Category: News Story

STORY:

The UK has been granted a temporary reprieve from a sweeping new US tariff hike that sees import duties on steel and aluminium doubled from 25% to 50%, under a fresh executive order signed by US President Donald Trump.

The move, which takes effect immediately for most countries, leaves the existing 25% tariff in place for British exports, at least for now. The exemption is tied to a yet-to-be-enacted US-UK tariff agreement signed in May, aimed at scrapping levies on steel and aluminium altogether. Until that pact is fully implemented, UK exporters remain subject to the current tariffs and could still be hit with the 50% rate if negotiations stall.

In a statement, the UK government reaffirmed its commitment to protecting “British business and jobs” vowing to work with Washington to bring the May agreement into force. Legislation to enable the deal is expected to be introduced in Parliament “in due course”.

President Trump justified the UK’s temporary carve-out on the basis of the UK-US Economic Prosperity Deal signed on 8 May. However, he warned that the exemption could be revoked “on or after July 9” if the UK is found to be falling short of its commitments under the deal.

The latest twist in transatlantic trade relations follows months of rising tariff pressure. After initially slapping 25% duties on all steel and aluminium imports in February, Trump followed up with a 10% baseline tariff on most other goods from 2 April. The May agreement offered a potential breakthrough, but its delay has left UK industry exposed and uncertain.

Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds met with US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer in Paris this week to press Britain’s case. But industry voices remain cautious.

Gareth Stace, director general of UK Steel, welcomed the UK’s temporary exemption as “a welcome pause” but warned that “uncertainty remains over timings and final tariff rates,” adding that US buyers may now be hesitant to place UK orders.

Shadow business secretary Andrew Griffith blamed the situation on Labour’s handling of negotiations, claiming their “botched” approach had left businesses “in limbo”.

STORY

In a response to recent assaults on frontline staff, the Ministry of Justice has announced that prison officers working in the most dangerous parts of the high-security estate will be required to wear protective body armour. The decision, unveiled by Lord Chancellor Shabana Mahmood today, aims to improve safety for officers stationed in close supervision centres, separation centres and segregation units.

Mahmood told MPs in the House of Commons that the policy change follows a review ordered after a violent incident at HMP Frankland, where Hashem Abedi, the convicted Manchester Arena bomb plotter, attacked three officers with boiling cooking oil in April. “I know this House shares my anger at recent attacks against prison officers” she said. “Today, I can announce I will mandate its use in Close Supervision Centres, Separation Centres, and Segregation Units in the High Security Estate. When Jonathan Hall’s independent review into the Frankland attack reports, I will take any further steps necessary to protect our brave staff.”

The new requirement will take effect immediately for officers working directly with those deemed most likely to pose a threat, ensuring they are equipped with ballistic-grade vests and stab-resistant panels. The move was welcomed by prison unions, who have long campaigned for better protective equipment following a series of violent incidents over the past year.

Jonathan Hall KC, the independent reviewer of terrorism legislation tasked with examining the Frankland attack, is due to deliver his full findings later this summer. Mahmood indicated that further adjustments to protective equipment policy could follow once his report is published. In the meantime, she stressed that mandating body armour is a crucial first step in bolstering officer safety. Prison officers routinely face volatile situations when managing high-risk inmates, and the Frankland assault underscored vulnerabilities in the current approach. Close supervision centres hold the most dangerous prisoners under constant guard, while separation centres and segregation units house inmates removed from the general population for disciplinary or security reasons. The decision to extend mandatory body armour to all three settings reflects a recognition that officers may confront life-threatening attacks without warning.

Richard “Rick” Thompson, a senior union representative for HM Prison and Probation Service staff, praised the announcement as “long overdue.” He remarked, “Our members have repeatedly warned that without adequate protective gear, they face unacceptable risk. Mandating body armour in the highest-risk units will save lives and send a clear message that the government values the safety of those who keep our prisons secure.” Not all details are yet finalised: the Ministry has indicated that guidance on fitting, maintenance and replacement schedules will be published in the coming weeks, and training programmes on the correct use of the new vests will roll out across affected sites. The overall cost is being met from existing departmental budgets, though officials declined to disclose precise figures.

Parliamentary observers noted that the announcement arrives amid wider debates over prison staffing levels, rising violence behind bars and the broader operation of the high-security estate. Mahmood hinted that, once Hall’s review is complete, ministers may consider further recommendations on matters ranging from staff-inmate ratios to the layout of segregation units.

STORY

A government-appointed commission has delivered a stark message about the state of water services in England and Wales: the system as it stands is broken, and a “fundamental reset” is now urgently required. Today’s publication of the Independent Water Commission’s interim findings, led by Sir Jon Cunliffe (the former deputy governor of the Bank of England), paints a picture of deep-seated failings on the part of water companies, regulators and even government.

In a report stretching to more than a hundred pages, Sir Jon and his colleagues set out how, over many years, rising pollution levels, crumbling infrastructure and financial mismanagement have eroded public trust. Sewage spills, bursting pipes and chemical contaminants, once treated as isolated incidents, are now described as symptoms of a much wider malaise. Put simply, the industry has become excessively complex, with overlapping regulatory bodies and blurred lines of accountability. The interim report stops short of recommending public ownership of water companies. Instead, it calls for the existing regulatory framework to be overhauled, streamlining oversight so that water providers can focus on long-term investment rather than short-term profit. Sir Jon argues that, by attracting stable and responsible investment, companies will be better placed to replace ageing pipes and meet increasingly stringent environmental standards.

One of the chief complaints highlighted by respondents to the commission’s call for evidence—over 50,000 members of the public and stakeholder groups in total—was the frequency of pollution incidents. Rivers and beaches that once ran clear now regularly host raw sewage discharges after heavy rainfall. Meanwhile, customers continue to face water bills that are among the highest in Europe, with some feeling that they get poor value for money. Behind the headlines of storm overflows and ‘fatbergs’ lies an even more troubling picture, the report suggests. Years of under-investment in sewer and treatment-works upgrades have left some areas with drainage systems that simply cannot cope when heavy rain falls. In other parts, old cast-iron mains, laid as far back as Victorian times, spring leaks so frequently that wholesale pipe replacement seems long overdue.

As expected, water companies have welcomed the commission’s intention to bring in fresh investment—though many remain uneasy about how new funds might be raised without passing even more costs onto customers. “We support measures that will help secure long-term resilience and prevent further deterioration, but bill payers will rightly ask who ends up footing the bill” commented one industry spokesperson. Meanwhile, environmental campaigners and opposition politicians have been quick to criticise what they see as half-measures. Liberal Democrat MP Tim Farron called today’s interim findings “a missed opportunity” and renewed his demand to abolish Ofwat, the sector’s economic regulator, and merge it with the Environment Agency into a single, stronger body. Green groups such as River Action and Surfers Against Sewage went further, arguing that only mandatory pollution-reduction targets and legally enforceable environmental objectives will halt the ongoing damage to rivers and coastal waters.

Nevertheless, there were some signs of cautious approval. Several local authorities and consumer bodies emphasised that, at least, the report acknowledges that drinking-water quality and environmental performance cannot be considered in isolation. Rural communities, in particular, have been campaigning for years to see their concerns about low-pressure zones and burst pipes recognised as part of a systemic failure, rather than individual glitches. The Independent Water Commission’s interim findings mark the end of Phase One of its work. Over the past few months, Commissioners have held more than 150 meetings with stakeholders ranging from environmental charities and consumer advocates to water-company executives and regulators. The next phase, now under way, will see Sir Jon’s team delve into the finer details of how reforms might be implemented.

Final recommendations are due in the summer, ahead of a complete report to be delivered later this year. Observers expect more detailed proposals on revising licence conditions, strengthening penalties for pollution events and reshaping Ofwat’s remit. In addition, the commission is likely to examine whether existing legislation is fit for purpose or should be replaced altogether. For now, though, the interim report’s headline message is unambiguous: piecemeal tinkering will not suffice. Without major reform, the water industry risks sliding further into disrepair, leaving consumers to grapple with ever-bigger bills and environmental watchdogs powerless to act. As Sir Jon concludes, “This is a pivotal moment: the choices we make now will determine whether future generations inherit rivers and reservoirs that are cleaner and more resilient—or simply more neglected.”

STORY

The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has today opened a formal investigation into an alleged multi-million-pound fraud against Thurrock Council, marking a significant escalation in probing the collapse of solar farm investments that nearly bankrupted the Essex authority in late 2022. Under Section 2 of the Criminal Justice Act 1987, the SFO has issued notices compelling banks and other financial institutions to hand over documents and information related to the scheme, which was orchestrated by Rockfire Investment Finance Plc and associated companies within the Rockfire Group.

Between 2016 and 2020, Thurrock Council invested millions of pounds into bonds tied to solar farms, enticed by promised returns of between 3–6 per cent alongside the return of the initial investment. Rockfire marketed multiple tranches of these bonds to local authorities and other investors as a “green” way to secure modest yields. However, the group subsequently fell into administration, triggering alarm when Thurrock was effectively declared bankrupt in December 2022. The financial collapse forced a series of council tax hikes and cuts to essential local services, leaving residents to shoulder the fallout from what many now see as reckless decision-making.

Nick Ephgrave QPM, Director of the SFO, emphasised the gravity of the situation:

“Today’s action is a significant step in our investigation concerning this suspected criminality. We are grateful for the assistance of Essex Police, Thurrock Council and others in the early stages of this enquiry.”

Ephgrave’s remarks underline the collaborative approach between the SFO and local law-enforcement agencies. By compelling information from banks and other intermediaries, investigators hope to unearth the detailed paper trail that led to the council’s ill-fated foray into renewable-energy bonds.

Although details of the alleged fraud remain tightly under wraps, several troubling facts have already emerged. Rockfire’s administration was triggered in 2023 after a shortfall in bond returns left the company unable to meet its obligations. Several councils across England, including Thurrock, were reported among its major investors. Critics now question whether due diligence was properly carried out when the bonds were initially underwritten, especially given the overly optimistic yield forecasts and the complex financial structures underpinning the solar farm projects.

Thurrock Council’s financial predicament has been high-profile in local government circles since 2022, when auditors first flagged significant pension and debt liabilities. The losses incurred through the Rockfire bonds dealt a final blow, forcing the authority to appeal to central government for assistance and prompting urgent reviews of its investment policies. Council leaders concede that the rapid expansion into renewable-energy bonds was intended to secure steady revenue but instead backfired, plunging the borough into severe fiscal distress.

The SFO’s investigation remains at an early stage. No arrests have been made, and it is unclear whether charges will follow. By invoking Section 2 powers, the agency can demand any relevant documents, including confidential bank records, and require individuals to answer questions under oath. That legal leverage often proves pivotal in unravelling suspected frauds of this scale. Local residents and council staff have welcomed the probe, hoping it will shed light on how decision-makers sanctioned such large outlays with seemingly inadequate safeguards. One unnamed council officer commented: “There was a sense of optimism around renewable investments, but people didn’t expect it to end up like this. We need clarity on who was advising us and whether warnings were ignored.”

STORY

A government-commissioned interim report has revealed that UK taxpayers lost £1.4 billion on defective or undelivered pandemic-era PPE contracts. Chancellor Rachel Reeves commissioned the Covid Counter Fraud Commissioner’s report, which highlights widespread procurement failures under the previous administration. According to the interim findings, £762 million of that total is unlikely to be recovered because substandard gowns, masks and visors were not inspected until two years after delivery—well beyond warranty periods. As a result, many suppliers cannot now be held contractually liable.

Reeves has pledged to pursue the remaining £468 million still recoverable. To date, £182 million has been returned to the public purse. Suspected fraudulent suppliers have been referred to the National Crime Agency. The Chancellor said Treasury officials are “determined to ensure that every penny spent during the pandemic is fully accounted for.”

“This Government will bring criminals to justice and put taxpayer money back where it belongs – in the NHS, police and armed forces” Reeves added.

The report identifies surgical gowns as the greatest source of loss as 52 per cent of gowns procured were non-compliant with safety standards. By the time quality tests were carried out, warranties had expired. Tom Hayhoe, Covid Counter Fraud Commissioner, concluded Phase One of his investigation, focusing solely on PPE contracts, and has now moved to Phase Two. The next phase will examine potential fraud and errors in other Covid support schemes, including furlough payments, bounce-back loans, business support grants and the Eat Out to Help Out programme. Final recommendations from Hayhoe are due in December 2025, when he will report back to the Chancellor with a comprehensive account of pandemic spending irregularities.

STORY

The UK Government today confirmed plans to significantly expand its nuclear-powered, conventionally armed submarine fleet, ordering up to 12 next-generation SSN-AUKUS boats. The announcement, made by Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer and Defence Secretary John Healey, follows recommendations in the newly published Strategic Defence Review calling for a shift toward “warfighting readiness” to deter mounting global threats.

Under the AUKUS partnership with the United States and Australia, the Royal Navy’s submarine force—currently seven Astute-class vessels—will be reinforced by these new SSN-AUKUS boats, which will begin construction in Barrow-in-Furness in the late 2020s and enter service in the late 2030s. The UK will also invest an additional £15 billion in its sovereign nuclear warhead programme to ensure the effectiveness of its strategic deterrent submarines for the coming decades.

The Strategic Defence Review, led by former NATO Secretary-General Lord George Robertson, comprises 62 proposals to modernise Britain’s Armed Forces. Key points include:

• Warfighting Posture: A permanent shift from “expeditionary” to “warfighting” readiness, emphasising rapid response against high-intensity threats, particularly from Russia and China.

• Submarine Expansion: Doubling the planned submarine fleet to twelve SSN-AUKUS vessels, enhancing undersea surveillance, special-forces deployment, and strike-capable platforms equipped to launch Tomahawk cruise missiles.

• Nuclear Warhead Upgrade: A £15 billion commitment to develop a new warhead design, securing the UK’s at-sea deterrent well into the 2050s.

• Munitions & Industry: Funds allocated for six new munitions factories producing up to 7,000 UK-built long-range weapons, safeguarding around 800 defence industry jobs and ensuring stockpile resilience.

• Cyber & Electronic Warfare: Creation of a unified Cyber and Electromagnetic Command to coordinate offensive and defensive cyber capabilities, alongside advanced electronic-warfare systems.

• Modern Technologies: Accelerated adoption of artificial intelligence, autonomy, hypersonics and counter-hypersonics, with new R&D facilities and partnerships with domestic tech firms.

• Defence Spending: A pledge to raise defence outlays from 2.2 percent of GDP today to 2.5 percent by 2027, with an ambition to reach 3 percent in the next parliamentary cycle.

Defence Secretary John Healey stressed that the larger submarine fleet, combined with the warhead upgrade, will “ensure the UK remains one of the most potent undersea powers in the world” and will “send a clear signal to any adversary that British deterrence is unwavering.” He added that the influx of new contracts into Barrow-in-Furness and other shipyards will “provide a decade of secure, high-skilled jobs” while bolstering the nation’s sovereign shipbuilding capacity.

Prime Minister Starmer underlined that this investment forms part of his “Plan for Change” agenda, aimed not only at protecting the UK but also at driving economic growth. “By committing to twelve SSN-AUKUS submarines,” he said, “we’re not only deterring those who would threaten our security, but also creating thousands of good jobs and revitalising Britain’s defence industrial base.”

Additional measures within the Review call for reversing previous troop cuts, improving military housing, and bolstering recruitment to address shortfalls in the Army and Royal Air Force. While some funding details remain subject to future budgetary approval, the Government has accepted all recommendations in full, signaling a decisive pivot toward higher readiness and strategic resilience. Construction on the first SSN-AUKUS boat is expected to begin in 2028, with the full twelve-submarine fleet scheduled for delivery by the early 2040s. In the interim, the UK will continue to operate its seven Astute-class attack submarines and maintain its Vanguard-class ballistic-missile submarines as its strategic nuclear deterrent.

STORY

At today’s session of the United Nations Security Council in New York, the United Kingdom delivered a pointed statement, placing “the onus on Russia and President Putin” to prove they are sincere about ending hostilities in Ukraine. Addressing fellow Council members, Ambassador Karen Pierce underscored that any real progress toward peace hinges on Moscow’s willingness to cease its aggressive actions and respect Ukraine’s sovereignty. In her remarks, Ambassador Pierce highlighted the “devastating human cost” of the conflict, noting that civilian infrastructure continues to be targeted across multiple regions of Ukraine—even as peace negotiations languish. She stressed that while Ukraine has demonstrated readiness to engage in dialogue, it is Russia’s recent intensification of bombing campaigns and frontline advances that have “eroded any semblance of trust” and made a negotiated settlement all the more elusive.

Pierce reiterated the UK’s unwavering support for Ukraine’s right to defend itself, praising Kyiv’s forces for successfully repelling several major assaults over the past month. She recalled the series of Russian missile strikes launched just yesterday—damage that left hospitals and schools in ruins and further compounded the plight of displaced families. Those attacks, she argued, were “irrefutable proof” that Russia’s stated calls for a ceasefire are mere “diplomatic theatre” unless paired with an immediate halt to military operations.

Turning to the path forward, the UK statement urged Council members to “redouble efforts” in support of Ukraine’s reconstruction and humanitarian relief, calling on everyone—from UN agencies to regional partners—to scale up assistance. Yet, Pierce made clear that financial aid and relief cannot substitute for concrete steps toward de-escalation. “We cannot rebuild hospitals while bombs continue to fall,” she said, demanding an immediate cessation of offensive operations as the first precondition for any meaningful peace talks.

In response to questions from fellow delegates, the UK reiterated its view that no lasting settlement can be achieved without holding Russia accountable for wartime conduct, including documented violations of international humanitarian law. Ambassador Pierce noted ongoing investigations into attacks on civilian targets and urged the International Criminal Court to expedite its inquiries. She also called for tighter sanctions on individuals tied to Russia’s war apparatus, insisting that economic pressure must remain in place until Moscow reverses course.

The UK’s intervention comes amid growing frustration within the Security Council over repeated Russian vetoes of Ukrainian-sponsored resolutions aimed at condemning aggression and authorising humanitarian corridors. Pierce lamented that Russia’s use of its veto power “continues to undermine the Council’s credibility” warning that the institution risks “irrelevance” if it cannot enforce its own resolutions. As the meeting concluded, several non-permanent members—particularly from African and Latin American states—voiced concern over the widening humanitarian crisis, with refugees streaming into neighbouring countries and winter approaching. While most delegates stopped short of directly criticising Russia, many echoed the UK’s call for an immediate ceasefire. A senior representative from Norway went further, urging Russia to “stop using UN presence as a shield” for its bombardments.

With the Security Council deadlocked, attention now shifts to separate diplomatic channels, including the recent mediation efforts by Turkey and Switzerland. The UK confirmed it will continue backing those efforts, but Ambassador Pierce reiterated that any genuine negotiations must be predicated on a “verifiable ceasefire”—a threshold she suggested Russia has yet to meet.

STORY

The UK Government has sold its remaining stake in NatWest Group plc, marking the end of almost 17 years of state ownership that began with the 2008 financial crisis bailout. The final tranche of shares was sold at market price today, returning NatWest fully to private hands and closing a chapter that saw taxpayers underwrite more than £45 billion to stabilise the bank (then known as Royal Bank of Scotland). Originally nationalised to prevent a systemic collapse in late 2008, the Government acquired an 84 percent stake in what was then RBS at an average price of 502 pence per share. Over successive stages of divestment—through public offerings, share buybacks by NatWest itself and targeted institutional sales—the Treasury gradually reduced its holding. As of mid-May 2024, only around 10 percent remained, and today’s sale of the last shares concludes the disposal plan announced in July 2021 and extended in April 2023.

Chancellor Rachel Reeves said the transaction “turns a historic page” while stressing the necessity of protecting savers and businesses at the height of the financial crisis. She noted that, since the Labour Government took office, share sales have been conducted with taxpayers’ interests front and centre, ensuring all disposals took place at prevailing market prices. Despite recouping roughly £35 billion through dividends, fees and previous share sales, the overall cost to the public purse stands at about £10.5 billion once financing costs are included. NatWest’s share price has recovered strongly in 2025, trading above 520 pence in recent weeks, but the aggregate losses reflect the steep discounts at which earlier tranches were sold—often below the 2008 bailout price.

The government’s financial vehicle, UK Government Investments (UKGI), confirmed that the remaining stake—well under 1 percent of the bank—was transferred via an orderly trading plan. With HM Treasury no longer holding any NatWest shares, UKGI has closed this chapter on its investment portfolio, which at its peak included stakes in a range of bailed-out financial institutions. Emma Reynolds MP, Economic Secretary to the Treasury, highlighted the broader impact of the bailout: “Millions of savers and businesses were shielded from potentially catastrophic contagion. Today’s exit does not erase the fiscal cost, but it does mark the full return of NatWest to the private sector, reflecting more than a decade and a half of careful stewardship of taxpayers’ money.”

NatWest itself has evolved considerably since rebranding in 2020, refocusing on core retail and commercial banking in the UK. Now entirely privately owned, the bank faces renewed pressure to drive lending growth and support economic recovery amid an increasingly competitive environment. Analysts expect NatWest to pursue strategic acquisitions and expand its fee-based services to sustain profitability. With this final share sale, the Government’s direct involvement in the banking sector has officially ended, following previous exits from Lloyds Banking Group and other institutions rescued during the crisis. Officials confirmed that no further state shareholdings remain in UK retail banks, underlining a return to normalised market operations.

STORY

The Charity Commission has issued an Official Warning to East London Mosque Trust following an investment deal that wiped out £1 million of the charity’s funds. Regulators found that trustees failed to carry out adequate due diligence and did not exercise proper oversight over the investment, amounting to misconduct and/or mismanagement in the administration of the charity. East London Mosque Trust, established in its present form to advance the Islamic faith through the upkeep of mosque and community facilities, reported the problematic investment to the Commission in February 2023. The trustees had placed £1 million with an NHS-approved supplier, anticipating a 20 percent return over six months. However, the supplier subsequently went into administration, rendering the entire sum unrecoverable.

In reviewing the case, the Charity Commission concluded that trustees did not undertake sufficient checks on the supplier or scrutinise key investment documents prior to committing charitable funds. “When people donate to a charity, they put their faith in those running it to manage those funds with care and in line with its aims” said Joshua Farbridge, Head of Compliance Visits and Inspections at the Charity Commission. “In this case, we found that trustees lacked the oversight we would expect of such a substantial investment, nor did they ensure thorough due diligence had been undertaken. We have now issued a formal warning.”

East London Mosque Trust—whose origins date back to 1910 and which operates one of London’s oldest mosques—was previously reminded by the regulator about the need for robust financial controls. Despite those admonitions, trustees went ahead with the investment without adequate governance checks. The Commission’s warning notes that this failure to act with reasonable care and skill directly contributed to the loss of the charity’s funds.

Under the terms of the Official Warning, East London Mosque Trust must, within six months:

– Implement stronger financial controls and ensure continuous oversight of all investments.

– Commission an independent review of its governance structures and report the findings to the Charity Commission.

– Take all reasonable steps to recover the lost funds, including exploring potential legal or insolvency remedies.

If the charity does not comply with these requirements, it may face further regulatory intervention, including the possibility of an inquiry or removal of trustees.

Trustees of East London Mosque Trust have acknowledged the Commission’s findings and say they will work to put the required controls in place. In the meantime, the charity continues to provide a range of spiritual and community services, but must now demonstrate that it can safeguard its assets more effectively going forward.

STORY

The UK Government today committed more than £1 billion to develop a groundbreaking battlefield system, the Digital Targeting Web, and announced the creation of a dedicated Cyber and Electromagnetic Command as part of its Strategic Defence Review. Defence Secretary John Healey made the announcements during a visit to MoD Corsham, the military’s cyber headquarters, underlining a shift towards faster, more integrated warfare capabilities. The Digital Targeting Web will link sensors, platforms and weapons systems across sea, air, land and space, enabling threats to be identified by one asset—such as a naval radar or satellite—and neutralised by another, including F-35 jets, drones or offensive cyber operations. Drawing lessons from Ukraine’s early-war successes, the new network aims to minimise decision-to-strike times and provide the UK with a decisive edge on the modern battlefield.

In tandem, the Ministry of Defence will establish a Cyber and Electromagnetic Command under General Sir James Hockenhull. Tasked with leading defensive cyber operations and coordinating offensive cyber capabilities alongside the National Cyber Force, the Command will also centralise expertise in electromagnetic warfare—covering activities such as jamming hostile drones or intercepting communications. The investment follows the Prime Minister’s pledge to raise defence spending to 2.5 percent of GDP and comes against a backdrop of more than 90,000 cyber-attack attempts on UK military networks in the past two years. Mr Healey emphasised that future conflicts will be won by forces “better connected, better equipped and innovating faster than their adversaries” stressing the importance of attracting top digital talent to bolster Britain’s national security.

To support this ambition, the MOD has already fast-tracked recruits into specialist cyber roles via the Cyber Direct Entry programme, which offers tailored training, placement in operational units by the end of 2025 and starting salaries above £40,000. The new Command will provide a clear career pathway for military cyber specialists and ensure the UK remains competitive in the rapidly evolving digital battlespace.