STORY
The European Court of Human Rights has formally raised questions about the UK Government’s 2019 decision to strip Shamima Begum of her British citizenship, signalling that her case in Strasbourg will be examined through the lens of the UK’s duties towards potential victims of trafficking.
Begum left the UK in 2015 when she was 15 and travelled to Syria, later being found in a Kurdish run camp in 2019. That year, then Home Secretary Sajid Javid removed her citizenship on national security grounds, arguing the move was “conducive to the public good”, a decision successive Governments have defended.
UK courts have repeatedly upheld the deprivation decision due to Begum’s support of a terror regime that threatened the lives of UK citizens. The Special Immigration Appeals Commission dismissed her appeal in February 2023 and the Court of Appeal rejected a further challenge in February 2024. The Supreme Court later refused permission for another appeal.
The Strasbourg judges have questioned whether the UK Government has an obligation to consider whether Begum was groomed before removing her citizenship. Concerns are growing that the European Court of Human Rights’ involvement in the Shamima Begum case could trigger a fresh wave of public anger, with critics framing it as ‘foreign judges’ overruling UK decisions. Ministers and campaigners fear the backlash could harden into wider hostility towards the court itself, especially in emotionally charged cases involving terrorism, citizenship and borders.