4 August 2000.

    In accepting Don Cruickshank’s report Chancellor Gordon Brown announced a package of new measures to improve competition in the UK banking market and deliver benefits to consumers.

    Announcing the Government’s detailed response to Don Cruickshank’s wide-ranging report on improving competition in UK banking markets, Gordon Brown said:

    “Don Cruickshank’s report is a major milestone in improving competition and ensuring that consumer benefits are central to banking services. In accepting the report’s recommendations, we are determined to drive competition forward and deliver real improvements for personal and small business customers.

    “Too often banks and other financial services providers have been slow to give consumers the information they need to make informed choices and make the most of developing competition, new technologies and new products.

    “Banking services, like every other sector of the economy, need to be exposed to the full rigours of competition. We aim to achieve this through reforming regulation, opening up payment networks and eliminating any special treatment.”

    The Chancellor and Don Cruickshank have discussed the Government response in some detail. Don Cruickshank welcomes the Government’s plans for action across a wide range of the recommendations.

    Measures announced today include:

    • CAT standards for credit cards together with emphasis on disclosure of key terms and conditions
    • Consultation on extending CAT standards to other financial services products
    • review of self-regulatory mechanisms such as the Banking Code to ensure they deliver sufficient consumer benefits
    • encouraging comparative tables of banking products and complaints against financial services firms.

    The Government Response to the Cruickshank Report also includes announcements on progress in a number of key areas to meet the aim of improving competition in banking services.

    Payments

    – work is continuing to introduce a payments regulator through primary legislation to open up networks and oversee access charges for bank customers.

    – consultation on detailed proposals to establish a licensing system for payment systems.

    – a payments strategy for all Government Departments to ensure a coordinated approach in modernising government and responding to developments in and the introduction of e-commerce.

    The Response also summarises significant progress in reforming charges and access to the cash machine network (LINK), including opening up the ATM network to non-bank providers, banning double charging for ATM withdrawals, and reform of wholesale charging structures. It outlines further work in progress, including OFT review of the LINK and MasterCard schemes.

    Regulation

    – a wide-ranging review of the Financial Services and Markets Act two years after implementation to monitor its impact on competition in financial services.

    – the review will also monitor the effects of regulation and policies introduced by the Government.

    – steps to improve transparency and disclosure in the supervision of financial institutions.

    – ensuring that the Government is not seen as giving special treatment to financial institutions in the development of Government initiatives.

    – ensuring that Government, consumers and financial services providers are in the best position to take advantage of the opportunities presented by e-commerce.

    – review of money laundering regulations to ensure that these are proportionate and minimise distortions to competition.

    The Treasury has already acted by announcing an amended objective to ensure that competition issues will be central in its dealing with financial services. This is set out in the White Paper Public Service Agreements 2001 – 2004 published on 28 July.

    Small and medium sized businesses

    – ensuring that small businesses’ access to the financial services ombudsman is not restricted by the number of staff employed but determined by turnover.

    – review of the proposed Banking Code for small businesses to ensure that it delivers sufficiently strong benefits to customers.

    – encouraging the FSA to ensure that small businesses benefit from its work on comparative information and complaint handling.

    – developing government information services to aid new entrants bringing competition to the small business market.

    The Chancellor and Trade Secretary Stephen Byers announced referral of the supply of banking services to small businesses to the Competition Commission immediately on publication of the Cruickshank Report on 20 March. This work is already under way and the Competition Commission has been asked to report by June next year.

    Thanking Don Cruickshank for his report, the Chancellor said:

    “I very much welcome the hard work Don and his team put into the report. There is no doubt of the interest it has generated both here and abroad.

    “The report lays firm foundations for the Government and the financial services industry to build on to develop one of the most competitive, dynamic and efficient financial services markets in the world.”

  • HISTORIC PRESS RELEASE : Local Communities Affected by Quarrying set to Benefit from Environmental Improvements [August 2000]

    HISTORIC PRESS RELEASE : Local Communities Affected by Quarrying set to Benefit from Environmental Improvements [August 2000]

    The press release issued by HM Treasury on 25 August 2000.

    Promoting conservation and funding research into more sustainable construction practices are amongst the wide-ranging proposals announced today by Treasury Minister Stephen Timms to help reduce the environmental impacts of quarrying.

    A consultation into proposals for the ‘Sustainability Fund’ launched today sets out possible approaches to delivering environmental benefits to local communities affected by sand, gravel and crushed rock quarrying.

    Announcing the consultation, Stephen Timms, Financial Secretary to the Treasury said:

    “This new Fund provides an excellent opportunity to deliver real environmental benefits – not only to local communities affected by the impact of quarrying – but also for the future of construction design and aggregates recycling.”

    Revenue for the Fund will be recycled from the aggregates levy due to be introduced from April 2002.

    The consultation document invites views from all interested parties on how the objective of the Fund – to deliver environmental benefits to areas subject to the environmental costs of quarrying – can best be achieved, and suggests a number of options for discussion. They include:

    • overcoming market barriers and promoting increased use of alternative materials as aggregates;
    • funding research into more sustainable construction and demolition practices;
    • promoting conservation and increased biodiversity;
    • restoring the natural landscape;
    • promoting environmentally friendly quarrying practices; and
    • local community projects.

    Responses to the consultation document are requested by 6 October 2000.

  • HISTORIC PRESS RELEASE : Andrew Smith Announces £38 Million Mobile “Quick Win” Strategic Partnership with Vodafone [August 2000]

    HISTORIC PRESS RELEASE : Andrew Smith Announces £38 Million Mobile “Quick Win” Strategic Partnership with Vodafone [August 2000]

    The press release issued by HM Treasury on 30 August 2000.

    Andrew Smith, Chief Secretary to the Treasury , today announced that the Office of Government Commerce (OGC) has agreed a strategic partnership with Vodafone for the provision of mobile telephone services to Government bringing over £38m of savings to the taxpayer.

    The partnership gives Vodafone access to over 100,000 mobile phone users across government for two years bringing a more streamlined approach to the government market.

    Speaking about the new strategic partnership Andrew Smith said:

    “We live in a fast moving technological age where the growth in the mobile phone usage is immense.

    “This agreement is the first in a series of initiatives streamlined by the Office of Government Commerce and demonstrates the savings that can be achieved with a co-ordinated approach to procurement across Government. The strategic partnership with Vodafone will deliver savings on both service costs and administration totalling at least £38 million over the next two years. This is excellent news for the taxpayer.

    ” There are clear benefits for Government to enter into strategic partnerships with major private sector providers, particularly where they involve initiatives that optimise the purchasing power of all government departments and demonstrate their ability to improve services and reduce costs. The agreement makes available Vodafone’s best value for government to the whole of the public sector, including local authorities and the NHS, on government contractual terms and without the need for further local competitions.”

    Peter Gershon, Chief Executive of the Office of Government Commerce said:

    “This is a quick win deal and demonstrates the OGC’s strategic approach to the purchase of a key procurement commodity across Government. Over the next two years we will gain a better understanding of the Government’s needs in this dynamic field and return to the market as a more intelligent customer. I encourage all public sector organisations to make use of these arrangements as soon as they are able.

    “There are real benefits to the taxpayer on this agreement as the joint arrangement with Vodafone includes process savings, tariff reductions and access to new technology. This should be seen as a catalyst for other private sector partners to come forward and work to streamline contract processes with Government. Such systems optimise the purchasing power of all government departments and demonstrates the real scope for improving services and reducing costs.”

    The agreement with Vodafone is based on the Government Telecommunications Mobile contract, one of the Central Computer and Telecommunications Agency’s (CCTA) managed services. This agreement potentially encompasses over 100,000 users across government and caters for the varying usage requirements of the public sector on a range of tariffs specifically designed for the government marketplace.

  • Gordon Brown – 2000 Speech to the TUC Congress

    Gordon Brown – 2000 Speech to the TUC Congress

    The speech made by Gordon Brown, the then Chancellor of the Exchequer, on 12 September 2000.

    My theme today, is to build through growth and productivity full employment for all in our generation.

    For twenty years all of us here in this hall, all of us have marched for jobs, we have rallied for jobs, campaigned and petitioned for jobs, demonstrated for jobs.

    For twenty years you, the TUC and trades unions, have rightly said, we have all said to each other, that unemployment is the central economic and social, indeed moral, issue of our time.

    But for nearly twenty years we could only protest about unemployment.

    Twenty years ago, ten years ago, even five years ago young people tried as hard as now to find work.

    • they were applying for jobs;
    • they were training for jobs.

    Don’t tell me these generations of young people didn’t have talent or potential, couldn’t learn or hold down a job.

    What they needed was a government on their side.

    If only one young person had got a job from the New Deal. Then that would have been worthwhile in itself.

    But there are now, since 1997, 500,000 benefiting from the New Deal. And nearly 250,000 are already in jobs.

    And every time a young person denied a job under the previous Government gets a job now we should be proud of the New Deal, that this is what can happen when we work together.

    So I believe it was right, even under fierce opposition, to take the decision to tax the excess profits of the privatised utilities to the tune of 5.2 billion pounds – and then to put that money to use in the poorest high unemployment areas of Britain, in the poorest communities of the country.

    I can report to you today that together we have created one million and 35,000 jobs since May 1997.

    • unemployment among men, the lowest since 1980;
    • unemployment among women the lowest since 1976;
    • long term unemployment now the lowest since the 1970’s.

    But as long as there is unemployment we will not be complacent . so from April with 300 million pounds we are extending the New Deal so that every one of the long term unemployed in all parts of the country can have the opportunity to work .

    Unemployment among young people is now the lowest since 1975.

    But none of us should be satisfied. With 400 million pounds a year allocated to help those people and places still left behind – those with literacy problems , drugs problems – we will now intensify the New Deal. So that in future no teenager is without training or work.

    Unemployment among single parents now falling for the first time ever, but not good enough. From April with 300 pounds allocated for four years a new programme of choices – our aim: training, jobs and – yes and at last – a national child care strategy to help all parents who want it.

    Unemployment rates among the disabled falling for the first time in decades. I want every person with disabilities empowered to use their abilities as they wish . From April we are extending the New Deal so that disabled men and women have the right to work too.

    Unemployment in Scotland, Wales, Northern Ireland and the regions, the North, the South West – the lowest for more than twenty years.

    But that is not good enough. With 500 million pounds for regional development agencies our aim is full employment not just in one region but in every region of the country.

    Unemployment among the over 50s rising for decades – a scandal that in the 80s and 90s thousands of men and women who lost their job over 50 were thrown on the employment scrapheap – now falling, half a million more over 50s in jobs since 1997. But we want to do more. To end the scandal of age discrimination. Hence a guaranteed minimum income of 180 pounds for the unemployed over 50 returning to work.

    And building from this starting point of one million more jobs. And the strength to take the tough decisions to achieve stability, this is a moment not for complacency but a moment of challenge and opportunity for our country – and the prize for all of us great, not just full employment for a year or two but full employment for our generation.

    So first, we must entrench an anti-inflation culture of stability to achieve full employment.

    Second, a tougher New Deal, rights and responsibilities, to strengthen full employment.

    Third, far higher productivity to sustain full employment.

    Fourth, a new unionism to underpin full employment.

    And fifth, new rights against discrimination and exclusion.

    And our first task has been to escape from 18 years of boom and bust and to never go back.

    Let us never forget that when we had the 15 per cent interest rates, one million homes repossessed and one million jobs destroyed in manufacturing – it was not the previous Government but Britain’s hard working people that bore the burden.

    I remember a couple coming to see me, both in tears, who, having lost their jobs knew they would also lose their home.

    I remember too the tragedy of the skilled craftsmen, miners in my constituency, steel workers, redundant in their forties who feared they would never work again.

    After three years we can reflect on where we now are, and remember how we got here.

    Remember those who said we could not achieve economic stability and growth.

    Remember the predictions of a downturn made in Downing Street.

    Let’s just say their forecasts have not aged well.

    And let me explain why: it is because we rejected short-termist, take-what-you-can, irresponsibility – and it is because we put our faith in our values of economic responsibility – planning for the long term, building from solid foundations – that with the Bank of England independence and new fiscal rules we now in our country have inflation close to its lowest for 30 years.

    And we cannot take it for granted.

    It is not by accident but by taking action that we have steady sustainable growth and investment rising.

    It is not by default but by design that we now have long term interest rates at historically low levels and are repaying the national debt.

    It is not by chance but by choice that we now have 28 million in work. This is what happens when the British people and their Government work together.

    Remember also those who opposed Bank of England independence and said our policies would mean a future of higher unemployment and lower public spending.

    Remember those who resisted our fiscal rules when we insisted on fiscal discipline and said we would never be able to spend on health and education and public investment.

    Time has not looked well on these forecasts either.

    Unemployment is down and because our prudence is not the barrier to spending but its pre-condition, spending on services is rising by 5 per cent in real terms for the next four years.

    And it is because we have tackled the levels of debt and the levels of unemployment that instead of 42 pence in every extra pound spent going to unemployment and debt repayments, it is now only 17 pence – leaving 83 pence in every pound to go to health, education and the vital services.

    Health spending rising this year by 7 per cent in real terms, education by 10 per cent , and public investment by 30 per cent.

    But our task is even bigger than creating stability for a year or two. It is – and this is the next and critical stage – to entrench a culture of long term stability so that people no longer expect that every period of growth will be followed by an inflationary and wages spiral and boom-bust recession.

    And every event tests our resolve to end short termism and steer a course of long term stability, the real foundation for full employment

    Now I understand the concerns about the exchange rate with the euro and we will continue to do more to support manufacturing.

    And I understand the concerns about world oil prices and petrol prices too

    But we will not return to short termism in any respect and put at risk our hard won stabiltiy

    No short term lurches in spending policy or tax policy, no irresponsible spending increases or inflationary pay rises that put youth jobs at risk, no quick fixes or soft options that would put long term stability public services and our policy for full employment at risk. We will not return to the stop go of the past.

    Governments have to deal with both national and international events and oil raises the issues of both.

    When we came to power in 1997 the deficit was 28 billion pounds.

    Yes – we had to face up to that deficit and we dealt with that deficit immediately.

    And so we retained and extended the fuel duty escalator that had been operated by the previous Government in successive years since 1993.

    And there were good environmental reasons as Kyoto proved for doing so.

    But last November – immediately – I had cut the deficit and was able to put in place new environmental measures. I said we would end the escalator, and we froze – and for 4 million cars have reduced – car licence fees, a March Budget that was welcomed by the motoring industry.

    And today, now that the deficit is down, let us note that the existing fuel revenues are not being wasted but are paying for what the public wants and needs – now paying for rising investment in hospitals and schools- 10 billon more this year alone – an 18 billion increase in money this year for transport and our public services, money well invested in services for all the people.

    Yes, we have higher excise duties than Europe but we also have just about the lowest tax rates on work, the lowest business tax rates, the lowest VAT rates.

    And unlike America – and we should be proud to say so – we fund from these revenues a truly national health service for all the people.

    Governments are of course subject not just to national pressures but to global pressures too.

    And in our three years in Government we have had to deal not just with debt and deficits in Britain but like other governments we have been tested by financial crises in Korea, then Asia, then Russia and a slowdown in the international financial system.

    And we are being tested too by an oil price that first fell from 19 to 11 dollars and then has risen above 30 dollars, trebling in 20 months.

    Of course when the oil price shifts from 10 to over 30 every economy is affected, every country’s petrol price rises and I understand very acutely the pressures that manufacturers, hauliers, farmers and consumers face.

    But it is precisely because there is volatility in oil prices that we should resist any lurches in policy or return to the old short-termism of the past – instead we should steer a course for long term stability.

    Our first duty is to ensure internationally – as we are pressing in world counsels – and in Britain – that oil flows from the wells to the refineries and to the petrol stations to the consumer and this we will do without interruption by barricades or blockades.

    Our second duty is to ensure that with our inetrnational partners we maintain a course of stability to ensure international growth and this we will do.

    I tell you this week among every one of Europe’s 15 governments as in America, in face of oil price volatility, it is not shifts in oil tax rates that are now being considered – it is pressure on the oil producing countries to cut prices.

    And I say that when OPEC countries have themselves stated their sustainable oil price rate is not 34 dollars but 22-28 dollars, none of us will relax in our representations until they ensure levels of oil production that bring the price at least to the levels they themselves plan.

    And moreover, because cartels should not exercise such power anywhere we will look even more intently at how to diversify energy supplies.

    And the third lesson I learn, I tell the country honestly, it is precisely because of volatility of oil prices that we should refuse to lurch between budgets from one policy quick fix or soft option to another – lurches that would inevitably be based on uncertain prices and unknown revenues – and instead we should steer a course of stability.

    Such short termism is the old way that brought us the stop go, boom bust economy, the ups and downs, of the past and this I will not endorse.

    Let me tell people that when the oil price was 10 dollars experts advised our Government we should let close every coal mine in our country and this I and my colleagues refused to do and instead for long term stabiltiy of supply we rightly sought a level playing field ended the discrimination against coal investing also 100 million in coal, a policy I believe the British people support.

    And it would be equally wrong and short termist to tie tax rates to what could be a temporary rise in oil prices as it would be wrong to lurch in the other direction between budgets to suddenly tie tax and other policies to a temporary oil price fall.

    And let me say also it would be the worst of short- termism to make a lasting cut in fuel duty-as some propose today – which would have to be paid for year on year, because of a one off- change in oil profits and thus oil revenues that might never be repeated.

    So we will listen, but we will not fall for the quick fix and the irresponsible short termism of making tax policy this afternoon because of blockades this morning.

    I say – we will continue to make policy as we have done – in Budgets and at Budget time, and I believe the British people value long term stability and it does nothing for full employment or growth to return to the short termism of policy lurches that brought us boom and bust in the past.

    And we will not change our European policy either – in principle our support for the single currency, in practice the five economic tests that have to be met.

    So we will continue to reject policies that pander to those who urge isolation and even withdrawal, something which would put jobs and stability at risk.

    Yes there is greater stability.

    But yes too there is still a 30 per cent productivity gap with our competitors, which must be bridged if we are to achieve full employment and long term prosperity for all.

    So when I listen also to those who say we can relax our efforts, return to the old ways, and ignore long-term challenges, I say I will not fall for that complacency either.

    Instead, from the platform of our new found stability and employment growth I want today to challenge the whole of Britain – British industry, British management, the British public sector, British trades unions – all of us to join together in seizing not squandering this hard won time of opportunity.

    • not ever again to retreat back as we have done in every previous economic cycle into the complacent short-termism and stop go or quick-fixes of the past;
    • -not to fight yesterday’s battles;
    • but – free of complacency – to address tomorrow’s challenges and to use our new found stability and growing strength in a national productivity drive to achieve a rise in productivity and thus prosperity that outpaces that of our competitors;
    • and to do this we must, day by day, week by week, year by year, have the discipline to address and overcome the old british problems of short termism and under investment, low productivity and inadequate skills, over-complacency in the boardroom and restrictive practices wherever and whenever they exist – and use this time of opportunity to remove all the old barriers to employment and prosperity for all.

    And I can tell you today what Government will contribute to this productivity drive.

    We are doubling public investment to 19 billion pounds, with permanent capital allowances and R and D credit, investing more in manufacturing, investing one billion pounds more in science so that British inventions can lead to British manufacturing products and British jobs. For the first time ensuring an employee share ownership plan that gives most benefit not just to a few employees in a firm but all.

    And making the biggest investment in education and skills in our country’s history, ten billion more by 2004.

    But winning at work – the theme of the Congress – is not simply making promises about what Government can do, but setting goals we can all meet together.

    In the old days, management said it was all up to the unions.

    Unions said it was up to management.

    Both said it was up to Government.

    I say it is up to all of us together.

    So I am here not so much to make new pledges as to summon all of us to new challenges.

    All the evidence shows that when unions win at work on a productivity agenda, prosperity and employment increase. And so we must be honest with each other.

    Just as prosperity for all is undermined by the wrong kind of Government, so too in the past the wrong kind of management and the wrong kind of unionism have failed us as surely as the wrong kind of Government.

    And when we know that in some plants our productivity is the best in the world and in other plants even in the same industry it is only half as good, our challenge is plant by plant, firm by firm, sector by sector, managers and union members, free from complacency, to address the barriers to productivity:

    • the levels of our skills;
    • and levels of investment;
    • standards of management and industrial relations all round;
    • barriers to the introduction of modern technology and questions of best practice and who does what in the workplace.

    Our challenge is to work together to ensure that the benefits go – not, as in the past, to a few – but – as they should always have done – the benefits go to all who play their part.

    We, the Government, will accept our responsibilities in the public sector, inviting trades unions to work with us to improve both conditions of service and the condition of each service.

    And in an environment of continuously low inflation I ask unions across industry to consider seriously the benefits of moving from the annual cycle and extending multi year pay deals.

    Friends, great historical changes are at work, even more dramatic than the changes a century ago when craft unionism transformed itself into new industrial unionism.

    Now in this new century, old industrial unionism is transforming itself into a new unionism:

    • our enduring values, justice and just rewards for all the same;
    • our objectives bolder than defending our members against the threat of poverty, now about ensuring all our members have the chance to realise their potential to the full;
    • and the surest way – the great drive of twenty first century unionism – to meet that age old aim of enhancing the value of labour is directly through education and training to enhance the value of each of our skills.

    So it is not only because the key to future levels of productivity and pay is in the level of our skills but because our strength and security lies in our skills.

    That this Government will work with you as you bargain for skills – the right to one million individual learning accounts at 150 pounds each and another 750,000 able to benefit from adult literacy courses by 2004 and the new University for Industry.

    And let me tell you the scale of our ambitions – what, from the 1970s the Open University achieved for thousands in second chances in higher education through TV and distance learning, we are now ready to achieve for millions in lifelong learning through the University for Industry – recurrent, permanent educational opportunity through cable satellite and interactive media and learning direct in workplaces and homes.

    Let me be clear. Our aim is any course of study – at any age, at any grade.

    We start with 1000 Learndirect Centres, open to all in every part of the country.

    And we will support every trades union as you bargain with employers for access to learning direct in every workplace and to advance training – I can tell you – the Union Learning Fund on which every union can draw which started at two million pounds a year will be 4.5 million pounds this year.

    And no one should be left out.

    And because we believe a fair society is essential to a productive economy we are ensuring new rights for working people.

    • because never again do we want mothers or fathers refused time off to see their sick child through a hospital operation, the right to time off when a family member is ill. This is what a good family policy is all about;
    • the right to four weeks paid holiday pay;
    • from last month the right to maternity pay extended to all low paid workers;
    • the right of recognition for trades unionists;
    • and from may 1997 the right to be a member of a trades union, a hard won right that no future Government will now ever dare take away;
    • and yes, we are now asking the low pay commission to report next year on a further rise in the minimum wage;
    • because in no part of our society should there ever be institutionalised racism again, we are removing barriers of prejudice, discrimination and racism.

    And having lifted the first million pensioners out of poverty, cut vat on fuel, introduced free tv licences for those over 75 and a 150 pounds winter allowance for all, our next challenge as Alistair Darling said yesterday is to ensure that all pensioners who need it – our priority those on modest occupational pensions and modest savings – are helped not penalised for their thrift. Our aim . Yes, to end pensioner poverty. Yes, to reward pensioners with savings. Yes, to ensure that not some but all pensioners gain more from the rising prosperity of the nation.

    And as we raise health service spending from 49 billion pounds to 54, to 58, to 63, to 68 billions by 2003, we will demonstrate by our actions that the best health service for each of us is not a private one that favours the few, but a public service run in the public sector by dedicated public servants in the public interest for all.

    They said that in one term we could never simultaneously abolish 800 hereditary Peers, introduce devolution to Scotland and Wales, ban hand guns, legislate new working rights, including a minimum wage and lead the world to start tackling world poverty and world debt. Now under Tony Blair we have.

    Now they will say we cannot achieve full employment, abolish child and pensioner poverty, build world class public services in education and health. Meeting the productivity challenge, we can and we will.

    And the fruits of working together will be not just for some but for all.

    The test of our country’s advance, judged not by the heights reached by a few individuals, but by the benefits to everyone when all of us work together.

    The test of national success to be judged not just as the successes of a few, but how success can be shared by the whole country.

    Our national progress – all of us as a family moving up together, with the strong helping the weak and, as a result, making us all stronger.

    Not selfishness but sharing.

    Realising our enduring values, the same yesterday, today and tomorrow – an opportunity and prosperity that enriches not just a few but everyone.

    This is our vision. It is our task.

    Have confidence that working together employment and prosperity for all can be our achievement.

  • HISTORIC PRESS RELEASE : New Team of top private and public sector experts appointed to drive forward improvements in public services [September 2000]

    HISTORIC PRESS RELEASE : New Team of top private and public sector experts appointed to drive forward improvements in public services [September 2000]

    The press release issued by HM Treasury on 15 September 2000.

    The membership of a new, expanded team of top private and public sector experts to help departments and agencies find fresh, practical ways to improve the performance and delivery of public services was announced today by the Chief Secretary, Andrew Smith.

    The Public Services Productivity Panel, which originally became fully operational in 1999 under the Chairmanship of the Chief Secretary, was such a success that it has been decided to renew and expand it. Panel members are freely giving up their time to work with him to improve the quality of public services for everyone. The new Panel’s first meeting was held yesterday at No 11 Downing Street.

    The Government’s 2000 spending review pledged a massive increase of £43 billion in funding for public services, but also set demanding targets for improved service delivery through new Public Service Agreements. A key role of the Panel is to help the government deliver and preferably outperform the PSA targets.

    Andrew Smith commented:

    “The Government is determined to make the very best use of the added investment it is providing for Britain’s key public services.

    “I am very grateful for all the hard work and imaginative ideas that the original Panel members contributed to help improve performance across the public sector. I am also very pleased to be able to announce the new membership of an expanded Panel to build on this work. I believe that we will be able to draw on the wealth of experience of the new Panel to drive forward further improvements.”

    The members of the Panel are:

    Andrew Smith (Chair),  Chief Secretary to the Treasury
    Lynton Barker,  Head of Management Consultancy Services, Pricewaterhouse Coopers
    Keith Burgess,  Former Global Managing Partner, Andersen Consulting
    Caroline Burton,  Board member, London Pension Fund Authority and Investment Panel member for various pension funds
    Sir Ian Byatt,  Former Director General, OFWAT
    Pat Carter,  Direct investor in US & European healthcare and technology businesses
    Fiona Driscoll,  Director/Marketing, Defence Evaluation Research Agency
    Michael Frye,  Chairman, Lynara (Management) Ltd
    Andrew Foster,  Controller, Audit Commission
    Sir Michael Lyons,  Chief Executive, Birmingham City Council
    John Miskelly,  Chairman of JM and Director of Blueprint Group Ltd
    Greg Parston, Chief Executive, Office for Public Management
    Lord Simon, Advisor to the Cabinet Office
    Lord Sainsbury, Minister of State, DTI
    Clare Spottiswoode,  Former Associate Partner of PA Consulting Group
    John Smith,  Director of Finance, BBC
    David Varney,  Chief Executive, BG Group
    Professor Sir Adrian Webb,  Vice Chancellor, University of Glamorgan

    The Government intends to supplement the skills and experience of the Panel by appointing a person with a trade union background as soon as possible.

    The Panel will be developing a new work programme, in consultation with public services, over the next month. Details of the programme will be announced at that time.

  • HISTORIC PRESS RELEASE : Brown puts Case for Reform to Strengthen Global Economic Co-operation [September 2000]

    HISTORIC PRESS RELEASE : Brown puts Case for Reform to Strengthen Global Economic Co-operation [September 2000]

    The press release issued by HM Treasury on 20 September 2000.

    Speaking at the Commonwealth Finance Ministers’ Meeting today, the Chancellor of the Exchequer, Gordon Brown said:

    “The IMF and World Bank Annual Meetings in Prague this week offer us a crucial opportunity to strengthen the international financial system and to ensure that all countries are able to participate fully in the world economy and share in the benefits of rising global prosperity.

    “When the next country is faced by turbulence, and when the next challenge confronts the global financial system, people will not ask who was at which meeting. People will ask whether we have learnt the lessons of Mexico, Korea, Russia and Brazil, and whether we have put in place measures – from early warning procedures to framework for crisis resolution – to create greater stability and economic growth.

    “The founders of the Bretton Woods institutions knew that prosperity is indivisible. This is even more the case in today’s world of instantaneous global markets. Today, instability anywhere has repercussions everywhere. The new world economy has brought greater risks of insecurity as well as opportunity. So it is the duty of the international community through economic co-operation to put in place measures to spot potential problems early, to prevent these problems where possible and where problems do occur, to minimise the disruption and real damage they can cause.

    “While the path of open trade and open capital markets that we have travelled in the last 30 or 40 years has brought unprecedented growth, greater opportunity and the prospect of better lives for millions across the world, we must not forget there is still massive poverty. Globalisation must work for the poor as well.

    “The message from Prague for us all – Governments, Institutions, demonstrators – must be that in the new world of open capital markets the proper course is not to retreat from global co-operation or globalisation. The way forward is to enhance international economic co-operation.

    “So we reject those that say the instability of recent years and argue we should turn our back on globalisation, in effect a return to the protectionism of the 1930s and tightly controlled capital markets of the 1940s. Those that look at the expansion of private capital flows and argue there is no longer a need for the IMF and World Bank, that in effect we should return to the discredited laissez-faire of the 1920s. Globalisation has the potential to be the key to greater prosperity. Greater international co-operation is the best hope for eradicating poverty and of delivering growth and opportunity to all.

    “The case for global economic co-operation is being made every day. The IMF, under the new leadership of Horst Kohler, and the World Bank, under Jim Wolfensohn, have agreed and are implementing reforms – including greater co-operation between the two institutions. There are four further steps we can and must agree in Prague:

    co-operation in surveillance to deliver effective early warning;
    co-operation in crisis prevention;
    co-operation in crisis resolution;
    and above all co-operation to break the vicious circle of debt, poverty and economic decline in which so many countries are still trapped, and create a virtuous circle of debt relief, poverty reduction and economic growth.

    Surveillance

    “Over the past two years the international community has made great progress in agreeing a framework of codes and standards covering the key areas that all countries need to address if they are to achieve stability and participate in the international financial system – transparency in fiscal and monetary policy, financial supervision and corporate governance.

    “And because sound economies depend not simply on robust and transparent economic and financial systems, but on welfare and social systems that build social cohesion and trust, the World Bank and UN are also developing principles of good practice in social policy.

    “But the codes of conduct will only work if there is an effective and authoritative surveillance mechanism, to monitor their implementation, so that the public have confidence in the transparency on which stability depends.

    “The building block is already present in the IMF’s Article IV process. The new international architecture, however, requires a step change in the IMF’s surveillance under Article IV. It must become broader encompassing not just macro economic policy but the implementation of the codes and standards on which stability depends. It must become inclusive, drawing on the work and expertise of the World Bank and other bodies to deliver broader surveillance under the Article IV umbrella.

    “It must become transparent so that the public and the markets get the information they need and have confidence in the process which produces it. Indeed we must ensure the private sector is aware of the codes and standards, and the information they provide. Evidence shows that where the private sector can see that a country has strong economic policies in place, that there is macroeconomic stability and a greater openness to trade, they are more likely to invest in that country. But we still have further to go. Strong foreign investment flows should be linked to strong economic policies.

    “Crucially, the surveillance system must be authoritative, independent and of the highest quality. It is important to ensure the IMF has the authority and credibility it needs: we need surveillance of the IMF as well as by the IMF. This is one of the reasons why we welcome Horst Kohler’s agreement to establish an independent evaluation unit at the IMF. This should cover the full range of the IMF’s activities.

    Back to top

    Crisis prevention and private sector involvement

    “In setting up new mechanisms for surveillance and crisis prevention, we must also ensure that we provide the right incentives. We must ensure that all the main participants, public and private, in the international financial system accept their responsibilities and play their part in maintaining stability.

    “All economies need not only to be transparent in their activities: they also need to forge regular contacts and lasting relationships with their private investors.

    “Countries which are prepared to make the efforts to implement internationally-agreed codes and standards, and to establish closer and more secure relationships with their private sector creditors – through establishing investor networks, debt monitoring systems, private sector contingent credit lines, and collective action bond clauses – will find that these efforts will help contribute to building less crisis-prone economies.

    “It is also important that the private sector works with the IMF on surveillance issues. We welcome the action the fund has taken in this area and its establishment of a capital markets group.

    “And countries that adopt the right policies need to be sure that they have support from the official sector as well as the private sector. That is why the UK supported the development of the preventative contingent credit facility (CCL) at the IMF for these countries. We welcome the agreement at the IMF which we will finalise in Prague to develop further the CCL to make it more attractive to countries and to ensure that it offers real protection.

    Crisis resolution

    “However successful we aim to be at avoiding crises, we should recognise that shocks will occur. We need to ensure there are effective methods in place for crisis resolution – in a way that ensures that the burden of adjustment is not placed on the poor and the most vulnerable people.

    “There will continue to be a role for the official sector, particularly the Fund, in resolving them. But we need also to recognise that the way we resolve crises may have significant implications for the behaviour of public and private sectors in the future.

    “Following the events of 1997 and 1998, the international community has now developed a new framework for private sector involvement in crisis resolution. The handling of a number of recent cases has demonstrated the ways in which the private sector can be involved.

    “But we need to go further in fleshing out this framework with a clear set of presumptions for appropriate private sector involvement concerning the range of potential crises, moving further away from the old ad hoc model, while still retaining the necessary flexibility to deal with the specifics of individual cases.

    World Bank and IMF co-operation

    “As we build a platform of stability, we must ensure that more countries share the benefits of the global economy.

    “This requires close co-operation between the IMF and the world bank and I welcome Horst Kohler and Jim Wolfensohn’s statement earlier this month of an enhanced partnership between the two institutions.

    “The focus of the World Bank is poverty reduction, structural reform and social development. Yet this matters not only in the poorest countries. As the crises of the 1990’s have demonstrated, it is important to put in place strong social systems and mechanisms for helping the most vulnerable in all countries participating in the international financial system.

    “The IMF’s prime responsibility is stability and surveillance. But stability and surveillance matter in all countries. And the Asian financial crisis has shown that structural problems can lead to financial and macroeconomic instability.

    “So in many countries the interests and activities of the IMF and World Bank are interdependent. They both have vital roles to play in surveillance and lending in emerging market and developing countries alike.

    “Above all the Bretton Woods institutions have a crucial role to play in forging the new consensus that I believe we need. A consensus that recognises that enhanced international co-operation is the key to prosperity.

    Development

    “The need to develop a new approach is clearest for the poorest countries.

    “To achieve our goal – halving by 2015 the proportion of people living in extreme poverty – we need to move beyond the economic and social assumptions of the past two decades. A new world requires a new understanding of what makes for sustainable economic development – how we break the vicious circle of debt, poverty and economic decline and create a virtuous circle of debt relief, poverty reduction and economic growth.

    “So what we need is a new approach that recognises the links that form the virtuous circle:

    first we need to deliver the enhanced debt relief;
    second, we need to build the link between debt relief and poverty reduction strategies;
    third, we need to create the new conditions for economic; development- stability and a recognition of the roles of the public and private sector – that will allow the participation of all poor countries in the global economy.

    First, the importance of debt relief.

    “The Commonwealth has played a crucial role in the drive for debt relief, starting with the Mauritius Mandate. Last year we were able to go further and secure a commitment to a major reform of the HIPC to deliver wider, deeper, faster debt relief. We are all anxious to see this implemented.

    “Some progress has been made. We now have 10 countries through to decision point who will receive $21bn in total debt relief. But we need to go further. We need to make sure that any HIPC country that can make the necessary commitments to poverty reduction qualifies quickly for decision point and the flow of debt relief to achieve our aim of 20 countries qualifying for debt relief by the end of the year.

    “I welcome the Fund and Bank’s statements earlier this month outlining new ways to speed up the process:

    first, much greater flexibility on track record with the focus on achievement, not on a fixed number of years;

    second, a recognition that the development of full PRSPs should not hold up debt relief and that to reach the decision point countries should produce interim PRSPs;

    third a streamlining of conditionality so that it focuses on what is essential to achieve poverty reduction and growth; and

    fourth, the Fund and Bank working more intensively through the joint implementation committee to drive the process more proactively.

    “But just getting 20 countries to decision point by the end of 2000 is not enough. We must also face the next challenge of dealing with countries that are not able to make the commitment to poverty reduction, many of which are affected by conflict. We need to help these countries move to a position where debt relief leads clearly to poverty reduction.

    This is an issue we need to address proactively – in following up the g7 declaration in Okinawa, and in the work of the bank’s post conflict unit. We will seek to move this agenda forward in Prague.

    Back to top

    Second, poverty relief

    “Next we need to build the link between debt relief, development and poverty reduction strategies.

    “The last year has seen a major and decisive shift away from the old Washington consensus and towards a new year 2000 consensus where anti-poverty policy and economic policy will in future go hand in hand in recognition that social justice and economic growth are intertwined.

    “It is now widely agreed that anti-poverty strategies are be not only be country-driven but community driven – developed transparently with broad participation of civil society, key donors and regional institutions. And that economic and social strategies must be clearly linked to the international development goals of halving world poverty by 2015.

    “Poverty Reduction Strategies are not however intended to hold up debt relief. Which is why I am glad the IMF and Bank have re-emphasised that only outline, or interim poverty reduction strategy papers are needed to reach decision point.

    “But full PRSPs are vital to achieving our goals. The countries concerned must and the international community must together ensure that PRSPs do reflect the new year 2000 consensus. And the Bank and Fund’s programmes must support the PRSPs designed by the countries.

    Securing the benefits of globalisation

    “Aid and debt matter but in order to grow out of poverty, the poorest countries need to have access to the global economic system.

    “We need to make this opportunity real for all the citizens of the world by ensuring the conditions, the capacity and the means to enable them to participate in the global economy in a manner that can benefit rather than harm them.

    “There are several major issues that Clare Short and I will to continue to work on in the next 12 months:

    the first is in trade talks to create liberalisation that does not disadvantage the world’s poorest. The EU has been working to persuade other industrialised countries to sign to its pledge of duty-free and quota free access to “essentially all” imports from developing countries. The prime minister, Clare and I have all gone further than this – calling for duty-free and quota-free access for all imports from developing countries.

    secondly, we have called for the reform of WTO in a manner that ensures a true voice for developing countries; and

    thirdly, we recognise in a new knowledge based global economy we need to ensure that the world’s poorest get access to technology, knowledge and skills that enable them to exploit opportunities rather than be exploited by them.

    “A lasting exit from poverty will also need all countries to have access to private investment capital. Now it is true, as we saw in recent years, that short-term capital flows can be destabilising when investors are insufficiently informed and when countries lack open and transparent policy making procedures, strong financial systems, and the necessary institutional capacity.

    “But, as I have said, the answer is not for the countries to turn their backs on globalisation but for us to join together to build a solution that meets the needs of developing countries.

    “To do this we need to provide countries with road-maps for opening up their capital accounts – with guidance on the speed and desirability liberalisation. On attracting more stable direct investment not just portfolio flows.

    “There are many issues to cover, from reforms to strengthen the financial sector, including banking supervision, bankruptcy laws, property rights and an independent judicial system; and on creating infrastructure and conditions to enable investment and using private sector finance and skills.

    “We must offer developing countries a practical programme of advice and assistance that will help them on the path, not overloading their capacity, but also not losing sight of the ultimate goal.

    “At present only 3 per cent of foreign direct investment goes to low income countries and only 1 per cent goes to the heavily indebted poor countries. We must change this so that developing countries receive stable, productive foreign direct investment. Investment which brings not just capital, but transfers skills.

    “All countries, rich and poor, need stable oil prices. When the price trebles in only 20 months, every economy is affected, but the poorest disproportionately. I therefore welcome OPEC’s commitment to increase the supply of crude oil by 800,000 barrels per day from 1 October. But the price remains unsustainably high. So we call upon OPEC to raise supply and to take additional measures to bring down the price of oil as they have promised to do.

    Conclusion

    “So we should not turn our backs on globalisation. We must continue to build an improved international financial system fit for the twenty first century that will enable all countries to participate in the new world economy and to share in rising prosperity. Enhanced international economic co-operation is the best hope of eradicating poverty and of delivering growth and opportunity to all.”

  • Andrew Smith – 2000 Speech at the Electronic Government Conference

    Andrew Smith – 2000 Speech at the Electronic Government Conference

    The speech made by Andrew Smith, the then Chief Secretary to the Treasury, on 5 October 2000.

    Good morning everybody, it’s a great pleasure to be here and great to see so many people here. The new information economy presents us all with terrific opportunities and important responsibilities and I think there is a very simple message here for Government, as for business, and it is that the information economy gives the opportunity to modernise Government, we see how industry and services are being revolutionised in the information age and the simple message is that Governments must do the same, we must move to on-line Government.  And it really goes without saying that that is about modern Government, it’s about improving the way that Government serves its customers, it’s about realising the huge efficiency gains also which IT makes possible.

    On-line Government isn’t therefore simply about the business which Government does internally, it’s about changing the way that Government does its business externally. It’s about more than improving the way Government does things and between Civil Servants and between departments, it’s how we deal with clients, with customers and with the general public and getting Government on-line is a crucial part of building the wider knowledge economy in the UK.  So we want to see the Government taking the initiative so that it can move into the lead and not simply follow what is happening in other sectors in embracing new technology and in order to achieve this we have set a number of targets that the United Kingdom should be the best place to trade electronically by 2002, that we should have universal net access by 2005 and that all Government services should be on-line by 2005.

    So what is the Government doing to make the UK the best place to trade electronically? Firstly, of course, our policies for economic stability that we have built since 1997, low and stable inflation, low interest rates, the long term framework for stability carrying forward economic growth in a sustainable way, a very important foundation. Secondly, what we have done on taxation. Corporate taxes at the lowest in our history are lower than any major competitors, capital gains tax now at 10% for investments held for more than 4 years, the research and development tax credits we have brought in, the other help we are giving to small businesses as well as larger ones. Thirdly, the establishment of a thousand centres where small businesses can find help and support with IT. The 100% capital allowances we have brought in for IT investment too.  And fourthly, and very importantly, ensuring that people have the skills which they and e-businesses need in order to be able to flourish in the information society.  So we are enabling adults to get 80% discount on basic computer courses, courses which will be free for unemployed people and through the schools providing a billion pounds for schools ICT over the next three years to deliver at least one computer for every five secondary pupils. We have also of course set e-commerce targets that we will have 1.5 million small and medium enterprises on-line by 2002, well things are moving so fast that progress has overtaken that particular target because we have got l.7 million on-line already. The target also to have 1 million trading on-line by 2002, we are presently at some 450,000.

    Now in moving towards universal net access by 2005 we have established UK on-line as a cross Government brand. We are putting in place 6,000 physical access points with internet access and assistance with technology. Many will offer training in IT skills. We are ensuring that the costs of internet access in the UK are amongst the cheapest in Europe and through last year’s budget we ensured that employees can borrow computers from their companies free of taxation.  And we are also developing a system in which poorer individuals can lease or buy recycled computers cheaply and 100,000 will be available by the end of next year.  So we are on the way to meeting our targets and in this year’s spending review we allocated one billion pounds to boost electronic service delivery in Government because we are very much aware that the public sector needs to be, not only a better operator but a better procurer of services. We need to be able to specify our requirements more clearly, to negotiate with the private sector on equal terms or better and we need to secure best value for the taxpayer as we establish the best standards for the public.

    So the Office of Government Commerce as you have heard was created to ensure that best practice in procurement is adopted right across Governments. The position of the E-Envoy was created to drive electronic procurement right across Government and to realise the benefits of properly joined-up Government.  And we now already have 33% of Government services on-line, a significant achievement but it gives us still some way to go. An example of what is possible is the Inland Revenue’s pioneering service offering on-line tax returns. That has already got more than a hundred thousand people now registered and indeed twenty four thousand have already filed their returns.  Through the Government’s secure intranet we now have 69 connections to departments, agencies, non-departmental public bodies, we have got 90,000 e-mail users, 55,000 web access users, the GSI directory which has been populated by 31 departments – this means that those civil servants know how to access colleagues right across Government.  So we can say that through the secure intranet we do have something of a success story in Government but it only really hints as to what more actually is possible.

    We can see too how the targets that we have set actually support and reinforce one another. For the UK to be the best place to trade electronically of course we need Government backing for e-business. That actually reinforces the way Government itself works as an e-business and as we get more of the population on-line then we are upskilling our employees and staff at the same time. So making Britain the best place to trade electronically, getting Government on-line and getting more people on-line are all part of the same drive and we are putting our money in this endeavour very much where our mouth is because through the cross cutting review of the knowledge economy, which was an important part of the spending review, we earmarked one billion pounds to improve on-line service delivery across Government. Money also will be available through the Capital Modernisation Fund for  priority services.

    Now the overall target for getting Government on-line belongs to the Cabinet Office, but all departments have their own targets and their own funds for electronic service delivery and they will have support from the centre in carrying their work forward working on three key aspects.  First, how Government deals with its suppliers through electronic procurement; secondly how it deals with the public through electronic service delivery;  and thirdly how Government procures major IT projects and we obviously need to get all of these three right if electronic government is to be a success.

    In the whole area of electronic procurement our aim is to use Government’s power as a purchaser to boost the markets and to encourage successful on-line business and also to make gains in the way Government procures by ensuring that electronic procurement makes joining up Governments itself easier.

    Now both the Office of Government Commerce and the Central Computer and Telecommunications Agency have a central role to play in Government’s electronic procurement strategy. For example the OGC are working on ways to make electronic tendering more reliable and more wide-spread and there are considerable gains to be made there.  On-line delivery of services is of course the most publicly visible aspect of on-line Government and it has got great potential to improve the way that Government deals with and serves the public. UK On-line has been established as a single portal which will make it easier to access all the functions of Government and if people can meet their needs more easily and faster on-line, if the service is designed to be user friendly then we will carry forward the culture of doing things electronically. It can and will be more convenient and accessible to people. Access of course can be 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. Services can be joined up on-line which can’t be joined up physically.  And the E-Envoy will be looking at Government on-line services to find and use the opportunities for joining up services from different departments and agencies.  And in the long term on-line service delivery should bring great gains in efficiency with lower transaction costs and less physical infrastructure, but for this to happen there needs to be improvement in the way Government goes about procuring IT projects. In the past there have been some pioneering projects, but these have not, if we are honest, always been managed well and one of the reasons we set up the OGC was to improve procurement powerfully right across Government.

    Peter Gershon will be saying more about this later on, but there is great scope for improving procurement in IT. The IT Projects Review is about helping departments to get large projects up and running and on budget and the OGC is already delivering great benefits. I mean it recently brokered a deal with Vodafone that will save the Government no less than thirty eight million pounds over the next two years and I would like to congratulate Peter Gershon and his team on that Vodafone deal. It’s not everybody who in their first few months working for the Government saves us thirty eight million pounds, so it’s an example to us all.

    How will OGC actually improve procurement? Well first it will help departments with their own projects and where a Government-wide approach is needed it will manage commercial relationships on behalf of departments. We faced a situation in the past frankly where very often big firms we are dealing with  know more about their business with Government than we know about our business with them. We need to change that for an intelligent strategy in procurement. Moreover the gateway  process which OGC is developing in a general way to handle large complex and novel projects, especially in Information Technology, offers great  potential gains. It’s proven in industry as a valuable tool in managing all aspects of projects, organisational, risk management and business case as well as technological aspects and it will also help spread best practice and because OGC will be working with departments they will be able to bring to bear the benefits of other departments’ experience and avoid reinventing the wheel or repeating avoidable mistakes.

    So in conclusion my message is today that OGC and the CCTA have had a relatively short time to sort of get up and running and drive forward electronic procurement, but they are already delivering and we can expect more, very much more for the future.  And for all of you here today there is a very important task in driving forward electronic procurement and e-service delivery in your own departments and agencies in partnership with industry, in partnership with other public services too, but I would just like to assure you that you will have very strong and committed support from the centre in this critically important endeavour.  So thank you all for coming today, thank you all for what you are doing and I believe that together we can and will build successful electronic Government in a successful on-line Britain. Thank you very much.

  • HISTORIC PRESS RELEASE : Gordon Brown Launches Pre-Budget Report consultation tour, setting new Targets to help lone parents get into work [October 2000]

    HISTORIC PRESS RELEASE : Gordon Brown Launches Pre-Budget Report consultation tour, setting new Targets to help lone parents get into work [October 2000]

    The press release issued by HM Treasury on 9 October 2000.

    Gordon Brown today launched his Pre-Budget Report Consultation Tour by announcing a ‘new world of opportunity and choice for lone parents’ and setting an ambitious target to get the number of lone parents in work in the UK up to the levels of other countries.

    He outlined new figures showing that:

    • 100,000 lone parents have moved from welfare to work since 1997;
    • after decades of rising numbers of lone parents on benefit, the numbers have fallen from 1,015,000 in May 1997 to 910,000 in May 2000 with further falls expected this year taking the proportion of lone parents in work to 50 per cent;
    • 150,000 lone parents have received help through the NDLP, with over 55,000 moving into work directly through the New Deal for Lone Parents;
    • 228,000 childcare places have already been established. With the planned and new money announced today by Margaret Hodge, new places will cater for 1.6 million children by 2004;
    • there are 100,000 (25 per cent) more lone parents claiming WFTC than claimed Family Credit, the benefit it replaced. And 90,000 lone parents receive the childcare element of WFTC, compared with 47,000 who claimed the childcare element of Family Credit.

    But the Chancellor said that there is much more to do, since lone parents in the UK are much more likely to be out of paid work and in poverty than elsewhere. Whilst the new figures show an increase in the proportion of lone parents in work from 44 per cent in 1997 to almost 50 per cent today, the UK still lags behind other countries in the ?league table? of international comparisons of the numbers of lone parents in work:

     Country  Lone mothers in work  Married mothers in work
     France  82 per cent  58 per cent
     Germany  67 per cent  57 per cent
     Sweden  70 per cent  80 per cent
     USA  60 per cent  64 per cent

    Furthermore, the figures show the UK has:

    • low overall lone parent employment rates;
    • relatively low full-time employment rates (about 20 per cent compared to around 70 per cent in France and 50 per cent in the US);
    • a large, and negative, difference between the employment rates of lone mothers and couple mothers. (Latest figures show almost two-thirds of married mothers are in work in the UK).

    More recent figures have shown the UK employment rate climb toward 50 per cent and the US figure is now around 70 per cent.

    The Chancellor stressed that the biggest changes are yet to come, with:

    • today’s launch by Margaret Hodge of an expansion of child care places to match the already announced expansion;
    • second, new and improved arrangements for the Working Families Tax Credit ; the under-16s child credit in WFTC increased from £21.25 to £25.60 in June this year.  With this change the maximum WFTC available for a lone parent with two children increased by £450 a year. A new £4.2m advertising campaign is to be launched this month;
    • third, the new £1.5bn Children’s Tax Credit for up to 5 million families; and
    • fourth, new pilots for the new Choices programme. This new programme, supported by the National Council for One Parent Families, was announced in Budget 2000 in recognition of the fact that for some lone parents moving into work is a process, not an overnight event.  Under this scheme, which is being piloted this month and will be available nationwide from April 2001, lone parents can choose between:
    • going into education or training, where they will receive an extra premium of £15 per week to help with the cost of studying;
    • taking a ?mini-job? of less than 16 hours, with help to pay childcare costs in  the first year and a being able to keep the first £20 of their wages without affecting their Income Support;
    • taking a job of 16 hours a week or more, and applying for the Working Families Tax Credit, which will give them a guaranteed income of £155 per week for 16 hours or more and £214 for 35 hours or more. They will also get help with childcare costs through the Childcare Tax Credit.

    There is no requirement to take up work or undertake training, though lone parents whose children are over 5 will be required to come in for a discussion about the possibilities.  Those with younger children can volunteer for the programme if they wish.

    The Chancellor said:

    “We want to see a sea change in the opportunities available to lone parents. We want a new world of opportunity and choice for lone parents.

    We want to give lone parents real choices, enable them to move from welfare to work and get them and their children off benefits and out of poverty. Our new package of help with child care, extra support through the Working Families Tax Credit and initiatives like Sure Start will help more lone parents combine a job with the vital work of bringing up children and get the number of lone parents in work up to US levels.

    This Government is on the side of working mothers and working families, helping them to combine paid work with the vital job of bringing up children.  We are working to give them a real choice, helping them with record increases in child benefit, the Working Families Tax Credit and the new Children’s Tax Credit, a £1.5 billion tax cut for up to 5 million families. We’re tackling child poverty, giving families and mothers genuine choice by making work – the best route out of poverty – pay.

    We have looked at alternative proposals for a transferable tax allowance. Under such a scheme, a family with two children on £15,000 a year would receive £965 a year. With the Working Families Tax Credit, the same couple would receive not £965 but £2,200 a year.

    Scrapping the WFTC and the New Deal for Lone Parents would deny lone parents the choice of whether to work and would leave millions of children and their parents in poverty.

    Over a million low and middle income families would lose more than £24 a week if the WFTC were scrapped.”