Author: admin

  • Tim Loughton – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Education

    Tim Loughton – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Education

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Tim Loughton on 2014-04-07.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Education, which local authorities are involved in investigations of historic abuse by Jimmy Savile; and when he expects the resulting reports to be published.

    Mr Edward Timpson

    As published in the Written Statement made by my Rt. hon Friend, the Secretary of State for Education on 27 March 2014, the following local authorities are involved in investigations of historical abuse by Jimmy Savile: Bournemouth, Devon, Gloucestershire, Leeds, London Borough of Hounslow, London Borough of Islington, London Borough of Southwark, London Borough of Tower Hamlets, Manchester, Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, and Surrey.

    The investigations will be completed at the earliest opportunity, but not before the independent quality assurers are satisfied that they have been full and thorough.

  • Chris Leslie – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Communities and Local Government

    Chris Leslie – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Communities and Local Government

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Chris Leslie on 2014-04-07.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government, which 10 consultancy firms were paid the most by his Department in the last financial year; and how much each of those firms was paid.

    Brandon Lewis

    The table below sets out the ten consultancy firms that were paid the most by my Department in the last financial year

    The data complies with definitions on Consultancy laid down by the Cabinet Office which excludes agency staff and interim (contingent) labour.

    Financial Year 2013-14

    Organisation

    Total Expenditure (excluding VAT)

    Local Partnership LLP*

    £150,918

    PricewaterhouseCoopers

    £108,516

    Ove Arup & Partners

    £66,790

    Amec Environment & Infrastructure

    £62,509

    Ernest & Young LLP

    £20,000

    Capgemini UK Plc

    £17,000

    Grant Thornton UK LLP

    £8,815

    Giant Professional Limited

    £6,400

    Oakleigh Consulting Ltd

    £4,950

    Land Use Consultants

    £1,345

    * Local Partnerships is a company that is jointly owned by HM Treasury and the Local Government Association; it provides commercial expertise on matters of infrastructure, legal and contractual complexity and acts for the benefit of the public sector.

    My Department has cut spending on consultancy from £36.6 million in 2009-10 to £0.5 million in 2013-14. This represents a saving of £36.1 million a year (2013-14 compared to 2009-10) and has been achieved through contract renegotiations, terminations and adherence to Cabinet Office controls on consultancy spending.

    To put this in context, based on current estimates (which reflect accounting consequences from machinery of government changes) the DCLG Group is reducing its annual running costs by around 40% in real terms between 2010-11 and 2014-15. This equates to net savings of at least £532 million over this spending review period and includes savings of around £420 million from the closure of the Government Offices for the Regions.

  • Chris Leslie – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Culture Media and Sport

    Chris Leslie – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Culture Media and Sport

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Chris Leslie on 2014-04-07.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport, which 10 consultancy firms were paid the most by her Department in the last financial year; and how much each of those firms was paid.

    Mrs Helen Grant

    The 10 professional services firms that were paid the most in 2013/14 are listed in the table below:

    Supplier Name

    Total paid in 2013-14 (£)

    KPMG LLP

    1,934,209.35

    Pinsent Masons

    950,789.80

    Local Partnerships

    429,919.24

    Grant Thornton UK LLP

    401,867.88

    Regeneris Consulting Ltd

    75,187.00

    Andrew Dumbreck Media Limited

    62,165.60

    National Centre for Social Research

    70,732.00

    Deloitte (LLP No 2 a/c)

    49,480.00

    CLAS Co-operative Ltd

    29,820.00

    SQW Limited

    29,413.00

    These are unaudited figures from the Department’s financials systems, net of recoverable VAT. The department uses professional services firms for a variety of purposes. In addition to consultancy services, they include expenditure on external legal support and advice on programmes, research fieldwork, evaluation, specialist technical advice and the provision of interim managers. Legal services from the Treasury Solicitors and providers of recruitment services have been excluded in order to arrive at a list of firms that are predominantly providers of consultancy.

  • Helen Goodman – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Culture Media and Sport

    Helen Goodman – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Culture Media and Sport

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Helen Goodman on 2014-04-07.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport, how many heritage sites English Heritage has declined to take control of as custodian of last resort in the last 30 years; and what the reasons were for declining in each such case.

    Mr Edward Vaizey

    To the knowledge of its current management team, English Heritage has not declined to take control of any heritage sites as custodian of last resort in the last 30 years. English Heritage has occasionally been offered properties that it has declined on the basis that there were other more suitable solutions available.

  • Helen Goodman – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Home Office

    Helen Goodman – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Home Office

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Helen Goodman on 2014-04-07.

    To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, with reference to the communiqué of the internet safety summit at Downing Street, published on 18 November 2013, what progress has been made by internet companies on ensuring that child abuse images are not returned following search engine requests.

    Karen Bradley

    Child abuse is a horrific crime and the Government is determined to tackle
    it. We have made real progress through our work with the internet industry.
    Following this work, internet search engines have made changes to
    their search mechanisms, and these new measures have been effective in making
    it harder to access child abuse images. For example, Google has implemented
    changes that prevent child abuse results against 100,000 unique searches
    worldwide. National Crime Agency testing of these new measures shows that they
    have been effective in making it harder to access child abuse images, videos or
    pathways. This is now a constantly evolving approach that tracks the latest
    terms being used by paedophiles and cuts off access to child abuse material.

  • Adam Afriyie – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Ministry of Defence

    Adam Afriyie – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Ministry of Defence

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Adam Afriyie on 2014-04-07.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what guidance and support his Department provides to military veterans and their families on securing stable housing; and if he will make a statement.

    Anna Soubry

    The £200 million Forces Help to Buy scheme commenced on 1 April 2014, meaning that Servicemen and women can now borrow up to 50% of their salary, up to a maximum of £25,000, interest-free, providing a boost to those needing to find a deposit to buy their own home.

    To assist the transition of serving personnel to civilian life, the MOD offers a wide-ranging resettlement programme which includes a briefing by the Joint Services Housing Advice Office. This offers advice and information about a range of topics that armed forces personnel may find useful relating to an individual’s housing needs before they leave the armed forces.

    Once a person leaves service, any need for social housing becomes a local authority matter. The MOD is working closely with the Department for Communities and Local Government to ensure the fair treatment of service families in need of social housing and ensure they are given proper priority on housing waiting lists.

    The Government recognises that there is more that can be done to provide practical support to our veterans and their families in this area. In February I announced LIBOR funding of £40 million to support charities which assist veterans with housing needs in order to build new homes, buy new accommodation and renovate old facilities. Projects are expected to include hostels and half-way houses for veterans who have fallen on hard times, supported housing for the wounded, injured and sick, and long-term care homes.

  • Bridget Phillipson – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Ministry of Defence

    Bridget Phillipson – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Ministry of Defence

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Bridget Phillipson on 2014-04-07.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, if he will place in the Library a copy of his Department’s notice 2014DIN01-021, Revision of cost-of-living addition salary bands.

    Anna Soubry

    Copies of the Department’s notice on the revision of the cost of living addition salary bands (2014DIN01-021) and the increase in the rate of excess fares allowance from 6 April 2014 (2014DIN01-032) have been placed in the Library of the House.

  • Bridget Phillipson – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Ministry of Defence

    Bridget Phillipson – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Ministry of Defence

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Bridget Phillipson on 2014-04-07.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, if he will place in the Library a copy of his Department’s notice 2014DIN01-032, Increase in the rate of excess fares allowance from 6 April 2014.

    Anna Soubry

    Copies of the Department’s notice on the revision of the cost of living addition salary bands (2014DIN01-021) and the increase in the rate of excess fares allowance from 6 April 2014 (2014DIN01-032) have been placed in the Library of the House.

  • Chris Leslie – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Ministry of Defence

    Chris Leslie – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Ministry of Defence

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Chris Leslie on 2014-04-07.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, which five companies were used most often to provide temporary workers for his Department in the last financial year; and how much in agency fees was paid to each of them.

    Anna Soubry

    The Ministry of Defence uses a process called “manpower substitution” to engage temporary staff at agreed fixed rates on a national basis through a number of contracts. Manpower substitutes are employed for up to 11 months to fill vacant, funded posts. The majority are brought in to fill medical and dental requirements at military medical centres to cover for military positions that are vacant due to deployment into operational theatre. This enables the medical services to continue to provide the best possible care to members of the Armed Forces.

    The five companies most frequently used by the Ministry of Defence in Financial Year 2013-14 to provide temporary workers, and the associated fees paid to each, are presented in the following table:

    Company

    Type of worker

    Number of Temporary Workers

    Fees Paid

    HoneyBee

    Medical & Dental

    790

    £3.46m

    CastleRock Ltd

    Medical & Dental

    490

    £2.61m

    Capita Resourcing

    Interim Professionals

    320

    £2.07m

    Hayes

    Medical & Dental

    190

    £0.59m

    Reed

    Clerical & Admin

    160

    £0.11m

    The figures provided for Capita Resourcing cover the period from April 2013 to March 2014. All other data cover the period April 2013 to February 2014. Data is extracted from the MOD’s centralised Manpower Substitution Service database and does not include any localised arrangements that individual Top Level Budget holders may have with other companies.

  • Madeleine Moon – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Ministry of Defence

    Madeleine Moon – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Ministry of Defence

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Madeleine Moon on 2014-04-07.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, how many (a) trucks for bridging, (b) medium girder bridges, (c) medium over girder bridges, (d) air portable ferry bridges, (e) pontoon sets, (f) LSB bridge and ramp sets and (g) launch sets are owned by his Department; how many are stored at MoD Ashchurch; and if he will make a statement.

    Mr Philip Dunne

    The following table summarises the requested vehicles and bridging equipment, and the quantity currently held by the Defence Support Group at Ashchurch:

    Equipment Asset

    Total Assets Held

    Quantity Held by DSG at Ashchurch

    Automotive Bridge Laying Equipment

    29

    11

    Bridging Vehicle

    64

    28

    Truck Bridge Transporter

    45

    12

    Pontoon Set

    3

    3

    Air Portable Ferry Bridge

    11

    2

    Air Portable Ferry Bridge Trailers

    66

    23

    Air Portable Bridge Powered Pontoons

    22

    10

    Air Portable Ferry Bridge Pontoons

    44

    16

    Medium Girder Bridges

    9

    1

    Medium Girder Over Bridges

    33

    3

    Logistic Support Bridge

    18

    7

    Logistic Support Bridge Adjustable Ramp

    17

    9

    Logistic Support Bridge Pier Set

    3

    2

    Logistic Support Bridge Foot Walk

    3

    2

    Logistic Support Bridge Distributions Beam

    5

    4

    Logistic Support Bridge Span Junction

    7

    4

    Logistic Support Bridge Launching Set

    17

    9

    Logistic Support Bridge Long Span Set

    8

    3