Category: Transportation

  • Graham Plant – 2025 Statement to Norfolk County Council Meeting on Sheringham Bus Stop

    Graham Plant – 2025 Statement to Norfolk County Council Meeting on Sheringham Bus Stop

    The statement made by Graham Plant, the Norfolk County Council portfolio holder on Transport, at County Hall in Norwich on 8 December 2025.

    I’m glad you brought this up, because it’s been a it’s been on my desk for a little while now.

    We’ve been through a proper process to get to where we are with the Sheringham bus stop.

    We’ve worked hard with Sheringham community, including local schools, the town council, bus operators, the North Norfolk railway, the local museum and Sheringham in Bloom, to shape the travel hub.

    We carried out a full public consultation in May 2025 with two Open Day events. And I’ve got to tell you that this started in 2022 so it’s not something that’s just suddenly dropped on the doorstep.

    More than 500 people engaged with this, and our plans were revised following the helpful feedback received from a number of people, notably, a new look bespoke glass and steel bus shelter with additional green spaces and more seating.

    We have had many positive comments about the new travel hub proposals from residents and other key stakeholders, and people in the area are pleased with a significant financial investment in Sheringham and in ensuring the area is made safe and fit for the future, especially given that we have managed to up the national trend in terms of bus usage in Norfolk, and we’ve seen a 26% increase in bus passengers numbers over the past two years, which is phenomenal. Last Friday, Government announced even more money for Norfolk to encourage even greater use of busses. So schemes such as this to cope with both current and future demand are essential.

    The consultation ran from the second of May to the 26th of May. It was promoted and well received.

    Only 19% of respondents to the online consultation said they wanted the old shelter to stay.

    All statutory consultees were contacted directly about the consultation and about it being a heavy handed reproach approach and legality. Last week’s protesters forced their way onto a live construction site. This has saved the implications of both our workforce, the protesters and the general public and the immediate area. Therefore, we are quite within our rights to attempt to remove those who should not be on the construction site. We have followed all necessary legal advice and processes and have acted appropriately and proportionally. We have not physically attacked anybody or physically touched anybody in this process, but ultimately, the protesters have not listened to any requests for them to leave the site. We’re doing the work over winter so that it doesn’t affect the summer trade and a question about, why are we not protecting this shelter? It did go to Historic England and were asked to consider the listing of the bus shelter. In their response, where they declined to list the structure, they said that, given its late date, it does not exhibit the architectural interest and technical innovation seen in the most significant examples of the building time, and they give three other bullet points as well as to why it’s not been listed.

    We did decline TV interviews last week because I didn’t see any benefit to it, particularly given that the local MP, who’s also been involved very late in the process, very late in the process, I said it started in 2022 it’s been through several processes and the sharing of town council on many occasions. Not a word, nothing. But he did manage to come in at the very last minute and help these supporters of it.

    He also tried to do it on social media. I don’t do my politics on social media. He can write to me and I respond. That’s what I do with most people. They write to me and I respond.

    I’m sure they understand the benefits of the project. Now he’s carried out his own study of the plans, and he spoke to me as he spoke to the leader. We had a meeting last Wednesday morning, at 08:30 in the morning. And he even said in that meeting, delay it for five to ten days, and we’ll probably carry on with the project. But he wanted to give the people who were protesting enough time to protest and then let them go.

    This money has to be spent by March 26 it has to be in place if we don’t spend the money by March 26 then we lose the money. I’m not intending to lose that money. If I don’t spend it in Sheringham, I’ll spend it somewhere else. I will not lose the money. So from that point of view, I have several schemes across Norfolk that I can spend this money on the stop itself.

    It’s important to some people, not everybody, but it’s been through a proper process to find out how we are where we are. Unfortunately, if it continues, and I’m not going to strong arm people out of there, I will not do that, but I will spend the money elsewhere. Unfortunately, that also means that, because the bus companies have said it’s a dangerous stop in its current form, then they won’t be able to use that bus stop either. So we’ll have to find a different stop to use as well, which is unfortunate because it’s really quite close to the bus the railway station.

  • Steff Aquarone – 2025 Early Day Motion on Sheringham Bus Station Controversy

    Steff Aquarone – 2025 Early Day Motion on Sheringham Bus Station Controversy

    The statement made by Steff Aquarone, the Liberal Democrat MP for North Norfolk, in the House of Commons on 3 December 2025.

    That this House notes with grave concern the plans of Norfolk County Council to demolish Sheringham’s historic bus shelter; recognises that the shelter is of Streamline Moderne art-deco design, dating from the 1950s; further notes that it contains a treasured poppy mural painted by a local artist which recognises the historic Midland and Great Northern Railway; is concerned that residents do not feel properly consulted or heard by the County Council; praises and expresses solidarity with the local people who have protested outside and occupied the bus shelter; calls on the County Council to suspend their plans to allow for further constructive discussion with the community; and agrees that Sheringham is a town which is not to be messed with.

  • Charles Sanders – 2025 Statement in Support of Bus Station Changes in Sheringham

    Charles Sanders – 2025 Statement in Support of Bus Station Changes in Sheringham

    The statement made by Charles Sanders, representing Sanders Coaches, on 7 May 2025.

    Dear All

    I have read with interest the comments on the proposed revised station approach layout to improve the movement and especially the safety of both vehicles and pedestrians. I would like to add that this is a County Council scheme using ring fenced money for the provision of improved public transport facilities for our County. This money cannot be spent elsewhere and is not our town council’s project. We as the local operator were consulted on the scheme and I am happy to share with you all the issues we raised which are as follows:

    1. Coming from the Cromer Road roundabout to enter Station Approach when traffic is waiting to exit Station approach buses cannot access the turn into Station Approach without impinging on the pavement therefore Buses have to wait and this can cause a block to traffic flow. Members of the public exiting the car park tend to stand on the corner waiting to cross, creating a further hazard for our drivers to be particularly aware of.
    2. The Bus Shelter is sited too close to the kerb edge given the number of passengers that regularly wait for the buses, this causes buses to often have to stop short of the actual stop point as the crowd is so close to the road edge it would be dangerous for the driver to try to drive past them.
    3. People heading for the North Norfolk Railway or the public toilets have to regularly edge through the bus passenger queue to reach their intended destination.
    4. The growth in passenger numbers over the last few years has been huge. In the period from April 1st 2022 to March 31st 2023 the number of passengers boarding and alighting in Station approach was 286,958, in the last 12 months from April 1st 2024 to March 31st 2025 it was just over 400,000. If numbers continue to grow as more and more people seek to use green sustainable public tarnsport the current issues can only continue to get worse.
    5. There is also going to be an improvement to the waiting pavement space at the West End of Station Approach Bus Stop near to the putting green, again an area no longer large enough to cope with the demand placed upon it at busy times.
    6. Whilst change is not always easy to accept, or easy to fully understand, I hope that the above information will help people to understand why this improvement is being considered, and that ultimately everyone is on the same side here, and just looking to do the right thing to help Sheringham be a vibrant and forward looking town dealing with its current success as a destination, and allowing for even more potential growth in the future.
  • Sheringham Town Council – 2025 Statement on Bus Shelter Controversy

    Sheringham Town Council – 2025 Statement on Bus Shelter Controversy

    The statement made by Sheringham Town Council on 3 December 2025.

    Sheringham Town Council recognises the strong feelings surrounding the changes taking place around Otterndorf Green and specifically the bus shelter. We understand how important this area is to residents, both in terms of heritage and as a gateway to our town, and we are grateful to everyone who has shared their views.

    We acknowledge that some individuals feel that Norfolk County Council’s public consultation process did not meet their expectations, and we recognise this as an important lesson learned.

    The consultation process, which was publicly advertised online, in the EDP, on town noticeboards, and in the Sheringham Independent distributed to all households, generated substantial resident engagement. Feedback was provided through sessions at the North Norfolk Railway, the Community Centre, and directly to Norfolk County Council. This input significantly influenced the design and resulted in meaningful revisions.

    As a result of this community feedback and partnership discussions, the plans were updated to include:

    • Increased green space and coordinated landscaping with Sheringham in Bloom and an overall design that better reflected the local vernacular
    • A shelter design drawing on Victorian and local railway architecture; requiring bespoke metalwork and that will include artwork contributions from Sheringham schoolchildren with support from our community artist Colin Seal.

    These changes were made in good faith, working collaboratively with Norfolk County Council engineers and project managers and other stakeholders.

    It is also important to recognise the limitations of the existing shelter:
    • Its position on a narrow pavement at a busy pedestrian point has long caused concern to the local bus operator.
    • The current layout often forces waiting passengers and passing pedestrians close to the road, creating uncomfortable and potentially unsafe conditions, particularly during busy periods or for those with mobility needs or pushchairs.

    The new Travel Hub layout is designed to address these long-standing challenges.

    Key benefits include:
    • a wider, safer and more accessible waiting area
    • improved pedestrian flow to remove the pinch-point
    • a shelter offering better visibility, more natural light and reduced crowding
    • facilities that support more reliable and efficient bus operations, as highlighted by the local bus operator

    Evidence from similar schemes elsewhere shows that improved facilities encourage more people to use buses. Sheringham Town Council believe that supporting increased use of local bus services is a positive step to:
    • promote sustainable transport
    • help reduce congestion
    • strengthen the long-term viability of the public transport services residents rely on

    Throughout this process, Sheringham Town Council has worked constructively with all authorities and local organisations to ensure that Sheringham’s heritage, safety and public realm were properly considered.
    While the Town Council is not the decision-making authority for highway schemes, we have consistently sought improvements that we believe reflect the values and priorities of our community.

    We remain committed to listening to residents, passing on concerns through the appropriate channels, and supporting the best long-term outcome for Sheringham’s public spaces and transport infrastructure.

    We would like to thank residents who have provided their feedback on this scheme. Sheringham Town Council would be pleased to engage in constructive dialogue both on this and other issues as they present themselves in the community.

    Sheringham Town Council

  • Heidi Alexander – 2025 Comment on Driving Lesson Backlog

    Heidi Alexander – 2025 Comment on Driving Lesson Backlog

    The comments made by Heidi Alexander, the Secretary of State for Transport, on 12 November 2025.

    We inherited an enormous backlog of learners ready to ditch their L-Plates, who have been sadly forced to endure record waiting times for their tests. Every learner should have an equal and fair opportunity to take a test.

    We’re taking decisive action and these new measures will deliver thousands of extra tests over the next year, helping learners get on the road sooner. This will ease pressure on the system, removing barriers to opportunity and supporting economic growth as part of our Plan for Change.

  • Lilian Greenwood – 2025 Statement on Dartford Crossing Charges

    Lilian Greenwood – 2025 Statement on Dartford Crossing Charges

    The statement made by Lilian Greenwood, the Transport Minister, in the House of Commons on 17 June 2025.

    The Dartford Crossing is the only fixed road crossing of the River Thames, east of London, and one of the most important links in the strategic road network.

    To manage demand and protect the crossing’s role as a vital component of the nation’s economic infrastructure, a user charge has been collected at the crossing since 2003. In 2014, the tollbooths were removed to help make journeys smoother and the charge was increased to help manage increased demand. This was the last time that charges were increased for all vehicles.

    In the 11 years since, demand at the crossing has grown 7.5%, with the crossing now used by an average of over 150,000 vehicles every day and up to 180,000 vehicles on the busiest days. These traffic levels are well in excess of the crossing’s design capacity, causing delays for drivers using the crossing, congestion and journey disruption to drivers on the M25 and a range of knock-on impacts for local communities.

    Current charging levels are no longer sufficient to achieve their stated aim of managing demand so that the crossing works well for users and local people. The need to increase the charges to manage traffic highlights the need for the additional capacity that LTC, for which the government confirmed new funding yesterday, will provide.

    To secure the effective operation of the crossing, I have, therefore, decided to increase the charges for all vehicle types that currently pay to use the crossing from 1 September 2025. The new tariff is given below.

    Class Vehicles One-off payment Pre-pay account holders
    A Motorcycles, mopeds and quad bikes Free Free
    B Cars (including trailers), motorhomes and any minibuses that have 9 or less seats (including the driver’s seat) £3.50 £2.80
    C Buses, coaches, vans and other goods vehicles with 2 axles £4.20 £3.60
    D Buses, coaches, vans and other goods vehicles with more than 2 axles £8.40 £7.20

    The increase in charges for car drivers will be a maximum of £1, with significant discounts for local residents and account holders. The new charges will be significantly lower than if they had increased in line with inflation since the tariff was last fully revised in 2014.

    I am aware that these necessary changes to the charges will be unwelcome news for users of the crossing. However, we will continue to support local people through the local resident discount scheme and I have been determined to keep the nominal fee paid by local people as low as possible, as many rely on the crossing to get around their local area. Drivers who live in Dartford or Thurrock and who have signed up to the scheme will pay £25 for unlimited annual crossings from 1 September 2025 – a small increase from the current annual fee.

    There are no other changes to the charging scheme. Journeys made between the hours of 22:00 and 06:00 will continue to be free, when there is no need to manage demand, as will those made by motorcycles at any time and the bicycle pick-up service.

  • Heidi Alexander – 2025 Speech at the National Railway Museum

    Heidi Alexander – 2025 Speech at the National Railway Museum

    The speech made by Heidi Alexander, the Secretary of State for Transport, in the National Railway Museum in York on 10 April 2025.

    Thank you, David, for that introduction.

    Good evening, everyone, and welcome to the National Railway Museum in York.

    I’m tempted to say we’re in the country’s finest transport museum, but as a Swindon MP and a former Deputy Mayor for Transport in London, I feel I should tread carefully.

    So welcome to ONE of the VERY BEST transport museums in the country!

    It feels fitting for me to do my first big transport speech here.

    The history of our transport network — the stories of the men and women who designed it, built it, operated and used it — are woven into the fabric of our communities in 21st century Britain.

    And it’s you — the people in THIS room — who are adding to that rich tapestry every day.

    You keep life moving.

    You get children to school, commuters to work, and families to their holidays.

    You move the goods that stock our shelves, fuel our industries, and keep businesses thriving.

    You don’t just connect places — you connect people with the things that they need to get on in life.

    And it’s in the spirit of connection that I’d like to tell you a story.

    I hope you won’t be disappointed to learn that I haven’t invited you here for a big policy announcement or news headline, but rather to share a little bit about who I am and what I believe.

    I want to tell you a story about the people and places who have shaped my thinking.

    I grew up in Swindon.

    A proud railway town on the M4 corridor – a place with much to be proud of.

    It’s also a humble football town – and I can tell you, that as a Swindon Town supporter, I have learnt the lessons of humility all too well.

    By fate and circumstance, that’s where my journey began.

    Outside our semi detached house, I remember my dad’s first van parked up — ‘Malcolm Alexander Electrical Services’.

    I remember the first bike I was given – blue with a basket on the front — a bit like the blue crate I’ve got on my bike now.

    And I remember learning to drive around the town’s infamous Magic Roundabout.

    And the car factories that punctuate the town’s history – Rover, Honda and now, BMW.

    It’s fair to say that in 1980s Swindon, the car was king.

    It still is.

    The proliferation of out of town shopping centres, urban expansions and a minimal public transport network shaped the transport destiny of my town.

    Now, I won’t pretend that urban planning preoccupied my teenage mind too much.

    Back then, I was much more concerned about whether Wham! were going to make it to Number 1.

    But when I moved away and got my first job, I began to see the bigger picture…

    … that a poor transport network will limit choices.

    … that it can block the aspirations of young people.

    And, most important of all, a good transport network can do precisely the opposite.

    I was the first person in my family to go to university.

    And like so many, I found work and opportunities in the capital.

    And so it was, at the age of 29, I walked into Lewisham Town Hall as a newly elected councillor – becoming the cabinet member for regeneration just two years later.

    I loved that job, and I fell in love with transport.

    Now, I’ll admit …

    It wasn’t the language of highways management that enthralled me: “There’s no such thing as a speed hump Cllr Alexander, only speed tables and speed cushions.”

    But it was the extension of the East London Line, the creation of new brownfield sites around major railway stations, the improvements to walking and cycling links that really got me hooked.

    I learnt quickly that transport shapes a lot more than roads and railways.

    And equally important, I learnt that it takes a lot of people to shape transport itself.

    At Lewisham, I saw first-hand how transport investment could make a dramatic difference to people’s lives.

    Take Brockley Railway Station.

    For years, it was an uninspiring, inaccessible place.

    Uninviting, a bit run down.

    Not somewhere you’d instinctively love as you rocked up for your morning commute.

    But working with local campaigners, we delivered step-free access, a stunning landscaped ramp and better connectivity along the London Overground.

    Today, Brockley is thriving.

    It’s a place where the old and the new coexist.

    The Wetherspoons on the corner and fried chicken shops sit side-by-side with bakeries, breweries and a pedestrianised square.

    It was a transport scheme that built a stronger, more connected community.

    And, it was transport that made the difference down the road in Lewisham too.

    We transformed it — relocating and improving a bus station, moving a roundabout, redesigning the roads, creating land for new homes, new public spaces and new opportunity.

    And when I say “we”, I mean the hundreds of people from different organisations who made it happen — people like you.

    When a few years later I became the Member of Parliament for Lewisham East, transport was always right at the top of the list of my constituents’ concerns.

    The longer train station platforms that were worse than useless without the longer trains to stop at them.

    The toxic air being pumped into homes around the South Circular.

    And when I later became Deputy Mayor for Transport in London, I had the privilege of working on those concerns more closely than I had ever done before.

    Look, London is big.

    So yes, naturally, I’m proud of the big stuff:

    Straining to keep the capital moving through Covid.

    Working on the Elizabeth line to deliver the jewel in the crown of the UK’s rail network.

    Sticking to my guns on the Silvertown Tunnel, a new river crossing that enables London’s red double-deckers to go under the Thames to the east of Tower Bridge for the first time.

    But honestly, big doesn’t always mean beautiful.

    Transport isn’t just about the price tag on the project.

    It’s about delivering a better everyday experience – buses that come on time, accessible stations, well managed road works.

    I’m just as proud of the smaller projects that made a big difference — many delivered in London by my good friend and then colleague Will Norman — segregated cycle lanes on Jamaica Road and Evelyn St, more secure cycle parking, slower speeds on roads with high KSIs, a direct vision scheme to improve visibility from the cabs of HGVs.

    These were transport interventions which ultimately delivered better public health, as well as better public realm.

    So when I moved back to Swindon a couple of years ago, I wasn’t just carrying a dream about becoming the MP for my home town.

    I arrived with baggage — determined to deliver for Swindon in a similar way to London.

    Not the same solutions — as every place is different, but to give people options and opportunity.

    There isn’t something in the water that makes Swindonians love their cars more than Londoners.

    Just a reality that public transport is better in London.

    And I think it’s a failure of imagination, as much as a failure of policy, that young people in Swindon don’t have better options than I had decades ago.

    Because change is possible.

    Across the country — from Swindon to Shrewsbury,  Rotherham to Peterborough — we have underused transport assets.

    Unloved railway buildings — land surplus to requirements or land that could be made so.

    Neglected stations, like Brockley.

    Potential that shouldn’t go to waste, but we know that, too often, it does.

    And with vision, funding and collaboration, these could become hubs of regeneration, places that don’t just usher people through — but bring people together.

    We talk about delivering “London style” transport to other places.

    But I think we should talk more about “Swindon style” transport for Swindon, or “York style” transport for York.

    And I want to support the capability and capacity within councils and combined authorities to deliver regeneration, investment and tangible improvements.

    We have great mayors.

    We have great local leaders.

    We have great organisations working nationally and regionally.

    We have a lot of talent in this room and beyond.

    So, the question for me, is how do we best harness that?

    Obviously, this is a question that has vexed me particularly since I took a call from the Prime Minister at the tail end of November, asking me to serve as his Transport Secretary.

    And as someone who has skin in the game as a local MP and a passion to build on the work started by the force of nature, Lou Haigh, I naturally said yes.

    And here I am.

    Full-circle in some ways, and trying to shape a new path in another.

    And the task is to build a better decade for transport.

    Towards a better railway…

    Laying the foundations for reform — establishing Shadow Great British Railways and launching a consultation on the upcoming Railways Bill to unify track and train.

    Towards public ownership…

    Passing the Passenger Railway Services Act, with the first operators — Southwestern and c2c — moving into public hands in the coming months.

    Towards better buses…

    Introducing the Bus Services Bill, giving local authorities greater control over routes, timetables, and fares — backed by over £1 billion in investment to improve reliability and frequency.

    Towards better roads…

    Investing £1.6 billion in local highways, an uplift of £500 million on last year — enough to fill an extra 7 million potholes.

    Towards fairer work…

    Enshrining greater protections for seafarers in law.

    Towards cleaner skies…

    Introducing the Sustainable Aviation Fuel mandate and launching a consultation on the revenue certainty mechanism.

    Towards a fossil-free future…

    Supporting the installation of thousands of new EV charge points—helping to drive record electric car sales, with 31% of new cars sold in December last year being electric.

    And towards a transport system that supports the aspirations of everyone in this country…

    It’s why I am so proud to work with the ministerial team at the Department for Transport.

    Like me — and like all of us — they’ve seen the difference that good services make…

    …Whether it’s the tap-and-go trams and buses in Mike Kane’s patch, with fares capped at £2 on Greater Manchester’s Bee Network.

    …Or in Simon Lightwood’s patch, where the mass transit system will improve integrated travel options in West Yorkshire, improving access to opportunities for people in Leeds and Bradford.

    …Or, in Nottingham, where one of the local bus operators, Nottingham City Transport, has been voted UK operator of the year a record six times, with passenger satisfaction amongst the highest in the country. I hear Lilian Greenwood is a pretty good local MP too …

    And as for Peter Hendy, who is his own walking museum of transport knowledge, he has a phrase that I would like to steal.

    He talks about transport needing to be “boringly reliable”.

    And he’s right.

    If public transport options are boringly reliable, then it means day-to-day life is easier for everyone.

    So, by 2035, I want public transport to play a greater role in national life, becoming the easiest, most attractive choice… brilliantly and boringly reliable.

    Enrique Peñalosa, a former mayor of Bogotá, once said:

    “An advanced city is not one where the poor have to own a car, but one where the rich choose to use public transport.”

    That’s a vision I believe in.

    But I can picture the headlines now — so let me counter the column inches before they emerge: there is no such thing as a war on motorists.

    I drive. I own a car and I love it — a racing green Mini Cooper convertible.

    I walk. I cycle.

    I take buses, trains, and taxis.

    And I’ll bet most of you do too.

    No serious person is proposing to ask people like my dad, a self employed electrician, to swap their van for a bus, forcing them to lug all their kit around — I certainly am not.

    Through his career, my dad was a professional problem solver, and I hope I’ll carry the torch for that family tradition.

    But I’ll be focussing on solving the real problems, not wasting time on the invented ones.

    Because I’m sure everybody in this room would agree that where you live shouldn’t determine what you can achieve…

    …that your hometown, no matter how big or how small, should provide the transport options to meet your aspirations…

    … and that — if transport doesn’t nurture young people with the opportunities they deserve, then our entire economy misses out on the talent it needs to grow.

    That’s why we’re here today.

    To have the conversations that bring us closer together.

    I want to harness your talents, your expertise and your drive to solve real problems.

    Because, no matter where people are travelling to, they should be proud of where they’re coming from.

    Thank you, and have a lovely evening.

  • Heidi Alexander – 2025 Speech on Supporting the UK Aviation Sector

    Heidi Alexander – 2025 Speech on Supporting the UK Aviation Sector

    The speech made by Heidi Alexander, the Secretary of State for Transport, at the Airlines UK annual dinner in London on 25 February 2025.

    Good evening, everyone.

    I’ve had the pleasure of meeting some of you over the last couple of weeks individually. But I will be honest with you, not only did I not expect to find myself in this job, I also didn’t envisage spending quite so much time talking about airports.

    But I am glad I have because aviation not only underpins the growth we want, but our approach to it says a lot about the country we want to be.

    Now some might say the current debate about airport expansion highlights a fundamental tension between growing the economy, whilst protecting the environment.

    I say: we must do both.

    We could put our head in the sand and pretend that people don’t want to fly. Pretend that families aren’t dispersed across the globe. That they don’t work hard for, and enjoy, their summer holidays. We could pretend that businesses don’t have international clients and colleagues and that air freight isn’t a significant part of the UK’s trade by value. We could pretend that aviation isn’t critical to the economy of an island nation. But we would be knowingly detaching ourselves from reality.

    We live in an increasingly interconnected world. Whilst technology has in some respects brought us all so much closer together, there are some things that smartphones, streaming or Zoom just can’t replicate. So as a government, we have a choice – either engage with the world as we find it, or we fail. We know demand for air travel is only going in one direction. Record-breaking stats from the Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) last week confirm passenger levels were 7% higher in 2024 than the previous year. Demand is up – and if we don’t meet it, then we will lose out to our European competitors and risk being on the wrong side of public aspirations.

    So the Chancellor has been clear: we will do all we can to support the sector and take the brakes off growth. It’s why we’ve approved London City Airport’s plans to expand to 9 million passengers per year by 2031 and it’s why we welcomed Stansted’s additional £1.1 billion investment to extend its terminal. But there remain capacity problems – particularly at airports in the southeast.

    So, as you know, planning applications for Gatwick and Luton are literally on my desk. And as you might have picked up, the government has invited proposals for a third runway at Heathrow to be brought forward by the summer. Once received, we will move at speed to review the Airports National Policy Statement. But let me be clear – this is in no way a blank cheque. My job as decision maker on all of these schemes will be to strike a balance – between expansion’s potential benefits of jobs, trade and tourism, with tough questions on:

    • whether this is compatible with our climate and air quality obligations
    • whether we can minimise noise and disruption to local communities
    • whether this will benefit airlines and passengers, and how we make sure costs are shared fairly

    This government believes in increasing airport capacity. We’re ambitious for the sector, but these strict criteria must be met if we are to balance the needs of today with the necessities of tomorrow.

    But it’s not just about airport expansion – I want us to take a holistic look at aviation. Our Aviation Minister, Mike Kane, has worked with many of you for years on what are now some of this government’s key manifesto commitments. He has seen first-hand this sector re-emerge stronger from one of its toughest periods and stand today at the cusp of what could be the biggest transformation in its 100-year history. Now more than ever, you need a government that is a willing partner you can trust, whose electoral mandate provides stability, and whose policy agenda provides certainty.

    But I would ask that you judge me and the government not on what we say – because goodness knows you’ve had enough of politicians promising you things. But judge us on the choices we make. While this government is only 8 months old, our choices are clear. Every decision measured against the yardstick of growth:

    • planning reforms – delayed by successive governments as just too hard, now allowing us to finally build again
    • a national wealth fund – now creating thousands of jobs and unlocking investment
    • the first industrial strategy in years – due this summer
    • work accelerated on modernising our airspace, that critical national infrastructure which gets forgotten far too often

    Right across the board, it’s clear, we’re choosing growth. For us here tonight, that means running hell for leather towards greener and quieter flights. Stand still and we risk making ourselves poorer in every way. I, therefore, see both decarbonisation and modernisation, above all, as a moral mission.

    Let me be clear, I have no intention of clipping anyone’s wings. I am not some sort of flight-shaming eco-warrior. I love flying – I always have. For me, there is something intrinsically optimistic about taking to the sky. I’d even go as far as saying that EasyJet’s bacon sandwich on an early morning flight from Gatwick is up there with my favourite things in life. Other airports, operators and snacks are of course available!

    I believe it is incumbent on all those in public life to give businesses the tools for success and increase opportunities for people to improve their lot. That means more passengers and freight in the air, not less. But I am equally clear that this must also mean less carbon, not more. That’s why sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) is so important. Over its lifecycle, it will reduce emissions by 70% when compared with jet fuel. And just weeks into office, we reiterated our commitment to the SAF Mandate and, in November, we signed it into law.

    Throughout, we’ve listened to your concerns. You rightly said demand without supply will mean higher costs – and that’s on top of pressures you’re already facing on many fronts. Harming your competitiveness doesn’t help anyone. So I don’t suggest for a second that SAF is a silver bullet, but it is integral to reaching net zero aviation by 2050 – that’s why we are backing it to the hilt. And by legislating for a price guarantee, we will send a clear signal to investors: that this is a serious opportunity for you.

    It will give certainty to producers looking to grow their UK production, and our £63 million investment in the Advanced Fuels Fund will ensure we start becoming more self-sufficient.

    I know it is early days, and many technologies are not yet scaled, but SAF sits alongside a range of other levers that we must pull to decarbonise the sector. More efficient aircraft and engines will burn less fuel and play a key role. We are even starting to get ready for zero emission flights. These projects – and more – are supported by nearly £1 billion in government funding for the aerospace technology programme as well as the CAA’s hydrogen in aviation regulatory challenge. And I’ve mentioned it already, but our ongoing commitment to airspace modernisation is key for both growth and decarbonisation, with the potential for quicker and greener flights.

    Getting all this right matters – it matters for the planet and for the next generation. I don’t have children, but I know what I want for my nieces and nephew.

    A world ravaged by climate change and extreme weather events? Of course not.

    A world where they have been denied the opportunities to travel that I have? No.

    I want them to live life. To fly. To see different places. Experience different cultures. To understand that those who would see countries retreating into their own corners of the globe are on the wrong side of history.

    So this matters – for the next generation, but also for today. Decarbonising aviation could be worth billions to the economy, and support thousands of jobs. It is an important enabler to our industrial strategy.

    And if we are to be successful, we must embrace partnership.

    I am grateful to many in this room for your involvement in the Jet Zero taskforce, it’s crucial that we pool our resources and expertise – both government and industry – to secure this industry’s future.

    So, I’ll finish by saying this – the government’s Plan for Change depends on aviation’s success, on the economic value you bring, on the jobs you support, on the trade you facilitate. But that growth depends on us running as fast as we can towards cleaner aviation. It’s the only way to break out of the paralysis successive governments have tolerated.

    The new aviation futures forum will be a crucial vehicle for that work. Some of you may remember this as the Aviation Council – and I’m sorry that we seem to have to rename everything when there’s a change of government. But I hope it’s clear that our commitment is immutable: we are as determined as you are to tackling our shared challenges.

    I don’t just want to talk about challenges though. Because if we continue making the right choices, we will achieve our shared vision of a growing, thriving aviation sector. One that improves both the lives and the livelihoods of people right across the country. Not many sectors so visibly and tangibly sustain both our economy and people’s lives. So let’s make sure, together, that we secure more of those benefits in the future.

    Thank you.

  • Louise Haigh – 2024 Letter of Resignation Sent to Keir Starmer

    Louise Haigh – 2024 Letter of Resignation Sent to Keir Starmer

    The letter sent by Louise Haigh, the Secretary of State for Transport, to Keir Starmer, the Prime Minister, on 29 November 2024.

    Text of Letter (in .pdf format)

  • Keir Starmer – 2024 Letter Accepting Louise Haigh’s Resignation

    Keir Starmer – 2024 Letter Accepting Louise Haigh’s Resignation

    The text of the letter from Keir Starmer, the Prime Minister, to Louise Haigh following her resignation as Transport Secretary.

    Text of Letter (in .pdf format)