Author: admin

  • Alison McGovern – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Work and Pensions

    Alison McGovern – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Work and Pensions

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Alison McGovern on 2014-04-03.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, what proportion of former jobseeker’s allowance claimants moving into work from the Work Programme in the Merseyside, Halton, Cumbria and Lancashire contract area started work on (a) a full-time, (b) a part-time, (c) a zero hours and (d) an apprenticeship contract.

    Esther McVey

    The information requested is not readily available and could only be provided at disproportionate cost. Figures published by the Office for National Statistics suggest that most job opportunities being created in the recovery are full-time and permanent. The number of people in work has risen by more than 450,000 in the last year. Within this full-time employment has risen by 430,000 and part-time employment by 29,000, while the number of people in temporary jobs has fallen, meaning the vast majority of the rise is full-time and permanent jobs.

  • Margaret Curran – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Work and Pensions

    Margaret Curran – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Work and Pensions

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Margaret Curran on 2014-04-03.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, where each Jobcentre Plus office is in Scotland; when each office opened; and how many people have used each such office in each year since 2010.

    Esther McVey

    There are 94 Jobcentres in Scotland. A full list of these Jobcentres is provided at Annex 1.

    We do not keep a record of when each office opened, so I am unable to supply you with this information.

    There are no official statistics kept which would provide you with the number of people who have used each office in each year since 2010. Many people, some of whom are already employed, use the jobpoints or Intranet Access Devices in our Jobcentres but may not make a claim to benefit or register unemployed. It would therefore be impossible to provide you with the total number of people using the Jobcentres.

    Annex 1

    List of Jobcentres in Scotland

    East & South East Scotland

    Alloa JC

    Bathgate JC

    Broxburn JC

    Cowdenbeath JC

    Cupar JC

    Dalkeith JC

    Dunfermline JC

    EdinburghCity

    Eyemouth JC

    Falkirk JC

    Galashiels JC

    Glenrothes JC

    Grangemouth JC

    Hawick JC

    High Riggs JC

    Kirkcaldy JC

    Leith JC

    Leven JC

    Livingston JC

    Musselburgh JC

    Penicuik JC

    St. Andrews

    Stirling JC

    Westerhailes JC

    Glasgow, Lanarkshire & East Dunbartonshire

    Airdrie JC

    Anniesland JC

    Bellshill JC

    Bridgeton JC

    Cambuslang JC

    Castlemilk JC

    Cumbernauld JC

    Drumchapel JC

    East Kilbride JC

    Easterhouse JC

    Govan JC

    Hamilton JC

    Kirkintilloch JC

    Lanark JC

    Langside JC

    Laurieston JC

    Maryhill JC

    Motherwell JC

    Newlands JC

    Parkhead JC

    Partick JC

    Rutherglen JC

    Shettleston JC

    Springburn JC

    North of Scotland District

    Aberdeen JC

    Arbroath JC

    Banff JC

    Blairgowrie JC

    Buckie JC

    Dingwall JC

    Dundee City JC

    Elgin JC

    Forfar JC

    Forres JC

    Fort William JC

    Fraserburgh JC

    Invergordon JC

    Inverness JC

    Kirkwall JC

    Lerwick JC

    Montrose JC

    Perth JC

    Peterhead JC

    Portree JC

    Stornoway JC

    Wick JC

    West of Scotland District

    Alexandria JC

    Annan JC

    Ayr JC

    Barrhead JC

    Campbeltown JC

    Clydebank JC

    Cumnock JC

    Dumbarton JC

    Dumfries JC

    Dunoon JC

    Girvan JC

    Greenock JC

    Helensburgh JC

    Irvine JC

    Johnstone JC

    Kilbirnie JC

    Kilmarnock JC

    Oban JC

    Paisley JC

    Port Glasgow JC

    Renfrew JC

    Rothesay JC

    Saltcoats JC

    Stranraer JC

  • Simon Kirby – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills

    Simon Kirby – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Simon Kirby on 2014-04-03.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills, what steps he is taking to promote digital industries in England and Wales; and if he will make a statement.

    Mr David Willetts

    The Government published its Information Economy Strategy on 14 June 2013 which sets out how we will work with business and academic partners to promote digital industries across the UK. I am now working with the Information Economy Council to deliver the actions in the Strategy. The Technology Strategy Board is also investing in a range of programmes, including Collaborative Research and Development competitions and the Connected Digital Economy Catapult Centre, to support UK companies working in the digital industries.

  • Simon Kirby – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills

    Simon Kirby – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Simon Kirby on 2014-04-03.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills, what recent assessment he has made of the Government’s progress in encouraging exports to emerging markets; and if he will make a statement.

    Michael Fallon

    UK exports of goods and services to Brazil, Russia, India and China (BRICs) reached £34.9 billion in 2013, their highest level since records began in 1999. In the Budget, my Rt. Hon. Friend the Chancellor highlighted rising exports, with combined goods exports to Brazil, India and China rising faster than those of the UK’s competitors (France, Germany, Italy) in 2013, but said there was more to do.

    UK Trade & Investment’s Britain Open for Business: The Next Phase (January 2014) underlined that: ‘To deliver our ambitious trade and investment targets we are continuing vigorously to pursue opportunities in developed markets while strengthening our efforts in high growth markets’. The Chancellor has given UKTI additional funding to strengthen its support for high growth markets.

    Additionally, UK Export Finance (UKEF) is devoting additional resources to supporting High Value Opportunities. UKEF also has cover available for over 200 overseas markets and is increasing its product range to provide more effective support to Mid-Size Businesses (MSBs) and smaller companies.

  • Simon Kirby – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills

    Simon Kirby – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Simon Kirby on 2014-04-03.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills, what steps he is taking to promote innovation within industry; and if he will make a statement.

    Mr David Willetts

    This Government is fully committed to improving the UK’s innovation performance as an essential component of its growth plan. Innovation has long been, and will continue to be, a key driver of UK growth and economic prosperity, accounting for up to 70% of economic growth in the long-term.

    The UK’s Industrial Strategy, a new long-term partnership between business and all parts of Government, has identified a range of opportunities to help create growth for the future, from developing new skills and securing critical investment, to commercialising our scientific research and inventions.

    Support for technologies is one of five core themes of the Industrial Strategy. The Government has identified "Eight Great Technologies" where the UK’s science strengths and business capabilities combine to give us world-leading potential and announced an additional £600M investment to help support their development from laboratory to marketplace.

    We have made the Technology Strategy Board the Government’s prime channel for supporting business-led technology innovation, which delivers a range of interventions in support of innovative businesses, such as the network of Catapult Centres and collaborative research and development competitions.

    We have also put in place a range of wider policies to support innovation which include a tax regime that supports innovation, investment and enterprise that enables the UK to be internationally competitive, as the increasingly international nature of innovation means that it is crucial for the UK and its businesses and universities to remain active in the global innovation ecosystem.

    We know that other leading innovators and the emerging economies are increasing their investment in science and innovation and that we need to strengthen our own performance in some areas and build on our acknowledged strengths to retain our position as one of the world’s leading innovation countries.

    This is why we will be developing a new Science and Innovation Strategy to be published this Autumn. This will set out the future shape and scale of the UK’s science and innovation system and look at how we measure the system’s performance and the key challenges that the UK needs to address to maintain its global leadership position.

  • Simon Kirby – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills

    Simon Kirby – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Simon Kirby on 2014-04-03.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills, how many social enterprises there were in Brighton, Kemptown constituency in the most recent period for which figures are available.

    Jenny Willott

    BIS does not have constituency level data on social enterprises. Using data from the 2012 BIS ‘Small Business Survey’ and the ‘Business Population Estimates for the UK and Regions 2013′, BIS estimate that in 2013 approximately five per cent (or 60,000) of small and medium-sized enterprise employers[1] in the UK were social enterprises[2]. It is not possible to provide reliable information for smaller geographical areas.

    [1] Small and medium-sized employers with between 1 and 249 employees.

    [2] Defined as an enterprise that considers itself a social enterprise and that should not pay more than 50 per cent of profit or surplus to owners or shareholders, should not generate more than 25 per cent of income from grants and donations and, therefore, should not have less than 75 per cent of turnover from trading.

  • Chuka Umunna – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills

    Chuka Umunna – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Chuka Umunna on 2014-04-03.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills, how many bids by LEPS to the (a) regional growth fund and (b) exceptional regional growth fund have been (i) under discussion with officials, (ii) submitted, (iii) approved and (iv) rejected in each (A) bidding round and (B) region.

    Michael Fallon

    All bids received to the Regional Growth Fund (RGF) and for exceptional RGF (eRGF) support are discussed with officials as part of the appraisal process. The following table lists bids received directly from Local Enterprise Partnerships to the RGF by bidding round and the outcome.

    RGF Round 2

    Region

    Number of bids received

    Number of bids selected

    Number of bids not selected

    Yorkshire & Humber

    5

    1

    4

    North East

    3

    0

    3

    South East

    2

    2

    0

    North West

    3

    2

    1

    East Midlands

    4

    2

    2

    West Midlands

    2

    2

    0

    East of England

    0

    0

    0

    South West

    3

    2

    1

    RGF Round 3

    Region

    Number of bids received

    Number of bids selected

    Number of bids not selected

    Yorkshire & Humber

    3

    3

    0

    North East

    2

    2

    0

    South East

    4

    4

    0

    North West

    3

    3

    0

    East Midlands

    4

    4

    0

    West Midlands

    8

    4

    4

    East of England

    1

    1

    0

    South West

    4

    1

    3

    RGF Round 4

    Region

    Number of bids received

    Number of bids selected

    Number of bids not selected

    Yorkshire & Humber

    3

    3

    0

    North East

    1

    1

    0

    South East

    5

    3

    2

    North West

    4

    3

    1

    East Midlands

    3

    3

    0

    West Midlands

    7

    7

    0

    East of England

    2

    2

    0

    South West

    1

    1

    0

  • Chuka Umunna – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills

    Chuka Umunna – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Chuka Umunna on 2014-04-03.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills, what the total value is of funds not yet drawn down by winning bidders under the regional growth fund in each bidding round and region.

    Michael Fallon

    Regional breakdown of RGF allocations for each bidding round (Rounds 1-4) including the amount drawn down and remaining to be drawn down are provided in the attached tables. This data is as at 2 April. The RGF not drawn down for Rounds 1 to 4 totals £1,238 million. Of this, currently, £1,152 million is budgeted to be drawn down in 2014/15 and later years. Payments schedules are agreed with companies and payments are made when they need them.

    Round 1

    Region

    RGF Allocation (£m)

    RGF Drawdown (£m)

    RGF not drawn down

    (£m)

    North West

    21

    19

    2

    Yorkshire & Humber

    47

    39

    8

    North East

    34

    34

    0

    West Midlands

    89

    22

    67

    East Midlands

    2

    2

    0

    East of England

    16

    10

    6

    South East & London

    0

    0

    0

    South West

    4

    4

    0

    National

    175

    175

    0

    TOTAL

    388

    305

    83

    Round 2

    Region

    RGF Allocation (£m)

    RGF Drawdown (£m)

    RGF not drawn down (£m)

    North West

    189

    123

    66

    Yorkshire & Humber

    68

    45

    23

    North East

    64

    56

    8

    West Midlands

    91

    87

    4

    East Midlands

    80

    49

    31

    East of England

    35

    20

    15

    South East & London

    60

    45

    15

    South West

    71

    69

    2

    National

    90

    80

    10

    TOTAL

    748

    574

    174

    Round 3

    Region

    RGF Allocation (£m)

    RGF Drawdown (£m)

    RGF not drawn down (£m)

    North West

    113

    43

    70

    Yorkshire & Humber

    63

    28

    35

    North East

    113

    44

    69

    West Midlands

    158

    24

    134

    East Midlands

    57

    14

    43

    East of England

    25

    8

    17

    South East & London

    48

    18

    30

    South West

    82

    8

    74

    National

    177

    75

    102

    TOTAL

    836

    262

    574

    Round 4

    Region

    RGF Allocation (£m)

    RGF Drawdown (£m)

    RGF not drawn down (£m)

    North West

    96

    5

    91

    Yorkshire & Humber

    30

    2

    28

    North East

    33

    1

    32

    West Midlands

    65

    1

    64

    East Midlands

    41

    1

    40

    East of England

    15

    3

    12

    South East & London

    25

    2

    23

    South West

    14

    0

    14

    National

    115

    12

    103

    TOTAL

    434

    27

    407

  • Chuka Umunna – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills

    Chuka Umunna – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Chuka Umunna on 2014-04-03.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills, what proportion of shares in Royal Mail allocated to priority investors in its recent privatisation are still held by those investors.

    Michael Fallon

    As set out in the National Audit Office report, 22% of Royal Mail shares (220.5m) were sold to priority investors. As set out in the NAO report, at the end of January, over a half of the shares remain owned by these investors. Some have sold all their shares; some sold part of their shareholding; and others have acquired more shares.

  • Chuka Umunna – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills

    Chuka Umunna – 2014 Parliamentary Question to the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills

    The below Parliamentary question was asked by Chuka Umunna on 2014-04-03.

    To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills, how many officials from (a) his Department and (b) its executive agencies and associated public bodies worked on the Royal Mail privatisation.

    Michael Fallon

    The core team working on the sale of Royal Mail shares was comprised of 17 people. None of the Department’s Partner organisations were involved in taking forward the initial public offering.