Author: admin

  • PRESS RELEASE : On the Day of Ukrainian Statehood, the President awarded the “Cross of Combat Merit” to the defenders of Ukraine

    PRESS RELEASE : On the Day of Ukrainian Statehood, the President awarded the “Cross of Combat Merit” to the defenders of Ukraine

    The press release issued by the President of Ukraine on 28 July 2022.

    President Volodymyr Zelenskyy awarded the Head of State’s “Cross of Combat Merit” to Ukrainian warriors who proved themselves in the defense of the state sovereignty and territorial integrity of Ukraine.

    The award ceremony took place in the session hall of the Verkhovna Rada during the solemn part of the plenary session on the occasion of the Day of Ukrainian Statehood.

    “When today, on this Day of Ukrainian Statehood, here, in the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, before the eyes of the entire Ukrainian people, I will honor strong people for strong deeds with the Cross of Combat Merit, I want all Ukrainians to feel: we are behind those who defend our country on the battlefield, and behind our backs – the backs of millions of Ukrainians living now – there are those who have been creating Ukrainian history, Ukrainian culture and Ukrainian character for centuries,” the President said.

    “We must be worthy of the height of our people, all its generations, and the thousand-year weight of our statehood,” the President emphasized.

  • PRESS RELEASE : Sanctions against Russia are effective, but even tougher steps are needed in this direction – Volodymyr Zelenskyy

    PRESS RELEASE : Sanctions against Russia are effective, but even tougher steps are needed in this direction – Volodymyr Zelenskyy

    The press release issued by the President of Ukraine on 28 July 2022.

    President Volodymyr Zelenskyy emphasizes that sanctions against Russia are an important element of helping Ukraine in the fight against full-scale Russian aggression, but even tougher steps are needed, and the Yermak-McFaul International Working Group is working on relevant proposals. This was stated by the Ukrainian Head of State during a conversation with media representatives after talks with the President of Lithuania Gitanas Nausėda.

    “Sanctions are a great help from all European countries, which, after all, followed the path when they do not balance between Ukraine and Russia, but fully recognized the aggression of the Russian Federation and started the path of sanctions pressure. And it really helps a lot. Even if Russia says everywhere in the media that they do not have problems due to sanctions, it is not true,” Volodymyr Zelenskyy noted, answering the journalist’s question.

    According to him, sanctions against the Russian Federation are effective, but not as fast as Ukraine would like.

    “There are some moments when this or that business of individual countries of the world, due to the economic interests, does not want to lose ties with the Russian Federation and finds ways to circumvent sanctions,” the President of Ukraine noted.

    Volodymyr Zelenskyy also emphasized the importance for all EU member states to adhere to a single position when introducing sanctions packages.

    “Yes, we see weakening in the latest sanctions package. We want strengthening. But not all at once. The main thing is that the countries found a consensus, that most of the states managed to find an understanding with the minority of countries in Europe that did not want to apply the sanctions package or did not want to have such a tough package,” he said.

    The Head of State emphasized that Ukraine expects tougher sanctions against Russia. This applies to the disconnection of the entire banking system of the Russian Federation from SWIFT and more decisive steps regarding energy, which Russia uses as a tool for blackmail. Proposals for sanctions against persons from the entourage of the President of the Russian Federation are also being developed.

    “This is done by the Yermak-McFaul International Group. We pass it on through the Ministry of Foreign Affairs to our partners, to all countries. We are constantly working on it. Many different sanctions are proposed, as well as an analysis of those sanctions that do or do not work. There are also details of how, through whom specifically Russia wants to circumvent or circumvents certain sanctions,” Volodymyr Zelenskyy said.

    For his part, President of Lithuania Gitanas Nausėda noted that a powerful sanctions policy is the tool that can make Russia’s war against Ukraine shorter, and its consequences for our country less destructive.

    “There are many opportunities to increase sanctions. Sometimes there is a lack of the courage to disconnect all Russian banks from the SWIFT system. We need solutions that can reduce Europe’s energy dependence,” he said.

  • PRESS RELEASE : The passport of a citizen of Ukraine symbolizes strength – President handed out the first passports to young Ukrainians

    PRESS RELEASE : The passport of a citizen of Ukraine symbolizes strength – President handed out the first passports to young Ukrainians

    The press release issued by the President of Ukraine on 28 July 2022.

    On the Day of Ukrainian Statehood, which Ukraine celebrates today for the first time, President Volodymyr Zelenskyy handed out the first passports to citizens of Ukraine who turned 14 years old.

    The ceremony took place in the Mariyinsky Palace. Among its participants are children of servicemen who defend the state, children of heroes who gave their lives in battles for Ukraine, and young citizens who were forced to leave their homes due to Russian aggression.

    As the Head of State noted, he is particularly pleased to hand over Ukrainian passports to teenagers in the presence of one of our country’s greatest European friends – President of Lithuania Gitanas Nausėda, who visited Ukraine on the occasion of the Day of Ukrainian Statehood.

    “This passport – the passport of a citizen of Ukraine, which you are receiving today – symbolizes strength. It is known and respected in all countries of the world, even where they do not have the freedom to talk about it openly,” Volodymyr Zelenskyy emphasized during the presentation of the documents.

    The President reminded that Ukraine experienced different periods in its more than thousand-year history – ups and downs, victories and losses, heroism and peace.

    “But there was no period when we lost our national strength – our Ukrainian love for freedom, our special sense of independence and our firmness – all that is fully manifested right now, when we are fighting for the future for Ukraine, for the future for all of you,” he said.

    Volodymyr Zelenskyy is convinced that young Ukrainians will be able to feel respect for themselves and their passports many times more, and called on them to do everything to increase that respect.

    “I am sure you will be able to feel this respect. And please do everything to ensure that Ukraine’s strength and respect for Ukraine only increase,” the Head of State summed up and wished all the children success.

  • PRESS RELEASE : President had a meeting with the President of Lithuania in Kyiv

    PRESS RELEASE : President had a meeting with the President of Lithuania in Kyiv

    The press release issued by the President of Ukraine on 28 July 2022.

    On the Day of Ukrainian Statehood, President Volodymyr Zelenskyy held a meeting with President of the Republic of Lithuania Gitanas Nausėda, who is on a visit to our country.

    Volodymyr Zelenskyy emphasized that Gitanas Nausėda made a lot of efforts to protect European values and showed historical leadership in the defense of freedom on the eastern borders of Europe.

    “A worthy representative of the great Lithuanian people, whom our children and grandchildren both in Ukraine and in Lithuania, I am sure, will recall in history lessons,” said the Ukrainian Head of State during a meeting with media representatives following the negotiations with the President of Lithuania in Kyiv.

    Volodymyr Zelenskyy reminded that Lithuania was one of the first to provide Ukraine with significant defense support during the full-scale invasion of Russia.

    “I have already told this more than once and I am proud to repeat that Ukraine received the first Stingers from our Lithuanian friends,” he said.

    The leaders discussed issues of security, defense and further protection of common interests of the two countries.

    The Head of State noted that today the Russian occupiers increased the intensity of missile attacks on Ukraine.

    “Against such a background, it was especially important for me to hear assurances from President Nausėda that defense assistance for the needs of the Armed Forces of Ukraine will be further provided,” said Volodymyr Zelenskyy.

    The President stressed that Ukraine and Lithuania will continue cooperation to speed up the European integration of our country.

    “All key elements of our negotiations, individual agreements that were reached, were recorded in a joint statement. This document will be made public soon,” said the Head of State.

    Volodymyr Zelenskyy thanked Gitanas Nausėda and First Lady of the Republic of Lithuania Diana Nausėdienė for their help to forcibly displaced Ukrainians.

    “At the initiative of the first ladies of our countries, the first Ukrainian center on the territory of the European Union was recently opened in Vilnius for the citizens who were forced to leave our country due to the Russian war,” the President noted.

    The Ukrainian President emphasized that such humanitarian initiatives, along with another assistance that Ukraine received from Lithuania, testify to the closeness of our nations and prove the readiness to give a joint response to existing challenges for both countries.

    President of Lithuania Gitanas Nausėda, for his part, said that on the Day of Ukrainian Statehood, he wishes Ukraine victory, which will surely happen, because Ukrainians deserve it.

    The President of the Republic of Lithuania thanked the President of Ukraine and all Ukrainians who are heroically resisting Russian aggression and are an example for everyone in Europe in protecting freedom.

    “Lithuania has always been and will always be with you, because the freedom and independence of your state, its territorial integrity and the safety of your people are extremely important to us,” Gitanas Nausėda said.

    According to him, Lithuania is one of the main allies of Ukraine, which provides financial, political and military assistance.

    “I didn’t come empty-handed today either. The new aid package is ammunition and ten armored vehicles. Soon we will present anti-drone systems, which are manufactured in Lithuania and which I know you need,” said the President of the Republic of Lithuania.

    He emphasized that Lithuania has united in helping Ukraine and will not allow anyone in the West to either forget about this cruel war or get tired of it.

    Gitanas Nausėda noted that all those who committed war crimes on the territory of Ukraine must be punished.

    The leader of Lithuania also highly evaluated the effectiveness of President Volodymyr Zelenskyy’s team, which is shown in the difficult conditions of war. This is evidenced by Ukraine’s obtaining a candidate status for EU membership and implementation of reforms.

    “The key thing now is not to stop and move forward,” noted Gitanas Nausėda and added that Lithuania will help Ukraine on its way to the EU.

  • PRESS RELEASE : Creative director of Balenciaga Demna became the ambassador of United24

    PRESS RELEASE : Creative director of Balenciaga Demna became the ambassador of United24

    The press release issued by the President of Ukraine on 28 July 2022.

    Creative director of the Balenciaga fashion house Demna became the ambassador of the United24 fundraising platform initiated by President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in the “Ukraine Recovery” direction to help temporarily displaced persons.

    The Head of State personally thanked Demna for the determination to support Ukraine, which the fashion house and he expressed during the Balenciaga Winter 22 show in March of this year, when the creative director shared with the guests his own experience as a refugee.

    “Thank you for your support, it is very much appreciated. It is extremely important to keep the world’s attention on Ukraine in order to help rebuild our country,” Volodymyr Zelenskyy said.

    For Demna, the decision to become a United24 ambassador is related to a personal story, as he has experienced the trauma of being a refugee.

    “I am honored to become a United24 ambassador. I know very well and feel the pain that Ukrainians are going through. I’ve been thinking a lot about how I can help Ukraine and all the refugees who want to return home. That is why I decided to focus on the humanitarian direction “Ukraine Recovery”. And the special sweatshirt that we created at Balenciaga will be a kind of message of support for Ukraine,” he said.

    A special sweatshirt was created in support of the United24 platform. 100% of the profit from its sale will be transferred to the “Ukraine Recovery” direction. The charity sweatshirts will be available to order from July 28 exclusively at united24-demna.balenciaga.com.

    The “Ukraine Recovery” direction is focused on raising funds for the restoration of critical infrastructure: roads, bridges, schools and hospitals, which will make it possible for Ukrainians to return to their homes, which they were forced to leave.

  • PRESS RELEASE : President during a speech in the Verkhovna Rada: We are creating a College of Europe in Ukraine

    PRESS RELEASE : President during a speech in the Verkhovna Rada: We are creating a College of Europe in Ukraine

    The press release issued by the President of Ukraine on 28 July 2022.

    President of Ukraine Volodymyr Zelenskyy announced the establishment of the College of Europe within the Presidential University, which will train specialists to work with the institutions of the European Union. The Head of State said this during a speech at the ceremonial part of the plenary session of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine on the occasion of the Day of Ukrainian Statehood.

    “The European Union has the College of Europe in Bruges and Natolin, which are some of the most prestigious institutions of postgraduate education that prepare professionals to work in institutions of the EU and member states. We are establishing our College of Europe in Ukraine. A corresponding memorandum has already been signed between the Government of Ukraine and the College of Europe in Natolin,” the President informed.

    According to him, at the first stage, a faculty of European integration will be established in one of the Ukrainian higher education institutions, and later, on its basis, the College of Europe within the Presidential University will be established.

    “And although I have been told that this will not be resolved in months, as I have been told many times on other issues, I know that the creation of our College of Europe will not take long. I’m sure it will start working shortly,” Volodymyr Zelenskyy said.

    The Head of State emphasized that the institution will be not only a professional basis for the European policy of Ukraine as a member of the EU, but also a contribution of our country to the development of European institutions.

    “This is what we, the citizens of Ukraine, are capable of. This is our statehood,” he noted.

    As the President noted, Ukraine should move towards the start of negotiations on membership in the European Union with the same speed with which it gained candidacy.

    “We will do everything we have to for this. We will synchronize the legislation of Ukraine with the law of the European Union. A plan for the implementation of all EU regulations and directives as part of the fulfillment of the Association Agreement with the European Union has also been formed. This is actually a joint task for us, for you, dear deputies, and for the Government of our country,” Volodymyr Zelenskyy stressed.

    According to him, today the process of European integration in Ukraine has been transferred from the sphere of foreign policy to the sphere of domestic policy, and this is where real European integration begins.

    The Head of State expressed conviction that Ukraine has always been Europe, and the values of the Ukrainian people have always been European.

    “Our state-building experience of different times is a European experience. And now we have come to the point where our state system is institutionally becoming Europe,” the President emphasized.

    “We showed strength in battles and united the world with the best emotions that people have. We fight against the terror of the occupiers, we defend humanity for all nations. We guarantee that the borders of Europe will never again move further west than our eastern state border. And we make our state and public institutions advanced,” the President said.

    President of the Republic of Lithuania Gitanas Nausėda also took part in the solemn part of the plenary session of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. He addressed the people’s deputies from the parliamentary rostrum. President of the European Parliament Mrs. Roberta Metsola took part in the event in the online mode.

    In her address, Roberta Metsola noted that on the Day of Ukrainian Statehood, the bravery and determination of all Ukrainians who fight and give their lives for the sovereignty and territorial integrity of Ukraine are honored. She emphasized that Ukrainians are fighting not only for their own state, but also for the whole of Europe.

    “Ukrainians are a free European nation that makes its own choices, chooses its own destiny and defends our common values,” said the President of the European Parliament.

    She emphasized that Europeans will never accept an aggressive invasion of a peaceful country.

    “We will never close our eyes to the atrocities and crimes committed by the Russians on Ukrainian soil,” said Roberta Metsola.

    The participants of the solemn part of the plenary session of the Verkhovna Rada honored the memory of the defenders of Ukraine who died fighting for the freedom and independence of their country with a moment of silence.

  • PRESS RELEASE : Volodymyr Zelenskyy received Lithuania’s highest award – the Order of Vytautas the Great – from Gitanas Nausėda

    PRESS RELEASE : Volodymyr Zelenskyy received Lithuania’s highest award – the Order of Vytautas the Great – from Gitanas Nausėda

    The press release issued by the President of Ukraine on 28 July 2022.

    President of Lithuania Gitanas Nausėda, who arrived in Kyiv on the occasion of the Ukrainian Statehood Day, awarded President of Ukraine Volodymyr Zelenskyy with the highest state award of the Republic of Lithuania – the Order of Vytautas the Great with a golden chain.

    “This highest Lithuanian state award symbolizes the historical unity of our nations, joint struggle and victories,” said the President of Lithuania, presenting the order to the Head of State during a speech at the solemn part of the plenary session of the Verkhovna Rada.

    Gitanas Nausėda told how in one of the numerous conversations with him Volodymyr Zelenskyy said that he had never thought he would be a “President during the war”.

    “Perhaps none of us hope to be president in time of war, except those who plan war themselves. But today the whole world admires the struggle of President Zelenskyy and every Ukrainian who is fighting for the family, home, Motherland. Such a strong nation can never be defeated!” said the leader of Lithuania, addressing those present at the meeting in Ukrainian.

    Gitanas Nausėda emphasized that today stories about the exploits of the Ukrainian people are spreading around the world. He thanked the Ukrainians for the fact that they defend their independence so resolutely and set a bright example for all others.

    “Your struggle is also our struggle, the struggle of Lithuanians. It reminds us of the times when we fought together against a common enemy,” he said.

    According to the President of Lithuania, when the 40th separate artillery brigade named after Grand Duke Vytautas bravely goes into battle, Lithuanians are proud of it as the achievements of their blood relatives.

    Gitanas Nausėda is convinced that today everyone must clearly choose the side of truth and not try to sit in two chairs.

    “Lithuania chose its friends a long time ago and will never betray them!” he assured.

    Volodymyr Zelenskyy thanked his Lithuanian colleague and the entire people of Lithuania for the important heroic support of Ukraine.

    “It was not politics for our states – it reflects the equally strong love for freedom of our nations. Nations who walked and keep walking together through European history,” said the President of Ukraine.

  • Eric Pickles – 2003 Speech to the National Association of Local Councils

    Eric Pickles – 2003 Speech to the National Association of Local Councils

    The speech made by Eric Pickles, the then Shadow Minister for Local Government, on 4 October 2003.

    In addressing you today I wish to make two points:

    The first is that Conservatives strongly support parish and town councils.

    We support you on the basis of your mandate and advocacy for your local community.

    We will do all in our power to make your community service easier.

    We will wind back Labour’s overbearing command state from parish and town councils – but more about this later.

    We do not see you as the Government’s branch office

    Secondly, there is a need to achieve more in large towns and cities – we wish to see an expansion of Town and Parish councils in urban and inner city areas, because rejuvenation must come from within and have a strong element of local accountability. I believe the National Association of Local Councils has a vital role to play in this aim.

    True localism: Parish and town councils shaping and guiding local communities

    Before there was new Labour and new localism there were town and parish councils.

    And when New Labour is but a distant memory there were town and parish councils

    True localism is local advocates for a local community.

    You entered public service not because it would end in Downing Street, or be part of some great ideological struggle, but because you wanted to put something into your community.

    The driving forces behind local communities are not edicts and diktats from Whitehall but the sheer energy and commitment and innovation displayed by local councillors.

    Like all generations before us, we have the ability to shape and render the society we wish to hand over to the next generation.

    Parish and town councils have a particularly important role shaping the growth of their local community.

    Yet in 2003 many of this shaping comes under what the Government allows councils to do under Labour’s freedoms. Freedoms that fit in with the other Blair’s concept of language in double-speak

    Eric Blair (George Orwell) would recognise that these are not true freedoms at all.

    In truth. The Government imprisons councils.

    You are told you are free.

    When in reality those freedoms are your prison warden. Ensuring you stay within boundaries set by the Government. Innovation is restricted. Councils are prisoners on licence of central government.

    I want to see central government retreat from its command state.

    · Retreat from telling you what local councils can and cannot do.

    · Retreat from the burdens, the targets, the statutory plans, the tick-a-box culture.

    · Retreat from the clutter of centralism.

    Labour cannot be trusted

    I have a confession to make. I had listened to what Labour had to say about local government when they were in opposition. I agreed we quite a lot of it. I was prepared to give them the benefit of the doubt.

    But after six years it turned out to be “sound and fury signifying nothing”

    The process has been good for me, because it has given me some empathy with Labour Backbenchers – For I too know what it feels like to be betrayed by New Labour

    You cannot believe a word they say. Especially when it comes to local government.

    And I will give you an example. Indeed, a saga.

    It relates to local government finance and obviously impacts upon you.

    Capping and council taxes.

    In November last year Minister Nick Raynsford announced that councils graded as excellent by the comprehensive performance assessment will not be subject to reserve capping powers.

    In December, Nick Raynsford announced the provisional local government finance settlement.

    I could see that council tax bills for Band D homes were going to hit the £1000 bill mark. Hitting families and pensioners and those on fixed incomes.

    And I said so in the House of Commons.

    It was and is quite clear to the impartial observer that the fiddled funding saw money transferred from Tory councils to Labour councils.

    Council tax, especially in the south was going to skyrocket as councillors tried to protect public services. The ultimate stealth tax. Fiddled by Whitehall for local councillors to take the blame.

    The Government pooh-poohed Conservative claims as scare mongering.

    We continued to warn that the result of the government’s fiddled funding, combined with Labour’s ethos of burdens and targets – council tax was going to not only hit the roof. It was to put a large hole there.

    And you know what happened…

    Council tax bills went out in April.

    Band D council bills hit over £1000. Council tax went up 12.9 per cent – three times the rate of inflation.

    As councils and councillors struggle to keep up with Labour’s spending demands council tax has gone up nearly 70 per cent since 1997.

    The Government did nothing.

    Seven months later in October – only when we have the sight of pensioners preparing for jail and Chief Police Officers warning of the break down in law and order has the government stirred.

    Not acted to restore the funding to councils. Not acted to remove burdens and targets and the grime of centralism.

    They feared they had been rumbled.

    And in a moment of crisis they turned to their greatest ally – spin.

    They blamed the councils. They blamed councillors. They blamed us. We are apparently part of a conspiracy to undermine values. Councils putting up local taxes to undermined the Government. If you like, role reversal to Labour Councils in the Thatcher years. But if that was the case, Ministers would be able to cite examples of Conservative Councils giving donations to right wing causes or flooding our school libraries with Michael and John go hunting and shooting,.

    So they blamed everyone else.

    And now they will shift the blame further by renouncing their promise on no more capping and have reverted to the cap council tax.

    I don’t trust or believe Labour anymore when it comes to local councils. And frankly, nor should you.

    You don’t fit in with their project. You are an inconvenience.

    Whether it is the code of conduct, best value, the audit regime – Labour finds parish and town councils a nuisance

    The Government’s aim is to mould and shape parish and town councils into little boxes to fit neatly within Labour’s project.

    Little cubes that are the same in Devon as they are in Lancashire. Little Whitehall franchises up and down the country.

    The same size, delivering the same services regardless of local need or want.

    Little boxes that only exist because the centre grants them life.

    Little boxes all full of ticky-tacky that all look the same

    It is more subtle Labour’s last attacks on parish councils. But just as deadly

    In 1999 Labour called for parish councils to be replaced with ‘neighbourhood forums’.

    Labour then said that parish councils should include ‘neighbourhood managers’ – rather than elected representatives.

    In 2000 Labour’s Environment Minister said he was worried about the ability of parish councils to represent rural people.

    Last year former Labour Cabinet Minister, Mo Mowlam called for parish councils to be abolished to make way for regional assemblies.

    Just recently in March this year was forced to Labour revealed secret plans to eradicate parish boundaries from Ordnance Survey maps. Winston Smith would have been proud

    The Conservative Approach – A Fair Deal

    These plans and plots are to be compared and contrasted with the Conservative approach. Conservatives who will deliver a fair deal for you.

    Conservatives who value the work of parish and town councillors.

    But we fear Labour’s regulations, interference and red-tape will restrict the role of parish councils and result in a large-scale reduction in the number of people willing to be involved.

    We will deliver a fair deal for parish and town councils. We will deliver a fair deal for the thousands of parish and town councillors.

    What we will do? Put it simply – it is a question of trust

    Trust the people to make their own decisions on standards of conduct

    Trust the people to ensure that their parish and town councils operate to accepted standards.

    Trust the people to run their own villages and towns.

    So what policy commitments will we make to you?

    For the local government sector we will abolish comprehensive performance assessment.

    We will abolish Best Value. Under Conservatives, parish and town councils will not be subjected to the introduction of Best Value.

    Statutory plans…

    Most will go to the dustbin. Where they belong.

    For town and parish councils we will remove the code of conduct.

    On this point I will suggest that if the National Association for Local Councils was to recommend a voluntary code of conduct for the larger councils then that, is a matter entirely for you to decide.

    But I will not allow good people to be forced out of voluntary roles because of bad laws.

    We will have a giant bonfire of the Quangos

    I am drawing up a list that will see on average at least one Quango abolished for every week of the first Conservative Government.

    They will not be re-named or replaced with Conservative versions.

    Their powers will revert to councils and local communities.

    Conservatives want to see a power shift of function not form.

    And this real revolution involves you. It involves all of you in this room and your colleagues back home.

    While Labour are effectively imposing a blueprint of rigid conformity on parish councils Conservatives believe in diversity.

    All town and parish councils should be given freedoms automatically. It is insulting for Labour to suggest that the freedoms should be ‘earned’ through compliance with central government. Your actual existence should guarantee such rights.

    Accountability and responsibility

    And if you or your town or parish council make mistakes then like the rest of us, you learn and move on and bear the consequences

    And if you keep on making mistakes then it should not be the fear of some distant bureaucrat in Whitehall that should concern you.

    The best system of accountability will be the wrath of your community. The people you live and work with.

    I can think of no better system of accountability.

    · Responsibility by association,
    · and accountability by the ballot box

    Only at the last resort. When governance is dissolved and responsibility absolved should there be intervention from Whitehall.

    The best remedy will be to ensure that you don’t the mistakes in the first place. Conservatives support training and continuous improvement. Public perception of standards and expectations of service continue to rise. And councils must meet that challenge.

    But any system must be voluntary and must not be seen as a burden on service.

    Why should clerks with many years of sound service be obliged to undertake courses?

    Surely their attendance should be voluntary and should not reflect upon the funding status of any parish council.

    Enhanced role of town and parish councils

    I genuinely believe in the vibrance all tiers of local government.

    For too long, local councils have been treated as an extension of Whitehall – bodies through which centrally decided policies are administered rather than local communities being able to use powers and resources to decide policies of their own.

    Tied up in so much red-tape, the talent of local councils is wasted as they are turned into the agents of Whitehall rather than the strong local voice wanted by local people.

    The next Conservative Government will not be characterised by the power wielded but the power yielded.

    Conservatives will not only wind back Labour’s command state from your daily operations but also want additional reforms.

    Conservatives not only want to see power and responsibility transferred from Whitehall to county, district and metropolitan councils but even further. Where councils and communities agree and were it is practicable I envisage a devolution of power from district and county councils to parish and town councils.

    We do see a greater role for parish and town councils.

    But only if the councillors and their community want a greater role.

    Town and parish councils can be so much more. You can do so much more as advocates for your local community.

    Growth of Parish and Town Councils

    Conservatives not only want an enhanced role for existing town and parish councils we want to see new parish councils not just in rural areas – but also in urban areas, both in towns and cities.

    We want to make it easier for new parish and town councils to be established.

    In recent years our televisions have been throwing towards us lifestyle programmes concentrating on the retreat from urban life.

    Families and stressed out city types are shown to escape to the sanctuary of small towns and villages.

    Part of this is a retreat from a crumbling urban society. Failing schools, rising crime, deteriorating hospitals, inner cities in decay. Communities not just breaking down but dissipating.

    One of the main attractions for this urban flight is wanting to belong to, or feel part of a community.

    We need to do more in our cities and large towns to encourage the sense of community that we find so strong in the country and towns. A sense of community that comes through your work. A community supported by parish and town councils.

    Labour will establish a taskforce. Recommendations will precede John Prescott’s intervention. He will throw taxpayer’s money like confetti at various schemes. Schemes will fail. Followed by a Government review. Conducted by another taskforce.

    I think we could use parish and town councils as good basis to start urban regeneration. By getting the individual members of the community involved in the community we will help to develop a sense of ownership.

    Damian Green, our Shadow Education Secretary of State has already announced Conservative policies that will allow communities to take over failing state schools and establish independent schools.

    Establishing town and parish council models in inner cities will help those communities regenerate.

    Conclusion

    But we do need to do much more.

    The Conservative Party is currently undertaking a major review of all of our policies dealing with local government.

    In the next few months I will bring forward to you further proposals that build upon themes outlined in this speech.

    I would welcome any written contributions that you as councillors and guardians of your community that you may wish to make. This offer is made regardless of your political affiliation or lack of affiliation.

    · If you want a fair deal for parish and town councils.
    · If you want a massive reduction in the clutter and grime of centralism.
    · If you want parish and town councils to be trusted and respected
    · And you want your councils to be unshackled but empowered then come with me as we tear down John Prescott’s rambling and unstable empire.

  • Tim Collins – 2003 Speech to Conservative Party Conference

    Tim Collins – 2003 Speech to Conservative Party Conference

    The speech made by Tim Collins, the then Shadow Secretary of State for Transport, at the Conservative Party conference held in Blackpool on 6 October 2003.

    Someone told me a story the other day. A man arrives at the pearly gates, and sees a clock above his name.

    He asks the angel what it signifies. This, he is told, is a clock whose second hand moves forward every time he tells an untruth.

    The man spots another clock, where the second hand has not moved at all. “Whose is that?” he asks. The angel says, “That belongs to Mother Theresa, who never told a fib in her life.”

    So the man asks, “Where’s Tony Blair’s clock?” “Oh that”, says the angel – “Gabriel has it with him and uses it as a portable fan.”

    Our Prime Minister has a problem with telling the truth. But we are quite happy to tell the truth about him and his Government.

    On transport they have been a miserable failure.

    Tax paid by the motorist up by an extra £13 billion a year – up yet again last week – yet we have had the smallest road-building programme since the Second World War.

    Motorway congestion up by 50 to 250% – while the CBI estimates congestion costs to business rising to over £20 billion a year.

    And train punctuality sharply worse since 1997.

    Transport Secretary Alistair Darling came up with a clever scheme to reduce the number of trains running late. Run fewer trains!

    After all if a train never sets off, it can’t arrive late. But even on his plans, train punctuality won’t return to 1997 levels, even after billions more, until 2010 at the earliest.

    Even worse there is the national scandal of the West Coast Main Line. After billions and billions of pounds of spending, and after months of disruption for engineering work – all designed to enable trains to run faster and to shorten journey times between the North West and London, we have just had the new autumn timetable published. The good news is that there is a 40 minute difference between the old time and the new time for getting from Oxenholme in my Cumbrian constituency to London. The bad news is that this is an extra 40 minutes – meaning that journeys which took three and a half hours ten years ago will be taking four and a half hours in year 7 of this Labour Government. Your money, ladies and gentlemen, is going straight down the plughole – and we all have every reason to be furious about it.

    Listen to people talking about transport and you soon hear frustration, disappointment and anger.

    The train boss who told me of growing bureaucracy from a Strategic Rail Authority set up just to supervise the rail industry, not to run a single station or train, yet shortly due to employ more people in central London than British Rail did when it ran the lot.

    The signalling engineer who told me that moving one signal box a few feet costs tens of thousands just on the contract.

    The residents of small villages – near Rugby and Cliffe, Gatwick and Stansted – with homes and lives blighted by Labour’s plans to destroy historic churches and wildlife sanctuaries in the pursuit of new and bigger airports everywhere – and I challenge Alistair Darling to do as I have done and visit these areas himself.

    I think of the pensioner who told me he was left gasping for breath, frail and fearful of a fall because at one station he had to climb steep steps in deep darkness and when he asked a member of staff for help was told “we don’t do that anymore”.

    Or the disabled person, coping with courage all her life, brought to tears because Gordon Brown’s petrol taxes mean she can no longer afford to drive.

    Think of these people and you will realise – enough is enough. And how dare Labour claim they care about the vulnerable, when this is what they do to the vulnerable?

    Conservatives believe in freedom, in a smaller state, in the unlimited potential of individuals and private enterprise.

    That’s why the motorist will always be hated by the Left, and championed by the Conservatives. It’s about freedom.

    Ten years ago Mr Blair used to tell a story. While canvassing he met a man washing his Mondeo, who said he’d never dream of voting Labour. Mr Blair spent years wooing Mondeo Man. What he never said was that in office he’d try to ensure the only thing you could afford to do with a Mondeo is wash it.

    When will they learn? Driving is not a sin. For millions of pensioners, people with disabilities and rural residents it is the only thing which makes life bearable.

    British motorists get the worst deal in the industrialised world.

    Just 14p in the £ of taxes raised from drivers is spent on roads in Britain. It’s by far the lowest ratio in any G7 country.

    The result? A road system which one Midlands company boss told me is unfair to call Third World – because at least in the Third World many roads are getting better.

    The Lib Dems just offer the same as Labour but with added spite. Even more congestion charging. Even higher motoring taxes. Even less road-building. Not so much an alternative to socialism as an alternative to sanity.

    The Left’s prejudice and intolerance have a sinister consequence.

    Under the Conservatives, the numbers killed on our roads halved – from 6,800 in 1979 to a still far too high 3,500 in 1997. Year after year the numbers fell. But no longer.

    In each of Labour’s first five years over 3,400 people have died on the roads – effectively the same number they inherited.

    What has changed? Cars still get safer. Medical science still gets better. Yet 1200 more people lose their lives each year now than would if 1980s trends had continued.

    However unintentionally, Government policy is largely to blame.

    They stopped building new, safer roads – in 2001, not one inch of tarmac was added to the national road network.

    And they have used speed cameras to replace, not supplement, traffic patrols. Under Labour, police officers on traffic duties have been cut by nearly 10%. As Chief Superintendent Mike McAndrew, former head of traffic policing for the Met, has said “speed on its own is not the real killer – it’s dangerous driving.” Without enough traffic patrols, he says, “people who drive dangerously, recklessly and carelessly don’t get caught”.

    So under Labour the numbers caught for driving without a licence or proper insurance have fallen by 10%. The numbers caught for driving with a defective car have fallen by 30%.

    Yet the number of speeding tickets issued to people who have

    correctly registered their car has shot up by 250%.

    So generally safe, generally responsible drivers are pursued ruthlessly for every mistake they make – while the really dangerous and irresponsible drivers, those without a licence, without insurance, without a safe car are let off time and time again.

    Enough is enough. And so my first announcement today is that we will tell the police and the courts to concentrate not on easy catches but on the really dangerous drivers.

    We will boost the numbers of traffic patrols. Improve driver education. And increase significantly penalties for those driving without a licence or without insurance, including permanent confiscation of their cars and when appropriate longer jail terms. Our Fair Deal for the Motorist starts with basic commonsense.

    Greater safety also comes from new roads. We’ll cut both the costs and the time of building roads, starting by scrapping time-wasting Multi-Modal Studies.

    Unlike Labour, we don’t aim to obliterate every last blade of grass in southern England. Our approach will ease overheating in the South – a sensible regional policy, respect for the Green Belt and, at last, firm and fair immigration and asylum rules to cut the numbers moving here from abroad.

    And of course we’ll keep the presumption, placed into law by the last Conservative Government, against major road developments in National Parks or Areas of Natural Beauty.

    But we also know sensibly planned, sensibly built roads enhance the environment for villages and small towns, cut pollution and congestion, and reduce the number of accidents.

    Most serious crashes occur not on motorways, but on small roads.

    International experience shows that higher and more rigorously observed limits on motorways, combined with lower limits on small roads, strongly help to reduce road casualties.

    That’s why we will on entering office immediately start a swift and comprehensive review of speed limits. It’s likely to mean raising the motorway limit to 80 mph while providing lower limits – of 20 mph or below – near schools or in small communities.

    A more rational attitude towards risk across transport is needed.

    In the eighteen months since the last time anyone was killed on a crashing train in Britain, over 5,000 have died in road accidents.

    It is much safer to travel by rail than by road. Yet very often the opposite impression is given. This distortion has got to stop.

    Because of it, we spend far more public money on rail safety than on road safety, putting a small chance of saving a few lives ahead of much better prospects of saving far more.

    Because of it, we saw a 3 month shutdown of London’s Central Line after an incident with no serious injuries – even though that caused tens of thousands to travel at far greater risk on the roads.

    And because of it, we saw a collapse of rail performance after Hatfield, causing many to switch to riskier road journeys.

    In the same way thousands of speed bumps were constructed, often thoughtlessly – when the London Ambulance Service say more die because ambulances are slowed than are saved by the bumps.

    So a narrow obsession with health and safety is endangering lives, not saving them. And we have yet another way of taking money from taxpayers and giving it to the legal profession.

    I don’t know about you but my view is that the lawyers get quite enough of all our money as it is.

    So my second announcement today is that Conservatives will concentrate on the big risks, not the small ones. When the next rail incident occurs, we will not rush to feed the frenzy of dangerous speculation encouraging people to switch to the roads.

    We’ll revise Government guidance which arm-twists councils into unwise speed bump schemes. Some make sense; many do not.

    And in office we will spend public money available for transport safety not to get headlines but to save the largest number of lives.

    Bus services need to be reliable, speedy and above all accessible, especially for pensioners. So we’ll aim to build on today’s half-priced bus pass to boost mobility for all, not just those near a bus route – because retirement should be a pleasure, not a sentence.

    We’ll be creative about transport solutions in the big cities – we’ll explore entirely private sector means to build London’s Crossrail, and welcome the thinking by Birmingham Conservatives about a privately funded new Tube. I look forward to further talks when next June Conservatives there sweep Labour out and take charge of England’s second city.

    Money spent on our railways must be better spent.

    So my third announcement is a radical slimming for the bloated Strategic Rail Authority. We doubt it makes sense to have three different public sector bodies – all created by Labour – supervising the rail network. And we’ll give longer franchises and more freedom to train companies, in return for much better service.

    We must also end Labour’s non-stop milking of the motorist.

    In London, Steve Norris is campaigning vigorously against Ken Livingstone’s Congestion Charge – not least because instead of the promised millions for public transport it is so off beam that it actually means less money for public transport. And we will resist Labour’s plan for the greatest stealth tax of all: charging 50p a mile for using roads we’ve already paid for many times over.

    In fact, here’s a thought. For years the British taxpayer has paid for new roads in Ireland, Greece, and Spain – and now in Iraq and Afghanistan. How about using British taxes on British roads?

    My final announcement concerns the purpose of the Department for Transport. The next Conservative Government will focus it on a goal which today astonishingly is not even an aspiration – reducing the time it takes to make a journey.

    We’ll address the frustration of millions – that it takes longer and longer to get home from work, get goods to market or visit friends.

    As technology advances, we expect many things to get better year by year. It shows the poverty of ambition of the Left that their aim on transport is just to manage decline into ever greater misery.

    There are no easy overnight solutions. But we can do better than the Left because we will at least try.

    Our policies will help traffic flow, not force it to grind to a halt. And we’ll aim to make journeys easier for all, not just for some.

    Under the Conservatives, the right to travel will not be confined to those with two Jags, huge egos and the sort of staggering hypocrisy which it takes years of socialist belief to create.

    I’m not saying this lot get things wrong – but they do sometimes remind me of the dyslexic devil-worshipper who sold his soul to Santa.

    Conference, let’s take pride in fundamental Conservative values.

    Never has loyalty to our nation-state been more evident in every age group, or more necessary in a changing world. Never has the need to get rid of petty interfering bureaucrats been greater.

    And never has it been more popular to believe in lower taxes – especially lower council taxes for pensioners.

    So let us for goodness’ sake take off the sackcloth and ashes.

    I for one am proud that Conservative Governments won the Cold War, revived our economy, and gave power and wealth and home ownership to millions who only dreamed of it before.

    And I’m proud to point out that today’s prosperity wasn’t built by Tony Blair but by Margaret Thatcher.

    With renewed self-confidence we can take on and take apart a Prime Minister who calls himself “battered”. Not half as battered, Tony, mate, as you are going to be.

    But let’s start with the Lib Dems. Their leader said that it was quite wrong to call his party Left wing – and then his Conference debated turning Britain into a People’s Republic, called for voting rights for convicted prisoners, voted to abolish all effective immigration controls and said most burglars should not go to jail.

    Charlie, the only place those ideas aren’t leftwing is in Fidel Castro’s Cuba. The Loony Left rides again.

    Lib Dem Menzies Campbell says he wants to turn our head of state into a bicycling monarch. We have not forgotten that wonderful Golden Jubilee, nor that we have seen a magnificent half century of public service for which all of us should be profoundly grateful.

    A bicycling monarchy, Mr Campbell? Let me echo Norman Tebbit – on your bike.

    Mr Blair has done so much harm to this nation. Ripped up its constitution, ramped up its taxes, bankrupted its farmers and fishermen, persecuted its motorists and let its violent crime soar.

    Worse, he has lied and lied and lied again. But none of this constitutes the most serious charge against him.

    Signing this country up to any European constitution, against his solemn word, is a grave matter. Committing Britain in principle to the current version of that constitution, which represents the end of national liberty, is shameful. But doing so without seeking the consent of the British people in a referendum is an absolute, utter and wholly unforgivable disgrace.

    Mr Blair arrogantly takes a third term for granted.

    Some Labour rebels want to see the back of him tomorrow. Good luck to them, I say – but we all know they won’t succeed.

    The Liberal Democrats have already conceded that they cannot deny him a further term in office.

    Only this Conservative Party can eject Tony Blair from Number Ten within the next two years.

    But we’ve got two obstacles to overcome to do that.

    First, there are some in this party who need rapidly to relearn the virtues of loyalty. Let us remind them – Iain Duncan-Smith was elected overwhelmingly, is daily exposing Tony Blair’s deceit and dishonesty and deserves the undivided support of this entire party.

    So let the message go forth to every Conservative, however eminent, senior or self-important – if you can’t say anything positive about your party, kindly don’t say anything at all.

    Second, we need to raise our sights. Some say our aim should simply be to cut Mr Blair’s majority and prepare to win the Election after next.

    Conference, we can’t wait that long. Those relying on failing public services, those paying skyrocketing taxes, those seeing years of striving to give their children a good education ruined by the corruption of the exam system, those held up as transport grinds to a halt – all these people can’t wait.

    Above all, Britain can’t wait. Another New Labour term could end all that makes Britain what it is.

    That is why our job is not just to oppose this Government, but to replace this Government.

    If we go forward now with energy, and fire, and passion – if we demonstrate commitment and clarity and courage – if we pledge ourselves anew to fight for liberty, for democracy, and for Britain – then we will do more than deserve to win – we are going to win.”

  • Liam Fox – 2003 Speech to Conservative Party Conference

    Liam Fox – 2003 Speech to Conservative Party Conference

    The speech made by Liam Fox, the then Shadow Secretary of State for Health, at the Conservative Party conference held in Blackpool on 6 October 2003.

    I want to begin today with a little general knowledge test. I’m sure we all remember Labour’s 1997 election campaign.

    Remember “24 hours to save the NHS”?

    Remember how they were going to get rid of hospital waiting lists?

    I wonder how many of you have been following the detail. Let me ask you. At the current rate of reduction, after six years of Labour government – how long would it take to deal with the backlog for NHS surgery?

    5 years, 15 years or 20 years? Well, actually, none of these .

    According to the Government’s own figures published last Friday, it will take no less than 62 years and 3 months to deal with the backlog of patients waiting.

    Some 24 hours to save the NHS.

    There is something going very badly wrong in Labour’s NHS. Record amounts of taxpayers money have been thrown at it. Yet despite huge spending increases, the number of hospital admissions actually fell last year. And the average waiting time for an operation actually went up not down. And the number of hospital beds fell …. again.

    It’s all because Labour have never learned the basic lesson that it’s not how much money you spend, it’s how you spend the money. It’s easy to spend money – especially, as a taxi driver in Birmingham pointed out to me last week, if it’s other people’s money. It’s easy to create waste and regulation and bureaucracy. It is much harder to carry out the real and difficult reforms which create greater choice, improved outcomes and more efficient use of taxpayers’ money.

    Yet to listen to Labour Ministers you would think everything was improving no end. Not that we can believe a word they tell us.

    What will they tell us next? That there are no pregnant mothers waiting more than six months for delivery?

    When they announced last year that only 2 patients were waiting more than eighteen months for treatment my office was inundated with calls from patients all over the country wanting to know who the other one was!

    There seem to be 2 NHSs. The one we all use and the virtual NHS that exists in the minds of the Government.

    So we need to ask them:

    If the NHS is doing so well, why are more nurses leaving Britain to work abroad than ever before?

    If the NHS is doing so well, why are we asset stripping some of the world’s poorest countries to staff our wards?

    If the NHS is doing so well, why is it harder to get to see your GP?

    If the NHS is doing so well, why are 3,500 elderly patients unable to leave hospital each day?

    If the NHS is doing so well, why are our hospitals so filthy, and why do so many patients pick up infections while they are in hospital?

    It is an appalling fact that 1% of all deaths in this country, the 4th richest in the world, are caused by hospital acquired infections.

    How many of us here today will be victims of what we catch while in hospital?

    How things have changed. Even when I was a hospital doctor, cleanliness was not a bolt on extra for patient care, it was taken for granted. Now, to add insult to injury, of the 20 hospitals with the highest infection rates, 15 got the Government’s top rating for cleanliness.

    The gap between the spin and the reality gets ever bigger, but it’s the public who are suffering while Ministers look the other way.

    DECENTRALISATION

    Over the past year, we have produced three Consultation Papers on our health policies.

    A central theme of all our reforms has been to take the politicians out of the day-to-day running of our public services.

    We know that politicians couldn’t run the airlines, couldn’t run telecoms and can’t run the post office.

    But if politicians couldn’t properly run any of these things, why does anyone think they can run the NHS? A complex and highly varied body employing over a million people and with a budget the size of the Egyptian economy!

    Too many Conservative governments wrongly believed that they could manage the NHS better than Labour.

    But let me tell you – it cannot be managed from Whitehall, from behind the Secretary of State’s desk. The NHS is too big, too diverse and too complex.

    And, of course, it’s all especially true for a Secretary of State who represents a seat in Scotland, where health is a devolved subject. What an insult to voters in England to have a Secretary of State who will have no electorate to answer to when he gets it all wrong. And what an insult for Labour to use their Scottish MPs to force through health legislation in England when they have no say in health matters in their own constituencies. That is the real unfinished business in the devolution settlement.

    No, when it comes to the running of the NHS, we intend to slash the central bureaucracy. We intend to abolish whole departments where possible. Whole quangos. And we will be able to do it because if we don’t have the targets we will not need those who implement the targets. And if we give more power to those on the front line we won’t need Whitehall babysitters to watch their every move.

    But there are some things we can learn from New Labour.

    Perhaps most importantly, we have seen the benefits Labour has derived from the discipline of an independent Bank of England. It is a lesson we must learn in the NHS. For too long, and especially under this Labour Government the allocation of health funding has been shrouded in mystery and used as a tool of political patronage.

    The NHS must not be used as a political football.

    That is why we will establish an independent NHS Board to allocate in a fair and transparent way the funding within the NHS. This step change will give the clearest possible signal that we are deadly serious about taking the politicians out of the day to day running of the NHS and it will be part of a rolling plan to reduce the powers of the Secretary of State and the Department of Health. It follows on to our plans to give hospitals greater financial independence and our frontline professions more freedoms.

    TARGETS

    But there is one other area of freedom they need.

    If there is one aspect of this interfering, controlling, know-it-all Government that has corroded the ethical basis of the NHS, it is their pathological obsession with targets. Let me give you just two examples.

    In the Thames Valley we have had the ridiculous sight of ambulances loaded with sick patients queueing around hospitals. Why? Because if Accident and Emergency Departments don’t admit the patients then it doesn’t count for their four hour waiting target. So not only do sick patients have to wait in ambulances instead of the hospital but the ambulances are not available when other patients may require them in an emergency.

    Can you think of anything more heartless, stupid or wasteful?

    And if you think that is bad, it is nothing to the experience of patients in Bristol. 25 patients have been documented as losing their sight permanently and, what’s worse, unnecessarily. Why? Because the Consultants who they should have seen for their follow up appointments for their glaucoma were instructed to see new patients instead. Because there is a target for new patients, but not for follow up appointments.

    Going blind to save the targets. Is this the ethical basis of Labour’s NHS? Am I the only one who finds this utterly disgusting?

    What’s worse, it is a policy instruction which comes directly from Ministers.

    It is entirely a product of Tony Blair and Gordon Brown’s whole approach to health care. It tells us all we need to know about the real moral basis of new Labour- run for them and not for us.

    CHOICE

    So we need to alter the balance in the NHS. Labour believe that the patients are there to service the system. We believe the system should be there to service the patients.

    People must be given a real say in what happens to them, or their children, or their elderly relatives.

    Labour’s pathetic so-called choice programme is little more than a watered down version of the system they abolished when they came to office in 1997. But it is the choices that they think you should be allowed to have and you are only allowed to get it once you have reached a maximum waiting time. In other words Labour only believe that patients deserve a choice once the NHS has already failed them.

    Let me remind them. We have already paid for this service through our ever mounting taxes. We don’t want a say about what happens to us- we demand a say in what happens to us. The NHS is not a gift from Government. It is a right we have already paid for.

    Gordon Brown loves to say that the NHS is the best insurance policy in the world. But who would buy car insurance or house insurance where your insurer could keep raising the premium whether you wanted it or not, where they wouldn’t tell you what was covered and didn’t have to deliver when you needed it.

    No, it simply won’t do in the world’s 4th richest country at the beginning of the 21st century for British patients to be denied the freedoms that are taken for granted in Germany, and France, and The Netherlands, and Sweden and Switzerland and any number of other European countries. Gordon Brown says “consumers cannot be sovereign in a health market” which is New Labour gobbledygook for saying that British patients would not be able to understand or operate the sort of choices, freedoms and control that is taken for granted by the French, the Germans, the Dutch, the Swedes or the Swiss. What breathtaking arrogance. What offensive patronising drivel – especially from a Chancellor who thinks that never smiling makes you an intellectual!

    PATIENTS PASSPORT

    That is why we will introduce the Patients Passport. It will work quite simply. There will be a standard price set for each treatment or investigation inside the NHS. Patients will be able to be treated wherever they choose and the bill will be paid by the NHS.

    It means that if you see your GP and they decide you need further treatment you will be able to decide where and when you would rather be treated and by whom. Still free of charge. But for the first time you will have access to a genuinely national health service rather than being sent to the hospital that is more convenient for those running the system.

    Why do we tolerate the elderly widow waiting in pain for her hip replacement when she could be treated more quickly elsewhere?

    Why should women be told that they cannot give birth at a midwife led unit because it is outside their district?

    How can we stand by while a war veteran goes blind when the cataract surgery that would transform his quality of life is denied because his local NHS won’t pay for his treatment anywhere else?

    Under the next Conservative Government each of these patients will get a patient’s passport that will empower them to take control over the treatment they get. After all, they have already paid for it through their taxes. What could be fairer than that?

    But never underestimate how much Labour fear and hate choice. It is at the core of their being that central planning is a good thing. That we need to be told what to do. That the man in Whitehall knows best. If Labour don’t have the NHS to run they don’t know what they’re for. Redundant. Pointless. Obsolete. They have no concept that patients might want to exercise choice to improve the care of themselves or their families. They have never understood that not everyone wants to wait at the mercy of the state – and they never will.

    We, on the other hand, will take patient choice and freedom much further. Each year more and more people use their savings to buy an operation or an investigation. Last year 300,000 patients did this- 3 times the number when Labour came to power. Often they are not wealthy but forced to use their hard earned savings to spare themselves or their loved ones a wait in pain or fear. Yet despite the fact that they have already paid for their healthcare often through a lifetime of contributions, the state will give them no help whatsoever. I believe that those who have already paid for their NHS care but who reduce the queues for others by going to the voluntary or not for profit or private sectors should be given a helping hand. That is why we will give patients 60% of the standard NHS price to take with them.

    What would that mean for a patient waiting for, say, a hip replacement? The standard price might be set at around £5,000. Our Patients Passport would mean that this money would automatically fund the patient’s care anywhere inside the NHS – entirely free to them at the point of use. If they chose to go outside the NHS they could take £3,000 with them to give them a helping hand. They would leave £2,000 behind to help the NHS and the queue would have got shorter. Everyone would benefit.

    Everyone should get a helping hand – choice should not only be available for the rich.

    In the 1980s Margaret Thatcher, our greatest peace-time Prime Minister set out to extend home ownership to those who had previously been unable to afford it. We didn’t force people to buy their homes. Nor did we give them away for nothing. But through our sale of council homes we brought a new choice within the reach of millions of people. Labour fought us every step of the way. But what we achieved in home ownership we are now challenged to do in health care.

    Our principle is clear. We believe that when you pay taxes you do so to cross subsidise your fellow citizens, but you have a right to expect the state, like any other insurer to deliver when you need it.

    And the difference, the essential political, philosophical, ideological difference between ourselves and Labour is this. Labour believe that when you pay your taxes it is their money. We believe that when you pay your taxes it is still your money.

    What we propose is nothing less than the fundamental recasting of the relationship between the state and the citizen – and no wonder the self-serving, centralising control freaks of New Labour are scared.

    No wonder there is no lie they won’t tell to distort our plans. Because they know that when the British people are given a freedom they will never give it back.

    CHRONIC CARE

    People say to me – it must be wonderful to be a doctor in your political position. I want to let you in on a little secret. It can be the most frustrating experience to sit in the House of Commons and listen to debates which have little resemblance to the real NHS that I worked in. Sometimes, to listen to Ministers, you would think that the only things the NHS did were hips, knees and cataracts.

    The PM says “it’s all about hospitals”. Well, actually, it’s not. Most of our health care is in primary care from our GPs, practice nurses, midwives and others.

    And what about those patients with chronic illness? Not the ones who can be easily counted on a waiting list, but those with conditions that cause constant misery. What about the stroke patients, the MS patients, the Crohn’s disease patients? What about those with rheumatoid disease or depression or in need of terminal care. They must be part of the picture too.

    That is why we intend to extend our Patient’s Passport to chronic illness as well. To help stroke patients determine where they are looked after and how support services are provided to them. To help those in need of palliative care to decide if they want to be in a hospital setting or at home or in a hospice. We must never assume that we always know best for the patient and we must never fail to recognise the wonderful contribution the voluntary sector makes to the care of patients and their families. We at this conference thank them and salute them.

    PUBLIC HEALTH

    Over the summer I outlined a new set of proposals on public health to deal with the horrendous rise in diabetes, sexually transmitted infections and TB afflicting our country. We need to act now to prevent not only enormous suffering but enormous financial liabilities arising for the NHS and our taxpayers.

    Today’s young people with chlamydia or gonorrhoea will be joining tomorrow’s infertility patients demanding expensive NHS care.

    Today’s overweight, underactive children will be tomorrow’s diabetics with eye problems, kidney problems or vascular problems. It’s a case of too many gameboys and not enough games.

    But politicians nowadays are too scared to criticise peoples’ lifestyles.

    That is why we are going to introduce a Public Health Commissioner who will be able to force governments to take action when it is needed instead of hiding behind some pathetic and cowardly concept of political correctness.

    One of my colleagues said to me: “Are you mad? Do you know what they would do to us in office”. Yes, I do. They might force us to do the things that are right for our people rather than what is comfortable for the politicians. And isn’t it about time.

    But the most controversial aspect of our proposals dealt with compulsory health screening for those coming to stay in Britain and health entitlement cards to prevent those so called health tourists who have contributed nothing from using the NHS free of charge.

    Let me put it bluntly. We are now seeing the resurgence of TB, especially in London. There are higher TB rates in Brent than Azerbaijan. Higher rates in Newham than Uzbekistan. It cannot be allowed to continue.

    That is why we intend to base our new public health law on the model adopted in Australia. Those seeking to come to reside in the country must satisfy three tests.

    First that they do not have an infectious disease that might put the public health at risk.

    Second that they are not coming to target relatively scarce resources such as renal dialysis or cancer care.

    And third that they will not be an undue burden on the public purse by requiring long term care.

    We are perfectly willing to give care to those who need it and are genuinely entitled to come to this country. That is our moral duty. But we also have a duty to ensure that our own citizens who have paid for these services get the priority they deserve.

    The NHS mustn’t be allowed to become the international health honeypot and a future Conservative government will ensure that it is not.

    There are those who try to claim these ideas are extremist. Let me give them this warning. If we, in the political mainstream are not willing to deal with these issues in a reasonable and responsible way then there will be those on the darker edges of our politics who will exploit them in a totally irresponsible and dangerous way.

    FAIRNESS

    Today we find ourselves confronted by a Government that has tried to hijack our language of fairness. So let’s ask Tony Blair what’s fair.

    What’s fair about patients with brain cancer, prostate cancer or ovarian cancer having to wait longer for treatment now than they did back in 1999?

    What’s fair about a system where those with mental illness are the last to get help and first to be forgotten?

    What’s fair about a system that leaves people blind to satisfy government targets?

    And what’s fair about a system that forces elderly people to sell their homes for care while those who have never paid a penny tax can come from overseas and use the NHS for free?

    No it’s not fair because fairness like truth is a casualty of New Labour’s mindset- that New Labour always come first and the British people come second.

    We now have a Government which has taxed and failed and taxed again and failed again.

    It is the most dishonest and untrustworthy Government we have ever seen.

    It is led by the most self-serving, self-righteous and un-British Prime Minister we have ever had. He doesn’t trust our people, despises our history and would sell out our national interests in a minute. We are constantly given distorted truths and fiddled figures especially in health care.

    But they are not just figures- they represent real people. They could be our families, our friends or ourselves.

    How do we counteract this corrosion of truth?

    We do it by treating our people with respect and telling them the truth even if it is not what they want to hear.

    We do it by remembering that politics is about leading the debate not following it.

    And we do it by remembering what made us such a formidable force. By being a truly meritocratic party which sees Britain as a single nation.

    We should have no talk about the grey vote or the gay vote or the black vote or any other vote that tries to define our fellow citizens. Our party’s and our country’s strength lies in offering opportunity to all those who are willing to contribute to their country. We offer not patronising slogans but opportunity to all those who want it.

    We judge people on the talents and endeavours they will give to Britain not what they look like or who their parents were.

    We have an urgent task. To prepare to be the Government our country needs.

    To govern not for north or south, for rich or poor nor any other divide. But for all our people. And when the call comes let us take our place with pride.