Category: Technology

  • Liz Lloyd – 2026 Speech on Software Security and Cyber Resilience

    Liz Lloyd – 2026 Speech on Software Security and Cyber Resilience

    The speech made by Liz Lloyd, the Minister for the Digital Economy, in London on 15 January 2026.

    On the 19  of September, a ransomware attack hit a major software supplier used by airports across Europe.  

    Overnight, checks and systems failed, flights were delayed, staff were forced back to pen and paper.  

    Thousands of people, families, workers and travellers were left stranded. It wasn’t an attack on any airport directly.  

    It was an attack on a software supplier, a single weak point rippled across a whole sector. 

    Incidents like this are becoming more common.  

    In the UK, 43% of businesses have experienced a cyber security breach or attack in the last 12 months. We estimate that cyber breaches cost the UK about £15 billion a year – around 0.5% of GDP.   

    And while the digital economy, especially AI, offers huge opportunities for growth across many sectors in the economy, none of that potential can be realised without confidence.  

    People need to trust the systems they use right now, but they still hesitate.  

    They worry about how their data is handled and whether the technologies they rely on are secure.  

    So software security isn’t just technical. It’s a commercial imperative. And trust is what unlocks growth.  

    Government’s first duty is to keep citizens safe. By securing our technologies, we protect citizens, their businesses, the economy.  

    Strong cyber security and supply chain security underpin enterprise, prosperity, and jobs. 

    That’s why we must do everything we can to protect against these attacks, and support our brilliant tech companies, so they can get on with what they do best.   

    We’re starting in a good place.    

    The UK has some of the strongest cyber defences globally.     

     We have fast-growing clusters of expertise in Cheltenham and Manchester, as well as Belfast and Scotland’s cyber cluster that spreads across several Scottish cities. 

     And our cyber sector is the third largest in the world – achieving double-digit growth, year on year.    

    As a government, we also know we must do our part.     

    Backed by over £210 million, the Government Cyber Action Plan published last week sets out how the government will rise to meet the growing range of online threats.  

    This will improve digital resilience across the public sector.  

    And as we strengthen government’s defences, we are also setting clear expectations for industry.  

    The Cyber Security and Resilience Bill will ensure that our critical national infrastructure is protected. 

     In October, we wrote to FTSE 350 companies, urging them to strengthen their defences – adopting things like our ‘Cyber Essentials’ certification.   

    This was followed by a similar letter to entrepreneurs and small businesses, in November, with bespoke advice for smaller teams.    

    We know these things work: organisations that adopt ‘Cyber Essentials’ are 92% less likely to claim on cyber insurance than those who don’t.     

    We have also worked closely with industry to identify the minimum actions to secure the technology that our economy relies on.   

    This includes working hand-in-glove with the NCSC [National Cyber Security Centre], UK companies, and international counterparts to develop policies that set a global standard for technology security.    

    For example, the UK’s AI Cyber Security Code of Practice has been developed into a global standard through the European Telecommunication Standards Institute.    

    This follows in the footsteps of the PSTI ACT: world leading legislation to ensure consumer devices secure by design that came into force in 2024.    

    But we cannot rest where we are.  

    The threat landscape is evolving rapidly, and adversaries are becoming more sophisticated with attacks on software.  

    Software now underpins almost every critical service in our economy, from healthcare, to transport, to national security. So it’s fundamental to our resilience and public trust.  

    To start to address this, the Department [for Science, Innovation and Technology] and the NCSC published the Software Security Code of Practice in May last year. 

    This Code outlines the minimum actions that software suppliers should take to ensure a baseline level of security across the software market. 

    But communicating those expectations is just the first step.  

    We now need to ensure that these actions are embedded in UK supply chains to provide businesses with confidence in the technologies they need to operate and to grow.  

    Currently, just 21% of organisations say they think about cyber security when buying software.   

    So it’s time to address this.     

    The question is how, exactly, we do this.    

    On one side, there are those who push for new regulation, and stronger government oversight.    

    On the other, there are those who say ‘do nothing’, businesses will get there themselves – just wait it out.     

    But I believe we can be more ambitious than that.    

    The UK is home to some of the best software firms anywhere in the world, and we’re lucky to have great examples here in this room today.   

    As well as the brilliant international firms who invest here, set up offices here, and make the UK their home.    

    I believe we need to learn from these companies – to find the ones who are leading the way and celebrate them, as role models.    

    The firms whose software is developed with security, top of mind.   

    Who appoint dedicated cyber experts.    

    Who have brilliant communication between buyer and seller.   

    Who offer best-in-class training to their workforce.    

     And whose leaders take safety seriously – with accountability at the very top.    

     That is what a true pioneer looks like.    

     And we see the same forward-thinking security posture throughout supply chains.    

    The UK hosts a burgeoning ecosystem of supply chain security experts. 

    This includes buyers leading the way in how they manage risks in their supply chains, and cyber security experts offering their services and knowledge to disseminate crucial cyber security capabilities.    

    Now we must learn from them and spread these habits to as many organisations as possible.    

    So today I am very proud to announce the UK’s new Software Security Ambassador Scheme, a group of leaders – 13 companies, in total – who are making a public commitment to champion secure software and to be role models for the UK government’s Software Security Code of Practice.  

    This Code has been written in partnership with industry and with cyber experts, at every step, including the National Cyber Security Centre.    

    And our national ambassadors span the whole software field – from vendors…   

    …Sage, Cisco, and Palo Alto Networks, Hexiosec, Zaizi and Nexor…   

    …to buyers – like Lloyds, and Santander…     

    …to expert advisors – Accenture, NCC Group, ISACA, ISC2, and Salus Cyber.    

    Now, we hope you will use your position as industry leaders, and first adopters, to spark a change in the sector more widely.    

     We’ve seen how effective this model can be.    

     A voluntary code of practice is a tried-and-true way of setting a professional standard.  

    Look at the World Health Organization’s code of practice for hand hygiene.  First introduced in 2009, the code has become a global benchmark despite not being enforced by law, and has helped to significantly reduce infection rates as hospitals can draw on a single, definitive source of best practice in one place.    

    That’s exactly what we want the Software Security Code of Practice to become.  

    Every sector that depends on software, a single trusted reference point that lifts standards across the whole economy. 

    Our Software Security Code of Practice sets out 14 principles, and clear expectations for how software should be secured in our supply chains to build a common understanding between vendors and buyers of what level of security a software supplier should be responsible for.   

    I’m delighted to say it’s already being used in the public sector, by the NHS.    

    So our health service can help to lead by example too.    

    If we get it right, this could be a real moment of achievement.    

    Great UK industry, paving the way.    

    Modelling safe, secure tech for the rest of the market.    

    And perhaps the start of a new, international benchmark too.    

    To protect our country from attacks.    

     Back British growth and prosperity.    

     And create a better future for all of us, starting here today.     

     Thank you all.

  • Liz Kendall – 2026 Statement on Grok’s Image Generation

    Liz Kendall – 2026 Statement on Grok’s Image Generation

    The statement made by Liz Kendall, the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology on 9 January 2026.

    Sexually manipulating images of women and children is despicable and abhorrent. It is an insult and totally unacceptable for Grok to still allow this if you’re willing to pay for it. I expect Ofcom to use the full legal powers Parliament has given them.

    I, and more importantly the public – would expect to see Ofcom update on next steps in days not weeks.

    I would remind xAI that the Online Safety Act Includes the power to block services from being accessed in the UK, if they refuse to comply with UK law. If Ofcom decide to use those powers they will have our full support.

    We will be banning nudification apps in the Crime and Policing Bill which is in parliament now.

    We are in the coming weeks bringing in to force powers to criminalise the creation of intimate images without consent.

    I expect all platforms to abide by Ofcom’s new Violence Against Women and Girls (VAWG) guidance and if they do not, I am prepared to go further.

    We are as determined to ensure women and girls are safe online as we are to ensure they are safe in the real world. No excuses.

  • Ian Murray – 2026 Statement on the Government Cyber Action Plan

    Ian Murray – 2026 Statement on the Government Cyber Action Plan

    The statement made by Ian Murray, the Minister for Digital Government and Data, in the House of Commons on 6 January 2026.

    Today I am publishing the Government cyber action plan, which sets out how we will transform cyber-security and resilience across Government and the public sector.

    Public incidents demonstrate the devastating real-world consequences of inadequate cyber resilience. The recent incident affecting the Legal Aid Agency compromised personal data and impacted the organisation’s ability to digitally process legal aid applications and bills.

    Similarly, the attack on Synnovis—a supplier of pathology services to the NHS—caused delays to over 11,000 outpatient and elective procedure appointments and, tragically, contributed to the death of a patient.

    This reality underscores the fact that cyber-security is not a luxury; it is a fundamental component of business continuity, and all organisations should take steps to defend themselves.

    Digitisation offers substantial opportunities to transform lives, deliver better public services, and drive economic growth and digital government. By investing in secure and resilient foundations, we do more than protect and transform public services; we drive innovation and growth within the UK’s cyber-security sector.

    This Government have taken important steps in understanding and mitigating cyber risk across Government and the public sector. The Government Cyber Co-ordination Centre, also known as GC3, enables us to respond as one Government to cyber incidents, threats and vulnerabilities. Our secure-by-design approach enables us to “fix forward”, ensuring future digital services are designed to achieve cyber-security resilience outcomes. GovAssure, our cyber assurance process now entering its third year of operations, offers an unprecedented picture of current resilience levels and the fundamental blockers to progress.

    However, the evidence is clear: we must do far more to address the persistent threat. We must move from a model where individual organisations act alone to one where the Government truly defend as one.Toggle showing location ofColumn 8WS

    Today’s Government cyber action plan sets out a radically new model for how Government will operate differently to deliver this necessary transformation. It is backed by investment of over £210 million, led by the Government cyber unit within the Department for Science, Innovation and Technology. The unit is taking decisive action to rapidly address the recommendations from both the National Audit Office and the Public Accounts Committee by holding Departments to account for their cyber-security and resilience risks, as well as providing them with more direct support and services, and co-ordinating response to fast-moving incidents.

  • Dan Jarvis – 2025 Speech on Cyber Threats

    Dan Jarvis – 2025 Speech on Cyber Threats

    The speech made by Dan Jarvis, the Security Minister, in London on 24 November 2025.

    It’s great to be here with you all today. 

    I’m also really pleased that the invitation for today’s conference actually reached you, and didn’t fall into your email’s junk folder. 

    But if you are here because you picked up this invitation in your spam, I just want to be crystal clear – we are not giving away a free Lamborghini at today’s event.

    Hopefully everybody is connected to the wifi, and if you’re not, the password is very simple to remember.

    It’s the full text of the Magna Carta in Latin.

    Anyway, it’s great to be able to welcome you all to the House of Commons. 

    But at first glance, it may seem like Parliament and Cyber are two mutually exclusive concepts. 

    Our democracy has – historically – been very wary of new technologies.

    There was a Parliament Technology Gap from when an innovation was created until it was introduced in Parliament. 

    First, the printing press.

    From the 1480s, printing became more common in this country. Thomas Hansard began printing Parliament’s debates independently in 1811 and it took a select committee in 1909 to adopt Hansard’s innovation as a legitimate part of their service. 

    A Parliament Technology Gap of about 400 years. Not a great start.  Next, broadcast cameras and microphones, which came into use in the early 1900s.

    Initially, the BBC couldn’t broadcast anything said in either House until two weeks after it had been discussed.  But eventually, cameras entered Parliament by 1989. A Parliament Technology Gap of about 90 years – so something of an improvement.  

    Finally, the personal computer and the internet – which became commonplace from the late 1970s. Parliament was again slow to take up the benefits of IT. 

    One MP, during a debate in 1988, said “the technological revolution – of which we are so proud in Britain – seems to have passed Westminster by”.

    From 1994, every MP with a personal computer was given internet access. A Technology Gap of only 20 years – the best yet. 

    And what about the technology of the future?

    Now, much like Steve Jobs and black rollnecks, Parliament and tech are now becoming inseparable.

    Parliament is more proactive. Its ‘Information and Technology Strategy’ faces the future stating how Parliament must continually adapt to the evolving landscape. 

    This is exactly the right approach to take. 

    The pace of change is only accelerating and the speed in which new technology is introduced and adopted is becoming shorter and shorter. So, we must protect ourselves against the threats of tomorrow. 

    Because cyber-attacks taking place across the world are only getting worse.

    If cybercrime were a national economy, it would be the third largest in the world.

    Microsoft’s Digital Defence Report said that – by 2027 – scams are expected to cost the world $27 trillion a year.

    As a joint Minister between the Cabinet Office and the Home Office, I have heard from my policing colleagues about the sometimes unseen cyber offending. Some that are central to truly awful online crimes.

    Like those that hack into accounts to steal and then trade intimate images mostly of women and children. 

    Or the community groups that blur boundaries between cyber and violence in the most despicable way. 

    These are growing trends and of deep concern, all of which show that our collective exposure to serious impacts is growing at an unprecedented pace.

    This is especially true when it comes to our world-leading business sector. It is essential for every organisation to operate in a way that minimises the risks of a cyber incident.

    The mindset for businesses should not be ‘if’ we get attacked but ‘when’ we get attacked. That means our cyber defences and technical resilience must evolve to cope with the threat.

    Which is why we’re doing more than ever before to keep our businesses and society safe from cyberattacks and cybercrime. 

    And we’re doing that through the building we’re all in today.

    Just a couple of weeks ago, the Cyber Security and Resilience Bill was introduced to Parliament.

    It will boost cyber protections for the services that people and businesses rely on every day. And it will ensure any breaches in cyber security are dealt with quickly.

    This is a vital piece of work, as is our Counter Political Interference and Espionage Action Plan.

    Because we know that Parliament is also a target, which is why we are taking this decisive action against foreign interference and espionage operations.

    The Action Plan will strengthen our legislation to disrupt the threat, help those who work in politics to recognise, resist and report the threat, and help break down the ecosystem of proxy organisations used by foreign powers to target our democratic institutions.

    We’re also giving more direct support to businesses to make sure they remain safe.

    The new tools we have created through the National Cyber Security Centre will help every kind of business, from the SME with a handful of employees, to larger corporations with hundreds of staff. 

    Our ‘Cyber Action Toolkit’ that we launched last month is designed to empower sole traders and small businesses to take their first steps toward cyber protection. 

    Our ‘Cyber Essentials’ certification proves your organisation is protected against common cyber threats.

    And over 13,000 organisations are part of the free ‘Early Warning’ service, giving them exclusive access to information on potential cyber-attacks. 

    All of this work will be enhanced next year when we publish the new National Cyber Action Plan. 

    It will outline how we will continue to build resilience and combat the technological threats facing us to secure economic growth.

    And, of course, it’s vital that the police, National Crime Agency, and our security services continue to work together so we can ruthlessly pursue and disrupt these cyber threats. 

    These criminals need to know we will use all of the tools at our disposal to counter their activity.

    We must support our businesses in any way we can. But businesses cannot be protected by the government alone. 

    Which is why last month, a letter was sent to the CEOs of the FTSE 350 companies that implored those business leaders to recognise the threat that is facing them.

    Now, today I’m talking to some great leaders from our tech sector – a sector that knows the importance behind rigorous security. 

    And I believe we are staring at a potential win-win situation for us if our business leaders increase their cyber security, working alongside the innovative UK cyber industry that brings in over £13billion in revenue. 

    Because this should be a priority for everyone driven at board-level, and I implore any business leader who thinks they may be exempt from gripping cyber risks to think again.

    Perhaps the Parliament of the past was right. 

    They could more or less evade utilising technology and, by doing so, they could keep their discussions mostly private and keep the country running. 

    That is not an option open to any of us today. Technology enhances everything we do. 

    It keeps our democracy transparent, it keeps our businesses successful, it keeps people connected and safe. 

    But this interconnection between technology and society can be exploited by those who seek to cause us harm.

    Many of you in this room lead by example.

    Our tech sector is one of the most crucial chips in the economy’s motherboard. One that takes its cyber security seriously.

    I hope that, through Government support and their own initiative, that the rest of our business leaders follow in your footsteps. 

    Thank you very much.

  • Liz Lloyd – 2025 Speech at TechUK Cyber Security Event

    Liz Lloyd – 2025 Speech at TechUK Cyber Security Event

    The speech made by Liz Lloyd, the Minister for the Digital Economy, at One Great George Street in London on 16 October 2025.

    It’s a real pleasure to be here with you tonight.

    And thank you Nils for my introduction – and for remembering my very long title.

    It’s a special moment for me personally. It’s my first public speech on cyber security since being appointed as Minister for the Digital Economy, and I can’t think of a better place to start than with you: the people at the heart of keeping our digital economy safe, resilient and thriving. 

    As you know, cyber security is not just a technical issue. It’s an enabler of growth and innovation. Firms with good cyber security in place can be confident of a stable environment under which they can invest and develop.  

    More widely, cyber security underpins everything we want to achieve in science, technology and innovation. Whether it’s AI, quantum, semiconductors or smart infrastructure – none of it works without trust, and trust depends on security. 

    UK cyber security sector

    So let me begin by reiterating the government’s unwavering support for the UK’s cyber security sector. 

    This sector is a crucial element in our Industrial Strategy. It’s a frontier industry – one that not only protects our national interests but drives economic growth, creates high-value jobs, and strengthens our global standing.  

    The UK cyber sector now generates over £13 billion in revenue per year and directly supports more than 67,000 jobs across 2,000 companies. In total, 143,000 people are employed in cyber security jobs across the economy. That’s a remarkable achievement – and it’s thanks to everyone in this room. 

    But we know there’s more to do. That’s why we commissioned the Cyber Growth Action Plan earlier this year – addressing the question of what government and industry need to do in the future to drive further growth.

    The plan sets out 9 recommendations across 3 pillars of culture, leadership and place. It calls for government to help stimulate informed demand for cyber security, clearer expectations for cyber risk reporting, and developing regional areas of cyber strength and specialisation. 

    It’s about helping winners grow, stimulating demand, and building public understanding of cyber security’s role in national resilience.  

    We’ll be responding to the action plan in due course, including working with our forums – such as the Cyber Growth Partnership – to discuss the recommendations and their implementation.  

    But in the meantime I wanted to touch on the other work my department has been driving forward across the sector, to help support your businesses to thrive.   

    We’re continuing to invest in programmes that support innovation. Our Cyber Runway programme – the UK’s largest cyber accelerator – is helping startups and scaleups access funding, develop products and expand internationally.  

    We recently secured a further £6 million pounds to support cyber startups by building on the Cyber Runway accelerator. 

    Then there’s CyberASAP – our academic startup accelerator – which has already created 34 spinouts, 76 new jobs and generated over £40 million pounds in investment. These programmes are helping turn pioneering ideas into commercial success. 

    As part of the Industrial Strategy we secured an additional £10 million pounds to support commercialisation of cyber research through the CyberASAP programme. 

    Driving growth is not just the role of government. You all have a role and I know that many successful cyber founders are now supporting the next generation of startups.  

    Last week an industry led group started to build on this, bringing Chief Information Security Officers (CISOs) from across all sectors of the economy into the same room as cyber startups to build collaboration through design partnerships. We will do everything we can to support this drive to find the next UK cyber unicorn. 

    And we hear from you that skills is a huge issue.  Tonight, I want to highlight a new flagship initiative: TechFirst. 

    Announced by the Prime Minister at London Tech Week back in June, TechFirst is a £187 million programme to build a sustainable domestic pipeline of tech talent.  

    It will reach one million young people with foundational skills in AI and cyber, support over 4,000 graduates and researchers, and connect skilled people with real job opportunities across the UK. 

    TechFirst builds on the success of our existing CyberFirst programme and will be delivered in partnership with industry. So I want to encourage you – the sector – to get involved.  

    Your involvement could include offering work experience, mentoring, training places, or helping to shape local delivery. Whatever it is, your support will be vital. Together, we can inspire the next generation and ensure that talent is never a barrier to growth. 

    Resilience and the Cyber Security and Resilience Bill

    Of course, we must also be honest about the threats we face. 

    Recent incidents – at Jaguar Land Rover, Co-op and M&S – have shown how disruptive and damaging cyber attacks can be. They’ve affected supply chains, halted operations, and put livelihoods at risk. Costs have run into hundreds of millions of pounds. These events are a stark reminder that resilience is not optional – it’s essential. 

    That is why the government this week wrote to the UK’s leading companies asking them to make cyber security a board level responsibility and to make full use of government support and guidance.    

    For the most critical and essential parts of our economy, we are going further by introducing the Cyber Security and Resilience Bill. 

    This legislation will expand the scope of our existing cyber regulations to cover more critical services. This includes bringing managed service providers and critical suppliers into scope. 

    The Bill will also strengthen the powers of regulators, and give government the tools to respond quickly to emerging threats. It’s a proportionate but decisive step to not only protect the critical services on which we all rely, but also strengthen cyber resilience across the UK economy. 

    The Bill will be introduced as soon as Parliamentary time allows. It has been developed working closely with regulators, industry and many of those who are here tonight.  

    I want to thank techUK for your close engagement with us as we’ve developed the Bill. We’ve really valued your feedback. 

    I want to assure you there will many opportunities to feed into our plans for implementation and there will be suitable transition periods for businesses to reflect the changes we are bringing forward. So please do continue to share your feedback – it is incredibly valuable. 

    This legislation to improve cyber resilience is focused on the most critical services. The services the public rely on to go about their normal lives – to switch on lights, turn on the tap to safe water, and know the NHS is there to support them.   

    However, the vast majority of UK businesses and organisations will not be covered by the Cyber Bill because we do not think it would be proportionate. The IT and services they rely on will become more resilient as a result of the Bill – and the support and free advice we have made available ensures firms are on a stronger footing to safeguard themselves and deal with disruption.  

    We are continuing to work with industry to help drive action and increase adoption of cyber security measures.  

    I want to work with you all to understand how we can best help businesses take up the guidance and tools the government has created.  

    For example, we know the Cyber Essentials scheme is highly effective. Organisations with a Cyber Essentials certificate are 92% less likely to make claim on their cyber insurance than those without. We’re working hard to drive adoption of Cyber Essentials, but how can we do it better? 

    Similarly, we published a Cyber Governance Code of Practice earlier this year. This helps Boards and Directors effectively manage cyber risks in their businesses – and it comes with free training from the National Cyber Security Centre. All larger organisations should be using this.  

    How will we make sure that happens – redouble our efforts? 

    New National Cyber Strategy

    Many of the answers will be set out in a National Cyber Strategy, which we’re in the process of refreshing. 

    The new strategy will reflect the evolving threat landscape and the opportunities of emerging technologies. It will focus on resilience and growth, and DSIT will play a leading role in shaping its direction. We’re working across Whitehall and with industry to ensure it delivers real outcomes and reflects the strengths of our cyber ecosystem.  

    Thank you again to everyone who has been involved.   

    Conclusion

    So, to sum up: 

    We’re backing the cyber sector – because it’s vital to our economy and our national security. 

    We’re investing in growth, innovation and talent – because a strong cyber ecosystem underpins everything we do.  

    And we’re strengthening our cyber defences – because it’s what we need to do to keep the public and the economy safe, and harness the opportunity of technology and digital advances on AI.  

    Finally, we’re asking you to continue working with us – because cyber security is a team sport. You can help us shape the future, support young people, and build a cyber sector that is secure, inclusive and built to last. 

    Thank you for everything you do. Have a great evening – and I look forward to working with you. 

  • Peter Kyle – 2025 Mansion House Speech

    Peter Kyle – 2025 Mansion House Speech

    The speech made by Peter Kyle, the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology at the Mansion House in London on 3 September 2025.

    I want to talk about a society and economy where AI benefits every person and community in the country.

    Where there is opportunity for anyone, no matter their background. Where our huge potential for wealth creation isn’t centred in the capital but is distributed where talent lies – which is everywhere people are.

    And where we finally become a country that celebrates entrepreneurial zeal, and those can who move from innovation to commercialisation, and thrive in a modern Britain.

    To get there, the question I’m seeking to answer in government isn’t ‘do we want to be a country that adopts AI or not’…because AI is going to happen. We know it is.

    That’s true for every country from Britain to North Korea.

    The better question is: do we want to use all the power and agency we have, as a government to shape how it unfolds?

    This will be my focus tonight.

    And what better setting than here, in Mansion House.

    The place where the future of this country has so often been debated, and yes, defined.

    Almost 70 years ago, in April 1956, this room was the setting of a major Cold War summit.

    Where Nikita Khrushchev came, after Stalin’s death, with a delegation from the USSR.

    On the way here he stopped by Claridge’s. Clearly nothing is too good for the workers.

    Before coming for dinner here, with Clement Attlee and Anthony Eden.

    Mansion House was done up, looking its finest.

    The Lord Mayor gave a speech.

    And the team put on a delicious spread, as always.

    It was a huge effort.

    But we know now, looking back at history…the charm offensive didn’t really work.

    Khrushchev returned to the USSR as resolved as he ever had been to lead, through technology.

    Racing to be first to the space rocket, the microchip, the bomb.

    Thankfully, those Cold War days are behind us.

    But on the world stage, the tech competition remains as fierce as ever.

    Only this time, the defining competitive advantage of this century – I believe…is going to be AI.

    Artificial intelligence will shape our economies, our security, and our place in the world.

    Those who wield it in their national interest – who invest in the right skills and hardware, while they have the chance…will be the economic superpowers of the future.

    Look at the US, and China.

    Or the Gulf states, vying to compete.

    Time and again, we see that a nation’s sovereign interest rests on its technological edge.

    It’s the lesson Khrushchev almost learned – but not quite.

    You see, in the years after his Mansion House visit, Khrushchev set about increasing the USSR’s tech capacity.

    As part of the plan, he wanted to have his own Soviet Silicon Valley.

    He ordered the creation of a new city, on the outskirts of Moscow: Zelenograd.

    The city had its own cinema, billboards, homes and offices. And a massive statue of Lenin.

    And the whole place was designed for engineers, racing to design microchips.

    The idea was simple: copy what worked in America, but do it faster.

    The Soviets got their hands on a prototype for a US microchip, the SN-51.

    Alexander Shokin, the official in charge, summoned the engineers of Zelenograd into his office, and he ordered them:

    “Copy it, one-for-one” – without a single deviation.

    This, ultimately, was their big mistake.

    The Soviets chose to imitate rather than innovate.

    At a time when the pace of change in chips was impossible to keep up with, without their own domestic research capacity.

    American speed proved too difficult for the Soviets to match.

    Individual US entrepreneurialism outpaced Soviet central control.

    And Silicon Valley won the chip race.

    Today, history is repeating itself in the development of AI and the new technological revolution.

    And the UK must think like the US, not act like the USSR.

    The computing power needed to train leading AI systems has doubled roughly every 6 months for the last decade.

    If we don’t keep up – with a domestic AI ecosystem of our own, on British shores, we’ll always be beholden to others, following where they point us.

    Buying off-the-shelf, from overseas.

    That’s a precedent I am not willing to set when it comes to our military tech, the integrity of our NHS, and data protection.

    Or when the prize is a huge competitive edge for our economy.

    Fortunately, we’re starting from a good place.

    We currently rank third for AI, after the US and China. We have 4 of the world’s top ten universities. The lowest corporation tax in the G7. And more venture capital investment than anywhere else in Europe.

    Only this year, the chief executive of NVIDIA, Jensen Huang, said the UK is in a ‘Goldilocks’ moment for AI.

    Because we are country not burdened by over-regulation, or a lack of ambition.

    Britain is striking the right balance.

    I remember, before this government came to office, I spent ages asking businesses what they needed from us.

    You certainly weren’t shy in telling us.

    Take AI seriously. Regulatory reform. Make sure we don’t fall short on talent.

    And ever since, we’ve been getting on with it.

    It started in January, with the AI Opportunities Action Plan.

    It outlined the 50 steps we are taking to grow the economy, and create scores of new jobs as part of the government’s modern industrial strategy.

    An early priority for me was skills.

    In June, we launched our TechFirst programme – backed by £187 million in funding which will bring digital and AI learning directly into the classroom and reach every secondary school pupil in the country.

    Next, we looked at the workforce. Forming a skills partnership with firms like Barclays, Amazon, BT, and Google.

    Together, committing to train 7.5 million people in AI – a fifth of the country’s workers.

    It’s fantastic to see how so many of you have risen to that challenge.

    After that, we looked at hardware.

    If we wanted to compete, we knew we had to improve our physical machinery.

    The raw processing power we have on offer, here in the UK, to churn through the mountains of data that will be required.

    The Compute Roadmap I set out in July charts that course.

    And I recently launched Isambard – our new supercomputer, the most powerful in the country.

    A machine that will be able to process an unthinkable amount of information, in seconds.

    We have another one, Dawn, in a lab in Cambridge.

    And I’ve announced the creation of a national supercomputer that will be based in Edinburgh.

    All told we’re on track to increase our compute capacity 20-fold between now and the end of the decade.

    We have our plan for the National Data Library.

    AI is pretty straightforward in its basic form. It is chips. It is data. It is software.

    We talk about chips a lot. We talk about software a lot. But we need to talk much, much more about the data that fuels it.

    AI is only as good as the data it uses, and Britain has the best data in the world.

    We will be safely harnessing it to power scientific and medical discovery, to drive our understanding of the human condition, and as potentially the biggest engine for the commercialisation of innovation in our country’s history.

    And we’re not slowing down any time soon.

    Our next big priority is our AI Growth Zones.

    These will be dedicated hubs of AI development.

    The first will be just 60 miles away, in Culham.

    And we’re getting spades in the ground for sites in Wales and in Scotland.

    Each has the potential for a full campus – bringing together companies, researchers, and investors.

    These efforts have been met by a wave of commitment from the private sector.

    With £14 billion in investment announced by firms like Vantage Data Centres, NScale, and Kyndryl.

    A brilliant British company, Synthesia, has announced they are expanding their London office just a few weeks ago.

    And global firms like Cohere, Open AI, and Anthropic have followed suit – choosing our capital as their home from home.

    That is a vote of confidence not just in our tech sector, but in the UK’s future.

    So this evening, I’m proud to publish the next 2 parts of our plan.

    The first is a roadmap for a new British AI assurance industry.

    Backed by a fund worth £11 million.

    In the next few years, AI assurance will bloom into a unique profession, worth up to £18.8 billion to our economy, based on a growing pool of independent experts with the skills to verify that new AI innovations are secure, and trustworthy.

    We hope it will give firms the tools they need to build trust with both customers and markets, especially smaller teams, who lack the in-house expertise to do this work themselves.

    Applications for that fund will be opening in the Spring – please do keep an eye out.

    Lastly, we’re looking very closely at regulation.

    I know this is a crucial issue for many of you. So I want to make it plain:

    British companies shouldn’t have to wait months for approvals, whilst competitors overseas race ahead. If AI can speed things up, even a little, then we will do everything we can to make that a reality.

    As part of this effort, today we announced our new AI regulator capability fund.

    Designed to support 5 UK regulators – from Ofgem, to the Civil Aviation Authority with up to £2.7 million in funding, to help them both use and regulate AI better.

    Whether it’s a new AI assistant. Analysing huge datasets. Or streamlining approvals.

    This is our challenge to regulators:

    Use every tool at your disposal to get new products to market quickly, without sacrificing safety.

    In aviation, for example, this might mean getting faster at clearing the skies for new drone technologies.

    Or, for the Office for Nuclear Regulation, we’re investing more than a quarter of a million pounds in a project that will enable the nuclear industry to test new AI tools in nuclear plants.

    Including things like making us more efficient at handling high risk nuclear waste.

    I want to personally thank the team at our Regulatory Innovation Office, set up last year, for being so forward-looking on this. I’m immensely proud of the work that it’s already doing.

    So that’s where we are today.

    A little over a year after I first set foot in the Department for Science, Innovation, and Technology, I don’t think a single person in this room could say, hand on heart, that we haven’t got stuck in.

    And it’s starting to pay off.

    In our first 12 months of in government we’ve attracted more than £44 billion worth of investment into the British AI sector. The average deal last year was worth £5.9 million.

    And we have doubled the number of AI firms in Yorkshire, Wales, the Midlands, and the North West compared to just 3 years ago.

    We have learned the lesson of history: countries can only prosper if they get the big calls right; if they decide to go beyond the expected and embrace the future; to innovate not imitate; refusing to be constrained by the problems of today by taking on the challenges of tomorrow.

    In these uncertain times, I am certain that’s what it takes to get a global competitive edge.

    So, if there is anyone here who still doubts our commitment.

    My message to you is simple:

    Britain is preparing for the challenge of the new technological revolution.

    We want you to keep investing here, keep building here. List here. Scale here.

    And if you invest in Britain, you will share in that competitive edge.

    I look forward to working with you all as, together, we create the security and opportunity society people are counting on us to deliver.

    Thank you.

  • Peter Kyle – 2025 Speech at the Google Cloud Summit London

    Peter Kyle – 2025 Speech at the Google Cloud Summit London

    The speech made by Peter Kyle, the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, at the Tobacco Docks in London on 9 July 2025.

    Thank you for having me, and thanks also for acknowledging the GOV.UK App, which I’m sure you’ve all downloaded.

    If you haven’t already, then you should be doing so now. And I don’t if you’re looking down at your phones while I’m speaking, if what you’re doing is downloading the GOV.UK App – which is already outselling the Bible on the app store, I’m reliably told.

    When I came into office a year ago, I was told to deliver an App, with a digital wallet, with a chatbot, and with a digital driving licence attached to it, I was told it couldn’t be done in one parliament, that it couldn’t be done in one 5 year period.

    My response was I’m sure Google and others don’t take that long to design and deploy their technology. Let me see a timeline.

    The timeline came back to me a week later, and it was now 3 years.

    We did all of this, the start of the deployment of GOV.UK App, within one year of government.

    Within 15 months, all of those services I’ve just outlined will be deployed and put to the benefit of citizens right around the country.

    And that for me is a source of huge pride, because we’ve used technology to wrap services around individual citizens needs.

    Right now, as all of you know, too often citizens are being wrapped around the needs of services themselves.

    And this is a profound change as we go forward.

    Now, sometimes I’m accused of being “too close to big tech”.

    And I could have no better place to have this argument out on the table with you now.

    In May, The Guardian criticised me for meeting with the sector 70% more than my predecessor. Now, to this crime, I plead guilty.

    In truth that was just 28 times over the course of a 6-month period, that equates to around twice a week over that time.

    As Technology Secretary I simply will not apologise for meeting with technology companies – that is the job.

    Just as meeting with the families of victims of social media, regulators, founders, overseas governments and the creative sector, it’s all part and parcel of what I’m paid to do on behalf of the people’s government.

    But I don’t do these meetings just because I’m paid to do it.

    I do them because they matter:

    keeping children safe or from social media – it matters;

    making sure Britain is the best prepared for developments at the frontier of AI – that matters;

    and securing better deals for the taxpayer for the billions of pounds spent every year on software, cloud services, devices and information technology – that matters.

    So today, I’m here to acknowledge our agreement for an entirely new way of working with Google – and how that will impact our public services.

    It’s an agreement that recognises our value as the UK government as a huge client to their organisation.

    And how important their technology is to help us deliver the changes to public services to make them more in-touch and more in-tune with citizens. And better value for money for taxpayers.

    The agreement signals and signifies our determination to exploit the full potential of a partnership between government and Google, with much more collaboration between their UK AI lab, DeepMind, and my own AI developers in my department, the Department for Science, Innovation and Technology with a new digital centre of government.

    We’ve already used Gemini to build “Extract”, a specialist AI tool to help councils convert decades-old, handwritten planning documents and maps into data in minutes.

    It could be pivotal in our plans to stop bureaucracy from holding up the construction and ultimately help us build 1.5 million homes that we’ve pledged over this parliament.

    We know that tools using the same technology are capable of transforming Whitehall itself, the NHS, and other essential services that millions of people across our country rely on.

    So, with more hands-on support, I can’t wait to see what our 2 teams deliver together.

    Google are also aiming to train up 100,000 public sector professionals with the skills that they need to use this technology by 2030.

    That’s going to help us hit the target the Prime Minister set earlier this year, where we’ve committed to double the number of digital experts across government…

    …essential to shaking up decades old processes and making public services work in the way people expect services to work in the 2020s – whether that’s in the NHS, policing, benefits or tax.

    And, perhaps most importantly, we are looking to the sector to help shake off the legacy technology that costs the taxpayer an absolute fortune and leaves us vulnerable to outages and to cyberattacks.

    More than one in 4 public sector systems run on this “ball and chain” tech – rising to 70% in some police forces and NHS trusts.

    With contracts signed decades ago, and a high costs of exit, we’ve seen a few tech companies really taking liberties with the public sector.

    In the worst cases, contracts have made it impossible for public sector organisations to move on. They’ve locked up their data up in vulnerable, archaic servers…

    …only to have the price of maintaining the tech hiked up, year-on- year, with no sign of light at the end of the tunnel.

    Now, as Technology Secretary, I am determined to break free from these costly chains once and for all.

    Through agreements like this we can transition public sector organisations trapped by the ball and chain of legacy products and services, and to migrate to the cloud.

    That move alone will liberate public service organisations and use the latest technology, and more freely explore the wider market moving forward. That is what I am determined to do.

    All in all, this partnership could see Google invest hundreds of millions of pounds in Britain’s public sector technology.

    Helping to deliver my ambition to bring the public services people use every day, drag it into the 21st century.

    Without deals like this in place, we had hundreds of public sector organisations…

    …police forces, NHS trusts, local councils, government departments and many, many more…

    They were simply just going it alone in negotiations with big tech companies.

    And they just don’t have the experience and market clout they need to drive the best deal for taxpayers.

    They end up paying the full shop-front rate or even being entirely mis-sold tech that doesn’t work for them in the first place.

    But they’re all buying on behalf of the same client: you, the British taxpayer.

    And that taxpayer is footing the bill for an annual £21 billion for buying the same technology time and time again.

    That’s why I’m determined to secure a new deal for buying tech for the British taxpayer.

    For too long, too many governments haven’t done enough to build the positive business relationships that Britain needs to prevent the taxpayer being short changed when it comes to procuring tech – from healthcare services, policing systems right through to benefits processes, and bin collections, right down to street sweeping.

    Just as with Google on this strategy, when I negotiate with Tech companies, I am negotiating on behalf of the British taxpayer.

    Britain will be using technology in more areas and more than ever before.

    So, my message to big technology companies is clear: bring us your best ideas, bring us your best tech, and bring it at the best price.

    In return, you’ll get access to the biggest client in the country, one that will be increasingly intelligent and increasingly digital.

    And as we start to operate as a more intelligent buyer of technology, new opportunities are going to emerge.

    The first one that I’m pushing for, is to make sure that, whenever possible, UK technology companies- large and small – get a fair shot at winning a contract.

    Our upcoming marketplace – the national digital exchange – will make sure more and more UK tech companies can get their slice of the £21 billion pie.

    That means more money for companies operating here in the UK, workers and founders.

    It will help us to achieve the economic growth upon which Britain’s future prosperity lies. And it will improve the public services on which British citizens depend.

    Now I want to acknowledge the foresight of Google in signing this key agreement, and I want more to follow. I want it to stimulate many similar co-operation agreements with the full range of international and domestic technology companies.

    That is in the interests of higher economic growth, more jobs, better public services and greater value for taxpayers.

    Thank you very much for having me along today.

  • Peter Kyle – 2025 Speech at CityWeek 2025

    Peter Kyle – 2025 Speech at CityWeek 2025

    The speech made by Peter Kyle, the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, on 1 July 2025.

    Last week, I represented the British government on a trip to Singapore.

    I was there to celebrate 60 years of partnership between our 2 countries.

    And drum up investment into British technology.

    It was my first time in Singapore.

    And it struck me that it’s a place that has mastered the art of reinvention.

    From traditional fishing village to global financial centre.

    Small trading post to one of the most competitive economies in the world.

    An economy that, like ours, knows that the key to staying competitive is being squarely focussed on the future.

    It’s a similar idea that brings us together today.

    Because this is a sector that’s also defined by an ability to reinvent itself.

    Where centuries-old banks have had to rip up the playbook.

    To compete with nimble, digital-first firms.

    And where new technologies have made the way you work unrecognisable from how it once was.

    One of my first proper jobs was in a finance team.

    It was 1989, and I worked in the purchase ledger at The Body Shop – a hero of the British high street at the time.

    I matched goods that came in with invoices.

    And inputted all of that into an arcane mainframe computer.

    I’m sure quite a few of you will remember those days.

    And the change after change you’ve seen your institutions through since.

    Because before PIN codes, there was paper.

    Before blockchain, there were books of accounts that landed with a thud on the desk.

    Before cashless, there was ‘Cashier number 3 please’.

    These are changes that financial services firms have not just weathered, but pioneered.

    To keep this sector as the engine of economic growth it truly is.

    And to keep creating products that improve the lives of working people.

    Over the past few years, another change has rippled through the sector:

    AI has reshaped what’s possible.

    And there’s not a sector of our economy it will leave untouched.

    There’s a simple difference between this change and those that came before:

    Sheer speed.

    In past waves of transformation, industry and the state alike could afford to dip a toe in.

    To spend a few years seeing how the water feels.

    This time, we need to jump.

    Since joining government, I’ve been clear that the UK will not be swept along as others lead the AI revolution.

    We’ll shape that revolution here.

    6 months ago, we launched the AI Opportunities Action Plan.

    Setting out how the UK will seize the massive potential for economic growth that AI offers us.

    Growth that’s at the heart of our Plan for Change.

    Since that launch, we’ve opened up applications for areas in the UK to become AI Growth Zones – hotspots of AI infrastructure and investment.

    And had over 200 responses.

    The full weight of government is behind the plan.

    With the Chancellor announcing £2 billion to deliver it, as part of the Spending Review.

    And a Modern Industrial Strategy that doubles down on our commitment to AI

    …as one of the 6 frontier technologies our digital and tech sector plan focusses on.

    Crucial to that plan is adoption.

    Because talking about the power of AI to grow the economy is all well and good.

    But unless companies use it, that growth only exists in theory.

    Not in practice.

    Financial services is at the front of the pack here.

    Around 3 quarters of firms surveyed by the Bank of England the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) already use AI.

    That’s the 3rd highest rate of adoption across the economy.

    That doesn’t surprise me in the slightest.

    The UK led the world in open banking.

    We led the world in near-instant digital payments.

    And our reputation in fintech is second-to-none.

    The most valuable private tech company in Europe is Revolut, a British fintech.

    Our fintech crown is one I’m infinitely proud of.

    If we’re to hold on to it, you need a government that continues to back you.

    That doesn’t just call for you to keep exploring new technologies.

    But actively enables you to do it.

    When I talk to firms about adoption, they tell me about 2 barriers more than any other.

    A lack of skills.

    And finding their way through a web of complex regulation.

    On skills, we’re partnering with 11 major tech companies to train 7.5 million workers in the UK with essential AI skills by the end of this decade.

    So that a lack of expertise will never put a ceiling on what you can do.

    Regulation shouldn’t be that ceiling, either.

    In her Mansion House speech last year, the Chancellor set out a vision:

    For a regulatory environment that cares about managing the burden we put on businesses.

    Since then, she’s launched a radical action plan on regulation to kickstart growth.

    My part in that is making sure we ease the burden on businesses when it comes to adopting emerging tech.

    About 9 months ago, I launched the Regulatory Innovation Office.

    A dedicated unit to curb red tape.

    And get game-changing tech into the public’s hands quickly and safely.

    It’s already delivered results.

    Apian, a British start-up founded by NHS doctors, is now freed up to use drones to take blood samples from Guy’s Hospital in London Bridge, over to a lab in St. Thomas’ for testing.

    Before the NHS had the okay to work with them, those samples were carted over in vans.

    The journey took around half an hour.

    More if they were snarled up in traffic.

    After support from Regulatory Innovation Office (RIO) and the Civil Aviation Authority (CAA), each delivery now takes just 2 minutes.

    Beds are freed up faster.

    NHS waiting lists go down.

    And a crucial difference is made for patients where every second counts.

    Thanks to RIO’s close work with regulators, companies have made advances like these in fields like space or engineering biology, too.

    But I want more sectors to benefit from the breath of fresh air it offers.

    Instead of being stifled by a blanket of bureaucracy.

    So, today, I can announce that RIO is joining forces with digital regulators.

    To consolidate a labyrinth of regulation, and make it easier for innovators to bring AI products to market quickly and easily.

    This marks a significant boost for fintechs.

    Right now, your efforts to use emerging tech can get mired in a lack of clarity.

    Because there’s no single port of call on what you can do with AI.

    You’re left going from regulator to regulator, picking your way through different sets of rules.

    For start-ups and scale-ups without big legal teams, that’s nigh-on impossible to navigate.

    And for bigger banks and firms, it’s days of productivity sunk.

    Now, RIO is teaming up to the Digital Regulation Cooperation Forum (DRCF).

    To bring all of that guidance together into a one-stop shop.

    A digital library that lets you quickly search for answers.

    These are changes that firms of all shapes and sizes can take advantage of.

    Up-and-coming fintechs to household-name banks will go from idea to impact faster:

    Using AI to spot credit card fraud hours before humans can alone.

    To get instant answers to your customers.

    To analyse stocks, so people can get more out of their investments.

    We’re clearing the path for you to harness AI to stay ahead of the game.

    And to make people’s lives fundamentally better.

    Because I know this is a sector that will keep reinventing itself.

    Just as I know that AI will continue to bring profound, positive change to the UK.

    With the right backing on adoption…

    Access to skills…

    And clarity on regulation…

    We’ll make sure that this isn’t just a change that fintechs and banks are part of.

    But a change that you lead.

  • Dawn Butler – 2025 Speech on Mobile Phone Theft

    Dawn Butler – 2025 Speech on Mobile Phone Theft

    The speech made by Dawn Butler, the Labour MP for Brent East, in the House of Commons on 3 July 2025.

    I beg to move,

    That this House has considered the matter of mobile phone theft.

    I thank the Backbench Business Committee for ensuring that we could have this important debate today. I know that there are many MPs who would have loved to be here today and who have suffered mobile phone thefts.

    Ten years ago my bag was stolen when I was at a conference in a Westminster hotel. I used geo tracking and saw it moving slowly over the bridge. I called the police, but they were not interested—as I say, it was 10 years ago. Somebody at the conference had a car, and in true “Starsky and Hutch” style we used it to chase down the thieves. We noticed as we were travelling alongside them that we were probably going to make them very suspicious, so we went ahead of them and stopped. This is probably a lot of detail, but we then pretended to kiss as the thieves walked towards us. I called the police again to tell them that we were about to apprehend the thieves and retrieve my phone. The police then arrived, and when they jumped out of the van we jumped out of the car. The thieves had about 20 mobile phones on them. I recovered my bag and, although they had dumped my stuff along the way, I got all my stuff back. But the thing is, that was 10 years ago, and things have moved on—people understand that there is “Find my phone”, as do the police, so we know that we can recover stolen phones—so now is the time to prioritise this type of theft, which is making our streets less safe. Tourists are being targeted.

    I know that the Home Secretary has had a roundtable with mobile phone companies and with the Mayor of London, but if the companies will not take this problem as seriously as they should, we need to force them to do that by law. I went to a good briefing on the Metropolitan police’s Operation Reckoning, which shows its determination. This is a vital way of achieving the Government’s safer streets mission. In Westminster, a mobile phone is stolen every six minutes.

    Jim Shannon (Strangford) (DUP)

    I commend the hon. Lady on bringing forward the debate. She is absolutely right, but it is about even more than mobile phones. I am not technically minded—I own up to that; I am of a different generation—but today’s young person carries on their mobile phone bank details, family things and personal things that allow access to accounts and whatever else. Sometimes, in the back of their phones they have their debit cards and their driving licence, so when someone gets their phone, they get almost their whole life. As the Minister acknowledged in a previous debate, perhaps today’s young person needs to understand that if they lose that, they lose almost everything financially.

    Dawn Butler

    I thank the hon. Member for that important intervention; he is absolutely right. A mobile phone is not just for making a phone call anymore; it is an integral part of most people’s lives. It holds data on it, as well as pictures that its owner will never be able to take again. It holds voicemails from loved ones. My friend who had her phone snatched in Egypt had a voicemail from her late mother on her phone. Mobile phones hold so much information that when someone snatches one, they are snatching a part of that person’s life.

    Mary Glindon (Newcastle upon Tyne East and Wallsend) (Lab)

    Further to the intervention from the hon. Member for Strangford (Jim Shannon), does my hon. Friend agree that public awareness is not where it should be? It worries me to see people with their phones sticking out of their back pockets or people standing and taking photographs around Westminster, knowing how high the incidence of theft is. Somehow the public need to be more aware and more careful with these precious things that hold so much of their lives on them.

    Dawn Butler

    I thank my hon. Friend for that important intervention. That is the thing: until we ensure that our streets are safe, we must ensure that people are acutely aware of what is happening. I find myself sometimes tapping people on the shoulder and saying, “Excuse me, can you move your phone from your back pocket? You might get pickpocketed.”

    I feel that the manufacturers use this as part of their business model. They know that once a phone gets stolen, its owner will go and buy another phone, and phones currently operate on a monopoly. I do not know if anybody has ever tried to switch from an iPhone to a Samsung as I did—oh my goodness; it is like they do not want you to switch over. Even from Android to Android, it is difficult to move over the data. Mobile phone companies know exactly what they are doing. Thank God for USB-Cs, because iPhone chargers used to change with every upgrade, so people ended up forking out more and more money.

    We need to hold the manufacturers to account because they make enough money and enough profit. We have to get to a stage where we are putting people and the safety of our citizens first.

    London is one of the greatest cities on earth and we want Tories to come—not Tories, but tourists. [Laughter.] Tories are obviously welcome too, even though they are not here today. We want tourists to come to London to sample the art, the culture and the inclusion. We do not want to go around warning them about their mobile phones. Over 700 phones were also stolen from Departments, so the Government should have a vested interest in this because it will cost taxpayers money to replace those phones.

    We can redesign mobile phones so that nobody wants to steal them. I do not know if people are old enough to remember—although there are a few in the Chamber today—when car radios used to be stolen out of cars. We combated and stopped that crime by building the radios into the cars so they could not easily be snatched out.

    John McDonnell (Hayes and Harlington) (Ind)

    I just want to throw something else at the debate around the insurance issue. Many say, “You should be covered by insurance.” My phone was stolen last November. It was classic: I got bumped into in a big crowd and did not realise. I then recognised the theft and did “find my phone”. It was in north London, so I contacted the police, but they do not investigate after an hour because they say it is gone. I said, “I have the personal numbers of the whole of the Cabinet there, so that might cause a bit of a problem.” I then claimed on the household insurance and was covered, but then the insurance company would not renew my cover. That just adds to the problems all the way through. Everyone seems to be making a profit out of it, apart from us.

    Dawn Butler

    I am impressed that my right hon. Friend has the all the Cabinet’s phone numbers. He is absolutely right; the knock-on effect of this crime is huge. Whether it is the house insurance, the personal stuff or the global crime syndicate, it is huge. I watched a documentary by Dave Fishwick, known through “Bank of Dave”. He spoke to one of the gang leaders and they talked about shoulder surfing, where they liked to watch people and get the details of their phones. They like to get phones when they are already open so that they can then scrape all the data and bank details. Within that hour, as my right hon. Friend said, they could empty out someone’s bank account. Around 30,000 people are also victims of identity theft in this country every single day. This crime, therefore, is not simply about nicking somebody’s phone; it goes a lot deeper than that.

    One hundred million second-hand phones go to China and some go to Algeria too. Apple and Google say that they will reconnect phones that have been reported stolen. We should say to them that that admission, in itself, is unacceptable. China has become an illegal electronic recycling hub where, if they cannot get into a phone, they dismantle it and build a new phone using various parts from stolen ones. Those who do not disconnect their ID straightaway are sent threatening messages that talk about killing and raping family members, with some even sent videos of guns that say they are coming to kill them. That is terribly frightening and also why we need to stop this global crime now.

    There is a link between neighbourhood crimes and organised criminality. Criminals think that the police do not care about mobile phone thefts because it is just a mobile phone and people can claim it back. I am glad that the Met police is taking this seriously, unlike 10 years ago. I doubt that many heads of criminal organisations will be watching this debate, but I note that 235 people were arrested in January 2024 through Operation Reckoning. On average, people are getting sentences of four to five years, which I think is right, because this is not a crime without consequences.

    The Government have a huge role to play in making sure that we say to these criminals that we are serious about holding them to account. However, we must also say to the manufacturing companies that if they will not provide a kill switch for stolen mobile phones, we will force them to do it by law.

  • Peter Kyle – 2025 Speech at Giant Ideas

    Peter Kyle – 2025 Speech at Giant Ideas

    The speech made by Peter Kyle, the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, on 16 June 2025.

    I speak to you having just wrapped up what was, in my department, one of the biggest weeks of the year.

    It was the outcome of the Spending Review.

    The Data Bill, after months, passed into law. And it was also London Tech Week.

    If you haven’t been before, think of it like Coachella. But swap Lady Gaga for tech founders in leather jackets, blue jeans and Britney mics.

    This was my 2nd Tech Week, but this year felt different.

    Not just because it was my first as Tech Secretary.

    But because the atmosphere had changed.

    The optimism was more tangible. The energy more urgent.

    The atmosphere in Olympia more excited and exciting.

    Nowhere was that excitement more obvious than when it came to securing the UK’s stake in a future shaped by AI.

    You had the Prime Minister announcing a £1 billion investment, to make our computing power 20x greater by 2030.

    You had buzz from international investors. Who have poured £45 billion into AI here since July.

    And you had Jensen Huang, CEO of Nvidia, declaring that the UK had reached a ‘Goldilocks’ moment: When our combination of world-class universities, AI start-ups and sheer ambition makes Britain ‘Just right’ as an investment destination.

    It won’t surprise you to know that I agree.

    We will turn our country into an AI superpower. But our ambition alone won’t define us.

    What will define us is how we achieve that ambition. Last week, I was reminded of the question in my mind the day I came into office:

    How do we shape the future of AI in a way that is progressive? In a way that leaves no one behind?

    Because we tend to talk about AI as an unstoppable force.

    But progress is never inevitable. It can be halted in its tracks.

    Fourteen years of slow or no growth, declining family incomes and a decaying public realm prove that. How change happens – and who benefits – is up to us.

    We have agency over what the age of AI looks like.

    It could be a Wild West Story, where the strongest and boldest make most – and the rest make do.

    Or it could be a story about opportunity and security. Where we all benefit from the scope and scale, health and wealth of the progressive change it brings.

    The way I see it, we can use our agency to shape 3 things:

    • Where we build.
    • Who does the building.
    • And what products come out the other side.

    Let me take each in turn.

    First, where we build.

    Where we build

    Technology has always promised to be the great equaliser.

    But that promise has proved elusive. For decades, the way we have invested in technology has been a Tale of Two Britains:

    Growth concentrated in the wealthiest parts of our country.

    With communities elsewhere left dependent on traditional industries.

    This time, we can do things differently.

    The unique geography of AI turns our country’s economic map on its head.

    The places that languished in the wake of 1980s de-industrialisation make prime locations for AI infrastructure. Because they’re often the only places that can supply enough power. And enough space to exploit it.

    These are the areas we’ll be looking to prioritise as we create AI Growth Zones: Hotspots of infrastructure that will crowd in private investment.

    When we asked communities to put themselves forward, over 200 places enthusiastically responded. The hunger for AI is not just coming from government and big businesses. But from across Britain.

    For the places that qualify, the results will be transformative. Because I’m not talking about a data centre as an anonymous black box by the side of the motorway. An economic island cut off from the surrounding area, with very few jobs and opportunities for working people.

    But as a hub that attracts AI start-ups and scale-ups.

    Creates new campuses for training and knowledge-transfer.

    And starts a ripple effect of good, future-proofed jobs, with all the economic security that brings.

    Where the excess heat from that data centre is not wasted. But used to power local homes, boost agricultural production, warm community swimming pools.

    For that vision to work, local people must be at the core.

    That takes me to who does the building.

    Who does the building

    A progressive approach to AI is impossible without a population with the skills to be part of it.

    We have to equip people with what they need to seize the extraordinary opportunities this technology brings.

    A few days ago, the Prime Minister kick-started a national AI skills drive. It will upskill people at every age, every stage of education, across the country.

    From new funding for TechFirst, giving students in every secondary school in Britain the chance to start a career in tech. To a partnership with industry, equipping 7.5 million UK workers with essential AI skills by 2030.

    These are exciting, decent jobs in the industries of tomorrow, for Britain’s prosperous communities of the future. If we can show people that, we will persuade them that it pays to be shapers of AI.

    I want to show them that it pays to be consumers of it, too.

    That takes us to what we build.

    What we build

    We sometimes talk about AI in a way that’s removed from real life.

    Abstract headlines about ‘growth’ or ‘revolution’ don’t give people much to hold on to.

    I want to show people that AI isn’t just an idea for the newsroom or the boardroom. But a reality in the classroom, the doctor’s office, the operating theatre. Because across the UK, there are researchers and companies using AI for the public good.

    Last week, I announced a project called OpenBind.

    At the Harwell Science Campus in Oxford, our best scientists will come together. To build the world’s biggest set of data on how drugs interact with the proteins in our bodies. Better data means better AI models. Models that can predict which compounds will turn into cures. As Demis Hassabis said himself, this is a brilliant initiative for UK science.

    Breakthroughs we make here could cut the cost of developing treatments by up to £100 billion. And see us not just treating disease. But beating it for good.

    I began by arguing that the state has agency over how we build AI.

    Perhaps the ultimate way to use it is by not only by backing others who build it. But by building it ourselves. With a smarter, smaller state that works better for the people we’re here to serve. Take the AI-powered chatbot we’ve built for GOV.UK.

    Soon, you won’t have to trawl through 500,000 pages to apply for Universal Credit or work out your tax code. The answer will come to you. Giving people more time to do the things they like with the people they love.

    It isn’t always easy to explain to people what AI means for them.

    With tools like this, we don’t need to tell them.

    We can let them discover the power of AI for themselves.

    As we find ourselves in the ‘Goldilocks’ moment, there is no time to waste.

    We have a small window to decide how this revolution will differ from those which came before.

    To make sure this isn’t the same Tale of Two Britains.

    By building in the places that have been left behind for too long. By giving everyone in the country the opportunity to do well, for themselves and their families, in the digital age.

    And by building things that make their lives easier, healthier, happier.

    The agency to do all of those things sits with us. We’ve just got to have the courage and the conviction to use it, positively and progressively.

    To create opportunity and security for all.

    For me, that really is the Giant Idea.