Tag: 1966 Manifesto

  • General Election Manifestos : 1966 Conservative Party

    General Election Manifestos : 1966 Conservative Party

    The manifesto issued by the Conservative Party for the 1966 General Election.

    Action Not Words:
    The New Conservative Programme


    FOREWORD

    I present to the people of Britain a manifesto which is also a blueprint It is a blueprint not for a year but for a full Parliament I am deter mined to promise nothing that we cannot achieve. I know that we shall inherit from the Labour Government a weak economic position, and I intend to give first priority to the management of our economy, to the strengthening of Britain’s competitive position in world markets and to the repayment of the heavy burden of debt which they have incurred.

    Equally I am determined to break away from the growing constraint of Socialism and the dreariness which stems from it: from the pattern of inflation and stagnant production which has been created.

    I want to see our social services recognise the overriding claims of those in most need. I want to see choice become once more part of the pattern of life of the individual. I want to see our country with confidence in itself and in the future taking its place in the European Economic Community.

    These are the things we must achieve. This manifesto points the way. I ask now for your confidence so that we can put it into effect I call not for words – but for action.

    EDWARD HEATH


    OUR NEW CONSERVATIVE PROGRAMME

    This is what we are going to do:

    • Get the economy straight, check rising prices, and restore expansion.
    • Reform the trade unions.
    • Remodel the Welfare State.
    • Get the nation properly housed.
    • Restore respect for Britain and lead her into Europe.

    THE LABOUR RECORD

    In October 1964 the Labour Government came to power promising action. Since then we have had many more promises. And many words. But the one thing we have not had is action. For eighteen months we have been waiting while the Labour leaders talk. But their words have had little relation to the facts.

    The Labour Government has had its opportunity and it has failed. It’s easy enough to say ‘Let’s be fair to Labour. Give them another chance.’ But it would be taking an immense chance with everybody’s future to do so. We cannot afford to sit and wait for the other failures and blunders that will be coming our way if Labour is left in charge.

    Just look at their record. The Labour leaders have failed to tackle the fundamental economic and social problems at home. Abroad Britain’s reputation has declined under their clumsy and uncertain touch. In the High Street prices are rising. Up go rates and taxes, down go standards of service on the buses and trains and in other public industries. The road programme is held up. The universities and technical colleges have had to cut back their expansion plans. The housing target has been missed. Mortgage rates are higher than ever. Complicated tax penalties are sapping individual enterprise. Production in industry is stagnating.

    It is a depressing catalogue. It is hard to see how any one of us, whatever our job or whatever our attitude to politics, can be satisfied with the situation into which we have now drifted. Nor can anyone be content to let this sort of thing go on. This is not the kind of Britain we want.

    All those who really believe in this country must know in their hearts that we can do far, far better, given energy and imagination. And not only for ourselves, but for our families, our communities and for the millions overseas who rely on a strong and free Britain.

    THE CONSERVATIVE WAY AHEAD

    The alternative to Labour drift is less talk and gimmickry, and more positive action. The alternative is a government team which means what it says and knows what it intends to do: a government that doesn’t run away; an honest government.

    Our first aim is this: to run this country’s affairs efficiently and realistically so that we achieve steadier prices in the shops, high wages and a really decent standard of social security.

    With sensible and determined action and our new Conservative policies we can reach these goals. But we have to be quite clear what this means. It means that we must give every man and woman a chance to play a decisive and worthwhile part in restoring Britain’s health and strength and confidence. It means that our best brains must be encouraged and rewarded so that they can get on and succeed. It means that there must be a war on inefficiency and waste in the public industries – as well as in Whitehall and in the town hall. It means that pride, self-confidence and efficiency must replace the suspicion and the ‘who cares?’ attitude which weaken industry and hold us all back.

    Now to get to these goals here are the action programmes which we will be starting on as soon as we form a government.

    • First the next Conservative Government will not hesitate to take all the measures necessary to deal with the immediate economic situation. Our new economic programme will make a prices and incomes policy really effective.
    • Second, we will use tax incentives to encourage individual men and women to earn and save more for themselves and their families.
    • Third, our new policies for competition will inject fresh vitality into British industry, keeping prices down and quality up, and giving the housewife the service she deserves.
    • Fourth, we will be launching new industrial policies, involving major reforms of both management and unions. At last the barriers in the way of higher productivity and higher earnings will be brought down.
    • Fifth, we will be making big changes in the organisation of our government and public services.
    • Sixth, we will start new programmes for speeding up the spread of prosperity to the English regions, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland.
    • Seventh, the strategy of the new Conservative Government will be to throw everything this country has in skill, resources and brainpower behind the things at which Britain is best. We intend to see British quality again become the pace-setter in world markets and British services again become the envy of the world. And we intend to bring in the men who can do the job.

    We intend to reform both British management and British trade unions.

    Everyone is fed up with pointless strikes and outdated management. We reject the argument that there is a clash between the interests of management and workpeople. Higher wages, good profits and competitive products are in the interests of both. Efficient production and stable prices are what the customer wants.

    Here are the action programmes we shall be introducing to bring this about.

    • First, we will be transforming industrial relations by introducing a new Act covering the trade unions and employers’ associations.
    • Second, we will be turning the heat on restrictive practices by both management and labour so that men and women can do a decent job unhampered by the fears and restrictions which belong to another age.
    • Third, we want to see better job prospects with greater security of incomes and pensions in the new high-wage low-cost economy.

    We intend to revitalise our Welfare State so that those most in need get the most help and so that our money is used sensibly and fairly. We will be working to a fresh pattern of social priorities to meet new needs and help build our community on more responsible lines.

    We want to see more generous help for those who have special needs not yet met by the Welfare State. We want to see family life strengthened by our Conservative social policies. We intend that there should be full equality of opportunity but not that we should all be equally held back to the pace of the slowest. Our policies are designed to bring higher quality and wider choice into our lives. We reject the kind of outdated thinking which leads to cuts in university and college expansion in order to provide free drugs for all.

    Here are the action programmes which make up the new Conservative social policy and which will fulfil our aims.

    • First, an entirely new social security strategy designed to concentrate better care and the biggest benefits on those most in need.
    • Second, wider ownership – not only of houses but of pension rights and other forms of capital as well.
    • Third, full educational opportunity, putting the needs of the individual child before Party doctrine. The first thing is to get more colleges and schools built, particularly primary schools, and more teachers trained.
    • Fourth, an all out attack on the rising wave of crime which today besmirches our society.
    • Fifth, fair treatment for immigrants combined with stricter control of entry.
    • Sixth, more regional administration with strong and modernised local government.
    • Seventh, better conditions for the car driver, the commuter and the travelling public generally.
    • Finally, a countryside preserved where it is beautiful and transformed where it is ugly and derelict.

    We intend to see that this entire nation is decently housed.

    Our aim is more choice in housing. We are determined to see house prices in reach of those eager to buy homes of their own. We are determined to see that the needs of people for rented accommodation are more effectively met.

    Here are the action programmes we intend to launch.

    • First we will raise the housing target to an annual rate of 500,000 homes by the end of 1968. We reached our target before, and we will hit it again. We will make use of every new method that works to get the houses up and keep the prices down. And there will be major reforms in planning procedure to increase the supply of land for building.
    • Second, we will encourage more people to buy their own homes – by aid with deposits or help with interest payments or by assisting with the purchase of older houses.
    • Third, the next Conservative Government will speed up council house building for slum areas. And we will insist on sensible local authority rent policies.

    We are determined to give Britain a respected place in the world again and lead her into the European Community.

    Britain must be part of a wider grouping if she is to exert her full influence in the world. British industry must have far bigger markets if it is to develop on the scale required in so many cases by modern technology.

    This can best be achieved by Britain becoming a member of an enlarged European Economic Community to which she herself has so much to contribute.

    A strong Britain can provide a powerful trading partner, and a growing source of skill, knowledge and capital, for the other members of the Commonwealth. This way also lies the best chance of Britain helping the developing countries.

    That is why we shall seize the first favourable opportunity of becoming a member of the Community.

    These are our aims. The detailed proposals which follow show how we will achieve them.

    Together they form a powerful new strategy-based on sound Conservative principles – to replace words with action, and promises with achievements.

    BLUEPRINT FOR A PARLIAMENT

    TO ENSURE PROSPERITY WITH STEADIER PRICES

    Get taxes down again so as to encourage hard work and enterprise.

    Encourage wider ownership. Drastically revise Labour’s ill-prepared tax changes which penalise saving and go-ahead companies.

    Get better management by improving management education at all levels.

    Reform company law-doing the whole job instead of Labour’s inadequate proposals.

    Mount a new attack on restrictive business practices which hurt the public interest. Close the legal loop-holes Labour have left open.

    Speed up and give more punch to the Monopolies Commission. And cut tariffs wherever it can be shown that competition from abroad is needed to deal with monopolies.

    Set up a Small Business Development Bureau to help small firms start and grow.

    Step up opportunities to train and retrain for better, more highly paid jobs. Build up the Youth Employment Service into a Careers Advisory Service for adults as well as young people.

    Help the housewife with new legislation on misleading ‘guarantees’ and more vigorous use of safety standards for food and household goods.

    Abolish the out-dated restrictions on the hours during which shops can open on week days.

    Start a new drive to put the customer first in the nationalised industries and to increase efficiency in these and other public services.

    Stimulate the new technological industries at which Britain excels. Provide the aerospace industry with a stable long-term programme based on European co-operation.

    Stop the war in Whitehall between rival economic Ministers with conflicting policies. Put one man in charge with one firm policy which hangs together.

    Start a war on waste in Government. Establish a Cost Effectiveness Department to introduce new management techniques into all Government Departments. Use sophisticated computer techniques to study the feasibility of Government projects.

    Make greater use of the knowledge available in the universities and industry in the formation of Government policy. In particular, enlist scientists, the universities and industrial consultants to help us prevent waste of taxpayers’ money.

    TO IMPROVE INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS

    Pass a new Industrial Relations Act and establish a new Code of Good Industrial Relations Practice.

    Ensure that agreements between unions and employers are kept by making them legally enforceable.

    Establish a Registrar of trade unions and employers’ associations. See that their rules are fair and meet the interests of the public.

    Set up a new Industrial Court to deal with industrial disputes and claims for damages against unjust dismissal.

    Introduce measures to deal with restrictive labour practices.

    Repeal the Trade Disputes Act 1965 so as to help prevent intimidation.

    TO PROVIDE BETTER TRANSPORT

    Speed up the building of motorways with the aid of increased productivity in the road building industry.

    Resume the task of increasing railway efficiency and of reducing the railway deficit.

    Give independent airlines new opportunities to develop inter-city services.

    Improve the traffic flow of big cities and the efficiency of public transport by traffic management and by building off-street parking.

    Get on with the modernisation of our ports. End the casual employment system. Reduce the number of different employers. Improve working relations – for example, see that better welfare facilities are provided.

    TO HELP AGRICULTURE

    Give Britain’s farmers scope to supply a bigger share of the home market for food.

    Move over gradually from Exchequer deficiency payments to a system of import control.

    Maintain the support given by the Agriculture Acts throughout the transition stage, and ensure continued support in any legislation required to implement our new proposals.

    Keep production grants and special help (e.g. small farms, farm improvements and hill farms).

    Modernise the main horticultural markets, give continued support to co-operation and encourage better marketing techniques.

    TO GET INTO EUROPE

    Work energetically for entry into the European Common Market at the first favourable opportunity.

    Prepare for entry by relating the development of our own policies to those of the Common Market, wherever appropriate.

    Encourage co-operation with other European countries in joint projects which need not await our membership of the Common Market: particularly where large-scale scientific and technological resources are called for.

    TO PROVIDE MOST CARE FOR THOSE IN NEED

    See that everyone has a good pension with their job, on top of the State basic pension.

    Ensure that everyone can either transfer or preserve their pension when they change jobs.

    Give more generous help to children in families where the income is below minimum need, to the very old, to the chronic sick, to the severely disabled and to others most in need.

    Improve rehabilitation and retraining for the disabled.

    Help people who have put by some savings, by raising the amount which can be disregarded before a supplementary pension is granted.

    Continue to ease the earnings rule.

    Provide a pension for those too old to be covered by National Insurance.

    Combine the Ministry of Health, the Ministry of Pensions and National Insurance and the National Assistance Board into a single Department with local officers who would have a positive duty to seek out those needing help whether in cash or in care. The new Department would have a research organisation to pin-point changing needs.

    Establish inspectors of welfare to improve co-ordination between local authority, hospital and voluntary services.

    Encourage voluntary service.

    End the present rigid age barrier of 50 which prevents some widows who have been out of employment for many years from getting any pension at all.

    Give special help to areas where there is the most need – for example, bad housing and oversized school classes.

    Restore – subject to wide exemptions (such as the elderly, chronic sick, disabled, expectant and nursing mothers) – prescription charges. Use the savings for higher social priorities including the hospital and medical service.

    Improve the health service by giving family doctors closer contact with hospitals and with local health and welfare services. Improve conditions for doctors.

    Review all public service and Armed Forces pensions every two years to ensure that they maintain their purchasing power. Reduce to 55 the age at which increased pensions become payable. Bring the pensions of those who retired before 1956 up to the same level as if they had retired then with appropriate increases since. Give special treatment to war pensioners and their widows.

    TO PROVIDE BETTER EDUCATION

    Get more teachers especially for the primary schools by expanding the Colleges of Education, enabling part-time teachers to qualify for pension, and giving more encouragement to married women who want to return to teaching.

    See that more teaching aids are made available.

    Give back to local authorities the freedom to make small improvements, for example, an extra classroom or better sanitation.

    Encourage local education authorities to provide as full a range of courses as possible in all their secondary schools.

    Judge proposals for reorganisation on their educational merits. Strongly oppose hasty and makeshift plans, especially in the big cities, for turning good grammar and secondary modern schools into comprehensive schools.

    Give improvements to primary school accommodation priority over projects for building new comprehensive schools where adequate secondary accommodation already exists.

    Give parents as much choice as possible by having diversity in the pattern of education. Give independent schools of high standing the opportunity to become direct grant schools, thus narrowing the gap between State schools and fee paying schools.

    Establish an Educational Television Centre to encourage the best use of television – broadcast and closed circuit – in schools, colleges and universities.

    Restore the university and further education buildings programmes cut by the Labour Government.

    TO HOUSE THE NATION

    Speed up house building. Reach our target of a rate of 500,000 new homes a year by the end of 1968. Use modern building methods and speed up planning procedures.

    Help home buyers by these three methods, as appropriate:

    • Helping with their deposits.
    • Enabling people below the standard rate of tax who are buying their home to deduct from the interest payments on their mortgages an amount similar to the tax relief obtained by those who pay tax. People eligible for the present tax allowance will have the option of continuing it.
    • Introducing again the scheme for Exchequer help for the buying of older houses through the Building Societies.
    • Give home buyers a guarantee of good workmanship.
    • Accelerate housing for the elderly.
    • See that council house subsidies are concentrated on those who really need them.
    • Increase council house building for slum clearance.
    • Expand the work of Housing Associations, so as to provide more good homes, at reasonable prices.
    • Introduce depreciation allowances to help provide more homes to rent.
    • Maintain rent control where there is a shortage of houses.
    • Legislate to allow ground leaseholders to buy or rent their houses on fair terms except where the property is to be redeveloped.
    • Take £100 million off the rates – equivalent to one-tenth of the rate bill.

    TO BEAT THE CRIME WAVE

    Place responsibility for law and order and for the war against crime on the Home Secretary and the Secretary of State for Scotland.

    Set up a central staff within the Home Office responsible for police strategy, intelligence and equipment.

    Accelerate the amalgamation of local police forces and establish a clear chain of command. Within a national force of this kind, local loyalties can and will be preserved.

    Ensure that the police have the organisation, manpower and equipment to do the job.

    Make offenders pay restitution for the injuries and damage they have done. Replace many short term sentences by substantial fines.

    Preserve the Juvenile Courts and expand the methods available for dealing with the problems of young people.

    Train those in prison to become useful members of the community.

    TO DEAL WITH THE PROBLEM OF IMMIGRATION

    Ensure that all immigrants living in Britain are treated in all respects as equal citizens and without discrimination.

    Introduce a conditional entry system which will control the initial time during which a new immigrant may stay, until permission is granted either permanently or for a further limited period.

    Strengthen the arrangements for health checks for immigrants.

    Require all immigrants to register the names of any dependants who might at any time wish to join them, so that their numbers will be known. In the case of new immigrants the number of dependants will be an important factor in deciding whether entry will be permitted.

    Help immigrants already here to rejoin their families in their countries of origin, or to return with their families to these countries, if they so wish.

    Combine stricter control of entry with special help where necessary to those areas where immigrants are concentrated.

    TO BUILD A BETTER COUNTRY AND WIDEN OPPORTUNITIES FOR RECREATION

    Plan the coast and countryside in such a way as to increase their natural beauty, increase the holiday attractions of Britain, and encourage provision for the growing numbers who leave the towns to sail, ski, climb, picnic or go caravaning.

    Create a new Coast and Countryside Commission with the powers to get on with the job, using the resources of both public authorities and private enterprise.

    Open more inland water for recreation, provide more access for visitors to the National Forests, and secure a national network of camping and caravan sites.

    Encourage the development of regional recreation areas, largely financed by private investment, on the model of the Lea Valley Scheme.

    End the existing confusion and duplication of effort between at least five Ministries in Whitehall, by setting up within the Ministry of Housing and Local Government a Recreation Department.

    Provide more choice and competition in broadcasting.

    Encourage the arts, particularly in the provinces. Promote high standards of architecture and civic planning.

    TO DEAL WITH THE SPECIAL PROBLEMS OF EACH AREA

    Develop fully the resources of each region and maintain its character in consultation with local organisations. Accelerate action on regional studies.

    Develop the growth zone idea which Labour has abandoned. Strengthen the public services in these areas by greater investment in communications, homes, schools and hospitals. Provide financial inducements for new industry.

    Improve amenities: provide powers to clear away the industrial dereliction of yesterday.

    TO BRING NEW PROSPERITY TO SCOTLAND

    Expand Government Training Centres and technical education programmes in order to provide the new skills which our new industries need.

    Make a greater allocation of funds for education in the Highlands, the Borders and other country areas.

    Concentrate development in those areas where it is most needed and will do the most good.

    Restore the cuts which the Labour Government has made in Scottish road-building and pursue policies which will stop transport costs rising so fast.

    Encourage competition on Scottish air routes and ensure that the Highlands have services timed to suit the people who live and work there.

    Make a top priority the clearance of the remaining slums in Glasgow, Edinburgh, Dundee and other cities by every type of building – private building, council building and housing associations.

    Introduce sensible rent schemes for local authority housing.

    Make the best use of our land resources outside the central belt by supporting the hill farmers, encouraging the expansion of forestry and planning special tourist areas.

    Make the Scottish Tourist Board a more professional body and use it to stimulate the growth of the industry.

    Modernise local government and its finance.

    TO BRING NEW PROSPERITY TO WALES

    Tackle the problem of depopulation in mid-Wales by constructing first class road communications from Shrewsbury to Cardigan Bay, by attracting new industries, and by revitalising existing towns and developing mid-Wales as an area of high amenity and a tourist attraction.

    Develop the coastal road in North Wales from Queensferry to Caernarvon.

    Encourage new industrial development in North and South Wales and the development of the South Wales ports under a group system.

    Give special attention to the needs of the hill farming community.

    Maintain a Secretary for Wales in the Cabinet.

    Overhaul the structure and organisation of Local Government in Wales.

    Legislate to allow ground leaseholders to buy or rent their houses on fair terms except where the property is to be redeveloped.

    Expand higher education in Wales and grant independent status to each university college. The university college of Cardiff, the Welsh college of Advanced Technology and the National School of Medicine will form the Civic University of Cardiff.

    Encourage and foster the culture and arts which are the characteristic of the Welsh people.

    TO BRING NEW PROSPERITY TO NORTHERN IRELAND

    Co-operate with the Northern Ireland Government in:

    • Seeing that Northern Ireland, as an integral part of the U.K., shares fully in the economic growth of the rest of the country; in particular, that the counties west of the Bann share in growing prosperity.
    • Improving basic services, such as the new road programmes now being planned.
    • Offering inducements to new industry to raise employment.
    • Promoting the interests of Ulster farmers, bearing particularly in mind the size of holdings and their distance from the rest of the British market.

    TO STRENGTHEN THE COMMONWEALTH

    Break the deadlock in Rhodesia by initiating talks with Mr. Smith and his colleagues for the purpose of obtaining a constitutional settlement, without any prior conditions on either side.

    Strengthen and expand existing Commonwealth links by making full use of the Commonwealth Foundation, by encouraging the professional, legal, medical and educational Commonwealth Conferences and by acting on their recommendations where appropriate.

    Encourage voluntary service overseas.

    Help Commonwealth development by technical and other assistance, by joint or bi-lateral projects and by ensuring that all aid given is used to its maximum effect.

    Work for the expansion of world and Commonwealth trade through the U.N. Trade and Development Board and the Kennedy Round tariff negotiations.

    TO HELP PRESERVE WORLD PEACE

    Make our contribution to NATO. Fulfil our treaty obligations in the Middle and Far East.

    Maintain a combination of nuclear and conventional arms related to our financial resources to enable us to defend ourselves and to honour these commitments. In particular, go on with the building of the new aircraft carrier.

    Maintain properly equipped Regular forces together with reserve forces – including the Territorial Army – suitable reorganised for their supporting roles.

    Seek, with our allies, every means and opportunity of bringing an end to hostilities in the Far East, thus reducing the pressure on our resources in that area.

    Seek to make the United Nations a more effective instrument for keeping peace.

    Renew Conservative support for the admission of Communist China to the United Nations.

    Give a new impetus to disarmament by pressing for an extension of the Nuclear Test Ban Treaty to underground tests and an agreement to prevent the spread of nuclear weapons.

  • General Election Manifestos : 1966 Labour Party

    General Election Manifestos : 1966 Labour Party

    The manifesto issued by the Labour Party for the 1966 General Election.

    Preface: TIME FOR DECISION

    PART I: FACING THE FACTS

    1. Britain in Crisis
    2. Forward from Crisis
    3. Telling the People

    PART II: A STRONG ECONOMY

    1. Paying our Way
    2. Increasing Productivity
    3. Helping Industry
    4. Agriculture
    5. Standard of Living

    PART III: BUILDING A NEW BRITAIN

    1. Housing
    2. Cities and Towns
    3. Transport
    4. The Countryside

    PART IV: THE FAMILY IN THE NEW WELFARE STATE

    1. Full Employment Policies
    2. Reconstructing Social Security
    3. Health and Welfare Services
    4. Educational Opportunities for All
    5. Fair Rents and Mortgages
    6. Fair Taxation

    PART V: WIDER DEMOCRACY IN THE NEW BRITAIN

    1. Reorganising Whitehall
    2. Modernising Parliament
    3. Immigration
    4. Law Enforcement

    PART VI: THE NEW BRITAIN AND THE WORLD

    1. Realism in Defence
    2. The United Nations
    3. Nuclear Weapons
    4. Better Relations in Europe
    5. Peace-keeping outside Europe
    6. The War on Want


    Preface

    TIME FOR DECISION

    The time has come when the Government must ask the British people to renew and strengthen its mandate. Since we came to power in October, 1964, the nation has had firm government. But without an effective working majority it is difficult – and would become increasingly so – for the Government to continue to exercise influence in the outside world, and to exert its full authority in Whitehall, Westminster and the councils of industry.

    Since the collapse of the Macmillan Government three years ago, the authority of successive governments had been eroded by an atmosphere of fevered electoral uncertainty.

    The remedy lies in the hands of the electors. The time for decision has come.

    The course the Government recommends to the nation is clear. We are asking for a mandate to carry through the radical reconstruction of our national life which we began eighteen months ago. The road of renewal had been mapped in our election manifesto of 1964. Since we took office we have started on the long process of modernising obsolete procedures and institutions, ending the dominance of vested interests, liberating the forces of youth and building a New Britain.

    The task we have started, however, cannot be completed by Government acting alone. Its fulfilment will only be possible if the British people understand what the Government is doing, and give us their active support in finishing the job. It is for this active support, represented by a clear Parliamentary majority, that we now ask.

    Part 1: Facing the Facts

    During the past 18 months, Britain has faced, fought and overcome its toughest crisis since the War. More, it has in the teeth of adversity fashioned the new instruments of policy with which, under the guidance of the National Plan, a new and better Britain can be built.

    In this Statement we first make a progress report to the nation. Then we show what next must be done to turn the breathing space won in 1965 into a period of permanent strength and security.

    Whatever the future may bring, there can be no turning back to the tired and discredited policies of the long Conservative era. The period of drift and indecision in Government, of backward looking complacency in industry and commerce, of reliance upon individual and group selfishness as the main motive for change – all this is over.

    1. Britain in Crisis

    No one can deny the magnitude of the crisis the Labour Government inherited in 1964.

    With a record – and almost incredible – deficit of over £750 million already incurred; with a rising flood of foreign goods; with the pound sterling imperilled; with prices soaring; with wages and salaries following hard behind – the nation in October, 1964, was plunging towards economic disaster and financial collapse.

    Not only did the Tories fail to take preventive measures; throughout the previous year they were busily feeding the pre-Election boom. By Initiating a spate of vote-catching schemes, they had encouraged a massive expansion of private and public expenditure without regard for the consequences that would follow after the Election.

    But acute as they were, the dangers we faced in October, 1964, were only symptoms of a more fundamental crisis:

    1. Successive Tory Governments had failed to rethink Britain’s role in the modem world. They failed to identify the new problems of the Sixties and realistically appraise national resources. Instead they pursued, from motives of prestige and nostalgia, foreign, military and financial policies which were increasingly irrelevant and increasingly expensive – policies which sapped our economic strength, depleted our reserves and overstrained our resources.

    2. At home there was an equally disastrous failure to tackle the fundamental problems of the British economy: instead of ensuring steady economic growth, a strong balance of payments, the rapid modernisation of our industries and a proper balance between public and private expenditure, the economy was left to the push and pull of the market – as though we were still living in an era of laissez faire.

    Consequently, for more than a decade, we suffered the disastrous cycle of Stop-Go; inadequate investment in manufacturing industry; the scandalous neglect of such essential community services as houses, schools and hospitals.

    3. Throughout our national life there was a stubborn refusal to root out obsolete ideas and modernise obsolescent institutions. Instead of setting an example to the timid and old-fashioned in industry and commerce, Tory Governments funked the radical reorganisation of the whole machinery of the state – local as well as national – which was so desperately required.

    4. Finally – and perhaps most serious – easy-going drift, backward-looking incompetence and an acceptance of national decline were accompanied by the erosion of fairness and social justice, by a growing neglect of community responsibility for the old, the sick and the needy – and by an incitement to speculation and the pursuit of sectional advantage.

    2. Forward from Crisis

    The Labour Government had to take unpopular decisions – and took them regardless of temporary unpopularity. Imports were cut and taxes raised. The TSR2 and other prestige projects were cancelled; firm limits were placed on military and civil expenditure. But in the pursuit of solvency and the defence of the pound, which were our overriding aims, the new Government was determined not to repeat Conservative Stop-Go.

    Whatever the pressures, it would not jettison the four central objectives of its policy:

    1. To ensure that even in times of economic crisis those in need should be helped by the state. Even in the first crucial six months of office, retirement and widows’ pensions, sickness and unemployment benefits, war and industrial disability pensions were all increased by the greatest amount ever. Prescription charges were abolished and an interim measure was rushed through to stop evictions, unleashed by the Tory Rent Act.

    2. To establish a clear system of priorities in public expenditure. While inflated public expenditure generally was cut back, housing, schools and hospitals were specially exempted, as were the regions of high unemployment.

    3. To maintain full employment and a high level of investment in productive industry, while damping down the overheated economy.

    4. To get on with the longer term reconstruction of Britain, with a National Plan and a range of new economic, fiscal and social policies to carry it through.

    Inevitably it took time to forge the new instruments of policy, such as control over building and the movement of capital abroad, without which national planning is an empty phrase.

    Nevertheless, the achievement in 500 days has been immense. The deficit on our overseas payments has been cut from over £750 million to around £350 million. Overseas confidence in sterling has grown steadily as the world has become convinced that we are winning the battle for solvency.

    The victory was a real one; but so was the price the nation paid. In particular the high interest rates required to strengthen sterling forced up mortgage payments and council house rents. But one price the nation did not have to pay – the deliberate creation of unemployment which our predecessors regarded as inevitable. In this crisis year we raised the level of employment; we built a record number of houses; we achieved record figures for investment in new schools and hospitals. Most important to the future, the deficit was halved; exports rose sharply and industrial investment reached an all-time high.

    In the past, our predecessors had reacted to overseas deficits by imposing a total Stop. Faced with the far greater crisis they left us in 1964/65, we stopped the inessential, we postponed the less essential and we went right ahead with our priorities.

    3. Telling the People

    Britain has weathered the storm. But full solvency has yet to be achieved. The debts incurred as a direct consequence of Tory policy will have to be repaid. The reshaping of British industry and the economy have only just begun.

    There is no easy road ahead – and only the dishonest would pretend that there is. But we do not believe that the British people want to be lulled with the message that “all is well” and that they have “never had it so good.” Nor do we think that they expected or wanted their Government to present a give-away Budget on the eve of a General Election. We have not done so. And we shall take whatever further steps are necessary even if they are unpopular, in order to achieve the rate of progress that we need.

    We are facing the facts – as they should have been faced in the 13 years of Tory rule.

    Part 2: A Strong Economy

    During the next five years we intend to carry through a massive programme for modernising and strengthening British industry. That is the prime purpose of the National Plan.

    We have regulated demand through selective measures with no return to Stop-Go. Now that our new techniques – such as investment grants, licensing of inessential building and the Industrial Re-organisation Corporation – are coming into use, we shall increasingly be able to apply social priorities, giving preference to industrial investment and to a better regional balance.

    While implementation of the policy depends on the initiative and ingenuity of industry and commerce, the Government too has its responsibilities abroad as well as at home:

    1. Paying our Way

    It is our aim to achieve balance in our international payments by the end of this year. To do this, a persistent national effort will be required.

    1. Exports. Last year, exports rose by 5 per cent in volume, and by 7 per cent in value. Further progress will be made as the new incentives to exporters – the export rebate scheme, better credit facilities and the favourable interest rates – take effect.

    2. Imports. The disastrous increase in imports was checked by the temporary surcharge we imposed in 1964. Intense efforts are now being made to replace those imported products which British industry can produce competitively.

    3. Overseas Military Expenditure. This is being cut back by such measures as the Anglo-German agreement on B.A.O.R. support costs and the decision to withdraw from Aden and to reduce establishments in Cyprus and Malta. But we shall still be carrying a heavy burden in maintaining commitments abroad as our contribution to peace-keeping in different areas of the world. The 1966 Defence Review is only the first step in a phased programme which should bring substantial cuts both in commitments and in expenditure by 1969-70.

    4. Drain of Capital. The uncontrolled flow of British capital abroad has been an excessive burden on an already weak balance of payments. By amending the taxation of overseas income and by selective control over the export of capital, we have staunched this loss of resources.

    There can be no relaxing here at least until we again earn a current surplus.

    2. Increasing Productivity

    The National Plan, published last September, defined the objectives of the British economy between now and 1970 and then outlined the strategy required to achieve them. Our central aim must be to accelerate industrial expansion without undermining our social priorities.

    I. Selective Investment

    British industry’s most compelling need is not just more investment but more selective investment. The National Plan in itself helps by giving industrialists a clear picture of national priorities. We are now introducing three new economic weapons to further this policy:

    First, the effect of the Corporation Tax will be to reduce taxation of profits, provided they are ploughed back, not distributed as dividends.

    Second, the new system of investment incentives will provide direct cash grants to expanding firms. These will differentiate sharply in favour of manufacturing industries, upon which the competitive strength of the economy depends.

    Third, the Industrial Reorganisation Corporation will stimulate rationalisation, modernisation and expansion in those fields where British industry at present seems unable to compete with the giant firms of the U.S. and Europe.

    ii. Productivity, Prices and Incomes

    In order to safeguard the real value of wages, the Labour Government launched the first serious attack on the rising cost of living. The weapon specially fashioned for this attack is the policy for productivity, prices and incomes, which forms an essential part of the National Plan. Without such a policy it is impossible either to keep exports competitive or to check rising prices at home. The alternative, in fact, is a return to the dreary cycle of inflation followed by deflation and unemployment.

    Substantial progress has been made in working out, with management and the unions, the objectives and criteria of such a policy. An essential part of the machinery, the Prices and Incomes Board, is now operating. But the policy needs further development.

    First, we intend to give a new stress to productivity, and we will attack restrictive practices wherever they exist. A National Conference representative of industry will be called under the Chairmanship of the Prime Minister to discuss all matters relating to productivity, including the extension throughout industry of Pay and Productivity Councils, representing management and employees. This will form part of an effort to stimulate industrial democracy.

    Second, we shall reconstitute the Prices and Incomes Board and seek such developments in the early warning system as are necessary for the Board to do its job properly. Our purpose is not to dictate prices, wages and salaries – but to give, in selected cases, the opportunity for objective consideration of claims before either prices are fixed or collective bargains struck.

    Third, we shall make sure that the policy is not only fair but seen to be fair. In our pursuit of a planned growth of incomes the needs of the lower-paid worker will not be ignored.

    iii. Regional Economic Planning

    Effective Regional Planning is needed:

    • (a) to assist the areas of chronic unemployment, and so bring into production the remaining untapped sources of labour; and
    • (b) to stop the drift of work and population to the West Midlands and the South East where congestion adds enormously to business and social costs.

    Vigorous action has already been taken in this field. We have used our new office and building controls to relieve congestion in London and Birmingham. We have extended the development areas and guided industry there. We have helped firms ready to set up business in development regions through massive special investment grants. We have further discriminated in favour of these areas by totally exempting them from the cuts imposed last summer on national and local government expenditure.

    Industrial Development Certificates are helping to bring new building to the under-employed regions – and reducing it in the congested South East. As a result, employment has grown markedly in these regions.

    These, however, are only the first emergency steps towards the development of full-scale regional economic planning, for which the Regional Councils and the Regional Boards have been established.

    Scotland and Wales

    Labour respects the differences of culture and tradition of Scotland and Wales; nevertheless, we see the economic well-being of Great Britain as indivisible. The Government has therefore set out measures which help both Scotland and Wales, within the context of a true National Plan.

    New life has been brought to the Highlands and Islands, and a major Plan prepared for economic and social expansion in Scotland. The task now is to achieve its targets, and keep up the record progress made in 1965.

    For the first time there is a Secretary of State for Wales in the Cabinet. The Welsh office is already making an impact on employment, industrial development and opportunities for young people in Wales. The Welsh Economic Development Council is now working out genuinely Welsh solutions to the problems of the rural areas.

    3. Helping Industry

    Some of our industries present special problems, too serious to be over come from their own resources. In such cases the Government must be ready to help. To this end, we propose, apart from vigorous action by the Industrial Reorganisation Corporation:

    • to continue and develop policies introduced by the new Ministry of Technology for providing purposive financial assistance to key industries such as computers and machine tools.
    • to use the various publicly financed research councils and the enlarged N.R.D.C. to sponsor and develop new science-based industries.
    • to transfer the private steel monopoly into public ownership and to rationalise its structure.
    • to rationalise the aircraft industry on the basis of public participation, taking into account the recent Plowden Report.

    Private and Public Enterprise

    Britain has a mixed economy – and both sectors must play their part in carrying out the National Plan. Both sectors, however, must be encouraged to become more enterprising.

    In the private sector, we have already proposed major reforms of Company Law, the purpose of which will be to stimulate, through much greater disclosure of their affairs, improved managerial practices and a better use of their resources. Companies will also be required to publish details of their political subscriptions.

    We shall encourage go-ahead firms by changes in the tax laws and, by securing a larger say in the affairs of companies for full-time working directors, encourage technical expertise, knowledge and Initiative.

    In the public sector, we shall remove statutory restrictions from publicly owned industries and so encourage greater diversification of their activities. In a rapidly changing economy it is simply absurd to limit by statute these large enterprises to a single sphere of activity.

    The great fuel and power industries occupy a major part of the public sector. Here, the Government has laid the basis for a national fuel policy, and gone a long way towards reconstruction of the coal industry’s finances by writing off £415 million of the National Coal Board’s capital debt. Further financial measures will help concentrate production on the most economic pits, and provide up to £30 million to encourage labour mobility.

    The best available estimate of the market for coal in 1970 is 170-180 million tons. We stress that this is an estimate, and in no sense a limitation. Everything depends upon efficiency, costs and the resulting prices. If more can be profitably sold, then no barrier will stand in the way of expansion.

    We shall further develop co-operation between nationalised industries to cut out waste; we shall set out more precise targets to guide their investment and price policy in the national interest.

    4. Agriculture

    The selective expansion of agricultural production is a key part of the National Plan. In particular, it will make a significant contribution to the balance of payments by import saving.

    The record of our farmers and farm workers in increasing productivity is outstanding. We shall not shake their confidence by substituting for the well-tried deficiency payments the levies on imported foodstuffs advocated by the Conservatives. This would reduce the farmers’ security and push up food prices to new high levels.

    The cost to the Exchequer of agricultural support can much better be contained by measures designed to enable the industry to achieve still higher productivity and a higher return on its capital. To this end we have presented a scheme to promote agricultural and horticultural co-operation and develop the resources of the hills and uplands.

    We shall continue to improve the conditions of the farm worker, and see that he gets his full share of rising prosperity.

    We shall also expand agricultural research, making the results more widely available. Most important of all, we shall Initiate the radical reform required to achieve cheaper marketing of foodstuffs by reducing the gap between what the producer receives and what the consumer pays.

    To maintain price stability and orderly marketing, imports of foodstuffs must be integrated with home supplies. Since these imports form so high a proportion of all our imports, and have a profound effect on our balance of payments, our price levels and the stability of our home industry, the Government must retain responsibility for integration.

    We shall do our utmost to conclude international commodity arrangements with a view to promoting stability. As the circumstances of each commodity differ, each will have to be treated on its merits.

    5. The Standard of Living

    In the next five years living standards for the individual and for the whole community will rise by 25 per cent, as we increase our production of goods and services.

    However, unless we can check the rising cost of living many groups, particularly those on fixed incomes, will find their living standards undermined – as they were persistently under the Tories. The prices and incomes policy is our main response to this problem. But other policies are also relevant. Labour’s rent control, for example, has secured hundreds of thousands of tenants against rising rents.

    In particular, we shall further reduce inflated costs and profit margins in production and distribution by waging a vigorous anti-monopoly policy in fields where market powers are abused. We have already referred a number of cases to the strengthened Monopolies Commission.

    We shall also enforce quality standards and protect the consumer from sharp trading practices. Under Labour’s Protection of Consumer Bill, false advertising, misleading labelling of goods, deceptive prices (the “4d.-off racket”) and oral mis-statements by doorstep salesmen, are banned.

    This “Shoppers’ Charter” will be administered by Local Authorities, whose Weights and Measures Officers will be able quickly to deal with customers’ complaints of unfair trading.

    Part 3: Building a New Britain

    The Britain we want has yet to be built. Many of our cities and towns are bursting at the seams with growing populations. Those spawned by the industrial revolution grew without vision or plan. They are utterly inadequate to the needs of today. But whether planned or unplanned, all our towns are choked with traffic, and their population overspill threatens the unspoiled countryside around.

    Within them, essential services are in short supply and in urgent need of renewal. Not only houses and roads, but hospitals, schools, universities, offices, civic buildings, facilities for leisure and recreation – even water and sewerage – are strained to breaking point.

    At the same time our network of communications – passenger and freight, road, rail and canal, ports and airfields – is increasingly inadequate and chaotic.

    In their pre-election boom the Conservatives gave the impression that money, resources and skilled labour were available to meet any and all of these demands simultaneously. It is now plain that the grandiose plans they announced were uncosted and mutually inconsistent. The industries concerned – building and civil engineering – cannot expand without limit when other demands of the economy are taken into account. Although their efficiency is being improved and their output increased, demands will outstrip resources for years ahead and there will be a constant shortage of skilled labour.

    Moreover, the resources available are strictly limited. That is why, in this crucial field of physical reconstruction, priorities must be clearly defined and strongly enforced.

    1. Housing

    Our first priority is houses. Last year, for the first time in a period of general economic restraint, the housing programme not only did not suffer but actually expanded.

    • In 1963, the nation built 300,000 houses.
    • In 1964, as part of the Tory pre-election boom, the figure reached 374,000 – and greatly strained the building supply industry.
    • In 1965, we not only overcame the shortages but increased the total to 383,000 houses.

    In the next five years we shall go further. We have announced – and we intend to achieve – a Government target of 500,000 houses by 1969/70. After that we shall go on to higher levels still. It can be done – as other nations have shown. It must be done – for bad and inadequate housing is the greatest social evil in Britain today.

    i. Controls

    To achieve our target, we need powers to stop less essential building. Office building is now controlled by law, and a strict control of all local authority building is exercised by the Ministers concerned. In this way resources and labour are being made available for the increased housing programme.

    ii. Land

    We inherited a land famine and rocketing prices, caused by the Tory decision to return to a free market in land. In the Crown Land Commission we are fashioning an instrument to secure a sufficiently orderly supply of land, and bring back to the community a substantial part of the development value created. This has met bitter opposition from Liberals as well as Conservatives.

    iii. Houses to Let

    The desperate shortage of houses to let at moderate rents in our great conurbations can only be met by a large and speedy increase in council building. To make this financially possible, we have provided councils with the equivalent of 4 per cent interest rates for house building. At present interest rates, the new Subsidy Bill increases the basic subsidy of £24, where the Tories left it, to well over £60 per house. Part of this very substantial increase will be used by councils to ensure that every new house is built to the improved standards laid down by the Government.

    In order to combine labour saving and standardisation, which will cut costs, with the improved quality on which we must insist, we are requiring local authorities to rely increasingly on modern system building techniques.

    iv. Houses to Buy

    In order to secure an adequate flow of finance for private housing we have persuaded the building societies and the builders to work closely with the Ministry of Housing in planning a steady continuous expansion of output up to their share of the programme.

    In addition to a mortgage plan (see page 17) we are determined to protect the owner-occupier against the jerry-builder. This can best be achieved if the building societies and the builders agree that mortgages will only be given on houses covered by the National House Building Registration Council certificate. The Government has made it clear, however, that if this voluntary scheme is not working effectively by the end of the year, legislation will be used.

    2. Cities and Towns

    Britain needs a massive programme of urban renewal. Large parts of our cities are in decay and many of our urban centres are ill-designed and choked with motor traffic.

    Here, however, we need the most careful planning if resources are not to be wasted. In the past ten years, far too many ill-thought-out plans have been sanctioned, tearing out at great cost urban centres and renewing them for essentially commercial purposes. Department stores and office blocks have made far too heavy demands on the construction industries. A new strategy of development is required.

    • First, and most Important, we must deal with the problem of the journey to work: for it is this, particularly in London and the other great cities, that poses the most intractable problem, presenting our diminishing public transport fleets with a tidal wave of users and jamming the roads with private car commuters.
      We are convinced that the basic solution to this problem must lie with improved public transport, supported by sensible parking regulations and by road building designed to siphon off through-traffic.
      We are already reviewing the absurd closure programme of suburban and urban rail services. We shall maintain public transport services in our towns and cities and aim at higher levels of comfort and frequency. We shall also tackle the problems of central redevelopment and new forms of transport by financing feasibility studies by local authorities; e.g., a monorail for Manchester.
    • Second: we shall make a new approach to the problem of central areas in our cities. Slum clearance must of course go on. But there must be quicker and fairer compensation for those displaced. However, we shall not be content simply to demolish. Wherever possible, we shall renew and modernise existing buildings. We shall also ensure that expensive facilities such as swimming pools, playing fields, assembly halls, are made more widely available to the community and not reserved only for the particular groups – schools and colleges – for which they were built.
      The better provision of sporting, arts and other leisure facilities is essential to modern living.
    • Third: we shall go ahead with a further programme of New and Expanded Towns.
      It was one of the scandals of the wasted years that from 1951 to 1961 not one New Town was authorised in Britain.
      We are now at work on a second generation of much bigger towns to relieve the strain on London, Birmingham, Liverpool and Manchester. They will reduce urban pressure by recruiting their citizens mainly from the housing lists and from council houses. Wherever possible we are also expanding the established New Towns.
      We shall fulfil our promise to bring real democratic self-government to those which are fully grown, by the abolition of the New Towns Commission.

    3. Transport

    Transport planning, both national and regional, is an essential part of community planning. The Tory attempt to solve our transport problems by increasing competition between road and rail, by the adoption of rigid commercial criteria for the railways and other public transport services, and by deliberate fragmentation of transport undertakings, is the most conspicuous and most costly of all their failures.

    Restoring sense and balance to our transport system is now an immensely difficult job. But it must be undertaken.

    Within the framework of a National Transport Plan Labour will:

    1. Carry out an expanding road programme speeding up road construction and cutting costs by new methods of financing highway development.

    2. Co-ordinate road and rail in order to use existing resources to best effect. As a first step, we shall create a National Freight Authority to co-ordinate the movement of freight by road and rail, and provide a first-rate publicly owned service.

    3. Legislate to annul the evil effects of the 1962 Tory Transport Act.

    4. Encourage the formation of regional and area transport authorities, to provide more effective public transport in both the conurbations and rural areas, by integrating road, rail and other forms of transport.

    5. In order to speed up the vital flow of exports, reorganise and modernise the nation’s ports on the basis of a strong National Ports Authority and publicly owned Regional Port Authorities. Within the ports, we shall end inefficiencies and delays in cargo handling and help to cure the chaos of the casual system by making each Port Authority ultimately responsible for all Port operations within its area, including stevedoring, and by extending the present valuable experience of joint participation.

    6. Remove the statutory restriction on the manufacturing powers of the publicly owned transport industries.

    To safeguard road users, Labour will press ahead with legislation to restrict drink while driving, to introduce more frequent testing of heavy goods vehicles and to provide for special driving tests and licences for their drivers.

    4. The Countryside

    Commons, parks, lakes and coastal areas are of the utmost importance for recreation and leisure. They must not be spoilt by private development, and public access must be assured.

    The Government has already taken vigorous steps to preserve our coast line, and safeguard common land.

    A new and more powerful Commission to deal with the whole countryside and coastline is now proposed. Its first aim will be the creation of country parks, to provide suitable sites for picnics, for leisure pastimes, and for the motorist.

    Long distance walks, access to the open country, the provision of recreation on canals and rivers – all will form part of this new, imaginative policy from which millions of our people will benefit, and by which the important balance between town and country will be maintained.

    We shall strengthen the Forestry Commission; promote landscape planting of trees; thoroughly explore the nation’s mineral resources. We shall ensure adequate water supplies by all means, including – where necessary – extensions of public ownership.

    Part 4: The Family in the New Welfare State

    At its simplest, our aim is to extend to the whole community what the responsible citizen wishes for himself and his family:

    • First and foremost, the opportunity to work and to be fairly rewarded for it.
    • Second, to make provision against the day when age, sickness, injury or redundancy impairs his capacity to earn.
    • Third, to know that during the misfortunes of ill health, the facilities of a modern and well equipped service will be available.
    • Fourth, for his children to receive the best possible standard of education and training, developing their abilities to the full.
    • Fifth, to have a home for his family, and to be able to buy or rent it at reasonable terms.
    • Sixth, to make a just and reasonable contribution to the costs of the essential community services which he demands.

    1. Full Employment Policies

    The level of economic activity in the community must be sufficient to provide jobs for all Labour has always insisted that this can and will be ensured through intelligent management of the economy.

    The problem today and in the future is not the general unemployment of the inter-war years but the redundancy that is due both to decline in demand for the products of an industry and to the development of new labour-saving methods of production.

    Coal, cotton, agriculture and the railways are among those industries in which, in the postwar years, employment has sharply contracted. Unlike our predecessors, we have positive policies to meet this problem. We shall:

    1. Ensure that new industries, providing new jobs, are available as and when older industries decline. That is the essential aim of our location of industry policy.

    2. Modernise training and extend retraining, so that new skills are rapidly acquired. The Government’s decision to make day-release a necessary condition for the new training grants is a major breakthrough in this field.

    3. Ease the transition from one job to another. This is the purpose of our Redundancy Payments Act, which brings lump sum compensation, related to service, to those affected by redundancy.

    4.Deal with the problem of transferability of occupational pensions.

    5.Recognise the right to trade union representation and ensure proper safeguards against arbitrary dismissal.

    6. Supplement voluntary collective bargaining by substantially increasing the voluntary industrial arbitration and conciliation machinery, including such successful innovations as the ‘on the spot” investigations instituted by the Labour Government in the motor industry.

    Finally, we must move towards greater fairness in the rewards for work. That is why we stand for equal pay for equal work and, to this end, have started negotiations.

    We cannot be content with a situation in which important groups – particularly women, but male workers, too, in some occupations – continue to be underpaid.

    2. Reconstructing Social Security

    The postwar Labour Government created the National Insurance scheme under which flat-rate pensions and other benefits are paid as of right in return for flat-rate contributions.

    But, over the years, this system has become increasingly inadequate, as the widening gap between actual earnings and National Insurance benefits makes it impossible to keep up living standards during absence or retirement from work.

    Our plans for a far-reaching reconstruction of social security were well-advanced when we took office. But first we had to undertake the rescue operation which we had promised. Within four weeks the Government introduced legislation to provide the largest single increase in retirement pensions and other social benefits since the National Insurance scheme began. The earnings rule for widows was abolished, and prescription charges removed. With this initial relief provided, we could plan the methods and the phases of radical reconstruction.

    1. Legislation has already been enacted which before the end of this year will provide earnings-related supplements during the first six months of sickness, unemployment or widowhood.

    2. We shall within the lifetime of the next Parliament prepare and bring forward a genuine earnings-related, contributory pension scheme to replace the present Tory swindle. The new graduated scheme will overcome the problems of transferability of pension rights when an employee changes his job. There will be partnership between state and occupational schemes.

    3. We shall establish a Ministry of Social Security uniting the Ministry of Pensions and National Insurance and the National Assistance Board. It will deal with the whole range of social security questions, and ensure a rational single system of paying benefits. The Ministry will also head a drive to seek out, and alleviate, poverty whether among children or old people.

    4. Finally, in the interests of greater equity, we shall seek ways of integrating more fully the two quite different systems of social payment – tax allowances and cash benefits paid under National Insurance.

    3. Health and Welfare Services

    • (i) Hospitals. The review we have undertaken of the much publicised Conservative Hospital Plan has confirmed our worst suspicions. The money they allocated was utterly inadequate to carry out the Plan, and to provide the new and modernised hospitals we so urgently need. Our aim will be to increase by 1970 the annual spending on hospital building to a figure double the highest sum spent in any year by the Conservatives.
      Already we have provided substantially more money for the running of our hospitals, and the rate of development will continue to increase.
    • (ii) The Family Doctor Service. In the space of a year, the Labour Government has produced the blueprint of a completely revitalised family doctor service. We shall ensure that all practical steps are taken to enable the hard-pressed family doctor to give the best possible service to his patients with the greatest satisfaction to himself.
      Many of the problems in general practice stem from the serious shortage of doctors, for which successive Tory Ministers bear a heavy responsibility. We have already made arrangements to increase the number of medical students by well over 10 per cent a year within the next couple of years. This is only a first step: a newly established Royal Commission on Medical Education will help chart future expansion.
    • (iii) Community Services. Local health and welfare services, especially for the elderly and the mentally handicapped, have been expanding fast. We shall develop these services rapidly, with special emphasis on those designed to help old people to continue living in their own homes. For those who can no longer do so, much more purpose-built accommodation will be provided to replace large obsolete institutions which can offer neither comfort nor a homely atmosphere.
    • (iv) Preventive Health. Far too little attention has been paid to preventive health measures in the past. Screening for cervical cancer, which it is estimated will save the lives of some 2,000 women a year, is being developed rapidly.
      More preventive health campaigns are planned. We shall make a real forward drive in the neglected field of health education, setting up an entirely new body, the Health Education Council, for this purpose.

    4. Educational Opportunities for All

    Our educational aims are two-fold: to give the highest possible standard of education to all children, and to ensure that those with special abilities have the opportunity to develop them to the full.

    These aims have to be achieved against an inheritance of acute teacher shortage, oversized classes, old and inadequate school buildings, and a chronically overstrained system of higher education.

    Schools

    Our first priority is to reduce the size of classes. We shall intensify our efforts to increase the recruitment of teachers, and improve their status in society.

    We must also make the most effective use of teachers, by encouraging the use of audio-visual aids and programmed learning; and by providing the teacher with the ancillary help which he increasingly needs.

    We shall carry out the largest school building programme in our history. The National Plan shows that the programme will be increased from £84 million in the last year of Tory rule to £138 million in 1969/70.

    Equally important, we shall press ahead with our plans to abolish the 11-plus – that barrier to educational opportunity – and re-organise secondary education on comprehensive lines. We have appointed the Public Schools Commission, to recommend the best ways of integrating the Public Schools into the State sector.

    New Deal for the School Leaver

    Far too many of our young people still leave school at 15, enter jobs with no training prospects and break off all contact with education. We plan to transform this situation by the early 1970s.

    The school leaving age will be raised to 16. The new Schools Council is studying ways of making this extra year at school the greatest success.

    Industrial Training Boards will increase the range of training opportunities for school leavers. They are not just concerned with the traditional craft skills. They will deal with the office, the shop, and the farm as well as the factory; with girls as well as boys.

    There will be a big increase of day-release and block release courses at local colleges of further education. It will become normal, rather than exceptional, for young workers to have part-time education up to the age of at least 18.

    There will also be radical improvements in the Youth Employment Service, and in careers advice at school, in accordance with the Albemarle Report.

    Finally, a new Minister is energetically creating, through regional sports councils, a new approach to the provision of facilities for sport.

    Higher Education

    We shall expand higher education provision in the universities, the colleges of education, and the leading technical colleges.

    The universities are being assisted to make a growing contribution in science, technology and social studies.

    The colleges of education will benefit from our new plans to liberalise their systems of government, giving more academic freedom. We shall encourage the growth of arrangements between the colleges and the universities, to enable more students to take a B.Ed. degree.

    In the leading technical colleges we shall rationalise the provision of higher courses, so that there can be a very large expansion combined with very high quality.

    The Open University

    We shall establish the University of the Air. By using TV and radio communal facilities, high grade correspondence courses and new teaching techniques, this open University will enormously extend the best teaching facilities and give everyone the opportunity of study for a full degree.

    It will mean genuine equality of opportunity for millions of people for the first time. Moreover, even for those who prefer not to take a full course, it will bring the widest and best contribution possible to their general level of knowledge and breadth of interests.

    Arts and Amenities

    Access for all to the best of Britain’s cultural heritage is a wider part of our educational and social purpose, and is one hallmark of a civilised country. That is why we appointed the first Minister for Arts and Leisure.

    The 1965 White Paper, “Policy for the Arts”, has inspired a coherent, generous and imaginative approach to the arts and amenities. Already the situation is being transformed, by substantially increased financial support for the Arts Council, purchasing grants for museums, and five times the support for younger artists. A quite new local authority building fund has been initiated. Next year expenditure on the arts will rise by £2½ million.

    5. Fair Rents and Mortgages

    A secure home for everyone is the most important contribution a community can make to family life. Building houses is only half the job. People need houses at a cost they can afford; and, once in their homes, they need protection against exploitation or eviction.

    (i) The New Rent Act

    The 1957 Tory Rent Act inflicted injury on hundreds of thousands of families by decontrolling their homes in a period of intense housing shortage. Labour was pledged to annul this social crime. This we have done. In addition to restoring security of tenure to every decontrolled house, we are appointing rent officers and rent assessment committees for fixing fair rents. The new Act also gives basic protection to almost everyone in his home, including the lodger and the worker in his tied cottage. Today it is a crime not merely to evict without a court order but to harass or to persecute anyone in order to force him out or force his rent up.

    (ii) Leasehold Enfranchisement

    For years socialists have crusaded to redress the grievance of the leaseholder who loses his home without compensation when a long lease comes to an end.

    More than one million house-owners will benefit from the Leasehold Enfranchisement Bill which we shall enact.

    (iii) A Fair Deal for the Council House Tenant

    The new houses we are pledged to build will not help existing tenants of council houses. Indeed most of them will have to contribute towards paying for them by increased rents. Within limits this is fair. But in cities crippled with slums, the burden was becoming too great. Hence the Government’s decision to give special financial relief to selected authorities so that rent increases can be kept within bounds.

    (iv) The new Home Ownership Plan

    Those who wish to buy their own homes also need help from the State. Until now this mainly took the form of tax remissions on mortgage instalments. The higher the mortgagee’s income bracket and the more expensive his house, the bigger his tax concession. This system is obviously unfair, particularly since the lower paid get nothing at all.

    We have therefore announced a new Home Ownership Plan under which each mortgagee will have this choice: to retain his present right to tax concessions – or qualify for a new Government grant which brings down the interest rate on his mortgage by 2j per cent (subject to a minimum of 4 per cent).

    With the help of this grant many more wage-earners, especially those with family responsibilities, will be able to buy their own homes. Everyone who joins the Home Ownership Plan will also benefit from a new Government Guarantee which will substantially reduce any deposit he is required to make.

    6. Fair Taxation

    In an age when taxation is bound to be substantial, it is essential that the tax system should be fair and intelligible. This has not been true of Britain for many years. Among the worst injustices has been the heavy weight of taxation on the average citizen and the very light burden which) as a result of tax avoidance and other devices, is borne by those best able to shoulder it.

    To remedy this we have already introduced:

    1. A Capital Gains Tax which at last brings into the tax system those large and previously tax-free gains, realised on the sale of shares and securities.

    2. A Measure to deal with Business Expense Accounts, by refusing to accept such expenses – except where related to export earnings – as deductions from company or income tax.

    3. A Corporation Tax which has the effect both of increasing the taxation of company profits if dividends are raised) and of decreasing them where profits are retained.

    We now intend to reinforce these remedies with two new measures: a general tax on betting and gaming, and a Land Levy. The case for the first need not be argued. The second will deal with the grossest example of speculative gains – the difference between the value of land at its existing use and the price received when it is sold for redevelopment.

    Reforming the Rates

    The most urgent area for tax reform is the rating system. When our reconstruction of local government has been completed, we shall introduce major reforms in local finance.

    Meanwhile the worst features of the rating system are being put right:

    1. The new system of rate rebates to help the two million hardest hit families should be in operation this year.

    2. A new measure of domestic de-rating will relieve all domestic ratepayers of about half the annual increase.

    3. Empty properties, now free from rates, will make a contribution.

    Part 5: Wider Democracy in the New Britain

    To create the new Britain we require an immense effort by the whole community. That effort can only be effective if the machinery of Government, in all its aspects) is refashioned to meet the needs of a modern society.

    In the next five years, it is not the power of Government that we shall seek to extend, but its efficiency and intelligence. The truth is that for many of the tasks that they must perform, our institutions are badly organised and ill-equipped.

    In the short time that the Government has been in office) a start has been made in reorganising the structure of Government Departments; in setting up new Commissions to overhaul both the Civil Service and Local Government; in convening a Speaker’s Conference to review the electoral system and in the proposal for a Parliamentary Commissioner (or “Ombudsman”) to investigate complaints by the citizens against the Administration.

    Law Commissioners have started to revise, consolidate and modernise our ancient laws, to bring them into line with the needs of a modern society. This is a considerable achievement. But it does not go far enough.

    1. Reorganising Whitehall

    In the interests of efficiency we shall greatly improve the collection, processing and organisation of Government information and statistical services.

    We shall streamline the organisation of many departments – for example, in addition to the new unified Ministry of Social Security, by integrating the Colonial Office in the Commonwealth Relations Office, and bringing into the Ministry of Housing, the Ministry of Land and relevant parts of the Ministry of Public Building and Works.

    2. Modernising Parliament

    1. Improvement and modernisation of the work of Parliament is essential to reinforce the democratic element in modern Government. Changes must improve procedure and the work of committees, and reform facilities for research and information.

    2. Consideration is being given to the broadcasting of Commons proceedings, in order to bring Parliament closer to the people it represents, and to increase the sense of public participation in policy making.

    3. The Labour Party has proposed to the Speaker’s Conference the introduction of Votes at Eighteen, to add a necessary political dimension to the increasingly important economic and social position of young people.

    4. Finally, legislation will be introduced to safeguard measures approved by the House of Commons from frustration by delay or defeat in the House of Lords.

    3. Immigration

    In the field of immigration, we shall continue realistic controls, flexibly administered, combined with an imaginative and determined programme to ensure racial equality. Incitement to racial hatred has been outlawed, and financial support given to the positive work of promoting racial harmony. A special committee is now studying the law relating to the position of aliens and Commonwealth immigrants who are refused entry or threatened with deportation.

    4. Law Enforcement

    For years Britain has been confronted by a rising crime rate, overcrowded prisons and many seriously undermanned police forces.

    Strengthening the Police

    The slide in numbers has already been checked. Energetic action will now

    be taken to build up police strength in those areas confronted with a severe shortage. We shall ensure not only that police resources are used more efficiently, but that they receive the most modern scientific and technological equipment.

    There is also an urgent need for fewer – and larger – police forces. This cannot await the reports of the Royal Commission on Local Government. We shall, therefore, press ahead with a vigorous programme of amalgamations, to provide the police with the form of organisation best suited to the battle against crime.

    Proposals for dealing with adult and juvenile offenders have been set out in two White Papers. Detailed legislative proposals will be presented early in the next Parliament.

    The problem of our out-of-date, overcrowded prisons and borstals remains. The parole system for adult offenders will ease the pressure on accommodation to some extent. But our prisons can only provide a useful reformative influence when we close the doors on some of the worst survivals of mid-19th-century England and transfer the inmates to more modern surroundings where they can do work of some social value.

    Part 6: The New Britain and the World

    While great tasks await us at home, we must never forget that Britain is part of a world community; that it is involved in the affairs of mankind; that in many areas it has special responsibility which it alone must bear; that it has, more widely, a key role to play.

    But what should our objectives be?

    • Britain must be committed to realism in Defence;
    • Britain must work to strengthen the United Nations which is the main instrument for peace in a divided world;
    • Britain must promote nuclear disarmament and work to prevent the spread of nuclear weapons;
    • Britain must work to achieve better relations in Europe;
    • Britain must not fail to contribute to peace-keeping outside Europe;
    • Britain must take the lead in the war on want and deprivation.

    1. Realism in Defence

    Britain has a key role to play in promoting peaceful change; but Britain’s position has also changed. Although we are a world power with world responsibilities, this is not the 19th century when Britain ruled one-quarter of mankind. We have to see ourselves realistically in the right proportion, not spreading ourselves beyond our means nor failing in our duty.

    Britain’s security and influence in the world depend no less on the strength of her economy than on her military power. Excessive and mis-directed defence expenditure by Conservative Governments has weakened our economy without providing forces sufficient to carry out the tasks imposed on them without dangerous overstrain. Labour has carried out a comprehensive review of Britain’s foreign and defence policies to rectify this situation.

    The Defence Review has achieved its three objectives:

    • (i) It has brought the runaway growth in our defence expenditure under control, and made sure that we get value for the money we spend.
    • (ii) It has decided what military tasks and political commitments it will make sense for Britain to undertake within the limits of her resources.
    • (iii) It has made certain that our forces will be able to carry out these tasks, without overstrain, with the full range of weapons needed for the job.

    By bringing defence spending down to a stable level of about 6 per cent of our national wealth, Labour will be able to direct new capital and skills to vital industrial modernisation. The country will benefit from this new realism in defence.

    2. The United Nations

    The United Nations is mankind’s chief instrument for preserving the rule of law, promoting peaceful change and fighting poverty. When Labour came to power, the United Nations was rent by dispute. The Labour Government, by contrast to the habitual Conservative disparagement of the United Nations, appointed a Foreign Office Minister to lead Britain’s delegation, helped to resolve the dispute, helped the United Nations to pay its debts and strengthened it by a pledge to make forces available for peace keeping activities. It was at the Security Council of the United Nations that Britain explained her policy for ending the Rhodesian rebellion and won world support to make sanctions effective. Labour will continue to give full support to the authority and efficiency of the United Nations.

    3. Nuclear Weapons

    Within N.A.T.O. we have given over-riding priority to stopping the further spread of atomic weapons. For this purpose we believe that Labour’s proposal for an Atlantic Nuclear Force remains the best basis for allied discussions, since it allows for legitimate consultation among the members of N.A.T.O. while providing firm guarantees against new fingers on the nuclear trigger. Labour stands by its pledge to internationalise our strategic nuclear forces.

    With the appointment in the Foreign Office of a Minister for Disarmament, Britain has exercised increasing influence in the Geneva Disarmament Conference. The Government had a difficult task; the Conservatives had landed Britain with the political dangers of an “independent nuclear deterrent” without in fact producing a deterrent that was truly independent. Labour’s immediate objectives are agreements to stop all nuclear tests and prevent the spread of nuclear weapons; further, Labour will seek agreements to create nuclear-free zones and make possible agreed and verified inter national disarmament.

    4. Better Relations in Europe

    In seeking to relax tensions in Europe we need to keep the confidence of our allies and to reach understanding with the East. We must be both ready to reach agreement and determined to resist threats. Labour, there fore, firmly supports N.A.T.O. and has greatly increased Britain’s contact and understanding with the Soviet Union and other countries of Eastern Europe. By the end of this year Labour Ministers will have visited nearly all of those countries. By such contact we shall encourage trade and travel and promote that growth of trust which is essential to progress towards disarmament and assured peace. This progress towards normalisation of our relations with Eastern Europe is an essential part of our whole European policy.

    Britain is a member of the European Free Trade Association, which is a thriving organisation beneficial to us and to our partners. The Labour Government has taken the lead in promoting an approach by E.F.T.A. to the countries of the European Economic Community so that Western Europe shall not be sharply divided into two conflicting groups. Labour believes that Britain, in consultation with her E.F.T.A. partners, should be ready to enter the European Economic Community, provided essential British and Commonwealth interests are safeguarded.

    The Conservative record on relations between Britain and the “Six” is one of notorious and abject failure. Yet Conservatives now talk as if they could take Britain into the Common Market without any conditions or safeguards.

    Labour believes that close contact with Europe – joint industrial ventures, scientific co-operation, political and cultural links – can produce among the “Six” that understanding of Britain’s position which is necessary to a wider European unity.

    5. Peace-keeping Outside Europe

    But it is the world outside Europe that now presents the greatest challenge and the greatest danger to mankind. The greatest problem in Asia is the future of China; this nation could render immeasurable service to mankind, but at present she is embittered and distrustful of the West and menacing to her neighbours. The Labour Government has worked and will continue to work for the granting to the Chinese Government of her rightful place in the Security Council of the United Nations, believing that there her differences with the rest of the world can best be resolved.

    Meanwhile the cruel war in Vietnam continues; Labour has consistently urged negotiations to stop the fighting and a settlement which would enable the peoples of North and South Vietnam to determine their own future and which would ensure that the whole country became neutral, without foreign troops or bases. Labour welcomes the readiness of the United States to negotiate on these lines; we still await an equal readiness from North Vietnam. The Labour Government has, through many channels, urged on North Vietnam the wisdom of making peace and these efforts will be continued.

    It is through her membership of the Commonwealth that Britain has the best opportunity for contributing to the advancement and well-being of so many peoples in the developing world on the basis of mutual trust and co-operation. Labour created the modern Commonwealth. We have always attached great importance to it as a unique association of peoples, spanning different races and continents of the world.

    The Commonwealth needs further new development, if it is to remain a coherent force in world affairs. During the past year, Labour has taken, with the Commonwealth, a number of important initiatives which will greatly affect its future.

    Firstly: We have established a Secretariat which will be concerned with planning the future political, organisational and economic relationships of Commonwealth countries.

    Secondly: The Commonwealth, as such, took an unprecedented Initiative for peace in establishing the Peace Mission to try to end the tragic conflict in Vietnam. While this initiative was not successful, it nevertheless points to a further and most important development of the Commonwealth.

    Thirdly: Britain has made clear, particularly in the confrontation between Malaysia and Indonesia, her willingness to assist the new Commonwealth nations when faced with external aggression.

    Labour will continue to foster the development of the Commonwealth by participating fully in schemes for financial, economic and technical co-operation.

    In just over a year independence arrangements have been made for a quarter of Britain’s remaining Colonial subjects, and a new status, carrying with it the right to opt for independence, has been offered to six Eastern Caribbean islands. This new status is an exciting adventure in Common wealth relations and may well prove a model for other small communities who wish to free themselves from any Colonial stigma and yet remain in close association with Britain.

    Constitutional changes have been made in other Colonies, and Labour’s policy remains:

    To give independence to all territories which want it and can sustain it. To help all other small dependencies which are unlikely to be able to stand on their own feet to achieve a new post-Colonial status of dignity in association with Britain.

    6. The War on Want

    In spite of the tremendous economic difficulties we faced, Labour has increased the flow of external aid to developing nations both inside and outside the Commonwealth. The effectiveness of this aid has been greatly increased by the co-ordination and careful scrutiny of programmes undertaken by the new Ministry of Overseas Development While there is an obvious limit to the volume of capital that Britain can afford to export, very much more can be done and will be done to promote the flow of technical advice and assistance. In particular we shall multiply our efforts to assist overseas development through the export of knowledge. The flow of experts will be stimulated by redoubling the recruitment efforts of the Ministry of Overseas Development and by continued support of recruitment by voluntary bodies, private agencies, foundations and the British Council.

    We shall make our aid more effective by helping recipient countries to plan their development and to select worthwhile projects on which to spend our aid. We shall continue to lighten the burden of debt by softening the terms of aid. For we recognise that “aid” can be negated by “trade” unless a concerted world effort is made to enable overseas countries to earn the foreign exchange essential to their development programmes. Labour will play a positive part at next year’s United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. We intend to put our full weight behind constructive inter national proposals for increasing and stabilising the export earnings of primary producing countries through international commodity agreements and arrangements for finance; for reduction of trade barriers; and for increasing liquidity for financing world trade, with particular emphasis on schemes for linking the creation of new credits to the needs of underdeveloped countries.

    By such means a Labour Government will mobilise increasing resources – in money, expert advice and voluntary effort – to make war on want.


    Postscript

    This postscript is also a preface – an introduction to (we believe) four or five years of Labour Government with the Parliamentary majority needed to carry through our plan for a better Britain.

    We have already shown that, even with a tiny majority, Labour Government works. But it would be foolish to pretend that we can do all that we mean to do with such a majority; for, make no mistake about it, some of our projects will be bitterly resisted by those whose privileges and interests are threatened.

    Already the pattern and the mood are clear. Even Tories admit, in private, that the conduct of Harold Wilson and his colleagues has been far more firm and decisive than they thought it could be. This is a Government that governs: it does not flop along from crisis to crisis as the Tories did, for so much of their 13 years.

    Moreover, the motive and inspiration of Labour remain, and always will remain, to secure the prosperity and welfare of all the people – the workers by hand and by brain who must be the backbone of our economic recovery, the old, the sick and the children.

    This is not a selfish motive – but you will be doing yourself and your family a good turn by voting Labour on 31st March. After all, you know Labour Government works.

  • General Election Manifestos : 1966 Liberal Party

    General Election Manifestos : 1966 Liberal Party

    The manifesto issued by the Liberal Party for the 1966 General Election.

    BRITAIN DEMANDS A NEW APPROACH

    Eighteen months ago many people had high hopes that a change of Government from Conservative to Labour would bring about a real change in the country’s fortunes. They had watched the country drift from one economic crisis to another and seen how Britain’s rate of expansion and industrial growth had continued to fall behind that of other countries.

    Now events have shown that, for all their talk about modernisation, Labour too cannot find the answer to our problems. However admirable their intentions. they, like the Conservatives, have been unable to implement workable solutions.

    There are very simple reasons for this. Both parties have their roots firmly in one section of the community or another. The Conservatives. both ideologically and financially, are still tied to the interests of capital. Equally Labour are tied to the interests of the Unions, often to the detriment of both.

    Is it surprising that their actions are seldom acceptable or effective for the country as a whole?

    Why are the Liberals different?

    Today, more than ever, the unique position of the Liberal Party enables us to bring new thinking and a fresh, objective approach to Britain’s economic and social problems and to put forward solutions that work. We can do this precisely because we have no vested interest in protecting one group or another. We are not a class party’. We draw our support from all groups and classes and we are free to reconcile conflicting interests for the benefit of the whole community. We are the party of all individuals, no matter what their background.

    What the Liberals have achieved.

    Already the three million votes polled at the last election in support of Liberal attitudes and Liberal policies have acted as a powerful brake and a positive influence on the policies of the Labour Government. Indeed the Liberal Party has provided the only effective opposition n curbing the wasteful excesses of Socialism and compelling Labour to give priority to at least some of the things that matter.

    Steel Nationalisation was shelved as a result of Liberal pressure and saved the country millions of pounds. Without that pressure it could still happen.

    Land Nationalisation was checked in response to Liberal pressure. The nationalisation of small plots of building land in private ownership has been dropped.

    Pensions and Rates. Although Labour’s plans do not go far enough Liberal pressure has forced the Government to put these issues before further nationalisation plans.

    The Neglected Regions. For years Liberals have been calling for action to revitalise the depressed areas of Britain. Even the tentative moves now being made by Labour would not have been made but for Liberal pressure.

    The Highland Development Board. A clear example of a Liberal proposal being implemented by Labour in response to pressure from the Highland Liberal MPs.

    A Really Positive Vote. The effectiveness of Liberal pressure to date is only the beginning. An increased number of Liberal MPs and an increased Liberal vote in each constituency will bring about still more positive action in Parliament. And there is plenty to be done.

    The most vital need is for a fresh and realistic approach to economic planning, defence and the machinery of government, because only then will the wealth be created that can bring about a real improvement in living standards, housing, education and the social services for all the people of Britain.

    The policies outlined show the positive action that is needed. Consider them carefully and decide for yourself.

    Three million people voted Liberal last time for what they knew was right. The 10 Liberal MP’s have done the work of 30 times that many. Those votes have really counted. A higher vote. More MPs. The same drive. And a Liberal Government will be near.

    HOW TO CREATE THE WEALTH

    BRITAIN MUST PAY HER WAY

    Facing World Realities. Britain today has the slowest rate of growth of any developed industrial economy. By 1980, if present trends continue, the only countries in Western Europe with a lower living standard will be Portugal and Spain. One reason for this pitiful performance is the attempt to carry world responsibilities far beyond our means.

    In 1964 Britain’s military spending overseas was £305 million, accounting for over half the country’s debt. Expenditure of this kind hits us all.

    The Labour Government is now trying to cut it down, but it has failed to cut the basic commitments, which made us spend the money, many of which are no longer realistic.

    Britain is also still the centre of a world wide currency system. Attempts to sustain the system have placed our economic policy in a strait-jacket and added a further restriction on our growth. In consequence we now have the largest debt in our history.

    The Government must work for a radical reform of the world’s financial system, in which we shall pool our exchange reserves with those of other Western powers and jointly assume responsibility for managing a new reserve currency.

    While illusions of military and economic grandeur must be dropped, British industry needs the wider horizon of the Common Market. British exports to Europe have suffered badly from our exclusion. Waiting for something to turn up is not a policy. Britain must declare now her intention to join the European Community.

    Growth Comes First. The Labour Government has now set up a Department of Economic Affairs, but real power over economic policy still remains in the cautious hands of the Treasury. The Department of Economic Affairs can only become a real driving force for expansion if it has authority over short term as well as long term planning. It should work in partnership with a new Parliamentary standing committee on economic affairs in the formulation, execution and continuous modification of a new national economic plan.

    Simplify the Tax System. The tax system must be overhauled and simplified so that it encourages efficiency rather than evasion. A standing committee of experts from industry, finance and Government must be set up to fit successive budgetary measures into a sustained programme of tax reform.

    Cut Direct Taxation. Direct taxation must be systematically cut and some of the burden shifted to inherited wealth and gifts. Death duties should be replaced by a legacy duty, to encourage the wider distribution of wealth.

    Tax reliefs for industrial investment, even after the new grants, are less than they were two years ago. They should be restored to the previous level and increased as soon as possible to a level comparable with that of other industrial countries. Office machinery and services which earn foreign exchange should be allowed to benefit from investment grants.

    Bring Down Prices. All people, but particularly the old and those living on fixed incomes, are hit by constantly rising prices. Between 1951 and 1964 the value of the E dropped to 13s. 0d. Since the last Election the cost of living has risen by a further 13s. 0d in the pound.

    The effective way to bring down prices is to increase competition by cutting tariffs. Because this would hit monopolies and price rings it would increase efficiency, and prices would fall accordingly. If necessary the maintenance of price rings and gross restrictive practices should be made criminal offences.

    A Positive Incomes Policy. An Incomes Policy is a necessary aid, if we are to check inflation with a minimum of unemployment, and achieve a fair distribution of the wealth we have, but to succeed an incomes policy must emphasise the need for greater productivity and efficiency before wages and incomes are increased.

    In Western Germany reasonable price stability has been maintained, with only 1 per cent unemployment (less than in Britain today), thanks to planned immigration, generous redundancy arrangements and systematic training to induce people to change jobs. In Britain, an ambitious retraining programme is needed with payment of average national earnings during retraining. Longer periods of notice should be given to those who must change jobs. There must be a greater expansion in management training and shorter and more flexible apprenticeships.

    Where there is direct confrontation with a large Union, Government intervention by tariff cuts or taxes may sometimes be necessary to prevent exorbitant wage increases in particular industries, but we would prefer wage increases to be restricted voluntarily. Labour’s Prices and Incomes Bill can only undermine the confidence of the Unions.

    Government pressure should be exerted to create strong unions covering whole industries and to rationalise the wage structure. Bargaining at individual plant level, in which higher earnings are negotiated in return for abandonment of restrictive practices, must be encouraged.

    PARTNERSHIP IN INDUSTRY PAYS

    Getting both ‘Sides’ Together. Strikes, stoppages and demarcation disputes are three major causes of Britain’s failure to pay her way. Too often they arise from class prejudices, the failure of employer and employee to understand each other’s problems and the lack of any common purpose between them.

    Each ‘side’s’ distrust of the other’s interests has led to inefficiency and prevented any lasting solution being reached. The Liberal Party, bound by no such interests, is in a unique position to bring the two ‘sides’ together and be accepted in doing so.

    A ‘Say’. The first step must be to give employees more say in the running of the companies in which they work. Company law must be amended to require the setting up of Works Councils for regular consultation and negotiation between employee and management on all major issues affecting their company.

    A Stake. Employees must be given the same status as shareholders and the consequent right to elect directors to the Board.

    Management should be encouraged by tax incentives to increase employee shareholding, because a financial stake is an important part of a man’s involvement with, and responsibility to, the company for which he works.

    Industrial efficiency depends on partnership not conflict. Our proposals would bring about this partnership.

    Contracts of Service. A standard contract of service should be introduced covering the right to Union representation; an equal range of security benefits for wage and salary earners; holiday pay based on average earnings; a guaranteed opportunity for further education and training in employer’s time; and equal rates of pay for men and women doing identical work. With such contracts it would be easier to gain the acceptance of arbitration rather than the immediate resort to industrial force and the contracts could be enforceable in the civil courts.

    Harness Technology. The establishment of the Ministry of Technology has not led to the ‘white hot scientific revolution’ promised by Labour before the last election. There have been small increases in government financed support for the National Research Development Corporation and for computers, but the machinery for science and technology is much the same as it was under the Tories.

    Among Liberal proposals are expansion of the Atomic Energy Programme, reorganisation of the Council for Scientific Policy, with wider terms of reference, better co-ordination of the Work and Research Associations and full transferability of pensions for the Civil Service so as to ensure mobility of scientific manpower.

    EXPANSION IN FARMING PAYS

    If you are a farmer or farm worker, today you can have little cause for satisfaction with Conservative and Labour farming policies. Both parties have allowed farming to drift The farmer’s life is hedged about with uncertainty. He never knows whether to expand or contract. His workers often leave the land.

    If you are a housewife, you too will have seen how this uncertainty has brought fluctuations and increases in the prices of meat, milk and dairy produce.

    A few years ago only the Liberal Party recognised the need for selective expansion in food production. We called for a system of managed markets for home and imported produce under a Meat and Grain Commission, and a system of agricultural support that gave the farmer his return from the market rather than from subsidies, and one that guaranteed reasonable prices to the housewife.

    The other parties now favour agricultural expansion, but the Labour proposals in the National Plan envisage a rate of growth in beef and pork production slower than that of the last five years. Only the dairy herd is set for expansion but the incentive to farmers is insufficient.

    We welcome Labour’s tentative scheme for easier farm credit, but we would extend it by a Land Banking system to help bona fide small farmers and ex-farm workers to make their farms efficient and modern.

    Better Prices for Beef. If this country wants beef the Government must recognise the need to pay substantially more to the producer. Substantial price increases would in turn give the producer a higher price for calves and enable marginal milk producers to turn over to livestock. The confidence n expansion created would remove the need to raise milk prices to the housewife.

    Cereals Expansion. As long as subsidies remain at their present level, there will be uncertainty for both Government and farmer. With a managed cereal market the price could be gradually raised until the subsidy is eliminated.

    Cost. These price adjustments would be self-balancing. The money saved on cereal subsidies and the levies collected on imports would provide sufficient funds for the increase

    n livestock prices. Introduced over a period of years, this new system and increased technological investment in farming would create for the farmer the firm prospect of expansion, a real increase in income, and a decreasing dependence on imported produce.

    BRING NEW LIFE TO THE NEGLECTED REGIONS

    A National Physical Plan. For too many people there is little incentive to stay in the area of their birth. Culturally and financially the draw is toward the South East.

    While Britain has a national plan for the economy, there is no national physical plan to redress this balance. The drift to the South East continues. Only in the Highlands, where the Liberals swept the board at the last Election, has Labour, under pressure, set up a Development Board with money and real powers.

    There must be a national plan for the future redistribution of population and development and the decentralisation of power and wealth from London.

    Scotland and Wales. Greater power to run their own affairs must be given to the people of Scotland and Wales.

    The Royal Commission on Scottish Local Government must be extended to examine particularly the devolution of power from Whitehall to Edinburgh with a view to establishing an elected Scottish Parliament.

    A Council of Wales must be established and a Welsh Development Agency set up to plan, to tend money and to promote new industries.

    There must be broader regional tax advantages to stimulate development in Northern Ireland.

    Elected Regional Councils. Regional Councils nominated by the Central Government give those who live in the regions neither a say in their affairs nor a responsibility for them. Regional councillors must be elected – and paid. This is not a part-time job for amateurs.

    Regional Councils throughout Britain must have full powers to co-ordinate all the industrial and cultural development within their regions. They must have their own financial resources and power to borrow, especially for physical re-development.

    Power to Plan. Regional Councils can only be effective if they have the executive power to plan for their areas. They should be responsible for the use of land, including new towns and new industries, public transport and hospital building, water supplies, regional resources and all facilities for leisure and the arts.

    An effective regional policy also demands the decentralisation of Government offices and the nationalised industries, and the appointment of Regional Officers with status equivalent to the Civil Servant.

    Reform Local Government. Our system of local government badly needs to become a more effective instrument of the electors’ will. The aldermanic system in England and Wales should be abolished. All trading arrangements by Councillors with their Council should be disclosed in the minutes. The resources and functions of smaller local authorities should be merged to ensure that effective people are employed and efficient services provided at the most economic price.

    A RADICAL APPROACH TO TRANSPORT

    Whether we are private motorists, farmers or industrialists, poor road and rail communications affect us all, but particularly they strike at the root of exports, regional development, prices and agricultural expansion. Yet Britain’s motorway network is smaller than that built in Germany thirty years ago, and under the National Plan investment in new roads gets a pitiful low priority.

    A network of motorways can and must be constructed without throwing an additional burden on the taxpayer. Those who use roads want to see results. The new motorways should be Pay Roads. This would mean a small charge to the user, but it would be more than balanced by savings in fuel, delays, and wear and tear.

    It would enable public loans to be raised, to build the roads quickly, and would provide a communication system to galvanise the economy.

    British Rail’s passenger and freight services must be rationalised, co-ordinated, and streamlined to meet the real demands of the customer.

    In other countries, air shuttle services between cities are profitable. Why not here? Our provincial airports must be modernised and the number of inter-city services and airports increased as the regions of Britain are developed.

    NON-RACIALIST APPROACH TO IMMIGRATION

    We believe that immigrant entry to this country should be regulated by the availability of jobs or the possession of skills and not fixed at an arbitrary figure bearing no relation to vacancies.

    The problems connected with immigration have aroused tremendous emotion. No one should minimise the social problems created. But clearly anyone who reflects upon the work of doctors and nurses in our hospitals, employees in our transport services, and many other industries, will recognise the significant contribution which immigrants are making to our society.

    We appreciate that integration is not always easy and, in order that the full contribution of the immigrant may be realised, more steps must be taken at national and local level to provide facilities for non-English speaking immigrants to improve their knowledge of English and the British way of life. There must be a closer co-ordination of action at national and local level to promote racial harmony.

    Above all the ‘immigrant problem’ is a problem of housing. Special subsidies must be made available to Local Authorities in areas of acute housing shortage.

    DEFENCE COMMITMENTS MUST BE CUT

    Too great a proportion of our national wealth is spent in pursuing a world peacekeeping role that n many areas is no longer realistic and that in any case is far beyond our financial resources to fulfil effectively.

    We appreciate Labour’s wish to limit defence expenditure but they envisage no equivalent cut in commitments as Mr. Mayhew has so honestly pointed out.

    Realistic Priorities. We reject the idea that Britain still has an independent peacekeeping role East of Suez. The likelihood of our being required to act independently, in the defence of India and Pakistan for example, as the Tashkent Agreement demonstrates grows more remote. We should cut our commitments East of Suez accordingly.

    Apart from a temporary obligation to Malaysia our role is as a member of the United Nations and not as an independent peace-keeping force. We must therefore plan today for a gradual reduction of our bases in the Far East.

    The Deterrent. Events have proved that only the Liberals were sincerely opposed to Britain’s possession of an independent nuclear deterrent. Labour in office, despite all they said in Opposition, have in fact committed us to a nuclear role for the next 10 years. Thereby Labour have made their task of reducing the arms bill more difficult and encouraged the spread of nuclear weapons.

    However, as we still have certain nuclear weapons under our control, steps must be taken to place these weapons under international control within the Western Alliance.

    Select Committee on Defence. During the past 10 years millions of the taxpayers’ money have been wasted on unrealistic commitments and abandoned prestige defence projects.

    Never has the need for a Select Committee on Defence (quite apart from the other Parliamentary reforms which Liberals advocate) been made more obvious than when the Government issued their defence review on February 22nd. Here were policies, which will virtually affect the defence of the United Kingdom for the next decade, which had never been discussed in Parliament or by Parliament until the decisions had been taken and were irrevocable.

    Our priority should be to ensure the security of the United Kingdom by retaining an effective defence force in Western Europe, which, by its very presence, will help to maintain our political influence in that area.

    By cutting our Far East commitments we shall be able to do this and still bring defence expenditure into reasonable proportion.

    Disarmament. We must call for a freeze in the development of nuclear weapons, work to establish nuclear free zones; and press for the admission of China to the UN and disarmament discussions.

    MODERNISE THE MACHINERY OF GOVERNMENT

    The prestige and influence of Parliament has declined. While the British electorate is often able to participate in the great formative debates of American democracy on television, too often major issues are discussed by Parliament only after the event.

    The decline of Parliament must be arrested by radical reform of its procedures. Standing Committees on Foreign Affairs, Defence, Economics and Science and Technology must be set up so that Parliament shares from the beginning in the formulation of policy. Television, the medium of political debate, must be brought into the House of Commons.

    Streamline Administration. Labour has set up new Ministries, but this has not led to quicker decisions or more efficient planning. Indeed it has sometimes led to duplication and made problems worse. Administration must be streamlined to give value for money. Economics. Technology, and Social Security must each be the responsibility of a single Minister. The Housing and Local Government Ministries must be co-ordinated in a Ministry for Regional Planning and Development, within which Housing and Transport would become subordinated departments. Detailed planning would be decentralised to the Regional Councils.

    The appointment of senior Ministers in charge of broad areas of policy would make possible a smaller and more efficient cabinet, comparable to Churchill’s wartime machine.

    Civil Service rules must be made more flexible to allow able people to be brought in from outside. But the test must be ability not political views. A small unit, set up by the Treasury, would ensure that recruitment of outsiders is fair and taps the best brains.

    Electoral Reform. The Electoral system must be reformed to ensure that membership of the House of Commons represents more accurately the will of the people. Through the Speaker’s Conference we shall continue to press for changes in the method of voting. A system which allowed over three million voters only nine members of Parliament and which made it possible for a party with less than half the total vote to become the Government, is clearly in need of a radical overhaul.

    The changes we propose would ensure that every vote cast really counted. and would dispel the present electoral apathy.

    We shall press for votes for young people at 18. Today’s youth is responsible and should be treated as such. At present, until they are 21 young people may not, without their parents’ consent, travel abroad or enter into any legal contract including a mortgage, nor may they vote.

    Full rights should be granted at 18.

    HOW TO IMPROVE YOUR WAY OF LIFE

    YOUR HOME AND YOUR RATES

    Millions still live in slums or have no house of their own. Millions more have homes without lavatories and running water.

    To rid the country of slums and shortage and build sufficient dwellings for all families to have their own homes, we must build at least five million homes within the next 10 years.

    This can be done if we tackle the real causes of the problem.

    Industrialised Building Techniques. System builders’ factories run at a fraction of their capacity. Regional Planning Offices must be set up to co-ordinate these resources, guide the housing effort and speed the creation of housing consortia among Local Authorities. Only from large scale housing schemes can the full benefits of industrialised building be obtained. Building land is available but too little use is made of it.

    Labour’s Land Commission will do nothing to correct this. It will simply discourage owners from selling, and the badly devised levy will make land still dearer.

    Site value rating. which would collect rates on the value of land instead of buildings, would encourage owners of vacant or underdeveloped land to sell instead of holding on for a better market price.

    Homes to Rent Help for Buyers. Much new housing must go to cure the acute short age of homes to rent at reasonable prices. Help from subsidies for Council Houses should be concentrated on those who cannot afford to pay the full economic rent and on Local Authorities with exceptional rehousing needs, particularly in areas where there has been a large increase in the immigrant population.

    The Government must also encourage more capital to be invested in cheap privately built homes for rent. Tax reliefs should be given to landlords who build low rent houses, with rent controlled at a level which gives them a reasonable but not exorbitant return.

    The present pattern of tax relief for home buyers, which helps a rich person taking out a mortgage and not those with little money, should be reversed, possibly by a straight interest rate subsidy, paid to the Building Societies on all mortgages up to £4,000. A Government fund should back one hundred per cent mortgages through Local Authorities and Building Societies.

    Keeping the Rates Down. A complete change in the rate structure is urgently needed. The proposed Liberal tax on land values would spread the load and bring down the cost to the individual ratepayer. The transfer to the Exchequer of a higher proportion of Education and Road costs would reduce it further. The loss of income by Local Authorities should be guaranteed by an annual Government grant.

    WHAT PRICE SECURITY AND HEALTH?

    Security in old age, security in sickness, security in unemployment. these are our responsibilities to each other. The great Liberal concept of the Welfare State is threatened by its increasing failure to match real needs.

    A long term plan linking benefits firmly to the general increase in national prosperity would ensure that all entitled to them share n the growing national wealth.

    Security in Retirement. Even after the 1965 increase in pensions, many old people are still forced to live on National Assistance and will be forced to still further as the cost of living rises; pensions should be raised high enough to make it unnecessary for them to ask for extra help. A reasonable level for a married couple would be half the level of average national earnings, rising accordingly.

    These pensions should be paid to all old people, including those registered before 1948, the earnings rule which prevents pensioners from earning a little extra must be abolished.

    Employees should be encouraged, through their unions and professional associations, to supplement the State pension with occupational schemes to a level not less than two-thirds of previous earnings; and pension rights must be fully transferable. Liberals oppose the idea of a monopolistic State Socialist Scheme.

    At present an employee, as well as paying for his Insurance Stamp, has to contribute with his employer to the State Graduated Pension Scheme. The same money invested in a private insurance scheme would yield him a much higher pension. He should have the right to choose where he invests this extra money.

    Security in Sickness and Unemployment. Sick pay and unemployment benefits must be raised to a realistic level. Two thirds of previous earnings should be the rule and full national average earnings for those undergoing retraining for a new job.

    Security for Wives, Widows and Children. The present system of family allowances which mainly benefit the better off, should be abolished. All children including the first should be eligible under a new system of allowances, graded from approximately £1 to £3 according to age. A widow with dependent children should receive from halt to two-thirds of her husband’s previous earnings, and others should receive sickness, unemployment or retraining benefits like anyone else. The present tax system discriminates against wives who, of necessity, have to stay at home, and it should be re-examined.

    How will it all be paid for? A closer partnership between State and private industry will help to rationalise the present wasteful contribution structure. A Social Security Tax, replacing National Insurance stamps and levied on employer (two thirds) and employee (one third) in proportion to the payroll would rationalise it still further. The tax should be varied regionally to encourage the creation of more jobs in areas of unemployment. Benefits on this scale will not be cheap and will take time to achieve, but would ensure maximum value for money contributed.

    A Better Health Service. At present, unless you can afford to pay privately. your chances of obtaining a hospital bed at short notice are small. Even when you do, you will find most of our hospitals crippled by shortages of doctors, nurses and modern facilities. And the same is true of dentists and GPs.

    We must make better use of the qualified people we have by reforming methods of payment and encouraging, not penalising. married women who wish to return to work.

    We must make the Service more efficient by co-ordinating the various branches of health and welfare under Area Health Boards in which the GP would play a vital part.

    Funds must be made available to these Boards to provide better facilities for dentists and GPs, to improve existing hospital buildings, to build new hospitals and to provide new homes for old people.

    WHAT ARE YOUR CHILD’S CHANCES?

    Although Conservative and Labour Governments have always expressed a desire to increase educational opportunity, in times of financial difficulty it is always education that they cut. Instead of setting up a proper building research group for Universities in order to bring down their costs, the Labour Government has simply imposed a six months’ stop on building for Further and Higher Education thus throwing carefully phased plans into chaos.

    We must get our plans and priorities right and then stick to them. Liberals recognise that education is the most important investment we can make.

    Schools. Priority in school building must be given to bring our slum primary schools, urban and rural, up to a decent standard and to prepare for raising the school-leaving age. This means more generous support for minor works; special grants for depressed areas; and a willingness by Local Authorities to accept large scale industrial building.

    Eleven Plus. Liberals regard the abolition of all selection at eleven plus not as a dogmatic principle, but as a necessary and long overdue reform. We accept the need for detailed consultation at local level and we realise that not every area in the country can go ‘fully comprehensive’ immediately, nor do we regard the ‘all-through, purpose-built eleven to nineteen comprehensive’ as necessarily the best solution. We are fighting for reform in the interests of all the children, not in the interests of dogma or special privilege.

    Higher Education. We reject the Labour Government’s long-term aim of two separate systems, one autonomous under the University Grants Committee and the other ‘public’ under the Local Authorities. The links between Universities and other institutions of higher education should be drawn closer together by exercising public control through Regional Councils rather than the 160 different Local Authorities.

    If the teacher shortage is to be conquered, there must be new methods of part-time training and re-training for teachers. n this connection we regret the Government’s failure in this Parliament to establish the University of the Air, proposed originally by the Liberals and promised in the last Labour Manifesto.

    Teachers. All professional teachers should be professionally trained and their salaries, working conditions and pensions improved. This could be done if many sub-professional jobs in schools were taken over by ancillary staff.

    Cost. The necessary improvements in our education cannot be made without expenditure of a higher proportion of the national income. We would oppose any plan to abolish all individual fee-paying schools although the role of the direct grant, grammar and independent schools must be re-examined.

    A WORLD WE CAN MAKE BETTER

    Liberals support the search for controlled disarmament. Meanwhile Britain must play her part in creating the conditions which will make the arms race unnecessary.

    Strengthen the United Nations. The United Nations must be made to work. A permanent UN force is needed. Liberals want Britain to contribute to it. Any British Government should support the authority of the UN in settling disputes between States and policing scenes of international violence.

    Liberals recognise that Britain is a European power. We cannot afford to carry responsibilities everywhere, and the East of Suez policy, persisted in by Labour, is as dubious politically as it is expensive militarily.

    Join Europe. To play our part in Europe would not only be of great economic benefit it would make us a pioneer in the first supranational community where States have agreed to share some of their sovereignty. Liberals want the Government to declare its intention of joining the EEC at the earliest opportunity.

    Once in Europe, Britain could be an effective Atlantic ally and with our fellow Europeans we could hope to influence American policy in places like Vietnam. Liberals believe in the late President Kennedy’s concept of the Atlantic partnership between the USA and United Europe. Such a partnership would wield great power for progress.

    Hunger and Disease – the World’s Great Enemies. Effective aid to the hungry millions of Asia, Africa and Latin-America means not only direct support but a co-operative effort by the rich States in the expansion of trade to the developing countries, through the reduction of tariffs and more credits and investment.

    The Commonwealth. British aid is naturally largely directed to the Commonwealth countries. Although the Commonwealth consists of loosely linked and widely different nations it remains a valuable association bridging the gap between races. It will lose that value and the gap will widen if Britain compromises with racialism.

    Rhodesia. The rebel regime in Rhodesia is not only defying the Crown and imposing an increasingly oppressive dictatorship. It is also poisoning race relations throughout Africa. Liberals therefore recognise the necessity of continuing pressure until the rebel regime can be replaced by an authority – representing all Rhodesians, willing to work for eventual independence based on majority rule and backed by effective British guarantees.

    The challenges today are tough, but if they are met in Europe, and in United Nations as in Rhodesia, Britain can play a great part n the advance to peace.

    CONCLUSION

    NOW IT IS UP TO YOU

    Liberals are guided by principle not by doctrine. We are not frightened by change. We welcome it, provided that it is directed towards the real priorities.

    If Britain is going to continue to play a significant part in the world there must be a radical change of attitude in Government. We can provide this because we are free to plan for the best interest of all individuals, not just for a few. And that means your interests. We want to see positive action to create a closer partnership between all sections of the community – State and private enterprise, employer and employee, business and union – Only we can bring about this partnership.

    If you want to see positive actions based on Liberal ideas flourish, you know what you must do. It is up to you.