Author: admin

  • PRESS RELEASE : IFR regime to shut out rogue owners and promote sound investment in football [September 2025]

    PRESS RELEASE : IFR regime to shut out rogue owners and promote sound investment in football [September 2025]

    The press release issued by the Department for Culture, Media and Sport on 4 September 2025.

    The Independent Football Regulator (IFR) has today set out plans to raise the bar on owners and directors of football clubs, as it launches its proposed Owners, Directors and Senior Executives (ODSE) test.

    • IFR publishes plans for new Owners, Directors and Senior Executives regime
    • Test will raise standards and give powers to take action when owners or directors fail to meet new requirements
    • ODSE proposals published alongside information gathering, enforcement and sanctions guidance

    The new regime will assess the honesty, integrity and financial soundness of those who want to own or run a football club, ensuring they have the necessary skills and experience to do so. It will promote responsible ownership and protect the financial health of the 116 regulated football clubs, and is the first element of the new IFR regime to be consulted on.

    The rules that will determine whether prospective owners, directors and senior executives are fit and proper have been significantly tightened, while the criteria used to protect against illicit finance and criminal funding entering football have also been widened.

    Incumbent owners, directors and senior executives will not need to apply for approval. Good owners, running clubs effectively, will experience minimal impact. However, if the IFR has concerns about the suitability of an incumbent, it will be able to take action.

    Under the new rules, the IFR will be able to go further and undertake greater due diligence and checks compared to those currently run by competition organisers. For example, the IFR will be able to consider domestic and international cases in applying its test and be able to check with banks where funds may be held, as well as with law enforcement agencies and other regulatory bodies.

    At the same time, the IFR is also consulting on how it will use its powers to determine a prospective owner or director’s ability to finance their purchase of a club as well as their intent and strategy.

    The ODSE proposals are part of a series of key consultations being launched today, which also include proposals on the IFR’s Information Gathering, Enforcement and Sanctions powers. These powers will be essential to allowing the IFR to enforce its rules efficiently and uphold standards across the game.

    The law gives the IFR the power to hold clubs and individuals to account as and when needed — from financial penalties, and public censure, to requiring an owner to divest from a club. These powers will be used proportionately, in accordance with the IFR’s statutory duties, and with an understanding of the importance of owner investment and risk-taking in English football.

    The IFR will work collaboratively with clubs to prevent issues occurring. Powers will be used if necessary, to incentivise clubs and individuals to comply and to make sure the IFR can act swiftly and fairly when rules are not followed.

    Members of the public, fan groups, clubs, competition organisers and related businesses are all invited to participate in the consultation and share their views, which will run until Monday 6 October.

    The IFR will publish its response to these consultations later this year, with the regime expected to go live as soon as possible.

  • NEWS STORY : Government Reshuffle Following Rayner’s Resignation

    NEWS STORY : Government Reshuffle Following Rayner’s Resignation

    STORY

    Following the resignation of Angela Rayner, Keir Starmer has appointed David Lammy as the new Deputy Prime Minister, with Yvette Cooper moving to the Foreign Office and Shabana Mahmood becoming Home Secretary. Steve Reed becomes the new Housing Secretary, with further appointments expected later today.

  • NEWS STORY : Nadine Dorries Defects to Reform UK Declaring “The Tory Party is Dead”

    NEWS STORY : Nadine Dorries Defects to Reform UK Declaring “The Tory Party is Dead”

    STORY

    In a dramatic turn of events on the eve of Reform UK’s annual conference in Birmingham, former Conservative MP and ex-Culture Secretary Nadine Dorries has officially joined the insurgent party led by Nigel Farage. She delivered a stark verdict on her former party, declaring that “the Tory Party is dead.” Dorries, who represented Mid Bedfordshire from 2005 until her resignation in 2023, said the decision to defect was made after “12 agonising months” of soul-searching. In her column for the Daily Mail, she said the Conservative Party has changed, not her core beliefs, and that only Nigel Farage has, in her words, “the answers, the knowledge and the will to deliver.”

    Her announcement lands as a significant boost to Reform UK, which is currently riding high in the polls. Dorries is slated to deliver the opening speech at the party’s two-day conference, signalling immediate integration into their campaign efforts. Reform UK leader Nigel Farage warmly welcomed her, praising her experience as both a politician and broadcaster, and describing her arrival as a “great boost” to the party.

  • PRESS RELEASE : Homes England signs Strategic Place Partnership with York and North Yorkshire Combined Authority to accelerate placemaking in the region [September 2025]

    PRESS RELEASE : Homes England signs Strategic Place Partnership with York and North Yorkshire Combined Authority to accelerate placemaking in the region [September 2025]

    The press release issued by Homes England on 3 September 2025.

    New partnership seeks to scale up existing collaborative working to unlock significant housing and regeneration plans for the area.

    Homes England, the government’s housing and regeneration agency, and York and North Yorkshire Combined Authority (YNYCA) have today signed a Strategic Place Partnership (SPP) to catalyse the delivery of the region’s ambitious housing and regeneration goals.

    The partnership formalises the alignment of YNYCA’s strategic priorities with the broad range of Homes England’s tools, including funding, capacity and expertise. Teams from YNYCA and Homes England will work together to unlock significant housing and regeneration plans in the area, boosting local placemaking ambitions through partnership working.

    As well as bringing forward a new way of working for housing delivery in the region, the SPP will build on the collaboration already happening on projects like York Central, one of the country’s largest city centre regeneration sites with the potential for up to 2,500 new homes.

    The partnership will be underpinned by the development of a shared business plan aligned to local priorities and focused on a range of developments across the area including Maltkiln and Elvington Garden Village.

    Through the SPP, Homes England will work collaboratively with YNYCA to boost the availability of new and affordable homes for York and North Yorkshire residents.

    Homes England now has nine Strategic Place Partnerships in place with Mayoral Strategic Authorities across England.

    Pat Ritchie CBE, Chair of Homes England, said:

    Our Strategic Place Partnership with the York and North Yorkshire Combined Authority signals our commitment to working with, and for, local leaders to drive real growth in their communities.

    In York, for example, we are already working with partners including Network Rail, the City of York Council and the National Railway Museum to drive forward the transformation of York Central, one of the UK’s largest brownfield sites, into new homes, cultural spaces and infrastructure.

    David Skaith, Mayor of York and North Yorkshire Combined Authority, said:

    Across York and North Yorkshire, we are in the midst of a housing crisis, with some of the most expensive homes in the UK. With over 10,000 households on housing waiting lists in our region, we must act now.

    We need to build the right homes in the right places, ensuring people in all our towns, cities and villages can stay and live in our region.

    Bringing together Homes England, our councils and key organisations through the York and North Yorkshire Strategic Place Partnership will help us all deliver on our shared vision to get building.

    As we work towards the government’s target of 1.5 million new homes this parliament, partnerships like this will be crucial in ensuring we deliver the right homes in the right places, in this case by supporting both urban regeneration and rural advancement across York and North Yorkshire.

    Notes to editors:

    1. The strengthened relationship between Homes England and the Mayoral Combined Authority follows the publication of the government’s English Devolution White Paper in December 2024, which details the plan to empower local leaders and deepen devolution across England.
    2. The white paper highlights Homes England’s work on SPPs and the important part they play in devolution.
  • NEWS STORY : Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner Admits Underpaying Stamp Duty on Hove Flat

    NEWS STORY : Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner Admits Underpaying Stamp Duty on Hove Flat

    STORY

    Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner has admitted to underpaying stamp duty on a second-flat—purchasing an £800,000 property in Hove and paying the standard rate rather than the surcharge reserved for additional residences.

    Rayner, who also serves as Housing Secretary, acknowledged the error today. She explained that she had relied on legal advice suggesting she was liable only for the standard stamp duty rate when she bought the Hove flat in May 2025, because at the time she had transferred her stake in her Greater Manchester home into a trust. However, further counsel revealed that the trust’s provisions meant she—or her children—could still benefit from the Greater Manchester property, meaning the Hove flat should have been classified as a second home, triggering the higher stamp duty of up to around £70,000 rather than the approximately £30,000 she paid—a difference of roughly £40,000.

    Rayner has voluntarily referred herself to the independent adviser on ministerial standards to examine whether her actions breached the Ministerial Code. She has also contacted HM Revenue & Customs to determine and pay any additional tax owed, acknowledging the error and expressing regret. Keir Starmer has publicly defended Rayner, praising her transparency and noting that she had gone above and beyond by challenging a court confidentiality order in order to explain the circumstances fully.

  • Angela Rayner – 2025 Statement on Stamp Duty on Second Flat

    Angela Rayner – 2025 Statement on Stamp Duty on Second Flat

    The statement made by Angela Rayner on 3 September 2025.

    Following the substantial scrutiny surrounding my living arrangements, I wanted to set out the facts as openly and transparently as I can.

    Until now, an undertaking in a court order prevented me from disclosing information about certain aspects of my personal life. In the interests of public transparency, I applied to the court and I was last night released from this undertaking.

    Family life can be complicated, and it is no secret that, like many families across the country, my domestic arrangements reflect these complexities. Throughout my career, I have always tried to be the best mum to my children, while managing the demanding realities of public service.

    There has been a lot of speculation in recent days about my domestic arrangements and in particular the home I share with my ex-husband and my family. While I do not find it easy to publicly discuss personal and sometimes distressing family matters, I have always taken my responsibility as an MP and deputy prime minister seriously and tried to be as open as possible while protecting my family. To address the allegations made against me I have now taken the difficult decision to explain why my arrangements are as they are.

    In 2023 my ex-husband and I divorced. As parents who have been through divorce will understand, the top priority for both of us during that process was the wellbeing of our children and helping them navigate this change. To provide maximum stability during this transition, we agreed to a nesting arrangement where the children remain in the family home full-time while we alternate living there. We also wanted to ensure that our child, who has special educational needs, was provided for as part of the divorce settlement.

    A court-instructed trust was established in 2020 following a deeply personal and distressing incident involving my son as a premature baby. He was left with life-long disabilities, and the trust was established to manage the award on his behalf – a standard practice in circumstances like ours.

    To ensure he continued to have stability in the family home, which had been adapted for his needs, we agreed that our interest in the family home would be transferred to this court-instructed trust of which he is the sole beneficiary.

    Some of the interest in our family home was transferred to the trust in 2023. In January 2025, I sold the remaining interest in the property to my son’s trust. This will give him the security of knowing the home is his, allowing him to continue to live in the home he feels safe in and grew up in. We transferred the property because it was in the best interests of our child. I acted as any parent would.

    The sale of the property in Ashton-under-Lyne to the trust has not altered my family life. It remains my family home, as it has been for over a decade. It contains the majority of my possessions and it is where I am registered for most official and financial purposes ranging from credit cards to the dentist to the electoral roll. But most importantly, it is where my children live and have gone to school and now college, and where I regularly live while caring for them.

    After I sold my stake to the trust, I bought a property in Hove in May 2025. Like many people, I used the lump sum from selling my stake in my Ashton home, which was the only property I owned and where my savings were, for the deposit on my new one. I obtained a mortgage to finance the rest. When purchasing the property my understanding, on advice from lawyers,
    was that my circumstances meant I was liable for the standard rate of stamp duty.

    However, given the recent allegations in the press I have subsequently sought further advice from a leading tax counsel to review that position and to ensure I am fully compliant with all tax provisions. I have now been advised that although I did not own any other property at the time of the purchase, the application of complex deeming provisions which relate to my son’s trust gives rise to additional stamp duty liabilities. I acknowledge that due to my reliance on advice from lawyers which did not properly take account of these provisions, I did not pay the appropriate stamp duty at the time of the purchase. I am working with expert lawyers and with HMRC to resolve the matter and pay what is due.

    The arrangements I have set out reflect the reality that family life is rarely straightforward, particularly when dealing with disability, divorce and the complexities of ensuring your children’s long-term security. Every decision I have made has been guided by what I believe to be in my children’s best interests.

    I deeply regret the error that has been made. I am committed to resolving this matter fully and providing the transparency that public service demands. It is for that reason I have today referred myself to the independent adviser on ministerial standards, and will provide him with my fullest cooperation and access to all the information he requires.

  • PRESS RELEASE : Ban on selling high-caffeine energy drinks to boost kids’ health [September 2025]

    PRESS RELEASE : Ban on selling high-caffeine energy drinks to boost kids’ health [September 2025]

    The press release issued by the Department of Health and Social Care on 2 September 2025.

    The government will consult on banning the sale of high-caffeine energy drinks to under 16s due to negative impacts on children’s physical and mental health.

    • Government to ban sale of high-caffeine energy drinks to under-16s
    • Evidence links the drinks to negative impacts on children’s physical and mental health, sleep quality, and educational outcomes
    • Move backed by parents and teachers and will deliver significant long term health benefits as part of government’s Plan for Change

    Children will be protected from the harm caused by high-caffeine energy drinks under new proposals to ban their sale to under-16s.

    Plans set out today will help boost kids’ health by stopping retailers from selling the drinks to children in a move that could prevent obesity in up to 40,000 children and deliver health benefits worth tens of millions of pounds.

    Around 100,000 children consume at least one high caffeine energy drink every day. There is growing evidence linking these drinks to harmful effects on children, including disrupted sleep, increased anxiety, poor concentration and reduced educational outcomes.

    Health and Social Care Secretary Wes Streeting said:

    How can we expect children to do well at school if they have the equivalent of four cans of cola in their system on a daily basis?

    Energy drinks might seem harmless, but the sleep, concentration and wellbeing of today’s kids are all being impacted, while high sugar versions damage their teeth and contribute to obesity.

    As part of our Plan for Change and shift from treatment to prevention, we’re acting on the concerns of parents and teachers and tackling the root causes of poor health and educational attainment head on.

    By preventing shops from selling these drinks to kids, we’re helping build the foundations for healthier and happier generations to come.

    Research highlights that up to one third of children aged 13 to 16 years, and nearly a quarter of children aged 11 to 12 years consume one or more of these drinks each week, so early intervention is crucial if we are to deliver on our pledge to create the healthiest generation of children ever.

    This is backed by parents, teachers and teaching unions who report on pupils being unable to concentrate and focus and even negatively affecting grades and academic performance. Evidence also shows that children from more deprived communities are more likely to consume these products – further contributing to health inequalities across the country.

    Acting now to improve children’s wellbeing will not only help give them the best start in life and prevent them from a lifetime of poor health but also deliver tens of millions of pounds of health benefits as well as future savings for the NHS and increased economic productivity.

    Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson said:

    Through our Plan for Change, we are determined to give every child the opportunities they deserve and the best start in life.

    This government inherited a scourge of poor classroom behaviour that undermines the learning of too many children – partly driven by the harmful effects of caffeine loaded drinks – and today’s announcement is another step forward in addressing that legacy.

    It goes hand-in-hand with our work to address the root causes of poor behaviour with targeted support to hundreds of struggling schools, access to a specialist mental health professional in every school and updated school food standards so children have access to healthy food and drink options during the school day.

    The proposal would make it illegal to sell high-caffeine energy drinks containing more than 150mg of caffeine per litre to anyone aged under 16 years across all retailers, including online, in shops, restaurants, cafes and vending machines. The proposals would not affect lower-caffeine soft drinks nor tea and coffee.

    Many major retailers already voluntarily restrict sales, but research suggests some smaller convenience stores continue selling to children, highlighting the need for a consistent approach that protects our children and is fairer for industry.

    A consultation launched today on delivery of the ban will run for twelve weeks gathering evidence from health experts, education leaders, retailers, manufacturers, local enforcement authorities and the public.

    Every child deserves the best possible start in life which is why we are also rolling out supervised tooth brushing for three to five-year-olds, , supporting free breakfast clubs and taking action to help families raise the healthiest generation of children ever.

    And we have just announced the largest ever expansion with 30 hours government-funded childcare saving hard-pressed parents £7,500.

    Carrera, a Bite Back activist from Milton Keynes, said:

    Energy drinks have become the social currency of the playground — cheap, brightly packaged, and easier to buy than water. They’re aggressively marketed to us, especially online, despite serious health risks.

    We feel pressured to drink them, especially during exam season, when stress is high and healthier options are hard to find. This ban is a step in the right direction — but bold action on marketing and access must follow.

    Lauren Morley from Worthing, East Sussex is parent to a six-year-old. She also works directly with young people and schools on nutrition and mental health. She is a parent ambassador with Sustain. She said:

    As a parent of a 6-year-old and an educator with 13 years’ experience, I’ve seen the harm these drinks cause. In schools, I’ve witnessed panic attacks, anxiety and poor focus, often after students consume multiple cans instead of breakfast.

    My concern grows as my child gets older. When young people stop drinking them, we see their wellbeing, concentration, and mood noticeably improve. I welcome the Department of Health and Social Care’s consultation on restricting high caffeine energy drink sales to children.

    Rounaq Nayak is a father to two children, living in Bristol. He works as a lecturer and is a parent ambassador with Sustain. He said:

    As a parent, I welcome the government’s announcement on restricting high caffeine energy drink sales to children. I’ve seen how marketing and peer influence make these drinks seem appealing – from my youngest wanting to copy older kids to my eldest believing they make you ‘faster’ at sport. Clear regulation, alongside education in schools and for parents, is essential to protect children’s health and ensure companies are held accountable for how these products are promoted.

    Charlotte Harrison, Senior Safeguarding Consultant, said:

    As a safeguarding consultant and former teacher, I am delighted about, and strongly support, this consultation on a proposed ban of high-caffeine energy drink sales to under-16s. I have seen first-hand the damaging impact these drinks have on young people; there is no doubt that they negatively impact children’s health, behaviour, and learning, as well as contributing to long-term issues like obesity.

    Protecting our young people from harmful substances is a vital part of safeguarding, and this consultation is a crucial step toward creating healthier, more supportive environments for our children to thrive in both education and life. I urge everyone to support this consultation to protect the future wellbeing of our children.

    Stuart, Assistant Head Teacher of a Sixth Form, said:

    As a teacher, I see first-hand the damage energy drinks do to students – from poor focus in class to poor nutrition and overall, well being. We do what we can to keep them out of classrooms and school in general, but without a ban, it’s an uphill battle.

    These drinks are not for young people – and I’m delighted the government is finally catching up with clear rules and legislation to support young people to make healthier choices.

    Professor Amelia Lake, Professor of Public Health Nutrition, Teesside University and Deputy Director of Fuse the Centre for Translational Research in Public Health said:

    Our research has shown the significant mental and physical health consequences of children drinking energy drinks. We have reviewed evidence from around the world and have shown that these drinks have no place in the diets of children.

    Other countries have age-restricted sales of energy drinks, Norway has recently announced their restrictions starting in 2026. I welcome this consultation, it will be a step forward in prioritising the health and wellbeing of our young population.

    Barbara Crowther of the Children’s Food Campaign at Sustain, an alliance of over 100 food, farming and health organisations, said:

    High caffeine energy drinks already carry warning labels saying ‘not suitable for children’, so it’s absolutely right for the government to limit them from being sold to children too.

    They are branded and marketed to appeal to young people through sports and influencers and far too easily purchased by children in shops, cafes and vending machines. Parents, teachers and health professionals have all called for this policy, so let’s get involved with the consultation and support children’s health.

    Katharine Jenner, Director, Obesity Health Alliance, said:

    High-caffeine energy drinks have no place in children’s hands. We fully support the government’s proposal to ban sales of high-caffeine energy drinks to under-16s. This is a common-sense, evidence-based step to protect children’s physical, mental, and dental health.

    Age-of-sale policies like this have a proven record of reducing access to products that are not suitable for children, and will help create an environment that supports healthier choices for future generations.

    Sarah Muckle, Policy Lead for Children and Young People at the Association of Directors of Public Health and Director of Public Health for Essex, said:

    Our children and young people deserve the opportunity to grow up in an environment which nurtures their potential, provides them with easy access to healthy food, drink and activities, and helps them thrive.

    Energy drinks, which are currently made incredibly attractive and affordable to children through targeted advertising and marketing campaigns funded by the industry, are associated with a wide range of physical and mental health issues and so we are very pleased to see the Government acting on its promise to protect children’s health in this way.

    A ban will not only make a huge difference to individual children’s health but will also have the knock-on consequence of enabling our children and young people to take a more active role in their education and their communities – something that will benefit everyone.

    Professor Tracy Daszkiewicz, President of the Faculty of Public Health, said:

    Mounting evidence shows us that high-caffeine energy drinks are damaging the health of children across the UK, particularly those from deprived communities who are already at higher risk of obesity and other health issues.

    We welcome this public health intervention to limit access to these drinks and help support the physical and mental wellbeing of our young people.

    Andrea Martinez-Inchausti, Assistant Director of Food at the British Retail Consortium, said:

    BRC members banned the sale of certain energy drinks to under 16s many years ago, so we welcome this announcement as it will ensure a level playing field across all businesses who sell energy drinks. But most importantly, it will protect young consumers.

    Pepe Di’Iasio, General Secretary of the Association of School and College Leaders, said:

    We welcome this consultation. There is clear evidence that high-caffeine energy drinks are not only a health risk to children but that these products also affect behaviour and concentration.

    They are banned in many schools but their wider availability means they can be consumed outside of school time with a knock-on effect in class. Restricting the sale of these drinks could be a relatively simple way of supporting learning and wellbeing.

    Paul Whiteman, General Secretary, National Association of Head Teachers, said:

    NAHT supports this proactive move to ban the sale of these drinks to under 16s. A healthy diet for children and young people is vital and these drinks, which are high in caffeine and in sugar, are not consistent with that. Evidence is also growing to support concerns school staff have over connections between these drinks and reduced concentration in the classroom. Anything which addresses this and helps pupils to focus on their learning has to be welcome.

    Professor Steve Turner, President of the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health, said:

    Paediatricians are very clear that children or teenagers do not need energy drinks. Young people get their energy from sleep, a healthy balanced diet, regular exercise and meaningful connection with family and friends. There’s no evidence that caffeine or other stimulants in these products offer any nutritional or developmental benefit, in fact growing research points to serious risks for behaviour and mental health. Banning the sale of these products to under-16s is the next logical step in making the diet of our nation’s children more healthy.

    Rebecca Tobi, Senior Business and Investor Engagement Manager, The Food Foundation, said:

    Caffeine is a very potent stimulant, as many adults know all too well, so it’s very welcome to see the government moving forward with their commitment to ban the sale of energy drinks to children. Caffeine and energy drinks should have no place in children’s diets, yet remain heavily marketed to children. As well as needing to ban sales of high caffeine drinks across all places where children can buy them, government and businesses should also look to ensure these drinks aren’t constantly promoted to children – for example on gaming platforms.

  • PRESS RELEASE : Air Chief Marshal Sir Richard Knighton takes over as Chief of Defence Staff [September 2025]

    PRESS RELEASE : Air Chief Marshal Sir Richard Knighton takes over as Chief of Defence Staff [September 2025]

    The press release issued by the Ministry of Defence on 2 September 2025.

    Outgoing Chief of Defence Staff Admiral Sir Tony Radakin handed over today (2nd September) to his successor, Air Chief Marshal Sir Richard Knighton.

    Sir Richard’s appointment was announced in June 2025, succeeding Admiral Radakin, who completed his four-year term, following his appointment in 2021.

    Admiral Radakin’s tenure included him playing a pivotal role in responding to the Russian invasion of Ukraine, rallying NATO support, playing a key role in this year’s Strategic Defence Review and leading the military through the ceremonial response to the death of HM Queen Elizabeth II.

    As CDS, ACM Knighton serves as the professional head of the UK’s Armed Forces, military strategic commander, and principal military adviser to the Prime Minister and Secretary of State for Defence.

    Under defence Reform, the Chief of the Defence Staff, for the first time since this role was created, now commands the service chiefs and is the head of the newly established Military Strategic Headquarters, responsible for force design and war planning across an integrated force.

    Sir Richard steps up from his previous role as Chief of the Air Staff, bringing extensive experience in strategic planning and overseeing Royal Air Force operations worldwide to his new position as Defence Chief.

    Sir Richard’s appointment comes in the same year that the Prime Minister announced an increase in defence spending to 2.6% of GDP from April 2027, with an ambition to reach 3% in the next parliament.

    In June, Defence Secretary John Healey MP welcomed the appointment, saying:

    As Chief of the Air Staff, Sir Rich Knighton has led the RAF with distinction through a period of intense demand, with NATO operations, deployments to the Middle East and activity across the world. As Chief of the Defence Staff, he will play a critical role in delivering the transformation set out in the Strategic Defence Review. And together, we will put the men and women of our Armed Forces at the heart of our defence plans.

    Air Chief Marshal Sir Richard Knighton said:

    It is an honour to begin my role as Chief of the Defence Staff today. I will work tirelessly to combat the threats the UK faces whilst fulfilling the integral role the Armed Forces play in protecting our personnel, our allies and operations worldwide.

  • PRESS RELEASE : Tens of thousands more to be tagged under biggest ever expansion [September 2025]

    PRESS RELEASE : Tens of thousands more to be tagged under biggest ever expansion [September 2025]

    The press release issued by the Ministry of Justice on 2 September 2025.

    More people will be tagged and monitored as part of the Government’s Plan for Change as the Sentencing Bill is published.

    • Up to 22,000 more offenders and defendants tagged each year as part of the Government’s Plan for Change
    • £100m extra investment and new expectation all prisoners will be tagged when leaving jail
    • Sentencing Bill will also end automatic release for badly behaved offenders

    Tens of thousands more criminals will be tagged and monitored over the next three years as part of the Government’s Plan for Change to make streets safer.

    It is the biggest expansion of tagging since the adoption of curfew tags in 1999 with an extra £100 million being invested into electronic monitoring – an increase of 30%.

    The Government is also introducing, for the first time, a presumption that all prison leavers will be tagged on release as part of intensive supervision with the Probation Service keeping a closer eye on offenders’ behaviour. This means, unless Probation Staff specifically decide not to, any offender leaving prison will be tagged.

    A new pilot launching next month will also see offenders tagged before leaving the prison gates, rather than days later as is currently the case ahead of a planned wider rollout to end the surveillance gap in the crucial time after release.

    It comes as legislation to end the prison crisis inherited by the Government and prevent the collapse of the justice system is introduced to Parliament today (2 September).

    Alongside the construction of 14,000 more prison places, the Sentencing Bill delivers urgent reform to a system on the brink. Together, this will ensure the country never runs out of prison cells, there is always space inside jails for dangerous offenders, and punishment cuts crime.

    Lord Chancellor and Justice Secretary, Shabana Mahmood, said:

    Last year, the criminal justice system was on the verge of collapse. Since being elected, the Government has worked rapidly to repair the damage, starting with investing £7 billion in 14,000 more prison places as part of our Plan for Change.

    A historic increase in tagging and record investment into probation will make our streets safer.

    And this Sentencing Bill will ensure that our prisons never run out of space again, we can always lock up dangerous offenders, and that punishment cuts crime rather than creating better criminals.

    The Sentencing Bill follows on from the Independent Sentencing Review led by David Gauke published in May.

    The Government has already announced it will introduce a new “earned progression model” that will see prisoners who break the rules spend longer than the minimum of 33 or 50 percent in prison, ending automatic release for badly behaved offenders. It was inspired by changes in Texas where crime has since fallen to levels last seen in the 1960s.

    To enforce this, the Government is toughening the prison punishment regime, so prisoners face up to three months extra in jail for violence or being found with illicit items like phones. Multiple incidents will see punishments added consecutively with constantly violent prisoners potentially spending their whole sentence behind bars as a result.

    Offenders released from prison will enter a period of “intensive supervision” tailored to their risk and the type of crime they committed. Probation officers will maintain discretion to tag offenders based on their risk to the public and their victim. Those subject to Multi-Agency Public Protection Arrangements will remain in this “intensive supervision” stage for the duration of their sentence. Others will progress into a licence phase, with strict conditions on their behaviour remaining.

    This “earned progression model” will apply to prisoners serving standard determinate sentences only. Some offenders on standard determinate sentences will spend at least one-third of their sentence behind bars. Those serving standard determinate sentences for more serious offences will serve at least half in prison. Dangerous offenders will be unaffected with those serving extended determinate sentences or life sentences continuing to spend as much time behind bars as they do now.

    The Government is also ramping up deportations of foreign criminals, freeing up vital space in our prisons and keeping the public safe – with deportations 14 percent higher since July 2024. This Bill will drive this work further with measures to see immediate deportation after sentencing for foreign criminals, rather than having their bed and board in prison covered by taxpayers as currently.

    The Bill also introduces a presumption that prison sentences of a year or less will be replaced with tougher sentences in the community that better punish offenders and stop them reoffending. Currently, 62 percent of those receiving a prison sentence of under 12 months reoffended within a year, which is higher than similar offenders given sentences in the community.

    Offenders who pose a significant risk of harm to an individual or who have breached a court order – including breach of a previous suspended sentence order – will be exempt from this change, meaning judges always have the power to send dangerous offenders or prolific law breakers to prison.

    For those offenders who will be punished outside of prison, the Government is toughening up community sentences with a series of new measures:

    • Punishments that restrict offenders’ freedom in the community. Judges will be handed new powers to bar criminals from pubs, concerts and sports matches, curtailing offenders’ freedoms as punishment.
    • Tough unpaid work orders that force offenders to give back to society. Develop new ways in which offenders can undertake tough, unpaid work. This includes working with local authorities to determine how offenders could give back to their communities, whether by removing graffiti or cleaning up rubbish. Publishing the names and photos of those subject to an unpaid work requirement will demonstrate to the public that justice is being delivered and increase the visibility and transparency of community payback.
    • Financial penalties that force offenders to pay back for their crimes. Work to deliver new “income reduction orders” which will see judges able to order offenders to forfeit some of their income as a form of punishment during their sentence.

    The Government will follow the most recent evidence on how to use punishment to reduce reoffending and cut crime. This includes expanding the use of “intensive supervision courts”, which target the root causes of offending amongst prolific offenders. Despite significant addiction issues at the start of the sentence, offenders tested negative for drugs over two thirds of the time. Across the world, particularly in Texas and across America, this approach has driven down reoffending rates. Early signs from four pilot sites in England are positive, and the Government has announced it will expand to more sites.

    The Sentencing Bill also introduces measures to better support victims of crime, including:

    • New “restriction zones” – welcomed last month by victims’ campaigners Diana Parkes CBE and Hetti Barkworth-Nanton CBE, co-founders of The Joanna Simpson Foundation, and Doreen Soulsby – which will restrict offenders to a certain area, allowing victims to travel without fear of seeing them.
    •  A judicial finding of domestic abuse in sentencing which will allow criminal justice agencies to identify domestic abusers, ensure they are better monitored, and the right measures are in place to protect victims.

    Chief Executive Officer of We Are Survivors, Duncan Craig OBE, said:

    I very much welcome the presentation of the Sentencing Bill today and whilst there will be much debate and scrutiny to come, we’re certainly moving towards a new and modern response to dealing with those that cause harm.

    As a victim/survivor, I have long been frustrated with the binary and repetitive way we think and respond to victims and offenders. Whilst victims must be a priority in our response, it’s vital we take action to reduce the number of future victims which means reducing offending in the first place.

    We have to have a grown-up conversation about offending behaviours, ensure we better understand the cause of offending, and design responses to offending that supports opportunities for people to change. We have to have a paradigm shift to reduce the creation of victims and equally reduce the number of offenders. It is too important not to.

    To support the implementation of the Sentencing Review, the Government is investing an extra up to £700 million in the Probation Service by 2028/29 – an increase of around 45 per cent on top of the current budget.

    The probation workforce is also being bolstered, with the number of probation officers already up seven per cent in the last 12 months.

    In addition to the 1,000 trainee probation officers recruited last year, the Government has commitment to recruit a further 1,300 by March next year. This will increase capacity whilst new technology will lighten the administrative burden and free up time for staff to focus on managing offenders and keeping the public safe.

    Further information

  • PRESS RELEASE : Vaughan Lindsay, Sarah Massey and Tom Gribbin appointed as Board Members to Sport England [September 2025]

    PRESS RELEASE : Vaughan Lindsay, Sarah Massey and Tom Gribbin appointed as Board Members to Sport England [September 2025]

    The press release issued by the Department for Culture, Media and Sport on 2 September 2025.

    The Secretary of State has appointed Vaughan Lindsay, Sarah Massey and Tom Gribbin as Non-Executive Board Members to Sport England.

    Vaughan Lindsay

    A leading professional in profit with purpose businesses and Impact Investing with deep sector knowledge of carbon markets and climate adaptation. Vaughan was the CEO at Climate Impact Partners and is an advisor to a number of businesses and private equity companies interested in the carbon markets. He has over 20 years’ experience in the charity sector and is currently chair of New Philanthropy Capital and the Oversight Trust (dormant assets for public good). He is also a keen triathlete and is representing GB (age group) in the world championships.

    Sarah Massey

    Sarah is an accomplished leader in the world of sport, with over three decades of experience in sports leadership, global event strategy, and planning. She is currently the Managing Director of the Women’s Rugby World Cup England 2025, set to be a landmark event for women’s sport.

    Prior to this, Sarah was the CEO of the 2022 World Athletics Championships in Oregon, USA and her career spans various roles across Olympic and Commonwealth Games, as well as Cricket and Hockey World Cups. She has worked with multiple international and national sports governing bodies across a range of different sports globally.

    Sarah thrives on bringing her energy, drive and business acumen to lead and navigate challenging and complex projects across sport.

    She firmly believes in the positive impact that sport can have on individuals and communities and actively supports work to reduce the dropout rates of teenage girls, helping them benefit both physically and mentally through staying engaged.

    Tom Gribbin

    Tom is an entrepreneurial leader who builds innovative partnerships, high-profile ventures, and campaigns across business, sport, and government. He has over 20 years’ experience in strategy, creative development, commercial, public relations, and behaviour change.

    He is the founder of Planet League, a platform that mobilises sports fans to live greener and has partnered with Premier League, NFL, NBA, and NHL teams. He is one of the founders of the annual Green Football Weekend campaign and has worked with many professional athletes to drive leadership in sustainability and sport.

    Earlier in his career he founded Boost, a digital platform to get young people more physically active and has worked in the digital innovation sector.

    Tom has taught management and entrepreneurship at UCL, he is trustee of Nottingham Forest Community Trust and recently entered the BIMA Class of 2025 which recognises individuals who are shaping the future of Britain’s digital industry.