Tag: 1998

  • HISTORIC PRESS RELEASE : First UK-China Financial Dialogue Meeting – Chancellor Gordon Brown welcomes greater partnership in developing economic links with China [November 1998]

    HISTORIC PRESS RELEASE : First UK-China Financial Dialogue Meeting – Chancellor Gordon Brown welcomes greater partnership in developing economic links with China [November 1998]

    The press release issued by HM Treasury on 10 November 1998.

    Following the first UK-China Financial Dialogue meeting today, Chancellor Gordon Brown and Chinese Finance Minister Xiang Huaicheng welcomed agreement on the need for further strengthening of prudential regulation and financial systems in emerging markets. They also agreed on the scope for greater partnership between the two countries in financial sector development and commercialisation of state owned enterprises in China.

    Mr Brown said :

    “I was very pleased to welcome Finance Minister Xiang and his colleagues to London for the first in a regular series of meetings between the Finance Ministries, Central Banks  and Financial Regulators of our two countries.

    “China’s economic transformation over the past twenty years has been remarkable.  It is now amongst the largest economies in the world, and is increasingly becoming integrated into the world economy.  As such we clearly have a common interest in pursuing greater dialogue on financial and economic issues.

    “Indeed, with one quarter of the world in recession, the ongoing world economic turmoil has highlighted more than ever before the very real interdependence of national  economies and financial structures in today’s globalised economy.  Both the UK and China  therefore have a clear mutual interest in seeing a positive resolution to both  short-term problems facing the world economy today, as well as the challenges for the longer term.

    “The meeting today with Minister Xiang sets the ground for increased cooperation and partnership on all then economic and financial challenges that both our countries face.”

  • HISTORIC PRESS RELEASE : Trust Fund for Honduras and Nicaragua – New UK Government Proposals [December 1998]

    HISTORIC PRESS RELEASE : Trust Fund for Honduras and Nicaragua – New UK Government Proposals [December 1998]

    The press release issued by HM Treasury on 10 November 1998.

    A new trust fund for Honduras and Nicaragua, with #10 million backing from the UK, was proposed today by Chancellor of the Exchequer, Gordon Brown and International Development Secretary, Clare Short. It is one of three proposals for international
    assistance put forward by the UK following the recent natural disaster in those countries.

    The proposals, outlined in letters to G7, IMF and World Bank colleagues, are to consider urgently :

    • a trust fund to which bilateral and multilateral creditors can contribute  assistance to meet short term debt service obligations, with a UK contribution of #10 million.
    • shortening the timetable for completing debt relief programmes for post-catastrophe countries as for post-conflict countries
    • a moratorium on official bilateral debts.

    The #10m UK contribution is additional money for Nicaragua and Honduras. The Treasury has guaranteed access to the reserve for this extra money.

    A copy of the joint letter is attached. Announcing these proposals, Gordon Brown said:

    “In addition to emergency relief aid which many countries and agencies are already giving to the victims of Hurricane Mitch, it is essential to consider longer term assistance to help the countries affected back on track towards sustainable development.

    “The proposals announced today will do a great deal to support the aid efforts. We shall continue to work closely with other Governments and international financial institutions to deliver practical, effective assistance.”

    Clare Short said :

    “We are willing to explore the possibility of providing help to Honduras and Nicaragua through some kind of moratorium on official bilateral debts with other bilateral creditors.

    “It is essential that the post-catastrophe countries themselves, not other creditors, benefit from any actions taken. Any combination of IFI and bilateral aid will be designed to achieve this vital safeguard.”

    Reminding members of the public how they can most effectively support Government efforts, the Chancellor said :

    “Individual contributions to help Honduras and Nicaragua can be made free of tax through the Millennium Gift Aid scheme. This scheme, which came into effect earlier this year, enables anyone giving at least #100 to qualifying projects before the end of the year 2000 to reclaim tax on their gift.

    “I know that many thousands of people have been moved by the plight of the people of these countries and wish to add their own contribution to that being provided directly by Government. Through Millennium Gift Aid, we shall help them to make their assistance go that much further.”

    10 November 1998

    M. Michel Camdessus

    Managing Director

    International Monetary Fund

    700 19th Street N W

    Washington DC 20431

    WASHINGTON

    USA

    POST-CATASTROPHE COUNTRIES

    We are all aware of the terrible devastation that Hurricane Mitch has caused to the social and economic infrastructure in Honduras and Nicaragua – two countries that were amongst the poorest in the world even before this disaster.

    Many countries have already made emergency contributions to the international aid effort, and these donations must continue.  It is essential that emergency aid is delivered immediately to help the homeless and injured and to minimise the chances of further damage being caused through disease.

    However, it is not too early to begin to think about how to put these countries back on a sustainable track towards development.  The catastrophe caused by Hurricane Mitch has left both Honduras and Nicaragua in need of substantial sums of money.  Given the drastic reduction in their exports as a result of the hurricane, this money is necessary to finance essential imports as well as to allow the necessary rebuilding of the countries’ infrastructure.  We must now consider how this money is best delivered.

    For the reasons above, in addition to providing rapid disbursing assistance under existing mechanisms for disaster relief, we ask you to look urgently at possible mechanisms that could mitigate the debt service payments that these countries are due to make to International Financial Institutions over the coming months.  We would support the temporary suspension of debt service payments to the International Financial Institutions.

    We suggest one way forward is to set up a Trust Fund for Honduras and Nicaragua into which bilateral and multilateral creditors could contribute to help meet the debt service obligations that these countries have to these Institutions in the near future.  The UK stands ready to provide money for any such fund alongside its continuing emergency aid donations.

    In the longer term, it is also important to ensure that these post catastrophe countries receive the debt relief that they so desperately need.  We therefore urge you to look at how we might ensure that the HIPC initiative is used as effectively as possible as a means for providing debt relief for these post catastrophe countries, as you have constructively begun to do so for post conflict countries.  It is important that debt relief is not stalled for these countries because of Hurricane Mitch and that creditors are ready to provide the full debt relief necessary at the decision or completion points to ensure that their debt burdens are reduced to sustainable levels.  In particular we would press for consideration of shortening the timetable to permit an earlier completion point.

    The UK is also willing to explore with other bilateral creditors the possibility of providing help to Honduras and Nicaragua through some kind of moratorium on official bilateral debts.  Any combination of IFI and bilateral aid will of course have to be designed so that the beneficiaries of any actions are the post catastrophe countries themselves, and not other creditors.

    We have written in similar terms to James Wolfensohn and Enrique Iglesias, and am passing a copy of this letter to G7 and EU Finance Ministers.

    GORDON BROWN

    CLARE SHORT

  • HISTORIC PRESS RELEASE : Byers gives further details of Public Service Agreements [December 1998]

    HISTORIC PRESS RELEASE : Byers gives further details of Public Service Agreements [December 1998]

    The press release issued by HM Treasury on 9 November 1998.

    Further details of the Public Service Agreements being entered into by each Government Department will be announced by Chief Secretary Stephen Byers later today.

    Mr Byers will explain for the first time that each Agreement, to be published together in December, will contain an efficiency statement detailing specific efficiency targets and demonstrating how  each Department will improve its own productivity.

    The efficiency statement will include substantive information on progress and plans in three key areas which will contribute to the overall effectiveness of the public services:-

    • dealing with fraud against the taxpayer;
    • better procurement practice;
    •  reducing sickness absence amongst public employees.

    Stephen Byers said:

    “Public Service Agreements will be ground breaking documents. We have already said that they will include clear performance targets.  But we need to go further and ensure that we achieve value for money for every pound of taxpayers’ money spent. High quality public services and greater efficiency go hand in hand.

    “Last Tuesday the Chancellor announced targets to cut down on public sector absenteeism. Each Government Department is now carrying out an audit of its own procedures, recognising the large variation in absence levels.

    “Dealing with fraud has to be a key responsibility for each Department, and I want every Department to have a clear and effective strategy for tackling fraud. Every pound saved is a pound more for front-line public services. The Government is also a major purchaser of goods and services, and we should use our position to achieve savings for the public purse.”

    Average Working Days Absence per Staff-Year by Civil Service Department, 1996

     

     Department  Working Day’s Absence
     National Savings Department  14.3
     DSS Group  12.2
     Employments Group  11.8
     Inland Revenue  10.8
     Home Office  10.8
     Lord Chancellor’s Department  10.7
     Crown Prosecution Service  10.2
     Land Registry  9.9
     Customs and Excise  9.0
     Trade and Industry Group  8.8
     Scottish Office  8.5
     MoD  7.9
     MAFF  7.8
     Cabinet Office Departments  6.4
     Treasury  5.1
     Civil Service Average  10.2

    NOTES TO EDITORS

    The attached table gives details of absences in major Civil Service Departments in 1996.

    The Comprehensive Spending Review, published in July 1998, announced that each Government Department would agree a Public Service Agreement. The Agreement will include each Department’s objectives and measurable efficiency and effectiveness targets. Progress will be monitored by a continuous process of scrutiny and audit, overseen by a Cabinet committee  chaired by the Chancellor. The Committee will be advised by a Public Services Productivity Panel, drawn from business and the public sector, on ways of improving the productivity of public services and announced by the Chancellor in the Pre-Budget Report.

    The Government has commissioned a review, announced in the Pre- Budget Report and to be led by Peter Gershon of GEC-Marconi, which will examine current arrangements for civil procurement and recommend any changes that would support the Government’s efficiency, modernisation and competitiveness objectives.

    Data covers major departments (and their agencies) of 5,000 staff and over, plus the Cabinet Office and Treasury.  These account for 91% of all non-industrial civil service employees.

    Source: Analysis of Sickness Absence in the Civil Service, 1996, BMI Health Services.

  • Patricia Hewitt – 1998 Speech at the Downing Street Seminar on Profitable Community Banking

    Patricia Hewitt – 1998 Speech at the Downing Street Seminar on Profitable Community Banking

    The speech made by Patricia Hewitt, the then Economic Secretary to the Treasury, at Downing Street, London, on 3 November 1998.

    Introduction

    1. Good morning and welcome to Downing Street.

    2. We invited you here today to explore community development banking, to hear about the US experience, and to consider what we can learn from it. Community banking can offer a win-win solution – it improves services for people in the poorest communities, and can prove profitable for the banks.

    3. How can we ensure people have basic cash access facilities? What is the best way of helping people begin to save and get credit? How can we expand Credit Unions? How do we bring small scale capital into deprived areas? Do we do this through banks? Through credit unions? What about micro-credit organisations? These are some of the many questions I hope we will explore today.

    We are extremely fortunate to have with us:

    Ron Grzywinski of Shorebank;

    Greg Hattem of Bankers Trust;

    Cliff Rosenthal of the National Association of Community Development Credit Unions; and

    Susan Rice, currently with Bank of Scotland, but formerly with NatWest’s US subsidiary, Bancorp.

    4. I want to start by why there is a problem with social exclusion. Then I want to move on to talk about the steps the Government is already taking to tackle social and financial exclusion. I will conclude by looking at how to take the agenda forward.

    General policy considerations

    5. My concern is financial exclusion, which is both a symptom and a cause of social exclusion. Combatting social exclusion is at the very heart of this Government’s agenda.

    6. We have watched the gap between rich and poor in this country widen over the last twenty years.

    7. Most people in Britain have benefited from rising living standards; and this is reflected in the growth and prosperity of the financial services industry.

    8. Of course this is good news, and we will be doing all we can to ensure it continues.

    9. But for the poorest people, concentrated in the most deprived neighbourhoods, it is a different story.

    10. They have not shared in the increased wealth and greater opportunities so many of us enjoy.

    11. And, crucially, they do not – or cannot – access financial services products.

    12. In my own constituency in west Leicester, there are outer city estates with too few jobs and too much crime, where most children leave school without qualifications – and where financial services all too often mean benefit cheques and illegal loan sharks.

    13. It is in the poorest communities that we find the highest concentrations of people without bank accounts, without access to other financial services.

    14. People in these communities can very often by locked into the cash economy, cannot get affordable property or possessions insurance, can only access credit at unbelievably high interest rates, and do not use mainstream savings opportunities. Also, the chances of accessing appropriate finance and support for self-employment or starting their own businesses may be effectively zero.

    15. This Government is not prepared to accept a society where economic opportunity is restricted in this fashion.

    Government response

    16. For many of those living in our most deprived neighbourhoods, the policies of the past bear much of the blame.

    17. But the past is the past. We must now get on and deal with the problems head-on.

    18. We have to bridge the gap between the poorest neighbourhoods and the rest of the country – and this is a priority issue.

    Tackling financial exclusion

    19. The Government cannot overcome problems of social exclusion on its own, and nowhere is this more evident than in the area of financial exclusion.

    20. Our policy is to promote wider access to financial services, where progress has been made, but is in danger of becoming stalled.

    21. We set out overall agenda for deprived neighbourhoods, in the Social Exclusion Unit report, Bring Britain together, which was published in September.

    22. This set out our proposals, to be taken forward by 18 policy action teams, over the next year.

    23. Two of these action teams concern financial services. They are to be run by the Treasury and will report to me by July next year.

    24. One of them will look into prospects for increased access to personal financial services for people living in poor neighbourhoods, especially retail banking, but also credit unions and insurance.

    25. The other will concentrate on encouraging enterprise in deprived neighbourhoods.

    26. This means better access to capital for small firms especially those starting up in poor neighbourhoods; and better access to appropriate advice.

    27. Let me now turn to the main areas of interest to the banking industry.

    Access to bank accounts

    28. First, access to bank accounts, and those who don’t have bank accounts.

    29. Whilst access to banking is the norm, at least for those in regular full-time employment, there is a conspicuous unbanked minority, predominantly poor and not in regular full-time work, for whom life without a bank account is becoming increasingly inconvenient.

    30. We are talking here about somewhere between 2 1/2 and 3 1/2 million people, concentrated in the most deprived neighbourhoods.

    31. We used to think that the main reason people did not have bank accounts was that banks turned them down.

    32. But recent research, sponsored by the British Bankers’ Association, dealing specifically with people without current accounts, reveals a far more complex pattern.

    33. Only a very small number of people had been refused accounts, or did not ask for one because they feared refusal.

    34. Far commoner were people who thought traditional bank facilities were not for them, the so-called self- excluded.

    35. But to depict the main problem as self-exclusion is to avoid the issue, which is how banks can redesign their products, to better suit the circumstances and preferences of those currently without access to them.

    36. I would like to think that such difficulties can be overcome. Some banks are offering new accounts where an on-line debit card replaces the cheque book and access to credit is withheld until the customer and the bank feel comfortable with it.

    37. I know a number of you are already thinking on these lines.

    Contribution of credit unions

    38. Credit Unions too have an important role in tackling financial exclusion. They provide savings facilities, a source of low cost personal credit and financial education and advice.

    39. Our approach to credit unions is to encourage the movement to grow, while retaining and strengthening its traditional focus on the poorer members of society. This will be partly through legislative change, lifting some of the restrictions on Credit Union operations.

    40. We have also been thinking about how the movement should be regulated in future; and the scope for setting up a share protection scheme. Proposals in these areas will be published soon.

    41. But even within the existing legislative framework, we believe there is considerable scope for expansion. We have established a taskforce to explore ways in which banks can work more closely with credit unions to increase their effectiveness, and are studying existing good practice here and in other countries.

    42. I am delighted to see most of its members here today, and we look forward to Cliff Rosenthal’s presentation, later in the morning, on how the banks have helped the credit unions in the United States.

    Small firm finance

    43. Just because a neighbourhood may be poor in its physical and economic standing does not mean that it cannot be rich in people with ideas and initiative to start up and run their own businesses.

    44. But to realise their ambitions for business, these budding entrepreneurs will often need more capital, advice and mentoring than is presently available. Access to capital is a key component of strategies to regenerate poor neighbourhoods and encourage greater self-reliance.

    45. At present there is too often a mismatch between potential enterprise and the support needed to realise it, with the deficit greatest in the poorer areas where it is most needed.

    46. The key to generating sustainable and productive enterprise in deprived neighbourhoods is to create the right incentives for the private sector to work with public agencies. This could help lever in fresh capital where it is needed most. Without access to capital there will be no new enterprises to support.

    47. We need to help pull together the expertise and disciplines which commercial finance and business advice can bring, along with the local understanding of neighbourhoods which local agencies provide.

    48. The work of the Treasury action team involves examining the current roles of large corporations, banks and professional service firms in community regeneration, and how this complements the voluntary sector and community support networks.

    49. The role that innovative community investment projects can play in building and sustaining local economies has already been vividly highlighted in some the world’s poorest regions. The Grameen Bank in Bangladesh, for example, offers Microfinance – savings and loans at a human level, providing first stage finance to enable individuals to make a go of their enterprise. This has proved itself viable.

    50. We will look at the availability of debt and equity finance, and we will see how that capital can be put to best use by making sure enterprises have the right technical advice and mentoring when they need it most.

    51. We will also examine critically the role of the various Government support schemes, such as the loan guarantee scheme, Business Links and Training and Enterprise Councils.

    52. So we – and I hope you – are interested in innovative approaches to small firm finance, to help overcome the disadvantages experienced by those seeking to start up on their own in poor areas.

    Conclusion

    53. Like the Clinton Administration in the US, this Government believes strongly that wider access to financial services – through positive action by the banking community – is vital.

    54. And we also believe that the driving force will be banks searching for new, profitable market opportunities.

    55. This has been the experience in the United States, as our guest speakers today will testify.

    56. In the US, the banks are obliged to report on their provision of credit to all sections of the community; but they are not required to do anything that is inconsistent with sound banking principles.

    57. The result, so we are told, has been a huge injection of finance into low and moderate income neighbourhoods. And US banks have found profitable market opportunities in areas they might otherwise have ignored.

    58. I think there is much to be learned from considering the implications of that message for what we do in this country. I should emphasise that we are not planning to copy the US legislation. But we are interested in increasing the response of UK banks to the opportunities that exist for profitable banking in our poorer communities.

    59. That is the objective of this seminar, which I hope you will find enjoyable and thought-provoking. So it is a pleasure to hand over to Ron Grzywinski, the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Shorebank, considered by many to be the pioneers of community banking in the United States.

  • HISTORIC PRESS RELEASE : Community Banking: Increasing Access to Financial Services [December 1998]

    HISTORIC PRESS RELEASE : Community Banking: Increasing Access to Financial Services [December 1998]

    The press release issued by HM Treasury on 3 November 1998.

    Seminar at No 11 to Learn Lessons from the US

    A call for banks to exploit the opportunities that exist to help the unbanked in our poorer communities was made today by the Economic Secretary, Patricia Hewitt.

    The Minister was speaking at a seminar at No 11 Downing Street where the Government and UK banks and building societies were listening to representatives from the US who were spelling out their experiences of community development banking.

    The Minister stressed there were lessons to be learned from the US experience. She said:

    “Community banking can offer a win-win solution – it improves services for people in the poorest communities, and can prove profitable for the banks.

    “This Government believes strongly that wider access to financial services – through positive action by the banking community – is vital. And we also believe that the driving force will be banks and building societies searching for new, profitable market opportunities.

    “US banks have found profitable market opportunities in areas they might have ignored.

    “I should emphasise that we are not planning to copy the US legislation. But we are interested in increasing the response of UK banks to the opportunities that exist for profitable banking in our poorer communities.”

    Ms Hewitt praised the work of credit unions in providing ccess to financial services for those on lower incomes and said there would be Government proposals published on how to encourage the credit union movement. The Minister said:

    “Credit unions have an important role in tackling financial exclusion. They provide savings facilities, a source of low cost personal credit and financial education and advice.

    “Our approach to credit unions is to encourage the movement to grow, while retaining and strengthening its traditional focus on the poorer members of society.

    “This will be partly through legislative change, lifting some of the restrictions on Credit Union operations. We have also been thinking about how the movement should be regulated in future; and the scope for setting up a share protection scheme.”

    The Government’s proposals for credit unions will be published shortly.

    The Minister also set out other initiatives in the area of financial exclusion which are being undertaken by the Treasury. They include:

    a taskforce, to explore ways in which banks can work more closely with credit unions to increase their effectiveness, and it is studying existing good practice here and in other countries. The taskforce is chaired by Fred Goodwin from the Royal Bank of Scotland; and
    two action teams, set up following the Social Exclusive Unit report, Bring Britain Together. One of the teams is looking into the prospects for increased access to personal financial services for people living in poor neighbourhoods, especially retail banking, but also credit unions and insurance. The other team will concentrate on encouraging enterprise in deprived neighbourhoods: looking at access to capital for small firms especially those starting up in poor neighbourhoods and better access to appropriate advice.

  • Gordon Brown – 1998 Speech to the CBI Conference

    Gordon Brown – 1998 Speech to the CBI Conference

    The speech made by Gordon Brown, the then Chancellor of the Exchequer, to the CBI Conference in Birmingham on 2 November 1998.

    Introduction

    I am delighted to join you once again here in Birmingham on the first full day of your Conference, grateful for the opportunity to address business leaders, to pay tribute to the contribution you and your companies make to the prosperity of Britain.

    One look at your agenda and the speakers you have invited to address you – last night President Menem of Argentina, today Prime Minister Aznar of Spain, tonight Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder of Germany – I am grateful to have a look in. But the fact that you have speakers from all over the world tells us much about the global economy in which business now operates and the international and European nature of all our interests and concerns.

    And so I am pleased to take this opportunity to talk to you about the forces at work in the global economy, which we must meet and master; to outline with you the steps we are taking at home and through our work in the international and European communities that will help Britain – and your businesses – steer a course of stability in this uncertain world, and discuss with you the reforms in labour markets, capital markets and product markets that we need in Britain and Europe if we are to be equal to any and every challenge this uncertain global economy brings.

    Globalisation

    The global turmoil we are witnessing could not have happened in the same way in the old sheltered economies of the past, with their national barriers and their limited capital markets. The challenges that we have to confront today arise from us being part of a global marketplace – with its ever more rapid waves of innovation and its fast-moving and often destabilising capital markets.

    When the world’s second largest economy, Japan, is likely to contract by 2.5 per cent in one year, when countries hitherto the growth areas of the world economy now face unprecedented declines and when world trade growth falls by two thirds in one year then, it is everyone’s business – not only because we are dependent on each other’s goods and services but also because – as we have seen – a weak financial system in one country can threaten another country’s financial system.

    This afternoon I will make a Statement to the House of Commons detailing a number of reforms which the G7 Ministers and Central Bank Governors have now agreed to strengthen the international financial system.

    Our challenge is to create the best conditions for stability and growth in the world economy. Firstly, by recognising that the balance of risks in the global economy has changed and therefore being vigilant in our monetary policies. Secondly, by avoiding protectionist tendencies when trade imbalances begin to appear. And finally ensuring that our policies for transparency, supervision and financial stability are as sophisticated as the markets they have to deal with. Hence our proposals for a new mechanism for crisis prevention, improvements in global financial regulation and codes of conduct that require all countries to pursue transparent procedures in their monetary, financial and fiscal policies.

    Stability in the domestic economy

    Monetary and fiscal stability is a precondition of economic success. And just as we must work with our international and European partners to create the best conditions for global stability and growth, so we must work together to steer a course of stability for Britain.

    In the 1970s British inflation averaged 12 1/2 per cent, and went as high as 27 per cent. In the 1980s it averaged 7 per cent. And having reached a high of 21 per cent. Even a few years ago in the early 1990s it stood as high as 10 per cent, revealing a still inflation-prone economy not capable of sustaining non-inflationary growth without a resort to boom and bust.

    That is why on coming to government we took immediate action to set in place a credible and long term monetary policy framework, making the Bank of England independent. By tackling inflation head on, inflation is now at our target of 2.5 per cent and expected to stay close to there for the period to come. And as a result long term interest rates have fallen from over 7 to 5 per cent, the differential with Germany narrowed by almost 1 per cent, the lowest long term rates in Britain for 35 years, the lowest since the boom-bust cycle in Britain became entrenched.

    It is also because alongside our monetary framework we have created a new framework for fiscal stability – with similar rules, similar disciplines and a similar transparency – that we are eliminating the current structural deficit while maintaining our commitments to health, education and infrastructure investment.

    Having kept within rigorous spending ceilings in our first two years, we reduced the deficit by 20 billion pounds, tightening fiscal policy by 3 per cent.

    We have consistently taken a prudent and cautious approach to managing the public finances and we will continue to do so. Our projections have been based on cautious assumptions which have been audited by the independent national audit office and our plans have built in margins to cover uncertainties, including the risk of slower growth.

    And it is because Britain now has an explicitly long term fiscal as well as monetary framework and policy from which we will not be diverted that, as world growth has weakened, monetary and fiscal policy can now work together. Let us not forget that in the last downturn the inflationary problems of our economy were such that even after the economy turned downward interest rates remained at 15 per cent for a whole year and in double figures for 4 years. In contrast, the Bank of England has now been able to reduce interest rates, to respond to a changed international environment – able to respond more quickly and in a more forward looking way than in past British economic cycles.

    I know your concerns about the pound and I have heard them.

    Set against the deutschmark the pound is now 10 per cent lower than at its peak, lower than May 1997, and I think everyone here would agree that the greater danger for our economy would have come if we had taken the wrong action and returned to the double-digit interest rates of the past.

    We are conscious, of course, that there is a balance of risks: the risk on the one hand of a sharper slowdown in the world economy, the risk on the other that inflationary pressures might persist.

    But because we have a long-term framework within which we are eliminating the current structural deficit and because we will continue to meet our inflation target Britain is now better placed to steer a path of stability in these troubled times for the global economy.

    If the country’s wage responsibility matches the Government’s inflation resolve – and this is as relevant to the public sector as to the private sector – then Britain can have a low inflation environment for many years to come that will end the violence of stop-go economics in our country.

    It is my objective to start a virtuous circle of low inflation, low long term interest rates and rising long term investment that will become the platform for driving our economy forward. And that in the face of the current international difficulties is a prize for Britain, one that has eluded us for too long. Higher productivity

    But in the global economy every country has to face ever intensified competition. For all the changes that brought liberalisation and flexibility in the 1980s, no one can doubt that Britain in the 1990s had two great economic challenges to resolve – the stop-go instability I have referred to, and a productivity gap with our competitors, which we must bridge if we are to rise to the challenge of more intensified competition in the global economy.

    So as you know over the past six months the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry and I have been holding a series of seminars with many of you, examining together some of the barriers to high productivity in our country.

    Because we believe it is businesses and companies not governments that create prosperity and jobs, we have already cut the main rate of corporation tax to its lowest level ever, first to 31p and from April to 30p. And we have cut the rate to 21p and from April to 20p for small businesses. This is the lowest of any major industrialised. And to encourage long term investment, we have also cut the long term rate of capital gains tax from 40 pence to 10 pence.

    But we can do more. Tomorrow I will present to Parliament our Pre-Budget Report. It will set out for the coming year the next steps that we must take to increase competition, cut red tape, increase investment and to equip the British economy for all the challenges ahead. And this will inform the Competitiveness White Paper Peter Mandelson is preparing.

    The Pre Budget Report on raising productivity will be the start of a process of discussion and debate leading up to the Budget in which I hope every part of the business community will be involved.

    This is not a theoretical exercise it is entirely practical because as I will say tomorrow, in preparing this Budget and the next the Government is ready to consider all tax, spending and regulatory changes that will help us bridge the productivity gap with our competitors and equip us to succeed in the future.

    Part of the solution to bridging the productivity gap is through a modern employment policy. And I want to say how grateful I am to hundreds of you for joining more than 29,000 employers in supporting our Welfare to Work Programme.

    Europe

    But there is a further area in which Government and business must work together to equip ourselves for the future – that is in moving forward our relationship with Europe, where we do half our trade, and being ready for the euro in little more than eight weeks time.

    My view of Europe is of a continent that has to accelerate change and modernise through pushing ahead with reforms in labour markets, capital markets and product markets for more competition, more flexibility, more investment and more employment.

    So we need a pro-business, pro-opportunity Europe that must not turn its back on necessary reform.

    The Single Market must not remain just an aspiration, in all areas it must become a reality.

    European-wide competition must not just be talked about. Markets must be opened up not least in telecommunications, energy, the utilities and public contracts.

    Budget reform must reduce wasteful expenditure in favour of a rigorous selection of priorities.

    The adaptability and flexibility which modern economies need, free of burdensome regulations, must become a reality across the continent.

    And this does not require the people of Europe to reject the strong desire for social cohesion. For by committing ourselves in this new Europe to maximising opportunity for all, and to getting the best out of people and their potential, Europe can be both enterprising and socially cohesive.

    This Government has decisively and unambiguously put this country on a new road of constructive engagement with Europe.

    Our position on the euro is as we set out last year, that we have committed our country to active preparations that will allow us to make a decision, subject to a Referendum, early in the next Parliament and our strategy is to prepare and then decide.

    When I spoke to you last November, I set out the challenges that economic and monetary union would mean to British businesses. How EMU would lead to fiercer competition for trade and for future investment across Europe and what we in Government would do to help you take advantage of the new opportunities.

    I can now report back to you on the results of our work.

    First, when we found that only 30 per cent of firms thought they needed to prepare for the euro and only 5 per cent had done anything, we decided to tackle this directly under Lord Simon’s leadership – through direct mailing of 1.6 million firms and a series of television adverts.

    Twice as many businesses are now making preparations.

    Second, we have brought together firms, business advisers, trades unions, and Government through 12 new Euro Forums in every region of the country, led by local business people.

    Over 500 personal advisers from business links, Chambers of Commerce and local authorities have been on training courses organised by the Treasury’s Euro Preparations Unit.

    Third, we have put in place arrangements to enable firms to pay taxes, file accounts and issue shares in euros. The tax authorities have issued guidance and the DTI will legislate next year to make redenomination of company shares into euros even easier.

    By the end of this year, over 10,000 of Customs and Excise staff will have been trained to deal with enquiries or deliver services in euros to the business community.

    The next stage is that in January, we will publish an Outline National Changeover Plan which will set out the practical steps which would be needed for the UK to join the euro.

    We will set out the stage-by-stage procedures that will need to be followed, we will spell out the practical implications of changing to the euro and we will give new advice to companies on the way to take forward their preparations.

    Finally, I am conscious that a test that business will apply is whether the public sector is prepared to take a lead in making preparations. And I can tell you today that every Government Department is playing its part, that we are investing in what is necessary to keep preparations on track and that as a further step a cross-party group of Members of Parliament on euro preparations will be set up to discuss euro preparations.

    Conclusion

    My themes therefore: our economy founded on a platform of monetary stability equipped to steer a course of stability in an uncertain and unstable world. Sound finances through prudence and investment in reform. A national drive for higher productivity through economic reform, and a new purpose in Europe. The great British qualities – our commitment to the virtues of enterprise, creativity, of hard work, fair play and being open and outward looking – put to work for a new era of global competition.

    A modern Britain, founded on lasting British values, the values of the British people.

    An economy that, because our commitment to opportunity for all means getting the best out of people and their potential, is both enterprising and fair.

    And a Britain where there is a mature patriotism that is outward looking and internationalist – giving us a renewed sense of national purpose and a long term direction as a country.

    A Britain ready to fulfil its role in the new world, and to realise the potential of all its people.

  • HISTORIC PRESS RELEASE : Fair and just enforcement procedures announced for the financial regulator [December 1998]

    HISTORIC PRESS RELEASE : Fair and just enforcement procedures announced for the financial regulator [December 1998]

    The press release issued by HM Treasury on 22 December 1998.

    Measures to ensure the enforcement procedures of the new financial regulator are fair and transparent, and that it is not seen to be ‘prosecutor, judge and jury’, were announced today by the Chief Secretary, Stephen Byers.

    The measures are being introduced in the light of the consultation on the Financial Services and Markets Bill, which will establish the Financial Services Authority (the FSA) as the new single regulator. Today’s announcement clarifies the role of the FSA and the new tribunal. The FSA is responsible for conducting fair internal procedures before reaching a decision on a case that can, if the individual concerned wishes, be referred to the independent tribunal.

    In addition, Mr Byers disclosed that the Lord Chancellor’s Department is to publish draft rules of procedure for the tribunal in the new year.

    Mr Byers announced 4 changes to the Bill to clarify and support the basis on which the process would work:

    • a statutory duty on the FSA to establish publish and procedures and to act in accordance with such procedures;
    • an explicit right to request to see the evidence on which a case rests and a duty on the FSA to disclose such evidence;
    • an explicit bar on the FSA publicising enforcement action until the full process, including any tribunal procedures, has been completed; and
    • dropping the power to make rules on when relevant evidence might be inadvisable before the tribunal.

    Mr Byers said:

    “The consultation has been truly open and we are taking on board comments received. There is support for the basic model of effective, open and fair administrative procedures, backed up by the opportunity to refer cases to a fully independent tribunal.

    “These measures will further clarify the role of the tribunal and reinforce the transparency of the FSA procedures, which must be simple and fair.

    “Concern has been expressed that the FSA could act as ‘prosecutor, judge and jury’. This would clearly be unacceptable. I hope that the changes I’ve announced today will meet with broad approval and demonstrate that we are responding positively to the consultation process.”

  • HISTORIC PRESS RELEASE : Chancellor welcomes IMF´s assessment of UK Economy [December 1998]

    HISTORIC PRESS RELEASE : Chancellor welcomes IMF´s assessment of UK Economy [December 1998]

    The press release issued by HM Treasury on 21 December 1998.

    The “strong economic performance in recent years” underpinned by “the shift in the focus of policy making towards setting and achieving clear medium-term goals” is highlighted today by the IMF in their annual assessment of the UK economy.

    Commenting on the IMF’s statement the Chancellor, Gordon Brown, said:

    “I welcome today’s assessment by the IMF which provides international support for the tough action this Government has taken across the full range of economic policy to ensure that the UK is well placed to steer a course of stability through the current difficulties in the world economy.”

    The IMF note that “private sector fundamentals are strong; and past policies have ensured that monetary policy is well placed to respond appropriately, and fiscal policy to utilize fully the automatic stabilizers.” On this basis, they say that “it is likely, therefore, that the slowdown will be short-lived…”.

    Other highlights of the IMF’s annual assessment include:

    • welcoming the Government’s approach to the accountability and transparency of economic policy, where the UK is regarded as “in the vanguard”;
    • supporting Bank of England independence and noting that ” the way the Bank and the MPC have responded to this charge is impressive”;
    • praise for the Government’s fiscal policy, where they note that “the degree of fiscal consolidation achieved by the Government since coming to office can only be viewed as highly commendable”;
    • a welcome for the “emphasis on policies to help vulnerable groups while encouraging greater individual responsibility, efficiency and flexibility”. In particular, they cite the New Deal, the Working Families Tax Credit, changes to National Insurance Contributions and proposed pension reform; and
    • commendation for the Government’s “initiatives to relieve the poorest countries’ debt problem and for their commitment to reverse the downward trend in UK overseas aid.”

    In line with the Government’s latest economic forecast, the IMF notes that the

    “economy is now weakening, possibly more than needed for sustainability because of adverse external developments” in the world economy. In its interim World Economic Outlook, also published today, the IMF’s revised forecast for UK growth in 1999 is 0.9 per cent, in line with the Government’s Pre-Budget Report forecast.

  • HISTORIC PRESS RELEASE : Increasing employee share ownership [December 1998]

    HISTORIC PRESS RELEASE : Increasing employee share ownership [December 1998]

    The press release issued by HM Treasury on 18 December 1998.

    A new drive to increase the number of companies offering share schemes to their workers was launched today by the Economic Secretary Patricia Hewitt.

    The Minister launched a consultation document at the third Productivity Challenge Roadshow in Loughborough. The consultation seeks views on:

    • how the Government can encourage more companies, particularly smaller and unquoted, to offer all-employee share schemes ;
    • what are the existing barriers to participation in such schemes; and
    • how the Government can encourage longer term holding of shares by employees.

    Ms Hewitt said:

    “Britain’s productivity lags behind that of our main competitors, as does the participation in employee share ownership schemes. These schemes have an important role to play in increasing that productivity by harnessing the ambition of employees to see the company where they work succeed.

    “Currently, less than half of UK listed companies have at least one all-employee tax-advantaged scheme. We have to find out why the take-up for these schemes amongst the listed companies is as low as this. We also want to promote long term holding by the employees.

    “This Government wants to see an increase in the number of companies, particularly smaller companies, that offer share schemes for all employees, and we would like to see employees building up their shareholdings in their companies over the longer term.”

    There are currently three tax-advantaged schemes designed to promote employee share ownership. These are:

    • the Approved Profit Sharing Scheme (APS);
    • the Save As You Earn Sharesave Scheme (SAYE); and
    • the Company Share Option Plan (CSOP).

    At present around one million employees are given shares and a similar number are granted share options each year though these schemes. About 7 per cent of the workforce currently participates.

  • HISTORIC PRESS RELEASE : Public services for the future – modernisation, reform and accountability [December 1998]

    HISTORIC PRESS RELEASE : Public services for the future – modernisation, reform and accountability [December 1998]

    The press release issued by HM Treasury on 17 December 1998.

    A revolution in the Government’s approach to public services was signalled today by the Chief Secretary, Stephen Byers, with the publication of a White Paper on Public Service Agreements (PSAs).

    For the first time, the Government is setting out its strategic objectives for the long term in each area of Government and targets for the progress it aims to make during the rest of this Parliament and beyond.

    The agreements require departments to meet over 500 clear, demanding targets. Improvements in efficiency will release over 8 billion Pounds per year by 2001-02 in savings to re-direct into front-line services – amounting to about 16 billion Pounds in total over the three years from 1999-00. Wherever possible, performance targets are SMART – specific, measurable, achievable, relevant and timed.

    Commenting, Stephen Byers said, “Our manifesto committed us to five key pledges – on class sizes, young offenders, waiting lists, getting young people back to work, and tax – on which we said we will stand to be judged. Now we are setting out what the public can expect from across the full range of public services.

    “For too long people have focused on how much money is spent on public services. It is now time to move on and consider the more important issue – how the money is spent and what people get in return for their money.

    “The old days of throwing money at a problem and hoping that it goes away have gone. So has the slavish adherence to the belief that market forces can deliver the public services that people want.

    “Our approach is to ensure that the extra investment we are putting into public services achieves real improvements, that standards will be raised and the quality of services enhanced.

    “By setting measurable targets backed up by annual reports we shall be ensuring that the public knows exactly what progress we are making to achieve these ambitious and challenging targets.”

    Over 350 new performance targets are set out in 28 separate PSAs covering each government department. Moreover, as part of the new “joined up” approach to the way Government tackles problems where departments need to work more closely together, there are also three cross-departmental PSAs setting out a strategic approach to the Criminal Justice System, Illegal Drugs and help for families with young children through the Sure Start programme.

    The new performance targets are set in terms of improvements in services or in the results those services are designed to achieve. For example:

    • a reduction in death rate from heart disease and stroke- related illness amongst people under 65 of 33% by 2010;
    • to make 189,000 asylum decisions in total over the next three years compared with 33,700 in 1998-99;
    • achieving a reduction in the long-run rate of the growth of crime, which has been growing on average by 5% a year since the 1920s;
    • reducing the backlog of council house repairs by at least 250,000 with over 1.5 million council houses benefiting from new investment by 2002;
    • 50% of 16 year olds to achieve 5 or more GCSE’s at grades A-C by 2002.

    The PSAs also set out an ambitious programme for the modernisation and reform of government, with 175 targets for increasing the efficiency of public services so that this money can be reinvested in the services the public receive. In total over 8 billion Pounds per year will be saved and redirected to front line services by 2001-02. For example, the NHS has a target for saving 1 billion Pounds a year and some 70 million Pounds year is being released through lower unit costs in Further and Higher Education. The Treasury has agreed that every pound saved can be used for other service priorities. To achieve these improvements, departments have been asked to look specifically at fraud, procurement and sickness absence.