Category: European Union

  • Liz Truss – 2022 Keynote Article on the Future of Europe

    Liz Truss – 2022 Keynote Article on the Future of Europe

    The article written by Liz Truss, the Prime Minister, published in The Times on 6 October 2022 and released as a press release by 10 Downing Street.

    Security, energy and migration are three of the most urgent priorities for the British people, so they are top of my agenda too. That’s why I am travelling to Prague for today’s European leaders’ meeting.

    These vital issues affect the whole of our continent, so it is right that we find common cause with our European friends and allies. It’s also why we want to see a strong voice for non-EU countries like Ukraine, Norway and Switzerland.

    Today’s meeting is not an EU construct or an EU alternative. I am very clear about that. It brings together governments from across Europe, around a third of whom are outside the EU. A post-Brexit Britain, as an independent country outside the EU, should be involved in discussions that affect the entire continent and all of us here at home. We are taking part as an independent sovereign nation, and we will act as one.

    Brexit was never about the UK stepping away from our proud and historic role as a leading nation in the region and beyond. We always believed we would find new ways of working that reflected our shared values and interests.

    Our actions in Ukraine have shown this to be true. No European country has done more than the UK to arm the Ukrainians in their fight for freedom and to lead the imposition of economic sanctions on Russia. Yet our actions are all the stronger because of the way that we collaborated with our European friends.

    We have worked with the EU through the G7 and helped Sweden and Finland with their accession to Nato, which remains the bedrock of our collective defence. We have co-operated militarily with European allies through the Joint Expeditionary Force. We are training Ukrainian soldiers together. And we are strengthening partnerships with other European friends, including Norway on energy security and Switzerland on science and research.

    So I welcome the opportunity to work with leaders from across the continent in this new forum. But this must not cut across the G7 and Nato, and it must not be a talking shop. I want to see concrete action and delivery on three key priorities.

    First, we must ensure that Putin is defeated. His attempts at mobilisation and annexation are a show of weakness. Ukraine’s counter offensive is succeeding, and Russia’s will is fracturing. This is the moment to redouble our resolve. The UK is sending £2.3 billion of military support to Ukraine this year — and we will match or exceed that next year.

    I will urge my European friends to continue to work with us in providing more weapons, imposing more sanctions, and backing Ukraine in pushing Russian forces out.

    Second, we must end our addiction to Russian hydrocarbons. Yesterday at the Conservative Party conference, I set out our plan for growth and the vital importance of becoming less reliant on authoritarians for our energy. It is right that we talk with our European allies about how we do that collectively. Putin is hoping he can divide us in a scramble for energy supplies. We must show him that he is wrong.

    The UK sends and receives both gas and electricity through the undersea cables and pipelines that link us with neighbours like France, Belgium and the Netherlands. Today we must all commit to keeping those connections open this winter so we keep the lights on across the continent.

    The UK will also play a leading role in protecting critical energy infrastructure. This week the Royal Navy deployed HMS Enterprise and HMS Somerset to work with Norway and our allies in the North and Norwegian Seas.

    Together, we will deter any threat to underwater pipelines.

    We must also act now to make sure we are never in this position again. We must usher in a new era of European energy independence, dramatically accelerating our own energy production. Today I will be discussing deeper bilateral nuclear co-operation with President Macron, including progress on Sizewell C. We are ready to work with our European friends to develop next-generation interconnectors in the North Sea. And I hope to make progress towards new partnerships on offshore wind, all of which will help to make the UK a net energy exporter by 2040.

    Third, we must use the opportunity of this forum to focus on migration. We are proud of the way that we have opened our homes to 130,000 Ukrainian refugees. But we need a stronger response to the crime gangs that exploit desperate people. Today we will be deepening our joint working with France, the Netherlands and other countries along the migration route to step up our collective response to this trans-national tragedy.

    I believe that with authoritarian states undermining stability and security around the world, democratic nations need to be bolder and more innovative in how they collaborate to ensure that our shared values prevail.

    It is in this spirit that I will join my fellow European leaders today and ensure that this new forum delivers for the British people.

  • Ursula von der Leyen – 2022 Speech on Russia’s Escalation of its War of Aggression Against Ukraine

    Ursula von der Leyen – 2022 Speech on Russia’s Escalation of its War of Aggression Against Ukraine

    The speech made by Ursula von der Leyen, the President of the European Commission, on 5 October 2022.

    Dear President Metsola, dear Roberta,

    Honourable Members,

    Since we last met to discuss the state of our Union, the Kremlin has escalated its aggression to a new level. Putin has launched Russia’s first mobilisation since World War II, treating hundreds of thousands of young Russians as cannon fodder. He uses sham referenda in an illegal attempt to change international borders by force. And since many months, he is using energy as a weapon. The Russian war causes economic and social hardship. It places a heavy burden on our citizens and on the economy in our Single Market. Rising energy costs in particular are leading to reduced purchasing power for citizens and loss of competitiveness for companies.

    Over the course of the last seven months, together with our Member States, we have already taken important steps. We have diminished our gas consumption by around 10%. Russian gas supplies have decreased from 40% to now down to 7.5% of pipeline gas. We have compensated this reduction by increased imports of LNG and pipeline gas, mainly from our reliable suppliers like the US and Norway. Gas storage in the EU is now at 90%. This is 15% higher than on the same day last year. In addition, three weeks ago in this hemicycle, I announced that we will skim the exceptional profits made by energy companies and use them to support vulnerable citizens and businesses. Last week, this has been enshrined in EU law. We achieved this in lightning speed, also thanks to the outstanding work of the Czech Presidency. And yesterday, the Council reached agreement on REPowerEU.

    So we have key instruments in place to make it through the winter – storage and savings; to jointly purchase gas – Platform; to get us out of the Russian grip ­­– agreement with US; to redistribute the windfall profits to support those in need – electricity emergency intervention; and to invest in the future – REPowerEU.

    The measures we have put in place provide us with a first buffer of protection. Thanks to these, we can and will now step up to the next level. I will lay out a roadmap in a letter to Leaders in view of our meeting in Prague later this week. It includes the following key components: We will step up our negotiations with trusted partners – for example with Norway – to dampen the price we pay for gas imports. As European Union, we have considerable market power. And many of our suppliers want to conclude deals with us, which are beneficial for both sides. We will also strengthen our Energy Platform. This is in our collective interest. We have to avoid a scenario where Member States are again outbidding each other on world markets and driving prices up for Europe.

    My next point is on gas prices. We use gas in three domains: industry, heating and electricity. Let me start with electricity. High gas prices are driving electricity prices. We have to limit this inflationary impact of gas on electricity – everywhere in Europe. This is why we are ready to discuss a cap on the price of gas that is used to generate electricity. This cap would also be a first step on the way to a structural reform of the electricity market.

    But we also have to look at gas prices beyond the electricity market. We will also work together with Member States to reduce gas prices and limit volatility and the impact of price manipulation by Russia. In March, we have already offered this as an option. We have said that it can give an important signal that the EU will not pay any price for gas. We qualified such a price cap as having an immediate impact on price levels. But that it entails drawbacks, in terms of security of supply of gas. The situation has critically evolved since then.

    Today, compared to March, more Member States are open for it and we are better prepared. Such a cap on gas prices must be designed properly to ensure security of supply. And it is a temporary solution to cater for the fact that the TTF – our main price benchmark – is no longer representative of our market that includes more LNG today. It is a temporary solution until a new EU price index ensuring a better functioning of the market is developed. The Commission has kick-started work on this.

    Honourable Members,

    These are far-reaching measures. I wholeheartedly agree with you when you say in the resolution you will adopt today that exceptional times require exceptional emergency measures, where the Union needs to act as jointly and united as ever. So, in pursuing our action, two things remain paramount: acting in unity and acting in solidarity. We need to protect the fundamentals of our economy, and in particular our Single Market. This is the strength of the European Union. That is where the wealth of the European Union comes from. Without a common European solution, we risk fragmentation. So it is paramount that we preserve a level playing field for all in the European Union.

    With REPowerEU, we have developed a crucial instrument to accelerate the transition to energy independence. It will allow to invest in infrastructure, like pipelines, interconnectors or renewables. And it allows to support businesses and households to invest in energy efficiency – like insulating houses or installing heat pumps. So I think we should further boost REPowerEU with additional funding. This way all European states can accelerate the necessary investments. We modernise the energy infrastructure. And we preserve the level playing field. And we secure our European competitiveness on global markets. And we have to do it as Europeans, together and jointly.

    Honourable Members,

    There is another pressing issue, which we have to address today. The acts of sabotage against Nord Stream pipelines have shown how vulnerable our energy infrastructure is. For the first time in recent history, it has become a target. Pipelines and underwater cables connect European citizens and companies to the world. They are the lifelines of data and energy. It is in the interest of all Europeans to better protect this critical infrastructure.

    For this, we will present a five-point plan. First, we must be better prepared. We have very recently agreed new legislation which will strengthen the resilience of critical EU entities. The responsible Parliament committee will be voting on it next week. And we can and should already now be working on this basis.

    Second, we need to stress test our infrastructure. We need to identify its weak points and prepare our reaction to sudden disruptions. We will work with Member States to ensure effective stress tests in the energy sector. This then should be followed by other high-risk sectors, such as offshore digital and electricity infrastructure.

    Third, we will increase our capacity to respond through our Union Civil Protection Mechanism already in place. With this, we can support Member States in addressing the disruption of critical infrastructure – for example, with fuel, generators or shelter capacity.

    Fourth, we will make best use of our satellite surveillance capacity to detect potential threats.

    And finally, we will strengthen cooperation with NATO and key partners like the US on this critical issue.

    Honourable Members,

    This war has entered a new phase. The Ukrainian army keeps reporting impressive successes in its fight against the aggressor. We all saw the images of deeply relieved people welcoming Ukrainian soldiers. And I could see with my own eyes, three weeks ago, that life has returned to Kyiv. Of course, it is the bravery of the Ukrainian people that made it possible. But Europe’s contribution has also made a huge difference. Our backing has helped Ukraine face down the invader. Only a strong and steadfast Europe will stop Putin. This is the moment to stay the course and support Ukraine as long as it takes.

    Long live Europe.

  • Ylva Johansson – 2022 Speech on General Visa Issuance in Relation to Russian Applicants

    Ylva Johansson – 2022 Speech on General Visa Issuance in Relation to Russian Applicants

    The speech made by Ylva Johansson, the EU Commissioner for Home Affairs, on 30 September 2022.

    Firstly I want to say – Putin cannot win, and will not win

    Every step he takes show we cannot trust him, we cannot deal with him or show weakness

    The recent ‘sham referenda’ in occupied Ukrainian and the mobilisation of Russian citizens confirm this.

    Now following the mobilisation order, we can see Russian citizen trying to enter  the EU.

    That is, from certain perspectives, understandable, they don’t want to go to war in another country that has been occupied by their leader.

    This said, avoiding the mobilisation does not necessarily equate to opposing the war as such. In addition, it cannot be excluded that Russian citizens trying to circumvent the mobilisation by getting into the EU, also constitute a threat to public policy, the internal security or the international relations of a Member State or the Union as a whole.

    That’s why, on our external borders we should be very vigilant regarding letting people from Russia in.

    We already abolished the VISA facilitation agreement, we adopted guidelines for Member States  – so already now it is very cumbersome and expensive to enter the EU from Russia as a tourist.

    Now we take one more step.

    We must ensure the security of Europe and its citizens.

    We have to keep in mind – to come to Europe is a privilege, not a fundamental right.

    We should stay open, of course, to dissidents, journalists independent from the Russian government.

    These are bravely and actively opposing the  Putin Regime.

    But we should very carefully scrutinize case by case every application.

    And we must take the geopolitical aspects into account.

    What is new in the Guidance?

    The Guidance we are adopting  today covers both Visas and the management of External Borders

    1. On Visas we have updated our previous guidance
    1. New visas
    • Stricter assessments and security over new visas
      • Schengen visas are issued for short stays of 90 days cannot cannot provide a long-term solution for Russian citizens seeking to avoid mobilisation.
      • For Schengen visas we have restricted our approach for all Russians, including for Russian citizens escaping the military mobilisation order.
      • MS should apply a strict approach assessing the justification of the journey.
      • It should be ascertained whether there are reasonable doubts as to the reliability of the statements made by the applicant or his/her intention to leave the territory of the MS before the expiry of the visa applied for.
      • This is without prejudice to the right of such individuals to seek international protection under the EU asylum laws or the possibility to apply for national long-stay visas or residence permits at EU consulates.
    • Restrictive approach of place of visa application
      • Following President Putin’s military mobilisation order, significant numbers of Russian conscripts have fled to neighbouring and other countries with the aim to avoid the Russian army. There are widespread expectations that many will seek to obtain Schengen visas in view of continuing their journey inside the EU.
      • In our guidance we make it clear that – pursuant to Article 6 of the Visa Code – applications should only be examined by the consulate of the competent MS in whose jurisdiction the applicant legally resides.
      • On this basis Member States should not accept Schengen visa applications from citizens of the Russian Federation that are present in a third country, such as for example  Georgia, Armenia, Kazakhstan, Serbia, Turkey, the United Arab Emirates etc.  for short stay or for purposes of transit.
      • Such applicants should be directed to the consulate competent for their place of residence, normally in the Russian Federation.
      • Exceptions can be made in cases of hardship and for humanitarian reasons (e.g. family visits due to sudden serious illness of a relative residing in the EU, dissidents, human rights defenders).
    • Confirms the humanitarian exceptions and clarifies its individual application
      • The Visa Code contains derogatory provisions allowing for the issuing of short stay  visas on humanitarian grounds, for reasons of national interest or because of international obligations.
      • This is relevant, for instance, in case of visa applications lodged by dissidents, independent journalists, human rights defenders and representatives of civil society organisations and their close family members, that are not controlled by the government of the Russian Federation and their close family members.
      • Member States should apply these derogatory provisions after a thorough assessment. It is therefore up to Member States, based on an individual examination, to assess if applications by Russian citizens can qualify as falling under the category “humanitarian grounds”. There is no unique set of documents that would prove that a person qualifies for a visa on humanitarian grounds, because individual circumstances differ too widely and need a case-by-case assessment.
    1. Revocation and annulment of valid visas
    • Stricter scrutiny of valid visas irrespective of the issuing Member State
      • MS should also adopt a strict approach with respect to reassessing visas already issued to any citizen of the Russian Federation, similarly to the principles applied when assessing new visa applications
      • In case there are grounds for annulment/revocation, such a decision may be taken by the border guard irrespective of the visa issuing MS. The authority should inform the issuing MS accordingly as well as affix the corresponding stamp on the visa sticker and enter the information on the annulment/revocation in the Visa Information System.  
    1. Guidelines on controls of Russian citizens at the external borders (Schengen Border Code)
    1. Coordinated and through checks at the external borders to ensure protection of the Schengen area

    Coordinated strong checks at the EU external borders protect not only security in the MS concerned, but also the integrity of the Schengen area as a whole.

    Coherent and comprehensive checks of Russian citizens

    • Border guards at all the border crossing points at the external borders should assess in a coherent fashion whether a Russian citizen crossing the EU’s external border fulfils the entry conditions into the Schengen area. This is to avoid that an applicant who has been denied entry by a Member State is admitted by another one.
    • In accordance with Article 30 of the Visa Code, the mere possession of a visa does not confer an automatic right of entry into the Schengen area.
    • If the entry of a Russian citizen is refused on the grounds that they are considered to pose a threat to the public policy or internal security of the MS entry should be refused.
    • With a view to carrying out such an individual assessment, border guards should notably conduct a thorough interview with a Russian citizen seeking to enter the Schengen area. In addition to a check on the basis of travel document data, a check using fingerprints in the Schengen Information System should be carried out, to also detect alerts on persons using false or unknown identities.
    • In this context, border guards should also take into account that allowing a Russian citizen to enter the Schengen area at a time when their country of origin is engaging in an illegal military aggression against an EU candidate country, could seriously harm the international relations of any MS with Ukraine, with another MS, or the EU as such. Therefore, the Commission recommends that border guard authorities consider the current geopolitical context when carrying out their case-by-case assessment. In light of the additional workload this reinforced scrutiny will lead to, Member States are encouraged to transfer additional staff to the border guards force located at the external borders concerned.

    However, the heightened scrutiny must not lead to denying entry to persons that have a legitimate interest to leave the Russian and should be performed in a way that preserve the right to seek asylum and prevents risks of non refoulement.

    Carriers Liability

    The carriers are obliged to immediately assume responsibility for third-country nationals who are refused entry into the territory of one of the MS. r.

    It is therefore important that carriers remain vigilant when verifying the presence of travel documents required for entry. The Member States are encouraged to offer practical support to the carriers in this regard.

    Monitoring

    The Commission will closely monitor the implementation of these new guidelines, in particular through the Blueprint Network. We will also discuss their implementation with Member States in the context of IPCR and adapt them in accordance with the evolving reality on the ground.

  • Ursula von der Leyen – 2022 Statement on New Sanctions Against Russia

    Ursula von der Leyen – 2022 Statement on New Sanctions Against Russia

    The statement made by Ursula von der Leyen, the President of the European Commission, on 28 September 2022.

    We wanted to present together the eighth package of sanctions. Last week, Russia has escalated the invasion of Ukraine to a new level. The sham referenda organised in the territories that Russia occupied are an illegal attempt to grab land and to change international borders by force. The mobilisation and Putin’s threat to use nuclear weapons are further steps on the escalation path.

    We do not accept the sham referenda nor any kind of annexation in Ukraine. And we are determined to make the Kremlin pay for this further escalation. So today, we are together proposing a new package of biting sanctions against Russia.

    The first part concerns the listing of individuals and entities that will be presented by the HR/VP, Josep Borrell, in a moment.

    I want to focus on the second part of these sanctions that will further restrict trade. By that, we isolate and hit Russia’s economy even more. So we propose sweeping new import bans on Russian products. This will keep Russian products out of the European market and deprive Russia of an additional EUR 7 billion in revenues. We are also proposing to extend the list of products that cannot be exported to Russia anymore. The aim is here to deprive the Kremlin’s military complex of key technologies. For example, this includes additional aviation items, or electronic components and specific chemical substances. These new export bans will additionally weaken Russia’s economic base and will weaken its capacity to modernise. We will also propose additional bans on providing European services to Russia, and a prohibition for EU nationals to sit on governing bodies of Russian state-owned enterprises. Russia should not benefit from European knowledge and expertise.

    The third complex is concerning Russian oil. As you know, Russia is using the profits from the sale of fossil fuels to finance its war. Concerning Russian oil, you might recall that we have already agreed to ban seaborne Russian crude oil in the European Union as of 5 December. But we also know that certain developing countries still need some Russian oil supplies, but at low prices. Thus, the G7 has agreed in principle to introduce a price cap on Russian oil for third countries. This oil price cap will help reduce Russia’s revenues on the one hand and it will keep global energy markets stable on the other hand. Today, in this package, here, we are laying the legal basis for this oil price cap.

    And my last point that I want to focus on is: We are stepping up our efforts to crack down on circumvention of sanctions. Here, we are adding a new category. In this category, we will be able to list individuals if they circumvent our sanctions. So for example, if they buy goods in the European Union, bring them to third countries and then to Russia, this would be a circumvention of our sanctions, and those individuals could be listed. I think this will have a major deterring effect. Our sanctions have hit Putin’s system hard. They have made it more difficult for him to sustain the war. And we are increasing our efforts here and moving forward.

  • Ursula von der Leyen – 2022 Speech at Princeton University

    Ursula von der Leyen – 2022 Speech at Princeton University

    The speech made by Ursula von der Leyen, the President of the European Commission, at Princeton University on 22 September 2022.

    Dear Dean Jamal,

    Dear Andy, Professor Moravcsik,

    Thank you very much for welcoming me back to Princeton,

    Distinguished members of the Princeton faculty and administration,

    And most importantly, dear students,

    Indeed, this is the United Nations General Assembly week right now. And you can imagine that one dominant topic was and is the war that Russia unleashed against Ukraine. It was 24 February when Russia invaded Ukraine and brought war back to Europe. I visited Kyiv for the first time since the beginning of the war round about five to six weeks after the invasion started. And I went to the town of Bucha. Before the war, Bucha was a quiet, friendly suburb on the outskirts of Kyiv. It has been occupied by Russian troops. Two days before I went to Bucha, it had been liberated by Ukrainian armed forces. When I went there, I saw mass graves; I saw the body bags lying there – men, women, children. I saw these brutal scars of missiles and bombs that had been aimed deliberately at residential areas, hospitals, schools kindergartens. So I basically saw first-hand the reality of Putin’s war.

    Last week, as you said, Andy, I was again in Kyiv and I was in Irpin, also on the outskirts of Kyiv. You still see the scars of the bombing of houses and hospitals and schools. I spoke, for example, to schoolchildren. And while we were speaking, when I visited that school, there was a missile alarm so we had to go to the shelter. And they told me that it was the third time on that day that they went to the shelter. That is their daily experience. But I also saw that life has come back to Kyiv. The streets were filled with people, the shops were open. People in Kyiv try to win their life back. The Ukrainian army is making impressive advances, liberating many towns and villages, and forcing the Russian army to retreat. Of course, I know that this all needs consolidation, but the success of the last days is lifting spirits – and not only the Ukrainian ones.

    I know that some are calling to stop the fighting. But I must say that the reality is as follows: If Russia stops fighting, the war is over. If Ukraine stops fighting, there will be no more Ukraine. Much is at stake. Not just for Ukraine – but also for Europe, for the international community and for the global order. Russia has invaded Ukraine with the goal to wipe the country from the map – that is what Putin says and writes. So Ukrainians are fighting for their survival, but they are also fighting for global values. This is not only a war that Russia has unleashed against Ukraine. This is a war on our values; this is a war on the rules-based international order. This is an attack on the UN Charter. I mean, Russia is a permanent member of the Security Council of the United Nations, we should not forget it. This is trampling on the UN Charter. And this is a war about autocracy against democracy. And I tell you: Many, many worldwide are watching very precisely what the outcome is going to be.

    From day one on, the United States and the European Union and many other friends have stood at Ukraine’s side with weapons, and it is amazing to see the bravery of the Ukrainians fighting for their survival; with funds; with hospitality, on the European Union side, for more than 8.1 million refugees in seven months; and with the toughest sanctions the world has ever seen. Let me tell you that these sanctions have only been possible because of a very, very close cooperation with our friends in the United States. As you said, I have been in politics now round about 20 years, 14 of them in the government of Angela Merkel. Never ever have I experienced such an intense, trustful and detailed cooperation with the White House. And therefore, I think the saying is right: When you face a crisis, you know who your true friends are. Since last year already – it was around Christmas or New Year when Putin had started, as you might remember, to deploy 10,000 troops to encircle Ukraine –, our teams started to work on the sanctions to align the European system with the American system. They are very different but the effect of the sanctions should be the same. And we do not want extraterritorial effects but sovereign effects from the European Union but also all the other G7 members that joined us and, of course, the United States. And this intense work over weeks then had as consequence that when the invasion started – on day two, day four, day six –, we could immediately deliver three very heavy packages of sanctions that are unfolding their effect right now. The sanctions are biting. Russia has tried everything to camouflage the effects. And as this is not a free country, you can twitch and turn around facts and figures into what you want them to be. Or you can say what you want and hide what you want. But if you look at the financial sector in Russia, it is on life support now. Russia’s industry is in tatters. It is very interesting to see the military complex, because the military complex now has a very hard time to replenish what is necessary for the armed forces. Because the updated technologies are missing, these are coming from our side and are no longer delivered, there is a ban on the exports. The spare parts are missing. So you observe now that the Russians are cannibalising their refrigerators and their dishwashers to get semiconductors they can use for the military complex. Basically, the Kremlin has put Russia’s economy on the path to oblivion. And I want to make it very clear that the sanctions are here to stay. This is the time for resolve and not for appeasement.

    The same is true for our financial support to Ukraine. So far, Europeans have provided more than EUR 19 billion in financial assistance since the beginning of the war. And that is without counting our military support. The message is: We are in it for the long haul.

    I grew up in a divided country. I was lucky. I was born in West Germany, in the western part of Europe, in a free and democratic country. I vividly remember the times of the Iron Curtain. When I was your age, student age, when we wanted to drive to the island of West Berlin that was surrounded by the GDR, I remember, still today, the feeling of being terrified when you were driving on the corridor through the death zone. Because you knew, one false move and there is no rule of law anymore to protect you. So I remember this feeling very well, what the Iron Curtain and the Wall, and the death zone were all about. I also remember, of course, in 1990 the jubilant days, when the Iron Curtain came down, when the Wall in Berlin came down, and when the countries behind the Iron Curtain broke free. Indeed, the Baltics, Poland, Romania, Hungary, Slovakia, Slovenia, Bulgaria, Czechia – you name it, so many others. Today, there is the same wind of change that is once again blowing across the continent. Because Ukraine has now applied for membership in the European Union. With their decision to apply for the candidate status in order for Ukraine to join the European Union, they have very clearly chosen the path of freedom. And with our decision to grant them candidate status, we have chosen to stand by Ukraine as long as it takes.

    This war will change Europe and the world fundamentally. Take energy, I want to speak a little bit about energy. At the beginning of the war, Europe was heavily dependent on Russian fossil fuels: coal, oil, gas. 60% of the Russian budgets’ revenues at that time was from fossil fuels. So you can imagine how important the fossil fuel export was and is. Putin has built very strategically, and later on used, our dependency to blackmail us, basically to suffocate us, with lowering – already in hindsight, I see it – the gas supply last year to the storage to make sure that we have not enough gas in the storages to make it through the winter, and slowly but surely cutting the gas supplies to one Member State after another. At the moment, he prefers to flare the gas – that is literally burning the gas – instead of delivering it, as he should, if you look at the contracts. I guess that he obviously thought that he could intimidate us and divide us. But let me tell you that just the opposite is the case. This blackmailing has really united us. And it is a turning point, because we have decided, as a European Union: We will end our reliance on Russian fossil fuels.

    Meanwhile, Europe has banned Russian coal imports completely. We have been winding down and are winding down the oil imports from Russia, down to 10% by the end of the year. Gas is interesting. Let me give you three figures: If you look at the overall global pipeline gas demand, 75% was the demand of the European Union on global pipeline gas supplies. So we are a huge client – very important. Half of it was imports from Russia. Today, we are down, on Russian imports, to 25%. One quarter is left. How are we doing this? We are diversifying away from the Russian supply towards other suppliers that are democratic friends and trustworthy. First of all, of course, our friends in the United States. I closed an agreement with President Biden on LNG imports that really, really helped us and saved us in these difficult times. It is very successful. The second point that we are doing, besides diversifying away, is saving energy. The energy that is not being used is good energy. We save it to the storage for the coming winter.

    Of course, this comes at a price. So let me tell you that we all feel that the global energy market is very tight. The whole Russian supply is missing, so we are demanding energy on the global market. Therefore, the global market is really tight. Energy prices are skyrocketing, as you will observe in Europe. This is a heavy burden on people’s and businesses’ shoulders. We are taxing now the windfall profits of electricity-producing companies to have a targeted support for vulnerable households and vulnerable businesses. We are doing all this not only because it is necessary but also because we know that this is the way to dry out Putin’s war chest. And we know that we are doing this because with energy independence and energy freedom comes greater power to defend the global rules. This is the immediate response. But there is of course a mid-term and long-term response.

    Ultimately, the best way to get rid of fossil fuels is a massive investment in renewable energy. Every kilowatt-hour that we are producing electricity from sun, from wind, from hydropower, from geothermal, from biomass, from green hydrogen – you name it – is not only good for the climate – it is also good for the climate that is the most important part – but it makes us independent. It is home-grown; it is security of energy supply; it created good jobs at home. If you look at the price today of solar and wind energy, it is cheaper by now than fossil fuels. This is why, for example, we are investing heavily in offshore wind parks. The biggest one worldwide is now starting in the North Sea. When it is ready to go, it will heath 50 million European homes throughout the whole year.

    So in sum, the era of Russian fossil fuels in Europe is coming to an end. And this is a big geopolitical shift, because if you look at the map, the demand and supply from Russia is coming to an end. This demand from the European Union will now switch towards the Global South. Because if we do it right, we are not only diversifying to other gas or fossil fuel suppliers, but we massively invest now in renewable energies, in regions where the resources are in abundance. If you look at the other side of the Mediterranean, in the European Union, it is the African continent: sun, wind, partially hydropower, in abundance. And if we invest in the infrastructure, we do not only gain freedom from the blackmail that we have experienced with Russia, but we are also fighting the right cause against climate change.

    The fight against climate change is the biggest one. And I want us – the Europe Union and the United States – to be allies in that fight. Global warming is the real crisis that is overshadowing everything. We know that climate change is man-made. The body of evidence is overwhelming. So it is us. The impact is tangible, you know it: floods, droughts, wildfires, hurricanes, tornados, melting glaciers, rising sea levels. I had yesterday a bilateral meeting with the Prime Minister of Pakistan: three-quarter of the country is inundated – climate change, it is nothing but climate change. So it is very bad. But there is a glimpse of hope, because if it is true that climate change is man-made, we can do something about it. That is the good news and the bad news. And that is what the European Green Deal is all about. When I came into office in 2019, this was the first initiative I took. Our strategy, the European Green Deal, wants to transform our economy, so that we preserve and restore nature. We need to decarbonise our economy; we need to move towards the circular economy; we need to develop a way of life and work that gives our planet a real fighting chance for the next generation, for you. So we have, as the European Union, cast in law our goals for 2030 and climate neutrality for 2050. We want to be the first climate-neutral continent by 2050. And we are the first highly industrialised continent that has put a concrete plan on the table on how we want to get there. So pieces of legislation, legal acts to make this transformational change happen.

    What are the principles? The first one is: CO2 needs a price, because nature cannot pay the price anymore. Those who emit CO2 must pay. Therefore, we have put in place an Emissions Trading System: If you want to emit CO2, you pay. If you want to avoid that, you go and innovate into clean technologies. Second principle: The transition has to be just, otherwise it will not happen. So we invest massively to support the regions that have to leapfrog forward, for example coal-abating regions that have to leapfrog forward into completely different industries. And we have a Social Climate Fund to support the small incomes and the vulnerable businesses that have no leeway to adapt to cleaner mobility, to insulated houses, to better heating systems and all that is necessary to change. The third principle is: We need massive investments in innovation and infrastructure. That is the point where NextGenerationEU comes into play. I called it NextGenerationEU because we raised EUR 800 billion on the capital markets to invest in projects that will serve the next generation. EUR 360 billion of these will go into projects of the European Green Deal. And I am very glad that the United States is matching that now. I was happy to hear that from this climate package, USD 369 billion, I think, are going into green projects, projects fighting climate change. The fourth principle is, and that follows from it, that the fight against global warming is a global one, a global task. Europe is responsible for 9% of the global emissions. We need everyone on board. Therefore, I very much welcome President Biden’s strong commitment to also become climate-neutral by 2050. And last but not least, the fifth and last principle is: We consider the European Green Deal as a huge business opportunity – our new growth strategy. If we master the turnaround, those who have innovated and developed the clean solutions will be the front-runners. They will have the first-mover advantage. Then the whole world will be asking for their technologies. This is the reason why we have to prepare now if we want to be competitive in the future.

    This brings me to one afterthought. I have been speaking about energy, I have been speaking about dependency, the European Green Deal or fighting climate change. The green transition but also the digital transition, I must say, will massively increase our needs for raw materials. Lithium for batteries; silicon metal for chips; rare earths to produce magnets, for example for electric vehicles. Demand for those raw materials and rare earths will presumably at least double until 2030. The good news is: That shows that the European Green Deal and the green transformation overall worldwide is progressing fast. The not-so-good news is: One country dominates the market. Out of the 30 critical raw materials, today 10 are mostly sourced from China. And China basically controls the global processing industry. Almost 90% of rare earths and 60% of lithium are processed in China. We have to avoid falling into the same trap and dependency as we did with oil and gas. So we have to be very careful not to replace one old dependency with a new one.

    And that brings me back to where I started: Democracy versus autocracy. Each of our democracies is very unique and different. Because ultimately, they have been shaped by our people, by our history, by our backgrounds, our cultures, our constitutions. But in the very end, democracies in all forms come down to one single point. And that is: It gives people a voice. It gives the ability to change things at the ballot box. In democracies, we even fight for the right to be against us. That is democracy. To be able to speak you mind. To change your mind, if you want to. To be free to be yourself so that if you are different from the majority, you are equal before the law. It is the accountability to all, and not only to those who have voted for you. That is democracy. A system where power is given and taken away by the citizens and framed by checks and balances. And we see what the alternative is. At the beginning of this year, Russia and China declared an ‘unlimited friendship’. And despite the fact that cracks have appeared in the last days, both continue to aim for a fundamentally different vision of the future. I believe we have to take this challenge very seriously. We need to defend the open and inclusive international order – both in the United States and the European Union, and beyond. Those who were lucky enough to be born and raised in democracies – like me – can often take the democracy just for granted. It was always there. I have always lived in a democracy. But now I realise that it is not going to be here if I do not stand up for this democracy. Those who have lived in autocracies and authoritarian regimes will know all too well how precious freedom is. In Europe, we have learnt that we must always work on improving democracy – because we know how quickly and how devastatingly history can change. We know that the opponents of democracy today are using sophisticated, new tools, modern technologies to oppress and manipulate through systematic disinformation. Disinformation is not a partisan issue, it is a societal one. Because it seeks to muddy the waters so much that truth and facts become impossible to distinguish from lies and falsehoods. So in the very end, democracy needs us – each and every one of us, explicitly. By that, I want to address you, the students, the faculty members, the administration here in this room: You have the privilege to study and work in an institution that is based on a long tradition to unveil truth through critical discourse, through evidence-based research, respect for facts and figures, the understanding of history. These are the tools and the ingredients to dismantle disinformation. You have a mission. As politicians, we have a mission, too, but you have a mission. Or in the words of Princeton’s informal motto: In the nation’s service and in the service of humanity.

    Many thanks for your attention.

  • Jacob Rees-Mogg – 2022 Statement on Retained EU Law

    Jacob Rees-Mogg – 2022 Statement on Retained EU Law

    The statement made by Jacob Rees-Mogg, the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, in the House of Commons on 22 September 2022.

    On 31 January, to mark the two-year anniversary of the UK’s departure from the European Union, the Government set out their plans to bring forward the Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Bill.

    Retained EU law is a category of domestic law created at the end of the transition period. It consists of EU-derived legislation that was preserved in our domestic legal framework by the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018 to ensure continuity as we left the EU.

    However, retained EU law was never intended to sit on the statute book indefinitely. The time is now right to bring the special status of retained EU law in the UK statute book to an end on 31 December 2023, in order to fully realise the opportunities of Brexit and to support the unique culture of innovation in the UK.

    To achieve this, the Bill I have introduced today includes the following provisions;

    Sunsetting retained EU law

    The Bill will sunset the majority of retained EU law so that it expires on 31 December 2023. All retained EU law contained in domestic secondary legislation and retained direct EU legislation will expire on this date, unless otherwise preserved. Any retained EU law that remains in force after the sunset date will be assimilated in the domestic statute book, by the removal of the special EU law features previously attached to it. This means that the principle of the supremacy of EU law, general principles of EU law, and directly effective EU rights will also end on 31 December 2023. There will no longer be a place for EU law concepts in our statute book.

    Before that date, Government Departments and the devolved Administrations will determine which retained EU law can be reformed to benefit the UK, which can expire, and which needs to be preserved and incorporated into domestic law in modified form. They will also decide if retained EU law needs to be codified as it is preserved, in order to preserve specific policy effects which are beneficial to keep.

    The Bill includes an extension mechanism for the sunset of specified pieces of retained EU law until 2026. Should it be required, this will allow Departments additional time where necessary to implement more complex reforms to specific pieces of retained EU law, including any necessary legislation.

    Ending of supremacy of retained EU law in UK law by 2023

    Currently, retained direct EU legislation still takes priority over domestic UK legislation passed prior to the end of the transition period when they are incompatible. This is not in keeping with our status as an independent, sovereign trading nation, and the Government’s 2019 commitment to remove this.

    Therefore, the Bill will reverse this order of priority, to reinstate domestic law as the highest form of law on the UK statute book. Where it is necessary to preserve the current hierarchy between domestic and EU legislation in specific circumstances, the Bill provides a power to amend the new order of priority to retain specific legislative effects.

    Assimilated law

    Following the removal of the special features of EU law from retained EU law on 31 December 2023, any retained EU law that is preserved will become “assimilated law” to reflect that EU interpretive features no longer apply to it.

    Facilitating departures from retained EU case law

    To ensure that EU law concepts do not become “baked in” through over-cautious court judgments, the Bill will also provide domestic courts with greater discretion to depart from the body of retained case law. It will also provide new court procedures for UK and devolved law officers to refer or intervene in cases involving retained EU case law.

    Modification of retained EU legislation

    To correct an anomaly created by European Union Withdrawal Act which gave some retained direct EU legislation legislative parity with Acts of Parliament for some purposes, despite it not having been properly scrutinised, the Bill will downgrade the status of retained direct EU law for the purposes of amendment. The Bill will modify powers in other statutes, to facilitate their use to amend retained direct EU law in the same way they can be used on domestic secondary legislation. This will enable the amendment of retained direct EU law, with the appropriate level of parliamentary scrutiny.

    Powers relating to retained EU law

    The Bill will also create powers to make secondary legislation so that retained EU law or assimilated law can be amended, repealed and replaced more easily. This Bill will allow Government via Parliament to clarify, consolidate and restate legislation to preserve its current effect. Using these powers, the Government via Parliament will ensure that only regulation that is fit for purpose, and suited for the UK will remain on the statute book.

    Business impact target

    Having left the EU, the UK has further opportunities to reform its regulatory regime. The UK Government published their consultation response to the “Reforming the Better Regulation Framework” and is in the process of implementing the wider reforms outlined.

    As part of these reforms, the Bill repeals the business impact target, which is outdated and not fit for purpose. Any subsequent replacement of the business impact target, when combined with the other wider reforms, will ensure that the UK’s regulatory framework is fit for the UK economy, business and households, into the future.

  • Michael Ancram – 2002 Speech on Europe and America – Not Europe or America

    Michael Ancram – 2002 Speech on Europe and America – Not Europe or America

    The speech made by Michael Ancram, the then Shadow Foreign Secretary, at the Conservative Foreign Affairs Forum on 13 March 2002.

    Some weeks ago I spoke about the benefits of building partnerships of sovereignty rather than supranational structures. Tonight I want to pursue that debate in terms of its implications for our relations with Europe and with the United States of America.

    The end of the Cold War and the fall of the Berlin Wall, even more than September 11, represented a fundamentally important turning-point in international affairs. These events launched a process of change in which many cherished old assumptions perished. The era of the great countervailing blocs, of two great superpowers balancing against one another with a mix of military and economic might, ended. The solidity it offered was replaced by a fluidity last seen in the nineteenth century. This time, however, there was the added dimension of the “rogue state” complete with weapons of mass destruction – and unlike the blocs in the Cold War with no compunction about using them. This is a new challenge calling for new responses and new forms of relationships.

    At the heart of this new geopolitical environment stands America. America is in relative as well as in real terms probably the greatest superpower the world has ever known. It is the predominant force in the world today, and its predominance continues to grow. Count up the aircraft carriers, the aircraft, the frigates, the battle groups and the conclusion is inescapable. As we have seen in Afghanistan, its military power and reach are awesome.

    Nor is America’s strength merely military. Its technology leads the world. Its universities are the most advanced, its Nobel laureates the most numerous, its production now back to almost thirty percent of the entire global output. America is in every sense of the word a superpower. It is on its own not a bloc, not a supranational institution but a very big sovereign nation, jealous of its sovereignty and its independent rights of self-determination. In fact America with her flag, her sense of allegiance, and the clear values which underpin her nationhood is the epitome of the modern sovereign nation state.

    Yet like all great powers throughout history the USA gives rise to strong reactions and mixed feelings. These range on the one hand from the downright hostility of certain countries and regimes towards America, to feelings of great kinship and shared friendship in the face of common threats on the other. Between these, there has always been a danger that feelings of jealousy or inferiority, the instinctive envy of the ‘overdog’, could grow in the breasts of European integrationists as much as antagonism will grow in the hearts of those who have always seen American capitalism as the antithesis of the socialist utopias in which they still believe. The European Union official who was recently quoted saying that “it is humiliating and demeaning if we feel we have to go and get our homework marked by Dick Cheney and Condi Rice” was showing early symptoms of those feelings.

    Our Foreign Secretary’s ill-judged accusation that the US President’s foreign policy was motivated more by domestic politics than by international security considerations was a further manifestation. References by senior Europeans to American foreign policy as simplistic and absolutist in contrast to the sophistication of European foreign policy, only serve further to fan the embers of anti-Americanism and to set Europe against America. It is a misguided trend which stems from a false belief that a United Europe should somehow counterbalance the United States.

    What all this does, however, is to pose the choice – Europe or America. It infers that there are no realistic options outside this choice; and by inference that the wise will opt for Europe. It is a false choice because there is another. The Nations of Europe and America; the one I strongly support.

    Over the coming months the first option will be played out in the chancelleries of Europe as well as in our own British Cabinet Room on the delicate subject of Iraq. Already we have seen many of our European partners raising the flag of non-involvement in any future action to deal with Saddam Hussein and his weapons of mass destruction. Already we have heard senior Europeans striving to exculpate the regime in Iraq from accusations of ‘evil’. Once again the inference being created is ‘Europe against action in Iraq, US for action in Iraq.’ Again it is a false choice.

    The real option is the sharing with America of the evidence of real threats to international security stemming from Iraq and other similarly ‘rogue’ states, and the shared determination to deal with the problem. Europe and America rather than Europe or America.

    The Europe or America proposition is a dangerous one, particularly when it is posed with anti-American sentiment. Hostile rhetoric is an easy game for some Europeans to play. But it plays straight into the hands of those in the US who rejoice in what they see as their ‘unipolar moment’ and believe that they can go it alone. The truth is that Europe needs the US, and that the US needs Europe. The first because Europe is many years away from having the military resources required for its security and needs American intelligence and manpower. The second because September 11 demonstrated to America that it is now vulnerable and that it needs us and our European partners.

    Which leads directly to the Nations of Europe and America proposition, a partnership not of superpowers but of shared interests and shared objectives. With our close relationships with both, we are ideally placed to help build and secure this proposition. It will require a less introverted and bureaucratic Europe and a sense of shared values around which a renewed Atlantic Charter can be formed.

    It is an opportunity that our current Government cannot grasp. Mr Blair is publicly tholed to the building of a superpower Europe with all that that entails. A common foreign policy, that of the lowest common denominator. A common defence policy whose military capability will not even be fully and effectively operational for a decade. A single currency with the loss of economic self-governance and even greater harmonisation. This superpower Europe would find little to share in partnership with the American superpower with whom it would be designed to compete. It would be Europe or America – and Europe would be the loser.

    Europe and America is an opportunity we should grasp, but to do so we need to redirect the purpose and nature of the European Union. There could be no better moment. Europe, in preparation for the IGC in 2004, is examining its future structures, partly through the Giscard d’Estaing Convention, but more widely as well.

    Too often in the past this process has been caricatured as a fight between those who seek a more integrated and centralised Europe –with the New Labour firmly among them – and those who seek to see Britain withdraw from Europe. The Conservative Party adheres to neither of these positions.

    Where New Labour integrationists look for a pooling of sovereignty in Europe and where the anti-Europeans want no part in any European arrangements, we look for a partnership of sovereignties. We believe we are part of Europe, but that the relationship within the EU must be one in which our sovereignty is not ultimately dissolved by ‘pooling’ or rendered meaningless by a legally binding Euro-constitution.

    Where the New Labour centralists want ever closer monetary union, and ever greater regulation, and where the anti-Europeans want straight-forward divorce, we look for the strengthening of the single market, whilst retaining our own fiscal and macro-economic management.

    We believe that influence comes not from coercion or centralisation or harmonisation, or from hang-ups about single currencies or common foreign policies or European Armies, but from cooperation and mutual understanding. We are neither of the above. We are Constructive Europeans working within a Europe of Sovereign Nation States.

    We understand the present malaise that is afflicting the European Union. We can understand the erosion of democracy and legitimacy that has been allowed to occur. We know that enlargement, which we totally support, is opening up new divisions and in turn making the total reform of the entire Union, its structures and its methods, both essential and unavoidable. This is where from our Conservative European standpoint as Constructive Europeans within a Europe of Nations we have a significant role to play.

    It is our chance in the months ahead to develop and present a raft of new ideas for making EU institutions more accountable to national parliaments in order to strengthen democratic accountability. A Europe Minister based in Brussels but reporting back regularly to Parliament; committees of Parliament shaping the Commission’s agenda; and much earlier and more effective systems of scrutiny of matters European in the national parliaments.

    We should not be afraid to urge the re-opening of the treaties to bring Europe up to date with the modern world. We should seek constructively to reverse its centralising tendencies. We should challenge the aquis and urge repatriation of large parts of agricultural and foreign aid policy. We should be prepared to revisit those areas that have not worked. We would find surprising allies in Europe in so doing.

    We can show that the Lisbon Process is not working. The facts are that unemployment in Europe is still rising, and that the ‘competitive knowledge-based Europe’ simply isn’t happening.

    We can respond. Our constructive plans for European economic reform should be tied to low taxation, to enterprise, to innovation and above all to light regulation.

    All of these can help to lay the foundations for a genuine partnership of interests with the US. By creating a European Union which is genuinely a partnership of its member nations, which does not demand conformity of approach on international relations or in response to American initiatives, where there can be different layers of enthusiasm and participation. By encouraging a common understanding of the importance of America to us and the contribution we can make to America. By building the base of a lasting partnership in which there is competition rather than rivalry and admiration rather than envy; and where advice and consultation occur naturally and mutually from within the partnership rather than as hostile comment shouted from the sidelines.

    As Constructive Europeans who believe in the importance of the sovereign nation state we would be ideally placed to develop even closer relations with the most powerful sovereign nation state of all, the US. Yet to do so we must look at how, as America’s friend and partner, we can best influence how that power can more effectively be deployed to advance the concept of Europe and America.

    The old tried and tested if unwritten formula of the Atlantic Charter– partnership, not subservience – was right, and it still commands the overwhelming support of informed British opinion. We are the colleague and partner who offers advice in the spirit of greatest friendship and well-meaning. This is the basis of our ‘special relationship’ with America, greatly revived since September 11, which I would like now to see strengthened and entrenched as a durable feature of international relations in this new Century. That means not standing aside from America, but being actively involved with her; not indulging in the US-bashing so beloved by the Left, but participating in the delivery of a higher moral responsibility which has fallen upon the US precisely as a result of the overwhelming might which she possesses.

    But America cannot carry forward these responsibilities on her own. Nor can that spirit of openness and freedom, so crucial to American life, be protected by unilateral action. That openness can best be preserved and strengthened by America deploying her undoubted wealth and might not in the style of imperial mastership but in new and imaginative ways. It was President Theodore Roosevelt who identified the need for America to speak softly and to carry a big stick. Never has that advice been more relevant or more difficult to deliver. The big stick is present in unprecedented measure. But there needs also to be a spirit of international partnership and support, well presaged in the international coalition brought together in pursuit of el Qa’eda and the Taleban. America knows only too well that terrorism can never be defeated, or even contained, within the US itself; hence the international campaign against the scourge of international terrorism. Nor however can it be finally defeated from the decks of America’s gigantic carrier fleet. It can be ‘degraded’, if not physically destroyed, by military action; but it cannot be eradicated from the hearts and minds of those who are recruited to terrorism by threat or use of the big stick alone.

    The conditions in which terrorism can flourish and which terrorism seeks therefore to promote must be responded to as well. Terrorism is criminal but it feeds on the society in which it finds shelter and support, and on the prejudices and hatreds and fears and inadequacies of that community. As well as the big stick, this is where the soft talk and imaginative deployment of resources has a role to play, and where we can help America play it.

    Last December I visited Washington and had talks with senior members of the Administration. There was no arrogance of power, there was no desire for American hegemony. There was, and still is, a very clear appreciation of the awesome responsibility that has fallen to the United States through the way in which international events have developed in the last decade. The knowledge that history will judge them by their response is clear in their minds.

    They were examining every option, analysing every nuance, evaluating every possible consequence of every possible action or initiative. They left me very reassured that whatever courses of action are chosen they will be based on some of the most fundamental and comprehensive analyses of the facts and the options ever carried out. The fundamental truth is that being so powerful America is relied upon by much of the world. Often she must act in ways others cannot, and this unfairly attracts the stigma of arrogance. To the contrary, in my view American foreign policy is grounded in realism, with a well-honed understanding of the limitations of their role, and the extent of the world’s expectations of them.

    And that is why we can as America’s friend and partner advise her to look even more widely. The areas for soft talk are numerous and growing. Let me set out a few of those that I see to be most urgent.

    To work with Muslim moderates everywhere, but particularly in the Middle East and especially in Saudi Arabia where efforts to balance Islamic populism with Western values is a cause of potential dangerous instability. And while on the Middle East to help Israel down the difficult road of accepting a viable Palestinian state on her borders in return for guaranteed security for the democratic state of Israel.

    To help Russia overcome its current sense of exclusion by extending the hand of genuine cooperation on security, on internal terrorism and on economic development. Bringing Russia into the big tent and according her the respect and status she should enjoy is an important element of the agile partnerships of nations we should be seeking to create.

    To develop new thinking on global economic development in place of outdated and unsuccessful aid doctrines, especially in Africa, understanding that the keys to development lie in good governance, respect of property rights, the removal of trade barriers and acceptance of the rule of law.

    But most immediately and urgently to work together, and to seek regional support in so doing, to control and remove weapons of mass destruction and their delivery systems currently in the hands of unscrupulous regimes which threaten the stability not only of their regions but of the wider international community as well.

    And alongside this we should support the Americans in pressing our European partners in NATO into serious increases in defence expenditure. In the most diplomatic way the US should find the means of explaining to the European Union that the ESDP is an absurd distraction and duplication within the European theatre, and that its real timescale itself indicates that it is both a cover-up for inadequate defence budgets and a faintly pathetic attempt at Euro-machismo. ESDP is symptomatic of a wider malaise, a growing anti-Americanism and introspection. ESDP can be interpreted as advice for too many nations in Europe “to get America off our backs” and a disguise for inaction. America should join us in pressing for a strengthened European capability within NATO, just as NATO has backed America in the global anti-terrorism campaign.

    These are some of those areas which together amount to a powerful agenda of involvement and of partnership that can mobilise America’s wealth and strength in a way which will unite the world rather than divide it. It contrasts starkly with the tone emanating from EU institutions with their talk of a rival currency, of a balancing of superpowers and of challenging American hegemony. This is the language of confrontation, of Europe or America.

    I conversely have sought to set out a path for the nations of Europe and America. A Europe which in terms of the relationship with America is not a rival but a complement, not a critic but a counsellor. We here in Britain can lead the way, bringing America and Europe closer together on the basis of the common interests which we epitomise. A partnership of true friends. Europe and America together, with us at the hinge. A partnership for freedom, prosperity and peace.

  • Ursula von der Leyen – 2022 State of Union Address

    Ursula von der Leyen – 2022 State of Union Address

    The address made by Ursula von der Leyen, the President of the European Commission, on 14 September 2022.

    A UNION THAT STANDS STRONG TOGETHER

    INTRODUCTION

    Madam President,

    Honourable Members,

    My fellow Europeans,

    Never before has this Parliament debated the State of our Union with war raging on European soil.

    We all remember that fateful morning in late February.

    Europeans from across our Union woke up dismayed by what they saw. Shaken by the resurgent and ruthless face of evil. Haunted by the sounds of sirens and the sheer brutality of war.

    But from that very moment, a whole continent has risen in solidarity.

    At the border crossings where refugees found shelter. In our streets, filled with Ukrainian flags. In the classrooms, where Ukrainian children made new friends.

    From that very moment, Europeans neither hid nor hesitated.

    They found the courage to do the right thing.

    And from that very moment, our Union as a whole has risen to the occasion.

    Fifteen years ago, during the financial crisis, it took us years to find lasting solutions.

    A decade later, when the global pandemic hit, it took us only weeks.

    But this year, as soon as Russian troops crossed the border into Ukraine, our response was united, determined and immediate.

    And we should be proud of that.

    We have brought Europe’s inner strength back to the surface.

    And we will need all of this strength. The months ahead of us will not be easy. Be it for families who are struggling to make ends meet, or businesses, who are facing tough choices about their future.

    Let us be very clear: much is at stake here. Not just for Ukraine – but for all of Europe and the world at large.

    And we will be tested. Tested by those who want to exploit any kind of divisions between us.

    This is not only a war unleashed by Russia against Ukraine.

    This is a war on our energy, a war on our economy, a war on our values and a war on our future.

    This is about autocracy against democracy.

    And I stand here with the conviction that with courage and solidarity, Putin will fail and Europe will prevail.

    THE COURAGE TO STAND WITH OUR HEROES

    Honourable Members,

    Today – courage has a name, and that name is Ukraine.

    Courage has a face, the face of Ukrainian men and women who are standing up to Russian aggression.

    I remember a moment in the early weeks of the invasion. When the First Lady of Ukraine, Olena Zelenska, gathered the parents of Ukrainian children killed by the invader.

    Hundreds of families for whom the war will never end, and for whom life will never go back to what it was before.

    We saw the first Lady leading a silent crowd of heartbroken mothers and fathers, and hang small bells in the trees, one for every fallen child.

    And now the bells will ring forever in the wind, and forever, the innocent victims of this war will live in our memory.

    And she is here with us today!

    Dear Olena, it took immense courage to resist Putin’s cruelty.

    But you found that courage.

    And a nation of heroes has risen.

    Today, Ukraine stands strong because an entire country has fought street by street, home by home.

    Ukraine stands strong because people like your husband, President Zelenskyy, have stayed in Kyiv to lead the resistance – together with you and your children, dear First Lady.

    You have given courage to the whole nation. And we have seen in the last days the bravery of Ukrainians paying off.

    You have given voice to your people on the global stage.

    And you have given hope to all of us.

    So today we want to thank you and all Ukrainians.

    Glory to a country of European heroes. Slava Ukraini!

    Europe’s solidarity with Ukraine will remain unshakeable.

    From day one, Europe has stood at Ukraine’s side. With weapons. With funds. With hospitality for refugees. And with the toughest sanctions the world has ever seen.

    Russia’s financial sector is on life-support. We have cut off three quarters of Russia’s banking sector from international markets.

    Nearly one thousand international companies have left the country.

    The production of cars fell by three-quarters compared to last year. Aeroflot is grounding planes because there are no more spare parts. The Russian military is taking chips from dishwashers and refrigerators to fix their military hardware, because they ran out of semiconductors. Russia’s industry is in tatters.

    It is the Kremlin that has put Russia’s economy on the path to oblivion.

    This is the price for Putin’s trail of death and destruction.

    And I want to make it very clear, the sanctions are here to stay.

    This is the time for us to show resolve, not appeasement.

    The same is true for our financial support to Ukraine.

    So far Team Europe have provided more than 19 billion euros in financial assistance.

    And this is without counting our military support.

    And we are in it for the long haul.

    Ukraine’s reconstruction will require massive resources. For instance, Russian strikes have damaged or destroyed more than 70 schools.

    Half a million Ukrainian children have started their school year in the European Union. But many others inside Ukraine simply don’t have a classroom to go to.

    So today I am announcing that we will work with the First Lady to support the rehabilitation of damaged Ukrainian schools. And that is why we will provide 100 million euros. Because the future of Ukraine begins in its schools.

    We will not only support with finance – but also empower Ukraine to make the most of its potential.

    Ukraine is already a rising tech hub and home to many innovative young companies.

    So I want us to mobilise the full power of our Single Market to help accelerate growth and create opportunities.

    In March, we connected successfully Ukraine to our electricity grid. It was initially planned for 2024. But we did it within two weeks. And today, Ukraine is exporting electricity to us. I want to significantly expand this mutually beneficial trade.

    We have already suspended import duties on Ukrainian exports to the EU.

    We will bring Ukraine into our European free roaming area.

    Our solidarity lanes are a big success.

    And building on all that, the Commission will work with Ukraine to ensure seamless access to the Single Market. And vice-versa.

    Our Single Market is one of Europe’s greatest success stories. Now it’s time to make it a success story for our Ukrainian friends, too.

    And this is why I am going to Kyiv today, to discuss this in detail with President Zelenskyy.

    Honourable Members,

    One lesson from this war is we should have listened to those who know Putin.

    To Anna Politkovskaya and all the Russian journalists who exposed the crimes, and paid the ultimate price.

    To our friends in Ukraine, Moldova, Georgia, and to the opposition in Belarus.

    We should have listened to the voices inside our Union – in Poland, in the Baltics, and all across Central and Eastern Europe.

    They have been telling us for years that Putin would not stop.

    And they acted accordingly.

    Our friends in the Baltics have worked hard to end their dependency on Russia. They have invested in renewable energy, in LNG terminals, and in interconnectors.

    This costs a lot. But dependency on Russian fossil fuels comes at a much higher price.

    We have to get rid of this dependency all over Europe.

    Therefore we agreed on joint storage. We are at 84% now: we are overshooting our target.

    But unfortunately that will not be enough.

    We have diversified away from Russia to reliable suppliers. US, Norway, Algeria and others.

    Last year, Russian gas accounted for 40% of our gas imports. Today it’s down to 9% pipeline gas.

    But Russia keeps on actively manipulating our energy market. They prefer to flare the gas than to deliver it. This market is not functioning anymore.

    In addition the climate crisis is heavily weighing on our bills. Heat waves have boosted electricity demand. Droughts shut down hydro and nuclear plants.

    As a result, gas prices have risen by more than 10 times compared to before the pandemic.

    Making ends meet is becoming a source of anxiety for millions of businesses and households.

    But Europeans are also coping courageously with this.

    Workers in ceramics factories in central Italy, have decided to move their shifts to early morning, to benefit from lower energy prices.

    Just imagine the parents among them, having to leave home early, when the kids are still sleeping, because of a war they haven’t chosen.

    This is one example in a million of Europeans adapting to this new reality.

    I want our Union to take example from its people. Reducing demand during peak hours will make supply last longer, and it will bring prices down.

    This is why we are putting forward measures for Member States to reduce their overall electricity consumption.

    But more targeted supported is needed.

    For industries, like glass makers who have to turn off their ovens. Or for single parents facing one daunting bill after another.

    Millions of Europeans need support.

    EU Member States have already invested billions of euros to assist vulnerable households.

    But we know this will not be enough.

    This is why we are proposing a cap on the revenues of companies that produce electricity at a low cost.

    These companies are making revenues they never accounted for, they never even dreamt of.

    In our social market economy, profits are good.

    But in these times it is wrong to receive extraordinary record profits benefitting from war and on the back of consumers.

    In these times, profits must be shared and channelled to those who need it the most.

    Our proposal will raise more than 140 billion euros for Member States to cushion the blow directly.

    And because we are in a fossil fuel crisis, the fossil fuel industry has a special duty, too.

    Major oil, gas and coal companies are also making huge profits. So they have to pay a fair share – they have to give a crisis contribution.

    These are all emergency and temporary measures we are working on, including our discussions on price caps.

    We need to keep working to lower gas prices.

    We have to ensure our security of supply and, at the same time, ensure our global competitiveness.

    So we will develop with the Member States a set of measures that take into account the specific nature of our relationship with suppliers – ranging from unreliable suppliers such as Russia to reliable friends such as Norway.

    I have agreed with Prime Minister Støre to set up a task force. Teams have started their work.

    Another important topic is on the agenda. Today our gas market has changed dramatically: from pipeline gas mainly to increasing amounts of LNG.

    But the benchmark used in the gas market – the TTF – has not adapted.

    This is why the Commission will work on establishing a more representative benchmark.

    At the same time we also know that energy companies are facing severe problems with liquidity in electricity futures markets, risking the functioning of our energy system.

    We will work with market regulators to ease these problems by amending the rules on collateral – and by taking measures to limit intra-day price volatility.

    And we will amend the temporary state aid framework in October to allow for the provision of state guarantees, while preserving a level playing field.

    These are all first steps. But as we deal with this immediate crisis, we must also look forward.

    The current electricity market design – based on merit order – is not doing justice to consumers anymore.

    They should reap the benefits of low-cost renewables.

    So, we have to decouple the dominant influence of gas on the price of electricity. This is why we will do a deep and comprehensive reform of the electricity market.

    Now – here is an important point. Half a century ago, in the 1970s, the world faced another fossil fuel crisis.

    Some of us remember the car-free weekends to save energy. Yet we kept driving on the same road.

    We did not get rid of our dependency on oil. And worse, fossil fuels were even massively subsidised.

    This was wrong, not just for the climate, but also for our public finances, and our independence. And we are still paying for this today.

    Only a few visionaries understood that the real problem was fossil fuels themselves, not just their price.

    Among them were our Danish friends.

    When the oil crisis hit, Denmark started to invest heavily into harnessing the power of the wind.

    They laid the foundations for its global leadership in the sector and created tens of thousands of new jobs.

    This is the way to go!

    Not just a quick fix, but a change of paradigm, a leap into the future.

    STAYING THE COURSE AND PREPARING FOR THE FUTURE

    Mesdames et Messieurs les Députés,

    La bonne nouvelle est que cette transformation nécessaire a commencé.

    Elle a lieu en mer du Nord et en mer Baltique, où nos États membres ont massivement investi dans l’éolien en mer.

    Elle a lieu en Sicile, où la plus grande usine solaire d’Europe produira bientôt la toute dernière génération de panneaux solaires.

    Et elle a lieu dans le nord de l’Allemagne, où les trains régionaux roulent désormais à l’hydrogène vert.

    L’hydrogène peut changer la donne pour l’Europe.

    Nous devons passer du marché de niche au marché de masse pour l’hydrogène.

    Avec REPowerEU, nous avons doublé notre objectif : nous voulons produire dix millions de tonnes d’hydrogène renouvelable dans l’Union européenne, chaque année d’ici 2030.

    Pour y parvenir, nous devons créer un animateur de marché pour l’hydrogène, afin de combler le déficit d’investissement et de mettre en relation l’offre et la demande futures.

    C’est pourquoi je peux annoncer aujourd’hui que nous allons créer une nouvelle Banque européenne de l’hydrogène.

    Elle aidera à garantir l’achat d’hydrogène, notamment en utilisant les ressources du Fonds pour l’innovation.

    Elle pourra investir 3 milliard d’euros pour aider à construire le futur marché de l’hydrogène.

    C’est ainsi que se bâtira l’économie du futur.

    C’est cela, notre Pacte vert pour l’Europe.

    Et nous avons tous vu au cours des derniers mois à quel point le Pacte vert pour l’Europe est important.

    L’été 2022 restera dans les mémoires. Nous avons tous vu les rivières asséchées, les forêts en feu, la chaleur extrême.

    Et la situation est bien plus grave encore. Jusqu’à présent, les glaciers des Alpes ont servi de réserve d’urgence pour des rivières comme le Rhin ou le Rhône.

    Mais comme les glaciers d’Europe fondent plus vite que jamais, les sécheresses futures seront beaucoup plus graves.

    Nous devons travailler sans relâche à l’adaptation climatique et faire de la nature notre premier allié.

    C’est pourquoi notre Union poussera pour un accord mondial ambitieux pour la nature lors de la conférence des Nations Unies sur la biodiversité qui se tiendra à Montréal cette année.

    Et nous ferons de même lors de la COP27 à Sharm el-Sheikh.

    Mais à court terme, nous devons aussi être mieux équipés pour faire face au changement climatique.

    Aucun pays ne peut lutter seul contre les phénomènes météorologiques extrêmes et leurs forces destructrices.

    Cet été, nous avons envoyé des avions de la Grèce, la Suède ou d’Italie pour combattre des incendies en France et en Allemagne.

    Mais comme ces évènements deviennent plus fréquents et plus intenses, l’Europe aura besoin de plus de capacités.

    C’est pourquoi aujourd’hui j’annonce que nous allons doubler notre capacité de lutte contre les incendies au cours de l’année prochaine.

    L’Union Européenne achètera dix avions amphibies légers et trois hélicoptères supplémentaires pour compléter notre flotte.

    Voilà la solidarité européenne en action

    Honourable Members,

    The last years have shown how much Europe can achieve when it is united.

    After an unprecedented pandemic, our economic output overtook pre-crisis levels in record time.

    We went from having no vaccine to securing over 4 billion doses for Europeans and for the world.

    And in record time, we came up with SURE – so that people could stay in their jobs even if their companies had run out of work.

    We were in the deepest recession since World War 2.
    We achieved the fastest recovery since the post-war boom.

    And that was possible because we all rallied behind a common recovery plan.

    NextGenerationEU has been a boost of confidence for our economy.

    And its journey has only just begun.

    So far, 100 billion euros have been disbursed to Member States. This means: 700 billion euros still haven’t flown into our economy.

    NextGenerationEU will guarantee a constant stream of investment to sustain jobs and growth.

    It means relief for our economy. But most importantly, it means renewal.

    It is financing new wind turbines and solar parks, high-speed trains and energy-saving renovations.

    We conceived NextGenerationEU almost two years ago, and yet it is exactly what Europe needs today.

    So let’s stick to the plan.

    Let’s get the money on the ground.

    Honourable Members,

    The future of our children needs both that we invest in sustainability and that we invest sustainably.

    We must finance the transition to a digital and net-zero economy.

    And yet we also have to acknowledge a new reality of higher public debt.

    We need fiscal rules that allow for strategic investment, while safeguarding fiscal sustainability.

    Rules that are fit for the challenges of this decade.

    In October, we will come forward with new ideas for our economic governance.

    But let me share a few basic principles with you.

    Member States should have more flexibility on their debt reduction paths.

    But there should be more accountability on the delivery of what we have agreed on.

    There should be simpler rules that all can follow.

    To open the space for strategic investment and to give financial markets the confidence they need.

    Let us chart once again a joint way forward.

    With more freedom to invest. And more scrutiny on progress.

    More ownership by Member States. And better results for citizens.

    Let us rediscover the Maastricht spirit – stability and growth can only go hand in hand.

    Honourable Members,

    As we embark on this transition in our economy, we must rely on the enduring values of our social market economy.

    It’s the simple idea that Europe’s greatest strength lies in each and every one of us.

    Our social market economy encourages everyone to excel, but it also takes care of our fragility as human beings.

    It rewards performance and guarantees protection. It opens opportunities but also set limits.

    We need this even more today.

    Because the strength of our social market economy will drive the green and digital transition.

    We need an enabling business environment, a workforce with the right skills and access to raw materials our industry needs.

    Our future competitiveness depends on it.

    We must remove the obstacles that still hold our small companies back.

    They must be at the centre of this transformation – because they are the backbone of Europe’s long history of industrial prowess.

    And they have always put their employees first – even and especially in times of crisis.

    But inflation and uncertainty are weighing especially hard on them.

    This is why we will put forward an SME Relief Package.

    It will include a proposal for a single set of tax rules for doing business in Europe – we call it BEFIT.

    This will make it easier to do business in our Union. Less red tape means better access to the dynamism of a continental market.

    And we will revise the Late Payment Directive – because it is simply not fair that 1 in 4 bankruptcies are due to invoices not being paid on time.

    For millions of family businesses, this will be a lifeline in troubled waters.

    Der Mangel an Personal ist eine weitere Herausforderung für Europas Unternehmen.

    Die Zahl der Arbeitslosen ist so niedrig wie nie zuvor.

    Das ist gut!

    Aber gleichzeitig liegt die Zahl der offenen Stellen auf Rekordniveau.

    Ob Lastwagenfahrer, Kellnern oder Flughafenpersonal.

    Ob auch Krankenpfleger, Ingenieurinnen oder IT-Technikerinnen.

    Von Ungelernt bis Universitätsabschluß, Europa braucht sie alle!

    Wir müssen daher viel stärker in die Aus- und Weiterbildung investieren.

    Dazu wollen wir eng mit den Unternehmen zusammenarbeiten.

    Denn sie wissen am besten, welche Fachkräfte sie heute und morgen brauchen.

    Und wir müssen diesen Bedarf besser in Einklang bringen mit den Zielen und Wünschen die Arbeitssuchende selbst für ihren Berufsweg haben.

    Darüber hinaus wollen wir gezielter Fachkräfte aus dem Ausland anwerben, die hier Unternehmen und Europas Wachstum stärken.

    Ein wichtiger erster Schritt ist, ihre Qualifikationen in Europa besser und schneller anzuerkennen.

    Denn Europa muss attraktiver werden für die, die etwas können und sich einbringen wollen.

    Deshalb schlage ich vor, 2023 zum Europäischen Jahr der Aus- und vor allem auch der Weiterbildung zu machen.

    Sehr geehrte Damen und Herren Abgeordnete,

    zu meinem dritten Punkt für unseren Mittelstand und unsere Industrie.

    Unabhängig davon, ob wir über maßgeschneiderte Chips für die virtuelle Realität sprechen oder über Speicherzellen für Solaranlagen – der Zugang zu Rohstoffen ist entscheidend für den Erfolg unserer Transformation hin zu einer nachhaltigen und digitalen Wirtschaft.

    Lithium und seltene Erden werden bald wichtiger sein als Öl und Gas.

    Allein unser Bedarf an seltenen Erden wird sich bis 2030 verfünffachen.

    Und das ist ein gutes Zeichen!

    Denn es zeigt, mit welchem Tempo unser Europäischer Green Deal vorankommt.

    Das Problem ist nur, dass derzeit ein einziges Land fast den kompletten Markt beherrscht.

    Wir müssen vermeiden erneut in Abhängigkeit zu geraten wie bei Öl und Gas.

    An diesem Punkt kommt unsere Handelspolitik ins Spiel.

    Neue Partnerschaften helfen uns, nicht nur unsere Wirtschaft zu stärken, sondern auch unsere Interessen und unsere Werte global voranzubringen.

    Mit gleichgesinnten Partnern können wir auch außerhalb unserer Grenzen Arbeitsstandards und Umweltstandards sichern.

    Wir müssen vor allem unsere Beziehungen zu diesen Partnern und zu wichtigen Wachstumsregionen erneuern.

    Ich werde daher die Abkommen mit Chile, Mexiko und Neuseeland zur Ratifizierung vorlegen.

    Und wir treiben die Verhandlungen mit bedeutenden Partnern wie Australien und Indien voran.

    But securing supplies is only a first step.

    The processing of these metals is just as critical.

    Today, China controls the global processing industry. Almost 90 % of rare earths and 60 % of lithium are processed in China.

    We will identify strategic projects all along the supply chain, from extraction to refining, from processing to recycling. And we will build up strategic reserves where supply is at risk.

    This is why today I am announcing a European Critical Raw Materials Act.

    We know this approach can work.

    Five years ago, Europe launched the Battery Alliance. And soon, two third of the batteries we need will be produced in Europe.

    Last year I announced the European Chips Act. And the first chips gigafactory will break ground in the coming months.

    We now need to replicate this success.

    This is also why we will increase our financial participation to Important Projects of Common European Interest.

    And for the future, I will push to create a new European Sovereignty Fund.

    Let’s make sure that the future of industry is made in Europe.

    STANDING UP FOR OUR DEMOCRACY

    Honourable Members,

    As we look around at the state of the world today, it can often feel like there is a fading away of what once seemed so permanent.

    And in some way, the passing of Queen Elizabeth II last week reminded us of this.

    She is a legend!

    She was a constant throughout the turbulent and transforming events in the last 70 years.

    Stoic and steadfast in her service.

    But more than anything, she always found the right words for every moment in time.

    From the calls she made to war evacuees in 1940 to her historic address during the pandemic.

    She spoke not only to the heart of her nation but to the soul of the world.

    And when I think of the situation we are in today, her words at the height of the pandemic still resonate with me.

    She said: “We will succeed – and that success will belong to every one of us”.

    She always reminded us that our future is built on new ideas and founded in our oldest values.

    Since the end of World War 2, we have pursued the promise of democracy and the rule of law.

    And the nations of the world have built together an international system promoting peace and security, justice and economic progress.

    Today this is the very target of Russian missiles.

    What we saw in the streets of Bucha, in the scorched fields of grain, and now at the gates of Ukraine’s largest nuclear plant – is not only a violation of international rules.

    It’s a deliberate attempt to discard them.

    This watershed moment in global politics calls for a rethink of our foreign policy agenda.

    This is the time to invest in the power of democracies.

    This work begins with the core group of our like-minded partners: our friends in every single democratic nation on this globe.

    We see the world with the same eyes. And we should mobilise our collective power to shape global goods.

    We should strive to expand this core of democracies. The most immediate way to do so is to deepen our ties and strengthen democracies on our continent.

    This starts with those countries that are already on the path to our Union.

    We must be at their side every step of the way.

    Because the path towards strong democracies and the path towards our Union are one and the same.

    So I want the people of the Western Balkans, of Ukraine, Moldova and Georgia to know:

    You are part of our family, your future is in our Union, and our Union is not complete without you!

    We have also seen that there is a need to reach out to the countries of Europe – beyond the accession process.

    This is why I support the call for a European Political Community – and we will set out our ideas to the European Council.

    But our future also depends on our ability to engage beyond the core of our democratic partners.

    Countries near and far, share an interest in working with us on the great challenges of this century, such as climate change and digitalisation.

    This is the main idea behind Global Gateway, the investment plan I announced right here one year ago.

    It is already delivering on the ground.

    Together with our African partners we are building two factories in Rwanda and Senegal to manufacture mRNA vaccines.

    They will be made in Africa, for Africa, with world-class technology.

    And we are now replicating this approach across Latin America as part of a larger engagement strategy.

    This requires investment on a global scale.

    So we will team up with our friends in the US and with other G7 partners to make this happen.

    In this spirit, President Biden and I will convene a leaders’ meeting to review and announce implementation projects.

    Honourable Members,

    This is part of our work of strengthening our democracies.

    But we should not lose sight of the way foreign autocrats are targeting our own countries.

    Foreign entities are funding institutes that undermine our values.

    Their disinformation is spreading from the internet to the halls of our universities.

    Earlier this year, a university in Amsterdam shut down an allegedly independent research centre, which was actually funded by Chinese entities. This centre was publishing so-called research on human rights, dismissing the evidence of forced labour camps for Uyghurs as “rumours”.

    These lies are toxic for our democracies.

    Think about this: We introduced legislation to screen foreign direct investment in our companies for security concerns.

    If we do that for our economy, shouldn’t we do the same for our values?

    We need to better shield ourselves from malign interference.

    This is why we will present a Defence of Democracy package.

    It will bring covert foreign influence and shady funding to light.

    We will not allow any autocracy’s Trojan horses to attack our democracies from within.

    For more than 70 years, our continent has marched towards democracy. But the gains of our long journey are not assured.

    Many of us have taken democracy for granted for too long. Especially those, like me, who have never experienced what it means to live under the fist of an authoritarian regime.

    Today we all see that we must fight for our democracies. Every single day.

    We must protect them both from the external threats they face, and from the vices that corrode them from within.

    It is my Commission’s duty and most noble role to protect the rule of law.

    So let me assure you: we will keep insisting on judicial independence.

    And we will also protect our budget through the conditionality mechanism.

    And today I would like to focus on corruption, with all its faces. The face of foreign agents trying to influence our political system. The face of shady companies or foundations abusing public money.

    If we want to be credible when we ask candidate countries to strengthen their democracies, we must also eradicate corruption at home.

    That is why in the coming year the Commission will present measures to update our legislative framework for fighting corruption.

    We will raise standards on offences such as illicit enrichment, trafficking in influence and abuse of power, beyond the more classic offences such as bribery.

    And we will also propose to include corruption in our human rights sanction regime, our new tool to protect our values abroad.

    Corruption erodes trust in our institutions. So we must fight back with the full force of the law.

    Honourable Members,

    Our founders only meant to lay the first stone of this democracy.

    They always thought that future generations would complete their work.

    “Democracy has not gone out of fashion, but it must update itself in order to keep improving people’s lives.”

    These are the words of David Sassoli – a great European, who we all pay tribute to today.

    David Sassoli thought that Europe should always look for new horizons.

    And through the adversities of these times, we have started to see what our new horizon might be.

    A braver Union.

    Closer to its people in times of need.

    Bolder in responding to historic challenges and daily concerns of Europeans. And to walk at their side when they deal with the big trials of life.

    This is why the Conference on the Future of Europe was so important.

    It was a sneak peek of a different kind of citizens’ engagement, well beyond election day.

    And after Europe listened to its citizens’ voice, we now need to deliver.

    The Citizens’ Panels that were central to the Conference will now become a regular feature of our democratic life.

    And in the Letter of Intent that I have sent today to President Metsola and Prime Minister Fiala, I have outlined a number of proposals for the year ahead that stem from the Conference conclusions.

    They include for example a new initiative on mental health.

    We should take better care of each other. And for many who feel anxious and lost, appropriate, accessible and affordable support can make all the difference.

    Honourable Members,

    Democratic institutions must constantly gain and regain the citizens’ trust.

    We must live up to the new challenges that history always puts before us.

    Just like Europeans did when millions of Ukrainians came knocking on their door.

    This is Europe at its best.

    A Union of determination and solidarity.

    But this determination and drive for solidarity is still missing in our migration debate.

    Our actions towards Ukrainian refugees must not be an exception. They can be our blueprint for going forward.

    We need fair and quick procedures, a system that is crisis proof and quick to deploy, and a permanent and legally binding mechanism that ensures solidarity.

    And at the same time, we need effective control of our external borders, in line with the respect of fundamental rights.

    I want a Europe that manages migration with dignity and respect.

    I want a Europe where all Member States take responsibility for challenges we all share.

    And I want a Europe that shows solidarity to all Member States.

    We have progress on the Pact, we now have the Roadmap. And we now need the political will to match.

    Honourable Members,

    Three weeks ago, I had the incredible opportunity of joining 1,500 young people from all over Europe and the world, who gathered in Taizé.

    They have different views, they come from different countries, they have different backgrounds, they speak different languages.

    And yet, there is something that connects them.

    They share a set of values and ideals.

    They believe in these values.

    They are all passionate about something larger than themselves.

    This generation is a generation of dreamers but also of makers.

    In my last State of the Union address, I told you that I would like Europe to look more like these young people.

    We should put their aspirations at the heart of everything we do.

    And the place for this is in our founding Treaties.

    Every action that our Union takes should be inspired by a simple principle.

    That we should do no harm to our children’s future.

    That we should leave the world a better place for the next generation.

    And therefore, Honourable Members, I believe that it is time to enshrine solidarity between generations in our Treaties.

    It is time to renew the European promise.

    And we also need to improve the way we do things and the way we decide things.

    Some might say this is not the right time. But if we are serious about preparing for the world of tomorrow we must be able to act on the things that matter the most to people.

    And as we are serious about a larger union, we also have to be serious about reform.

    So as this Parliament has called for, I believe the moment has arrived for a European Convention.

    CONCLUSION

    Honourable Members,

    They say that light shines brightest in the dark.

    And that was certainly true for the women and the children fleeing Russia’s bombs.

    They fled a country at war, filled with sadness for what they had left behind, and fear for what may lie ahead.

    But they were received with open arms. By many citizens like Magdalena and Agnieszka. Two selfless young women from Poland.

    As soon as they heard about trains full of refugees, they rushed to the Warsaw Central Station.

    They started to organise.

    They set up a tent to assist as many people as possible.

    They reached out to supermarket chains for food, and to local authorities to organise buses to hospitality centres.

    In a matter of days, they gathered 3000 volunteers, to welcome refugees 24/7.

    Honourable Members,

    Magdalena and Agnieszka are here with us today.

    Please join me in applauding them and each and every European who opened their hearts and their homes.

    Their story is about everything our Union stands and strives for.

    It is a story of heart, character and solidarity.

    They showed everyone what Europeans can achieve when we rally around a common mission.

    This is Europe’s spirit.

    A Union that stands strong together.

    A Union that prevails together.

    Long live Europe.

  • Ursula von der Leyen – 2022 Statement on Energy

    Ursula von der Leyen – 2022 Statement on Energy

    The statement made by Ursula von der Leyen, the President of the European Commission, on 7 September 2022.

    We are facing an extraordinary situation, not only because Russia is an unreliable supplier, as we have witnessed over the last days, weeks, months, but also because Russia is actively manipulating the gas market. I am deeply convinced that with our unity, our determination, our solidarity, we will prevail. And we have, over the last six months, during this war, very much increased our preparedness and we have weakened the grip that Russia had on our economy and our continent. We have done three things, as you recall: The first one was demand reduction. Demand reduction, so save gas in order to save it in the storage. We have created a joint storage, and this is really a success story, because now we are already at 82% with the joint storage in Europe. As you know, our goal was to reach 80% at the end of October. So we overshoot it, and that is good.

    The second step that we have taken was: Diversify away from Russian fossil fuels. And you know that we have stopped the import of Russian coal. We are winding down the Russian oil. And we have been working very hard to diversify away from Russia towards other reliable suppliers, like for example the United States or Norway, Azerbaijan, Algeria and others. Actually today, Norway is delivering more gas to the European Union than Russia. And we were able, if you look at the cuts that Russia has done in gas, to completely compensate so far the gas imports through other reliable suppliers.

    And of course, the third step is the most important one. This is massive investments in renewables. We have REPowerEU on the table. The renewables are cheap, they are home-grown, they make us independent. We will deploy renewables this year that are an equivalent to round about 8 billion cubic metres. So the renewables are really our energy insurance for the future.

    But we also see that the Russian manipulation of the gas market has spillover effects on the electricity market. So there is, on the one hand, the Russian manipulation, but there are also other factors during this summer. We see the effects of climate change. We see the drought. Hydropower has been reduced by 26% in the European Union, and by 46% in Portugal. And we have the fact that we have less nuclear electricity in the European Union at the moment being. And this is the reason why we are now confronted with astronomic electricity prices for households and companies, and with an enormous market volatility. Therefore, we will put forward a set of five different immediate measures.

    The first one is smart savings of electricity. What has changed over the summer, because of the elements I was just mentioning, is that we see that there is a global scarcity of energy. So whatever we do, one thing is for sure: We have to save electricity, but we have to save it in a smart way. If you look at the costs of electricity, there are peak demands. And this is what is expensive, because, in these peak demands, the expensive gas comes into the market. So what we have to do is to flatten the curve and avoid the peak demands. We will propose a mandatory target for reducing electricity use at peak hours. And we will work very closely with the Member States to achieve this.

    The second measure: We will propose a cap on the revenues of companies that are producing electricity with low costs. The low-carbon energy sources are making in these times – because they have low costs but they have high prices on the market – enormous revenues. Revenues they never calculated with; revenues they never dreamt of; and revenues they cannot reinvest to that extent. These revenues do not reflect their production costs. So, it is now time for the consumers to benefit from the low costs of low-carbon energy sources like, for example, the renewables. We will propose to re-channel these unexpected profits to the Member States so that the Member States can support the vulnerable households and vulnerable companies.

    The third measure is that the same goes, of course, for the unexpected profits of fossil fuel companies. Oil and gas companies have also made massive profits. Therefore, we will propose that there is a solidarity contribution for fossil fuel companies. Because all energy sources must help to overcome this crisis. Member States should invest these revenues to, as I said, support vulnerable households and vulnerable companies, but also to invest them in clean home-grown energy sources, as the renewables are, for example.

    The fourth point is addressing the energy utility companies that must be supported to be able to cope with the volatility of the markets. Here, it is a problem of securing futures markets. And for that, liquidity is needed. These companies are currently being requested to provide unexpected large amounts of funds now, which threatens their capacity not only to trade, but also the stability of the futures markets. It is a liquidity problem. Therefore, we will help to facilitate the liquidity support by Member States for energy companies. We will update our temporary framework and enable thus state guarantees to be delivered rapidly.

    The fifth and the last point: We aim at lowering the costs of gas. Therefore, we will propose a price cap on Russian gas. Of course, the objective is here very clear. We all know that our sanctions are deeply grinding into the Russian economy, with a heavy negative impact. But Putin is partially buffering through fossil fuel revenues. So here, the objective is: We must cut Russia’s revenues, which Putin uses to finance his atrocious war in Ukraine. And now our work of the last months really pays off. Because, at the beginning of the war, if you looked at the imported gas, 40% of it was Russian gas, since a long time. Today, we are down to 9% only.

    So these are the five measures that we will discuss with the Member States at the informal Energy Ministers Council on Friday. These are tough times, and they will not be over soon. But I am deeply convinced that, if we show the solidary, the unity and we have the determination for that, we have the economic strength, we have the political will, that then we shall overcome.

  • Chris MacManus – 2022 Comments on Need for Brussels Belfast Engagement

    Chris MacManus – 2022 Comments on Need for Brussels Belfast Engagement

    The comments made by Chris MacManus, the Sinn Fein MEP for Midlands Northwest in The Republic of Ireland on 9 September 2022.

    I welcome the opportunity to engage with our MLA colleagues at this roundtable event. However, I do not believe it should be up to individual MEPs or political groups to organise such events. This should be an ongoing formal engagement.

    Today we have had, what were on occasions, frank exchanges between MEPs and MLAs from across the political spectrum. These exchanges were healthy and productive, that is why I believe it is important that the European Parliament and the Assembly formalise engagements such as this and that we have direct dialogue between the elected representatives of both institutions.

    I consider this to be both a practical and crucial step we can and should take, as EU legislation can often have an impact for the north of Ireland, therefore it is important elected representatives from the north and other sectoral interests are heard in the drafting of any such legislation.

    It is also worth noting that the Assembly itself has sought mechanisms for direct dialogue in the past and that the European Parliament agreed to this. Indeed, Vice President of the European Commission Maroš Šefčovič referred to such a concept in his non-papers. It is now time to make formal those assurances.