Category: Coronavirus

  • Ed Miliband – 2020 Comments about Loans to Businesses in Difficulty

    Ed Miliband – 2020 Comments about Loans to Businesses in Difficulty

    The comments made by Ed Miliband, the Shadow Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy Secretary, on 30 July 2020.

    Any help in breaking down the obstacles to loans is welcome but this has all taken far too long with too many businesses left out in the cold. Time will tell whether this sorts out the growing backlog of CBILs loans.

    There also remain serious, unaddressed problems of loans for larger firms, CBILs, and growing evidence of firms being shut out of bounce back loans unless they are an existing customer of a major high street bank.

    Every week that passes with these problems being allowed to continue puts at risk the future of businesses, the livelihoods of workers and the strength of our economy.

  • Jonathan Ashworth – 2020 Comments on Latest ONS Statistics of Excess Deaths

    Jonathan Ashworth – 2020 Comments on Latest ONS Statistics of Excess Deaths

    Comments made by Jonathan Ashworth, the Shadow Health and Social Care Secretary, on 30 July 2020.

    The official confirmation today that England has had the highest level of excess deaths in Europe is a devastating moment.

    Every life lost is a tragedy and leaves behind grieving families. We can no longer hide from the fact the Government has not handled this crisis well and needs to urgently learn lessons from its mistakes.

    Boris Johnson must now take responsibility for why we were so badly prepared. As we start to see a resurgence in other parts of the world, ministers need to urgently outline the steps they are taking to better protect people and save lives in the months ahead.

  • Marsha de Cordova – 2020 Comments on Virus and Ethnicity

    Marsha de Cordova – 2020 Comments on Virus and Ethnicity

    Comments made by Marsha de Cordova, the Shadow Secretary of State for Women and Equalities, on 29 July 2020.

    Of course further research is always welcome and will provide an evidence base, but we all know this should have started months ago.

    Given the Government’s poor track record on taking action, let’s hope this time the findings translate into real change.

  • Nick Thomas-Symonds – 2020 Comments on Contingency Plans for those Returning from Spain

    Nick Thomas-Symonds – 2020 Comments on Contingency Plans for those Returning from Spain

    Text of the comments made by Nick Thomas-Symonds, the Shadow Home Secretary, on 27 July 2020.

    Labour has made clear that it supports evidence-based protective measures at the border.

    We have long called for all the scientific evidence to be made public and for a ramped-up track trace and isolate system to be in place so as to avoid the need for the blunt tool of 14-day quarantine.

    The Government’s policy regarding travel restrictions has lacked grip and coherence from the outset.

    This latest decision-making process regarding Spain and the short-notice for travellers has created a sense of panic and loss of control.

    The Government should have proper contingency plans to support people coming home where there is no guarantee their employers will allow them 14 days of work flexibility.

    And it is high time that a sector-specific deal for aviation is introduced as quarantine measures continue to affect the travel industry.”

  • Nick Thomas-Symonds – 2020 Comments on Quarantining Tourists Returning from Spain

    Nick Thomas-Symonds – 2020 Comments on Quarantining Tourists Returning from Spain

    The comments made by Nick Thomas-Symonds, the Shadow Home Secretary, on 25 July 2020.

    The news will be deeply concerning for families who are in caught Spain or are planning travel – the Government needs to come forward now with full details of how people affected will be supported.

  • Matt Hancock – 2020 Comments on Blackburn

    Matt Hancock – 2020 Comments on Blackburn

    Text of the comments made by Matt Hancock, the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, on 24 July 2020.

    Blackburn with Darwen and Luton councils are doing excellent work with their local communities to address an increase in coronavirus cases and we continue to work collectively with them. Strong community engagement, major boosts in testing and increased support are already underway to manage outbreaks in these areas.

    The latest data shows the incidence of COVID-19 in these areas is higher than in other areas of the country, and we have today agreed to support both local authorities to pause the further easement of lockdown measures in these areas. This means indoor gyms, swimming pools and other sport and exercise facilities will not reopen in Luton or Blackburn with Darwen on 25 July.

    I appreciate this will be disappointing for many people and some businesses in the area but we are in complete agreement with local leaders that the priority must be to protect local residents by stopping the spread of this virus.

    I have every faith in the local leaders’ ability to help their areas return to normal as soon as possible and in local communities coming together during this time.

  • Matt Hancock – 2020 Statement on Leicester

    Matt Hancock – 2020 Statement on Leicester

    The text of the comments made by Matt Hancock, the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, on 16 July 2020.

    Mr Speaker, with permission, I would like to make a statement on our action against coronavirus and the decisions we’ve been taking throughout the day today to determine what we need in Leicester.

    We continue our determined fight against this invisible killer.

    The number of new cases yesterday was 642, lower than when lockdown began.

    And according to the latest figures, the number of deaths in all settings is down to 66.

    We are successfully turning the tide.

    And part of this success lies in our ability to take action locally, whenever we see it flare up.

    Often this is on a very small scale – swiftly and quietly – like in an individual farm or a factory.

    But when needed, we also act on a broader basis, as we have done in Leicester.

    And today I wanted to update the House on the situation in Leicester.

    At the end of June we made the decision to close schools and non-essential retail in the city, and not to introduce the relaxations that applied elsewhere from 4 July, like the reopening of pubs.

    This was not an easy decision, but it was one that we had to take.

    At that point, the 7-day infection rate in Leicester was 135 cases per 100,000 people, which was 3 times higher than the next highest city.

    And Leicester was accounting for 10% of all positive cases in the country.

    This decision was taken with the agreement of all local leaders.

    And I am grateful to the leader and officers of Leicestershire County Council, and to the officers of Leicester City Council, for their support and hard work.

    Since then, we’ve doubled testing.

    And through a monumental programme of communications and community engagement, we’ve been pushing our important messages.

    I committed to reviewing the measures in Leicester every 2 weeks.

    This morning I chaired a Gold meeting of the Local Action Committee to discuss the latest situation.

    And this afternoon, I held a further meeting with local leaders, Public Health England, the JBC, the local resilience forum, and my clinical advisers.

    The latest data show that the 7-day infection rate in Leicester is now 119 cases per 100,000 people, and that the percentage of people who have tested positive is now at 4.8%.

    These are positive indicators, especially in light of the huge increase in testing in the local area.

    But they still remain well above the national average, and the average for surrounding areas.

    Thanks to the incredible efforts of people of Leicester, who have followed the lockdown, even while others have had their freedom relaxed, we are now in a position to relax some, but not all, of the restrictions that were in place.

    So, from 24 July we’ll be removing the restrictions on schools and early years childcare and taking a more targeted approach to the restrictions on non-essential retail.

    Replacing the national decision to close non-essential retail with a local power to close them where necessary. This is all part of our more targeted approach.

    However, other restrictions, like those for travel and only having social gatherings of up to 6 people, for example, will remain in force.

    And measures introduced on 4 July, like re-opening the hospitality sector, will also not yet apply.

    The initial definition of the geography covered by the lockdown was a decision I delegated to Leicestershire County Council, and they made and published.

    The Leader of Leicestershire County Council, Nicholas Rushton, has advised me, based on the data and the best public health advice, that he recommends these restrictions now apply only to the Oadby and Wigston area of Leicestershire, as well as the City of Leicester itself.

    And I have accepted his advice.

    Some say that the local lockdown is unnecessary. I wish this were true.

    But sadly it remains vital for the health of everyone in Leicester, and the rest of the country, that these restrictions stay in place.

    We will review them again in a fortnight.

    I hope that this careful easing of restrictions will provide some comfort to people in Leicester and Leicestershire.

    And I’d say this directly to the people of Leicester and Leicestershire – I’d like to pay tribute to you all.

    Your perseverance and your hard work has brought real and tangible results.

    And you have shown respect for one another.

    I understand this hasn’t been easy.

    Strong representations have been made to me by my honourable friends, the members for Charnwood, Harborough and South Leicestershire and for the members opposite who represent the city of Leicester, on behalf of constituents who have been impacted, and constituents who wanted to see the lockdown lifted too.

    However, there is still a lot to do. And the public health messages remain critical.

    So please get a test if you have symptoms.

    Keep following the rules that are in place.

    Please do not lose your resolve.

    Because the sooner we get this virus under control, the sooner we can restore life in Leicester, and across the country, to normal.

    Mr Speaker, this statement also gives me the opportunity to inform the House of an issue relating to testing.

    We have identified some swabs that are not up to the usual high standard that we expect, and we will be carrying out further testing of this batch.

    As a precautionary measure and while we investigate further, we are requesting that the use of these Randox swab test kits are paused in all settings until further notice.

    This problem was brought to my attention yesterday afternoon. We contacted settings using these swabs last night, and published the pause notice immediately.

    Clinical advice is that there is no evidence of any harm.

    Those test results are not affected.

    There is no evidence of issues with any of our other tests swabs.

    And there is no impact on access to testing.

    Mr Speaker, our ability to take action on this local level is the keystone of our plan to defeat coronavirus.

    So we can keep this virus on the run and defeat it once and for all.

    I’m grateful to you for allowing me to make this statement at this time and I commend this statement to the House.

  • Justin Madders – 2020 Comments on Wearing Face Masks

    Justin Madders – 2020 Comments on Wearing Face Masks

    The text of the comments made by Justin Madders, the Shadow Health Minister, on 15 July 2020.

    This is just hopeless. We have had mixed messages from Government all week and it seems that once again they are making it up as they go along.

    We need clear and consistent messages about when the wearing of a face-covering will be compulsory not attempts at redefining what a shop is.

    Public safety and confidence are key to preventing a second wave and the Government need to raise their game in ensuring that everyone knows when the wearing of a mask is required.

  • Martyn Day – 2020 Speech on the Coronavirus

    Martyn Day – 2020 Speech on the Coronavirus

    The text of the speech made by Martyn Day, the SNP MP for Linlithgow and East Falkirk, in the House of Commons on 14 July 2020.

    I thank the Secretary of State for his statement; it represents a welcome step towards preparing for any potential new second wave of coronavirus infections this winter. The virus has not been eliminated, so as we lift lockdown and people increasingly interact with one another, we need to use every tool we have to reduce the risk of a second wave.

    A report commissioned by the UK chief scientific adviser, Sir Patrick Vallance, has concluded that July and August must be a period of intense preparation for a potential winter resurgence of the virus, with R potentially rising to 1.7 by September. The report’s worst-case scenario forewarns of an estimated 119,000 associated hospital deaths between September and June—more than double the deaths we saw during the spring wave. This outcome, of course, does not take any account of likely actions that the Government may take. I sincerely hope that an elimination strategy is adopted as part of that.

    The move to compulsory face coverings is a welcome and helpful intervention, but I am in no doubt that effective uptake will require consistent and effective public messaging. So far, we had the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster saying on Sunday that face coverings should not be mandatory, the Justice Secretary saying that they perhaps should be, the Prime Minister saying that he is looking at the evidence and, thankfully, the Health Secretary today saying they will be mandatory. Will he confirm the implementation date? Press speculation has suggested 24 July. When the head of the World Health Organisation said yesterday that mixed messaging from leaders is one of the worst challenges in tackling covid-19, who do we think he had in mind?

    The chair of the British Medical Association said that

    “each day that goes by adds to the risk of spread and endangers lives.”

    While I welcome the UK Government’s falling into line with Scotland and 120 other countries worldwide on mandatory face coverings, they need to be one component of a wider elimination strategy, not just about keeping the virus down. I hope the Secretary of State will take this opportunity to commit to an elimination strategy.

  • Jonathan Ashworth – 2020 Speech on the Coronavirus

    Jonathan Ashworth – 2020 Speech on the Coronavirus

    The text of the speech made by Jonathan Ashworth, the Shadow Secretary of Health and Social Care, in the House of Commons on 14 July 2020.

    I thank the Secretary of State for his statement. After days of ministerial muddle, we finally have a decision. I have long warned that this virus exploits ambiguity and that mixed messaging in a pandemic is so damaging. On Friday, we had the Prime Minister saying he favoured face masks. On Sunday, we had the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster saying he did not favour face masks. Yesterday, the Justice Secretary, unsure what to say, had to say in the end he was perhaps in favour of face masks.

    It did not have to be this way: we did not have to have this confusion. We have long known about airborne transmission via aerosols. The Secretary of State has long warned about asymptomatic transmission. The Royal Society and the World Health Organisation have long recommended wearing face masks. Even Donald Trump now wears a face mask, although admittedly it is because someone told him he looks like the Lone Ranger. The former Chair of the Health Committee has long warned about wearing a face mask. The Secretary of State’s own advice, published on 11 May, advised in favour of wearing face masks. So why has it taken two months for him to make this advice mandatory, and why will it take another 11 days for the measure to come into force? The World Health Organisation has said throughout this pandemic, “Act with speed”, but yet again this Government appear to be in the slow lane.

    All we need and want is clarity, so may we have it in other areas? What now is the position on workers returning to offices? Do the Government want them to return to offices, yes or no? Will the Health Secretary offer greater clarity to the people of Leicester, who are now in the 17th week of lockdown in my city? What metrics will be used to judge whether Leicester can ease out lockdown later this week? When will he make that decision? How will he communicate that decision to the people of Leicester? Will he clarify why the Under-Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, the hon. Member for Stratford-on-Avon (Nadhim Zahawi), has ruled out extra support for Leicester businesses and employers, contradicting the indications that the Health Secretary gave to the people of Leicester? When people are worried about their jobs this mixed messaging is the last thing they need.

    On the other parts of the country that have been identified as being of concern, will the Secretary of State instruct the Health and Safety Executive to inspect all factories, meat packing plants, distribution centres and large employment sites as a matter of urgency?

    On testing, local authorities still need specific data that can facilitate action. [Interruption.] The Health Secretary disagrees, but they still need person-identifiable data, not just postcodes. They need not just positive test results, but the negative results, so that they can understand the overall infection prevalence, and they need contact tracing data, so that they know who has been asked to isolate by Test and Trace and can follow them up. They need this data daily. The virus does not wait a week, so why should local directors of public health have to wait a week? I note that in the financial statement £10 billion has been allocated to Test and Trace. Can the Health Secretary itemise what that £10 billion has been spent on? Can he rule out spending more on private outsourced companies, and invest more in NHS labs and testing instead?

    Finally, today we have a report from the Academy of Medical Sciences warning of a new wave of infection this winter. The Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies has also warned that the transmission of the virus

    “could be elevated under UK winter conditions”.

    Yet missing from last week’s financial statement was any increase in NHS England’s revenue budget. Instead we have a mooted NHS reorganisation, with suggestions that Public Health England could be abolished and speculation that a new centre for disease control could be set up in its place instead. NHS staff need certainty, now more than ever, so will he ensure that the NHS and the social care sector get the winter funding they need to prepare for a second wave? People want to do the right thing. Muddled messaging hinders that. As George Osborne said yesterday, people just “want answers”. Can the Health Secretary give our constituents answers today?